iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

North Korea Warns: 'Brink Of War'

AHN YOUNG-JOON and KIM KWANG-TAE   11/26/10 11:08 PM ET   AP

Korea War
South Korean marines stand guard on the Yeonpyeong Island, South Korea, Friday, Nov. 26, 2010, three days after a North Korean artillery attack on the island. (AP Photo/Lee Jin-man)

SEONGNAM, South Korea — Dignitaries placed white chrysanthemums on a funeral altar Saturday as South Korea honored two marines killed in a North Korean artillery attack that was one of the worst bombardments of its territory since the 1950-53 Korean War.

The South Korean marines commander vowed unspecified "thousand-fold" retaliation at the funeral, as the country geared up for joint military maneuvers with the U.S. starting Sunday that are likely to keep tensions soaring following the attack on a South Korean island – which also killed two civilians.

North Korea issued new warnings Saturday against the Yellow Sea war games, calling them an "unpardonable provocation" and warning of retaliatory attacks that would "turn the stronghold of enemies into a sea of fire" if its own territory is violated.

The comments ran on the state-run Uriminzokkiri website, and came a day after the North's warnings that the peninsula was on the "brink of war."

China, under pressure from the U.S. and South Korea to rein in its ally Pyongyang, urged both sides to show restraint while Washington played down the belligerent rhetoric, noting that the weekend war games were routine and planned well before last week's attack.

"The pressing task now is to put the situation under control and prevent a recurrence of similar incidents," Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi told U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton by phone Friday, according to the ministry's website.

The North's strike Tuesday destroyed large parts of Yeonpyeong Island in a major escalation of their sporadic skirmishes along the disputed sea border. The attack – eight months after a torpedo sank a South Korean warship, killing 46 sailors – has laid bare Seoul's weaknesses in defense 60 years after the Korean War.

South Korea's government has struggled to recoup from the surprise attacks, replacing the defense minister on Friday.

A dispatch Friday from Chinese state media saying Beijing's foreign minister had met the North Korean ambassador appeared to be an effort to trumpet China's role as a responsible actor and placate the U.S. and the South.

"The Chinese government is trying to send Pyongyang a signal that if they continue to be so provocative, China will just leave the North Koreans to themselves," said Zhu Feng, director of Peking University's Center for International and Strategic Studies.

In Seongnam, near Seoul, about 600 mourners including South Korea's Prime Minister Kim Hwang-sik and the marine commander Maj. Gen. You Nak-jun attended the funeral for the two marines at a packed gymnasium in a military hospital as somber music played.

Dignitaries and family members placed chrysanthemums – a traditional flower of mourning in South Korea – before framed photographs of the two victims, who were posthumously promoted by one rank and awarded a medal.

"Our marine corps ... will carry out a hundred- or thousand-fold," retaliation against North Korea for launching Tuesday's attack, You said, without elaborating.

The Pentagon played down any notion that the weekend maneuvers with South Korea were a provocation.

"We have exercised there regularly," said Capt. Darryn James, a Defense Department spokesman in Washington said Friday. "And all of these exercises are in international waters."

President Lee Myung-bak has ordered reinforcements for the 4,000 troops on Yeonpyeong and four other Yellow Sea islands, as well as top-level weaponry and upgraded rules of engagement.

The heightened animosity between the Koreas comes as the North undergoes a delicate transition of power from leader Kim Jong Il to his young, inexperienced son Kim Jong Un, who is in his late 20s and is expected to eventually succeed his ailing father.

North Korea does not recognize the maritime border drawn by the U.N. in 1953, and considers the waters around Yeonpyeong Island its territory. The island is home to South Korean military bases as well as a civilian population of about 1,300 people, and lies only seven miles (11 kilometers) from North Korean shores.

___

Kim Kwang-tae reported from Seoul. AP writers Christopher Bodeen in Beijing and Pauline Jelinek in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

SEONGNAM, South Korea — Dignitaries placed white chrysanthemums on a funeral altar Saturday as South Korea honored two marines killed in a North Korean artillery attack that was one of the worst...
SEONGNAM, South Korea — Dignitaries placed white chrysanthemums on a funeral altar Saturday as South Korea honored two marines killed in a North Korean artillery attack that was one of the worst...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,881
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (37 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Aarons
10:56 AM on 11/28/2010
I'm amazed by the number of people who write comments that indicate that they THINK they know something about the DPRK (North Korea). But most of what they write could have been lifted from Faux News or other right-wing, U.S.-nationalist, sources -- and probably was.
12:54 PM on 11/28/2010
And I'm amazed by an ignoramus like you who would claim to know something about the DPRK from GOVERNMENT-CONTROLLED SOURCES.
01:00 PM on 11/28/2010
Completely agree with Aaron Aarons comment. Our information about NK is limited and focalized in the most recent event. Although the aggression exists and the militaries and civilians were killed, there is no intent to see how this situation has risen. Not even a single wonder if maybe there has been some kind of previous escalation of provocation, like for example doing military exercises 11 miles from NKean territory. This is not denying what NK did but trying to have a more comprehensive view of complex situations we can barely understand, before letting fairy tales ogres, typical in US "enemy mythology", inundate our many times basic imagination.
09:30 PM on 11/28/2010
"Not even a single wonder if maybe there has been some kind of previous escalation of provocation,"

So what if South Korea held military exercises 11 miles from North Korean territory? They didn't hold it in North Korean territory. But North Korea disproportionately responded by indiscriminately targeting innocent civilian on a South Korean island.

Is that comprehensive of a view enough for you or no?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jockmama
02:50 AM on 11/28/2010
North Korea has nothing to lose by going to war. Its leaders don't give a rat's patoot about their own people, and don't care how many of them die as long as L'il Kim can strut around in his elevator shoes and shout about what a bad*ss he is. He's been issuing "threats" as long as he's been in power, as he listened to his daddy do as long as HE was in power. If they DO come across the line, the best thing that South Korea could do is drop a daisy-cutter on the Imperial Palace. Then the UN can step in and start honest elections - after which there will only be one Korea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Aarons
07:58 PM on 11/28/2010
Your ignorance and bias are amazing, or would be to someone unfamiliar with the mindless rantings of U.S. nationalists.

1) The reason there is NOT only one Korea is that the U.S. militarily occupied the South in 1945, imposing there a puppet government consisting largely of people who had collaborated with the Japanese colonial occupation. It would have done the same to the whole country if the North had not been occupied by Soviet troops. The U.S. knew that KIm IL Sung, whose forces had actually fought the Japanese, would have been the president of any unified Korea not occupied by foreign forces, with or without a Western-style election, so that could not be allowed to happen.

2) If "the UN can step in and start honest elections", why has the U.N. occupation force in Haiti actively, violently, backed a government that doesn't let the majority political party run in its elections? Maybe it's because honest elections there, as almost anywhere else in the world, would not produce results pleasing to the U.N.'s masters in Washington.
08:55 PM on 11/28/2010
What an irony a communist spoonfed ignoramus screaming ignorance and bias of Americans on a website created by an American.

1) Great job distorting history. Unfortunately history doesn't work according to your fairytale fantasies you communist tool. The reason why there isn't one Korea is because the North Korea, backed by your communist heroes of Stalin and Mao Ze Dong, invaded South Korea prompting a UN-coalition to repel the invasion. The war was fought all the way up to the north of North Korea until Mao's China illegally entered the war causing the stalemate between the North and South.

2) More wetdreams from the communist who hasn't hit puberty yet. Fact check: the US isn't the only member of the UN, it's one country of 181 member states. So the reason why a UN occupation force would be anywhere is because all the states comprising of that occupation force have decided they will collectively work towards some political objective.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Juba
Freethinker
02:25 AM on 11/28/2010
I am amazed at how much effort, time, thought and money is spent on weapons to kill people. I guess sitting down and discussing differences and beliefs is too difficult to accomplish by world leaders. This world is on a crash course for destruction. What will be accomplished from this human stupidity? Nothing. I look forward to the day the sun runs out of fuel and disintegrates the pathetic human race for ever developing weapons to kill people. North Korea versus South Korea. I do not care about Korean lives and American lives lost, if a war breaks out. Good riddance.
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
02:41 AM on 11/28/2010
Well, Matt, while I share your amazed sadness at all the effort put into finding new ways to kill each other (I once read that 50% of all scientists and engineers are employed in weapons research), it will be a long wait for the sun to "run out of fuel" -- Life on earth has about 1 billion years to go (and who knows if any humans will even be around by then -- we've only been around for a few hundred thousand years) -- before the sun will become too bright, and the Earth's oceans will evaporate and the planet will become uninhabitable.
 
But it will be 5 billion years before the sun enters its red giant phase, which will likely destroy what is left of the Earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Juba
Freethinker
03:00 AM on 11/28/2010
jwcmass, I can't wait until this planet runs out of oil. Big game changer in the military and world economy. I agree with your statement, around 5 billion years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:11 AM on 11/28/2010
Let me know when you figure out human nature.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Juba
Freethinker
10:39 AM on 11/28/2010
Human nature is the concept that there is a set of inherent distinguishing characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling and acting, that all humans tend to have. Unfortunately, the United States and especially the religious community are hypocrites who embrace God and war at the same time. The U.S. government spends billions on military defense and millions on a stupid Korean war game every year but can not figure out how to end starvation in America. “In God We Trust”, what a joke.
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
01:09 PM on 11/28/2010
While it may be impossible to fully understand human nature, it is not that difficult to understand the basics.
 
Believe it or not the Bible (whatever you think of its doctrines) does a fair job with describing human nature.
 
There is a reason, you know, why the first story after Adam and Eve leave Eden is the story of Cain and Abel.
 
Human beings have been killing each other for a LOOOONG time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shrank
We are sorry, your micro-bio is not PC
02:12 AM on 11/28/2010
I'm completely prepared for war with North Korea.

I have my new 60" flatscreen ready to go.

All the microwave popcorn I can eat.

American flags on the wall.

And a comfortable La-Z-Boy to relax in.

Now I call that patriotism!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:13 PM on 11/28/2010
Faved and fanned! Your friends must love you for your sense of humor.
02:02 PM on 11/29/2010
LOL. That's what NK is counting on.
12:54 AM on 11/28/2010
The US is now so deep in the big muddy,
that one more war will bankrupt us.

Venezuela, Cuba & all of Latin America will just laugh
if we get stuck in Korea.
10:46 AM on 11/28/2010
How about a trade: 2 wars in the middle east for this one in the Koreas.

That oughta even out the figures a bit, don't ya think?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbrillante
I take action knowing Love will win.
07:41 PM on 11/28/2010
Al Queada is already laughing at us. With Fox News, the tea party and all of the crazy spouted by republican leaders just out to make this president and our country fail acting for the sake of the rich and putting political victory over what is best for country and its people.

Our country is quick becoming a sick farce. Linsday Graham saying DADT isn't going anywhere even though most people know it is going to go eventually. Kyle holding up the START treaty... its all political games. Rarely is anyone making a real and valuable point anymore.

And you're right we can't afford the wars we are already in. We get weaker every day the wars go on. But the rich connected with the war get richer and that works for them. War with Korea is fine with them. They don't seem to care if American falls.
08:45 PM on 11/28/2010
So you seem to think that war is never the answer, even though some wars (like this one) have causes that are just.

Shame. And whose to say for the South Koreans that with friends like the Americans, who would need enemies?
12:49 AM on 11/28/2010
I was in Navy intelligence in 1960, when the US
secretly planned to Nuke North Korea.
After months, of studies it, we realized it would not be effective
& would just bring the Chinese army in.

So they the US invaded Cuba
& almost started WW III with Russia.
I felt I was going to die.

So did my parents.
Our best bet is to cut the Pentagon budget by 95%
like China has done with their military.

Youtube: paul8kangas
12:59 AM on 11/28/2010
Um, sorry to break this news to you, ex intel man. China is not cutting their military budget.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marsyas
02:13 AM on 11/28/2010
Um, sorry to break this news to you sanevoice, but we spend more on defense than the next top 30 countries combined, 28 of which are our allies. Your point couldn't be more irrelevant.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:23 AM on 11/28/2010
Even the Debt Commission didn't recommend cutting the defense budget by much.
It's obvious to a lot of people that this is a good place to save lots of money, and we don't need to be quite so paranoid, but the militaristic mindset is too ingrained.
Fly the flag, glorify our military, and shout "We're Number One."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
armadillious2002
11:44 PM on 11/27/2010
I'm sure the tea bag party would know what do do in this situation. These people are the
same ones who believed that the Earth would end at the millinium when all the computers stopped.

My brother is a tea bagger and despite my constantly telling him that it was all BS and nothing would happen at the millineum - he went out and bought 1500 dollars worth of survival crap - then was trying to sell it a couple of weeks afterward.

And, these are the people that want the keys to our nuclear arsenals? - I don't think so.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:26 AM on 11/28/2010
Y2K wasn't BS; it was dealt with well.
Computers stopping wasn't part of the scenario.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djtejas
06:35 PM on 11/28/2010
the whole computer thing associated with Y2K was BS...you would not believe how many customers of mine were scared that our equipment would fail when we hit 2000; and these are people in the high tech industry that should know better.
My engineers and myself had to go to each customer site before 2000 and prove that nothing would happen when the clock struck midnight Jan 1, 2000...all tests the tests we did showed our equipment would be fine...still, everyone wanted us to be on call for them in case something happened...
Guess what? NOTHING out the ordinary happened to any of the equipment that I had at all customers sites all over the US.
Just goes to show what media hype can do to anything...
11:37 PM on 11/27/2010
Again we try to play world policeman where we have no business. Let South Korea defend itself. For sixty years they have thanked us for defending them in the Korean war by keeping our products out of their country to a greater extent than any other country. This conflict is a issue for South Korea, North Korea, China and maybe Japan. Let's bring our 37,000 soldiers home while they are still uninjured.
12:36 AM on 11/28/2010
What a strange post. Certainly America has taken the unenvious title of world policeman, but it certainly doesn't apply to it's role in the Korean theater of conflict. So are you suggesting that we leave South Korea to fend for itself even though it asks for America's help? You relaly think that 37,000 troops would be stationed in South Korea if the Koreans didn't want them there?

And I think you must have missed the part where there companies like Daewoo, Samsung are employing thousands of manufacturing jobs in the states.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SallyBaughn
In a broken country there is nothing left to steal
03:38 PM on 11/28/2010
PersonFromEarth, it doesn't matter that Korean companies are employing Americans here. What usually happens in fair trade is that American companies would be selling things in Korea as fair trade. But that doesn't happen.

South Koreans have lied, our own government has lied to us about what has happened on the Korean Peninsula. Both governments (North and South) are brutal, and the single fact that the North Koreans are loudly aggressive is not enough for me to be happy to send 37,000 (or more) young men and women and children to a nuclear death. The LA Times mentions that North Korea has stated that the South Koreans already shelled them before they retaliated. I don't know what's true. But I wouldn't bet my life on either story.
Let the Koreans take care of Korea.
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
02:45 AM on 11/28/2010
Unfortunately WWW, if a full scale conflict erupts, it is likely we wouldn't be ABLE to avoid getting involved, as there is the possibility that nuclear weapons could be involved.
 
And if ANY of those other nations get drawn in (China, Japan, even possibly Taiwan) then the entire region would become greatly destabilized, and this would have drastic implications for the world wide economy.
 
Like it or not we live in a global society -- the days of isolationism and counting on two oceans to protect us has been outdated since the age of the ICBM.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Konnie
GOP = GOLDEN CALF OLD PARTY
11:30 PM on 11/27/2010
as i see it there are two choices. ignore the sabre rattling and pray a lot or beg china to take the necessary diplomatic steps to calm this situation down. the west has to take responsibility for this mess since we are the ones who backed this nut job into a corner and now must pay for the mistakes of previous generations.
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
02:51 AM on 11/28/2010
While China needs (out of its OWN self interest) to get involved -- this IS in their backyard, after all) I don't see how the West is responsible for this.
 
After all, the West would have basically eliminated North Korea and united the two nations had China not intervened in the FIRST Korean War.
 
But I fail to see how we have backed "this nut job" into a corner --and are you sure that "nut job" is even still running things? Have you considered the possibility that there is a power struggle occurring that we don't know about in North Korea? It's possible that high ranking North Korean Military officials don't feel comfortable turning the nation over to a man in his early 20's.
 
But the US has tried MANY diplomatic attempts at bringing the "hermit kingdom" in from the cold. All have failed, but it is not for lack of effort on the part of the West.
11:27 PM on 11/27/2010
The little dictator doesn't like being ignored. Maybe he needs a good spanking so he'll stop whining like a 4 year old boy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luceee
11:15 PM on 11/27/2010
Where's Cheney?
11:27 PM on 11/27/2010
The Dark Lord is in his bunker.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chedet
Le Panda
12:09 AM on 11/28/2010
In North Korea?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Turner
News? I hurt the news.
10:55 PM on 11/27/2010
That Kim Jong-il. Always sticking his Dongs where they don't belong.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
09:50 PM on 11/27/2010
Let's negotiate with North Korea. We give Kim Jong Il copies of slasher flicks - we'll have to find out what Kim Jong Un likes - if they promise not to attack our guys.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rachael Marie
09:44 PM on 11/27/2010
For those that think this is just North Korea's annual saber rattling, or chest thumping of the new 'leader', this news story suggests otherwise:

http://www­.independe­nt.co.uk/n­ews/world/­asia/expat­s-recalled­-as-north-­korea-prep­ares-for-w­ar-2145018­.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Benjamin Grant Gamron
09:11 PM on 11/27/2010
If the north fires on one of our ships will the President apologize for the provocation?
09:27 PM on 11/27/2010
I like your way of thinking.

F&F
photo
jwcmass
I dream of things that never were and ask Why not
02:55 AM on 11/28/2010
It would have to be some shot, as the naval exercises are due to take place in waters to the SOUTH of South Korea -- nowhere NEAR the North Korean border.
 
When you see where the exercises are to take place, they are not in waters that the North claims as its own.
 
And it is highly likely that any such attack would be met with a strong response.
 
37,000 troops is little more than a tripwire. But an aircraft carrier task force carries some heavy weaponry which would be able to reach North Korea.