iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The Politics Of WikiLeaks

Wikileaks

First Posted: 11/29/10 10:39 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Americans believe in the power of the presidency. The job contains no magical powers, but we like to think it does. It's fatal for a president to seem overwhelmed by events, unable to exert his will in the world (or Washington or Wall Street).

But powerlessness is the theme that the WikiLeaks cables -- carefully culled and leaked -- create.

And they come at a bad time for President Obama: as he tries to deal with Republicans who think recalcitrance is a philosophy, and with corporations and banks who were rescued by bailouts and cheap money but who now hoard cash and pay CEOs grotesque bonuses.

Will President Obama be able counter Bush-era tax policy and raise marginal rates on the richest Americans in the name of cutting the deficit? Probably not. Will he be able to convince the Senate to ratify the New START treaty with Russians? Perhaps not. Will he be able to cajole Congress into adding more unemployment benefits for wounded warriors of the Great Recession? Not clear.

On the economic front, he has been reduced to operating in one of the few domains in which he still has clout: freezing the pay of federal workers.

And now the global humiliation of the cables.

The Bush administration -- eager to drop daisy cutters and launch wars -- made a diplomatic hash of the world in the aftermath of 9/11. The resulting mess was, in part, what got Barack Obama elected.

But now the world seems more divided and unstable than ever -- and the mess that got him elected could be his undoing.

The cables depict us in this world not just a wounded giant, but not a giant at all: begging countries to house our prisoners of war; busying ourselves with trivial tasks (collecting frequent flier numbers) while North Korea ships missiles to Iran; being lied to by Syrians; relying on the good will of Saudis even as they fund Sunni terrorists and demand that we destroy Iran's nuclear capability; fretting about Pakistan's loosely-guarded enriched uranium while remaining unable to influence what they do; elevating leaders in Afghanistan we know to be corrupt or insane or both.

The dominant impression is of an Obama administration full of good intentions and shrewd people, but dealing with raging, contradictory forces it cannot control or even fully understand.

It was ever thus in diplomacy, of course, but the difference now is the existence of rogue states and thugs determined to acquire nuclear weapons. That gives it all a desperate existential urgency.

And it is not clear what Obama can do about it.

If you are a president, you don't want to bring an aura of confusion and ineffectiveness with you to a meeting of your political enemies.

But that is exactly what is going to happen tomorrow, when Obama meets with Republican congressional leaders at the White House.

Republicans are decrying WikiLeaks, but they will have all read the cables by the time the president walks into the meeting.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Americans believe in the power of the presidency. The job contains no magical powers, but we like to think it does. It's fatal for a president to seem overwhelmed by events, unable to ex...
WASHINGTON -- Americans believe in the power of the presidency. The job contains no magical powers, but we like to think it does. It's fatal for a president to seem overwhelmed by events, unable to ex...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 442
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:59 AM on 11/30/2010
Whether or not Obama and the Democratic Leadership care to admit it, Obama was elected to en d the foreign entanglements, particularly in the Middle East. Those folks that would lament such action would never vote for him. The Republican gains are due to his failure to change any of the Bush-Cheney policies. 15 million under thirty years old voters that created the 2008 Democratic majority stayed home. The same occurred in 1994. Some day hopefully true leadership will appear. One can only hope it is noble!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:14 AM on 11/30/2010
It seems to me the one with the greatest damage potential here is Obama. Smear the whole ship, and it is the captain of the moment that bears the stain. If its not "follow the money" but follow "who stands to gain" it all starts to look different. But I can't stop my kitchen faucet leak, so what the hell do I know?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
G Dobbs
08:15 PM on 11/29/2010
How wonderful that he is alive and kicking - giving the world the nonsense, buLL*t, and glory of our foreign diplomatic corps. Geez, I'm not surprised Wikileaks has what it has, I'm surprised it doesn't have more. I love love love America! Ohhhh, I am so sad with where we are at - strip searching kids and grandmas? Come ON! That is just awful.
photo
woodshoe
MAYDAY! BastaYA!
08:03 PM on 11/29/2010
(belongs up here.)

the deeply flawed premise throughout this line of thinking is that we all agree that this is work that requires doing..

pretending this is a settled premise makes it easier to then suggest only that 'diplomat' is a skilled trade, -end of argument-

those who present similar arguments seem to dust off their hands after establishi­ng that being a diplomat for an hegemonic national/e­conomic empire,.. requires a carefully acquired skill set.

but seemingly NO ONE, including anyone affiliated with wikileaks, is suggesting otherwise.

what many are suggesting is that it remains undemonstr­ated that we need anyone doing THIS, particular­ly in this way.

we are NOT seeking any more "experts" in deceit, militarism­, ecocide, hegemony, resource usurption, democracy mangling, union underminin­g, press planting, torturing, dictator suckling, etc..

these state department documents would indicate that of those we have amply supply.

a pretend intellectu­al class who finds it acceptable to subject material population­s elsewhere to political and economic experiment­s as it suits their fancy for manipulati­on regarding business interests.

many of us are not naive,.. we get that not doing it this way will mean 18$ a gallon gasoline.. but of course 'price' and 'cost' are two very different things..

this way of living has become far too costly, in the lives of billions.

we would prefer responsibi­lity.
with a period after it rather than the 10% responsibi­lity that our culture and our government asks of us.

enough already with empire.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GraniteSkyline
I wish you happiness!
07:47 PM on 11/29/2010
http://www.dojleaks.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
G Dobbs
07:49 PM on 11/29/2010
See!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GraniteSkyline
I wish you happiness!
07:59 PM on 11/29/2010
I was shocked but no one seems to care that the C/I/A imported a n/a/z/i war criminal to the US and paid him a salary!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
G Dobbs
07:44 PM on 11/29/2010
K, I can't post my thoughts - will try to be less wordy I guess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
G Dobbs
07:36 PM on 11/29/2010
I must agree with some of the stuff flying around here - free Pfc Manning - this is GOkD DA.Mned AMERICA - I do love this place - heck, I've lived overseas and I'm getting mad about our current reality - when John McCain went nuts I cryed - geez, we have such a beautiful country, let's keep it.
photo
woodshoe
MAYDAY! BastaYA!
08:50 PM on 11/29/2010
when people try to qualify your 'american-ness' based on the degree to which you will casually submit to authoritarian systems.. they gravely drag you into a tiny world to judge you there.
arundhati roy had said;
"To call someone 'anti-American', indeed, to be anti-American, (or for that matter anti-Indian, or anti-Timbuktuan) is not just racist, it's a failure of the imagination. An inability to see the world in terms other than those that the establishment has set out for you: If you're not a Bushie you're a Taliban. If you don't love us, you hate us. If you're not Good you're Evil. If you're not with us, you're with the terrorists.
What does the term "anti-American" mean? Does it mean you are anti-jazz? Or that you're opposed to freedom of speech? That you don't delight in Toni Morrison or John Updike? That you have a quarrel with giant sequoias? Does it mean that you don't admire the hundreds of thousands of American citizens who marched against nuclear weapons, or the thousands of war resisters who forced their government to withdraw from Vietnam? Does it mean that you hate all Americans?"
of course it is rhetorical.
;)
photo
woodshoe
MAYDAY! BastaYA!
07:33 PM on 11/29/2010
a large segment of the american population would prefer that wikileaks concentrate on the leaking and leave the redaction to those who find it interesting.. especially with all the whining by authority everywhere.

few persons the world over have a special interest in the redaction of names of torturers and informants and spies and plants and moles.. quite the contrary really.. you would think that the presiding authorities would recognize just how generous wikileaks was being.
too generous?
too patient?

an argument could be made that much of the world has been waiting 60 years.
should they wait just a few more months so that elites can organize and redact their creepy 'blackberry for empire' files?

so much of the argument that plays out on corporate media is an argument between two elite groups.. with little consideration for large otherwise interested segments of the population.

many for instance, find it disgusting, these momentary fleeting considerations of political parties and political characters.. so disturbingly insular and enthusiastically feckless.. when compared to princliple. when compared to wisdom, dignity, justice, and love.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gerry Orme
07:26 PM on 11/29/2010
While I applaud these illuminating documents, it would be far more useful to this nation if we had all the communications during the Bush-Cheney administration made public.
We are a third world nation!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
G Dobbs
07:36 PM on 11/29/2010
Excellent point - I don't think it will ever happen - but Wikileaks gives me some hope.
07:12 PM on 11/29/2010
So one really does have to look at the kid who leaked much of this stuff. If we are honest about it we would admit that he was gay, felt like a victim and lashed out at authority. There is a psychosis here and the fact that he was gay is relevant as tough a time as it is for the DADT agenda.
photo
woodshoe
MAYDAY! BastaYA!
07:19 PM on 11/29/2010
this is naive,.. he has STATED quite clearly his motives,.. his job was pointing the iraqi police to people who were writing pretty sober scholarly articles critical of the occupation and of the iraqi government..

this, coupled with knowledge that the iraqi police were routinely torturing inmates, led bradley manning to confront his superiors about the moral legitimacy of his work..

they told him essentially to shut up and get back to it.

he attempted to address the disease from within, failing that he took more heroic steps.

thank goodness for that.

free bradley manning.
07:26 PM on 11/29/2010
You can't really be defending his actions? I'm not saying all gays are security risks but in this instance it was part of the equation.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PunKinPai
Tact is just not saying true stuff. I’ll pass.
07:49 PM on 11/29/2010
From what source are you quoting his motives?
06:46 PM on 11/29/2010
Thesis--Antithesis--Synthesis. Hegelian Dialectic is happening as we speak; both republicans and democrats are happy, happy with the untruths we hear each day! We should be all proud of how we are brainwashed in believing what we are told. Truth is Good! Release the documents, it's good for the country's soul.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PHILLIP A SMITH
06:56 PM on 11/29/2010
Let me be the first! F&F
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:37 AM on 11/30/2010
To Truth F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vinca
06:08 PM on 11/29/2010
People are interested in finding out the truth, but it is very likey damaging to our relations with other countries. Saudi Arabi seemed to want us to attack Iraq. We do know Iraq had nothing to do the attack on the world Trade center.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
G Dobbs
06:30 PM on 11/29/2010
Hello - I think you mean Iran, and please don't post if you're posting to angry nothingness. Peace, Guy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
G Dobbs
05:50 PM on 11/29/2010
See - all this useless already known information - so who cares? Oh, surprise, Saudi Arabia and Abu Dabai are worried about Iran, well - guess what? They should be - as Iran is scared of Iran (leadership wise) so.... step back, let's stop investing those trillions (over ten years it adds up, but that is a real number) and let them figure their thing out and let us be America again for a change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skantea
A Resource Based Economy
05:47 PM on 11/29/2010
Truth is not our enemy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
G Dobbs
05:52 PM on 11/29/2010
I agree - tell me more
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PunKinPai
Tact is just not saying true stuff. I’ll pass.
07:51 PM on 11/29/2010
There is no "Truth." All truth is subjective, and no bit of information is complete on its own. I think if you explore the details of, say, your personal life and that of your family, perhaps you might find that some secrets are beneficial.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skantea
A Resource Based Economy
03:55 AM on 11/30/2010
I didn't say it wouldn't hurt, but all information can be instrumental in discovering 'objective' truths. Take math for instance, two plus two equaling four is not a subjective truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rog1112
stealing bread from the mouths of decadence
05:43 PM on 11/29/2010
"If you are a president, you don't want to bring an aura of confusion and ineffectiveness with you to a meeting of your political enemies."

Thought you were going to say the president doesn't want to bring a knife to a smoking cap gun rant.