iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

South Korea's Defense Minister Resigns In Wake Of North Korean Attack

HYUNG-JIN KIM and FOSTER KLUG   11/25/10 11:26 PM ET   AP

South Korea Defense Minister
South Korean Defense Minister Kim Tae-young looks at the destroyed houses on Yeonpyeong Island, South Korea, Thursday, Nov. 25, 2010. (AP Photo/ Lee Jin-man)

YEONPYEONG ISLAND, South Korea — North Korea warned Friday that planned U.S.-South Korean military drills are pushing the peninsula to the brink of war as a U.S. military commander headed to an island devastated this week by a North Korean artillery barrage.

North Korea's state news agency said drills this weekend involving South Korean forces and a U.S. nuclear powered supercarrier in waters south of Tuesday's skirmish between the rival Koreas are a reckless plan by "trigger-happy elements" and that the maneuvers target the North.

"The situation on the Korean peninsula is inching closer to the brink of war," the dispatch from the Korean Central News Agency said.

The comments came ahead of a planned visit Friday by Gen. Walter Sharp, the U.S. military commander in South Korea, to the island targeted by the North Korean attack to show solidarity with ally Seoul.

Four South Koreans – two marines and two civilians – were killed in the hour-long skirmish Tuesday after North Korea unleashed a hail of artillery on the Yeonpyeong, but the island was quiet Friday morning, with most residents having evacuated to the mainland.

Marines with M-16 rifles patrolled a seawall, while others gazed toward North Korea from a guard post on a cliff. Technicians worked to restore communication lines. Several stray dogs growled near destroyed houses.

The heightened animosity between the Koreas is taking place as the North undergoes a delicate transition of power from leader Kim Jong Il to his son Kim Jong Un, who is in his late 20s and is expected to eventually succeed his ailing father.

South Korean President Lee Myung-bak has ordered reinforcements for about 4,000 troops on Yeonpyeong and four other Yellow Sea islands, as well as top-level weaponry for the soldiers and upgraded rules of engagement that would create a new category of response when civilian areas are targeted.

He also sacked his defense minister amid intense criticism over lapses in the country's response to the attack.

In scenes reminiscent of the Korean War 60 years ago, dazed residents of Yeonpyeong island this week have foraged through blackened rubble for pieces of their lives and lugged their possessions down eerily deserted streets strewn with bent metal.

"It was a sea of fire," resident Lee In-ku said Thursday, recalling the flames that rolled through the streets of this island that is home to military bases as well as a fishing community famous for its catches of crab. The spit of land had only six pieces of artillery.

North Korea blamed South Korean drills this week as the motivation behind its attack – but Lee said the South could not afford to abandon such preparation now.

"We should not ease our sense of crisis in preparation for the possibility of another provocation by North Korea," spokesman Hong Sang-pyo quoted President Lee Myung-bak as saying. "A provocation like this can recur any time."

Washington and Seoul also ratcheted up pressure on China, North Korea's main ally and biggest benefactor, to restrain Pyongyang.

Without criticizing the North, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao responded by calling on all sides to show "maximum restraint" and pushed again to restart the six-nation talks aimed at persuading North Korea to dismantle its nuclear programs in exchange for aid. Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi, meanwhile, canceled a trip to Seoul this week.

On Thursday, Lee accepted Defense Minister Kim Tae-young's offer to resign after lawmakers criticized the government, claiming officials were unprepared for the attack and that the military response was too slow.

Skirmishes between the Korean militaries are not uncommon, but North Korea's heavy bombardment of Yeonpyeong Island took hostilities to a new level because civilians were killed.

South Korean troops returned fire and scrambled fighter jets in response. Two South Korean marines and two construction workers were killed and at least 18 others wounded. South Korea has said casualties on the North Korean side were likely significant, but none were immediately reported by the country.

Marine Lt. Col. Joo Jong-wha acknowledged that the island is acutely short of artillery, saying it has only six pieces: the howitzers used in Tuesday's skirmish.

"In artillery, you're supposed to move on after firing to mask your location so that they don't strike right back at you," he told reporters. "But we have too few artillery."

On Yeonpyeong, some spoke of walls of flame, surreal images of blackened skies, massive dust clouds, orange-colored lightning.

"My town was almost burned out," said Noh Myung-san, 56, who was planting trees near a mountain when he heard artillery explosions. "I thought it was an earthquake."

Islanders walked gingerly over potholes and past electric poles pockmarked by artillery shells. Blackened beer bottles lay outside what's left of a supermarket. Coast guard officers patrolled the streets in pairs.

Though North Korea regularly threatens to rain munitions down on its rival, the two Koreas are required to abide by an armistice signed in 1953 at the end of their three-year war.

North Korea does not recognize the maritime line drawn by U.N. forces and blamed South Korean military maneuvers near Yeonpyeong Island this week for the clash, calling them a violation of its territory.

The disputed waters have been the site of three other deadly naval skirmishes since 1999. However, the most costly incident was the sinking of a South Korean warship eight months ago that killed 46 sailors in the worst attack on South Korea's military since the war.

Seoul resident Cheong Hyung-yong, 77, blamed the government for reacting with too little, too late.

"If only I was young, if only I could fight against the North Koreans," he said. "I wish I could punish the North Koreans right now."

___

Foster Klug reported from Seoul. Kwang-tae Kim, Seulki Kim, Kelly Olsen, Ian Mader and Jean H. Lee in Seoul also contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

YEONPYEONG ISLAND, South Korea — North Korea warned Friday that planned U.S.-South Korean military drills are pushing the peninsula to the brink of war as a U.S. military commander headed to an ...
YEONPYEONG ISLAND, South Korea — North Korea warned Friday that planned U.S.-South Korean military drills are pushing the peninsula to the brink of war as a U.S. military commander headed to an ...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 612
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
01:39 AM on 11/27/2010
The South's hesitation to avoid war is understandable, but they also have to show some spine and let the North have it for repeatedly provoking them with acts of war.

As for the USA, can somebody please tell me again why we invaded 1 country on the assumption they were building nukes (and are threatening a 2nd one now), and we consistently let North Korea get away with building, threatening, and testing their nukes? I guess our policy of belligerence only applies if our "special ally" is your neighbor.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
11:14 PM on 11/26/2010
That gives confidence. The leader quits when attacked. Must be a Korean Palin.
07:14 PM on 11/26/2010
Read the history of warfare on the Korean peninsula then answer this question: Don't the people of Korea (South and North both) deserve to live in peace?
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
12:04 PM on 11/26/2010
"Washington and Seoul also ratcheted up pressure on China, North Korea's main ally and biggest benefactor, to restrain Pyongyang."

Huh...good luck with that. If "something" happened to take South Korea's industrial capacity offline, I don't think the Central Committee of the People's Republic of China would be...displeased. Any way you look at that particular outcome, the PRC wins.
04:25 AM on 11/27/2010
Yeah I was thinking about that. China would not be unpleased with having a asian competitor off the market.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brashier
10:42 AM on 11/26/2010
"...After Hearing 'America to Stand With Our North Korean Allies'"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedSox61
The Right has left the world of sanity.....
10:01 AM on 11/26/2010
It seems that the United Nations is another place where the US can save its money. We are the primary funder of this organization which, quite frankly, is irrelevant.....If it can't:
- enforce its nuclear proliferation pacts
- take measures against a country like N. Korea
- take serious measures to stop human trafficking - supported by so many small countries in the world

Then why exactly is it there.....
It doesn't have the stomach to deal with dictators before they start a war
won't do anything when they provoke a war
can't deal with human rights in any way....

I mean - other than generate hot air - what exactly do the do?
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
12:06 PM on 11/26/2010
Another gift Bush left for him...and after all that whining Bush did about "the Axis of Evil", too!

For shame....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:23 PM on 11/26/2010
Bush can be blamed for a number of things, but NK seems like an unfair shot. NK has been taking provocative actions for decades across Republican and Democratic administrations. Among the highlights:

-Kidnapping SK and Japanese citizens from the soil of those two countries, and at least once from Hong Kong.

-Commando raids against SK (see Blue House raid).

-Attempted assassinations of SK officials, including the President of SK (Rangoon Incident). Hell, even China reprimanded them for that one.

-The bombing of a Korean Airliner (Flight 858).

-Periodically launching missiles over Japanese territory.

-Building nuclear facilities.

None of those actions resulted in any serious repercussions against NK, so of course they'll continue. It's been working for them for half a century.
08:47 AM on 11/26/2010
What a baby.
Wupta
Parent
07:33 AM on 11/26/2010
Many on this board are responding emotionally to the situation. This coming war has nothing to do with us. We shouldn't get all worked up because of North Korea's action, leave it to the South to deal with this, they have enough economic wealth and power to respond with their military. Let's not wish for another war as we have several going on that haven't been finished at this time.
04:34 AM on 11/26/2010
I reckon if one American soldier dies from North Korean fire, war may be declared.
SamEasy
You really don`t want to know.
03:19 AM on 11/26/2010
Does anyone know what rock Rummy is hiding under? Some countries have outstanding warrants for war crimes waiting for him.
12:43 AM on 11/26/2010
communism=dictatorship=slavery
01:20 AM on 11/26/2010
re-pub-li-cans=poverty=zero social security
01:42 AM on 11/26/2010
current social security system=lazy people claiming disability at early age
12:41 AM on 11/26/2010
okay everybody... this is not about our repubs or libs... this is about communism and capitalism... this is about a puppet country for communist heavyweights trying to drain and strain our free countries... we cannot let dictatorship rule this world of ours... dictators need to be dealt with... i for one do not want my life, or our generations to come, to be dictated by leaders that only have their position of power because of their family... just because one man was a great leader, which from the sounds of it kim il jong was not, does not mean his children will be nor any other one of his friends he decides to give power to. imagine us letting one president keep power for fifty some odd years... i mean come on, we see how easy it is to sway the public, imagine one man or counsel doing it their way for decades. i like our system, new blood every vote. no more dictators...
01:11 AM on 11/26/2010
The situation in North Korea currently is a little more complex that what you would believe. First and foremost, you are quite accurate in identifying it as a dictatorship, and it economically it still operates under the banner of communism, but the reality is quite different than that. What they have is a hereditary authoritarian leader, but the true level of power of Kim Jong-il is a subject of debate. Certainly he yields quite a bit of it, but he must make decisions largely in order to maintain the support of the military leadership without which he would fall quite rapidly. This is one possible reason for the recent aggression, as Jong-il's son Kim Jong-eun is being groomed to replace his father, he also must earn his stripes with the military. Also, equating communism with dictartorship with slavery isn't entirely accurate either. A communist country doesn't by definition have a dictatorship, and throughout history maybe dictatorships have arisen (often times U.S. supported) to staunch the spread of communism (see Iran, Iraq, Chile, Dominican Republic, Cuba before '59, etc. But yes, dictators are bad...very bad...but what if there were a benevolent dictator? Could that sway your conclusions?
01:34 AM on 11/26/2010
that brings to light a lot for me... it def def definitely makes sense that military leaders who have the hearts and minds of their soldiers would be the ones with the true power. and to answer your question pertaining to a benevolent dictator... i would have to say no. isnt communism basically polar opposite of capitalism, government for control of industry, it eventually leads to a shot caller type of system, if your a govt official then you have more power than the civilians.
01:21 AM on 11/26/2010
you think this country is not a dictatorship?
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
01:29 AM on 11/26/2010
If you really think that, you are mistaken.
01:38 AM on 11/26/2010
"First and foremost, you are quite accurate in identifying it as a dictatorship, and it economically it still operates under the banner of communism" - my second sentence...of course it's a dictatorship, but it's not your average dictatorship, and that's because there is another dynamic going on here. Let's take a look at it actually: dictatorships tend to fail. Dictators ultimately step on the wrong persons toes at some point, or their cult of personality types and the regime dies when they do with old age. However, two of the longer running dictatorships in the broad sense of the word are Cuba and North Korea. Is this coincidence? I honestly don't know because I've never researched or studied it, but it would interesting to note which factors in these two nations have allowed for such extended periods of rule, even to the point that dictators can transfer power to their own children or family members (Fidel to Raul, Il-sung to Jong-il, and now possibly to Jong-eun). This makes them different, and in North Korea's case it's not as simple as "dictator person, bad, democracy, yay!"
12:09 AM on 11/26/2010
I will hardly pretend to be an expert, but from my experience I can add some insight into this mess. I currently live in Incheon teaching English, so the shelling of Yeonpyeong was sort of a big deal around here, to the point that my students were making jokes about NK killing everybody. Cute, but beside the point. From what I've heard from people during my 3 years here, to what I've read about, nothing going on right now is entirely out of the ordinary. The only significant development in this round of aggression is that the North targeted a civilian population, which is truly tragic. However, there is a good reason why they targeted a sparsely populated island many kilometers off the coast compared to a heavier populated area; they don't want a war (which, even if they murder every last person in the South, will inevitably to their own destruction as well). The reason why the South, and the U.S. for that matter, don't act "stronger" on this issue is because over half the population of the ROK lives in or around Seoul and Incheon, which are only 50 or so kilometers from several hundred, or even thousand, pieces of NK artillery. So essentially, increase the number of targets by about 20 million or so, and throw in high value targets such as the International airport, major embassies, and the governmental and economic foundations of the entire country, and you can conclude why they don't want a war
photo
Pod-gers
Jeremy Lin = Game Change
12:00 AM on 11/26/2010
this story reeks of propaganda. It is quite different from an interview we heard on NPR. I suggest that war games using live ammo and tens of thousands not be heal on the door step of a foe we are still technically at war with. One would have to be numb to imagine they would have to respond when shooting was dirested at them. No one should be confused about why they shot back.

Now the question is, is this a positive way forward? of are we going to relive the mistakes of the 50s?

As for China, there is no love lost between them and the No Koreans. Nor can we expect them to do us a favour after the way we have been treating them for the past two years.

I wish we would sign a peace treaty with No K, normalize relations and open an embassy there. let's get on with the grown up stuff. War games is childs play that costs tons of money and can result in unanticipated "incidents."
12:43 AM on 11/26/2010
liberals like to appease our enemies and treat insane criminals like the nk military as if they would follow any agreement they have signed. They have never done that in the past, why do liberals continue to pretend that they would do it in the future?
01:24 AM on 11/26/2010
simple answer...WAR doesn't work....get it jer-kw-ad?
12:51 AM on 11/26/2010
didnt NK sign a denuclearization treaty a couple years back that they havent been following...?