More

Less Than Half Of Americans Have Been Tested For AIDS

STEPHANIE NANO   11/30/10 03:06 PM ET   AP

Hiv Test

NEW YORK — Fewer than half of Americans have had an AIDS test since guidelines were expanded to include routine screening, according to a government report released Tuesday.

Last year, an estimated 45 percent of Americans ages 18 to 64 reported they've had an HIV test at least once in their lives, up from 40 percent in 2006. That's an increase of 11 million people to 83 million people who have ever been screened, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in Atlanta.

CDC director Dr. Thomas Frieden said the increase was significant and encouraging, while one outside expert called it disappointing.

"The numbers show that progress is possible. They also show how much more progress is needed," Frieden said during a teleconference.

In 2006, the CDC urged routine testing for everyone ages 13 to 64, even if they're not in high-risk groups. For those at high risk, including gay men and intravenous drug users, annual testing is recommended.

Because more people are getting tested, Frieden said, fewer people are being diagnosed late with HIV. In 2007, about a third of infections were discovered late, an improvement from 37 percent diagnosed earlier in the decade. Frieden said those cases are often only detected when the disease has progressed to AIDS.

AIDS drugs lower the amount of virus and are more effective when given earlier. People who know they are infected are more likely to take steps to prevent spreading it, Frieden said.

He said 28 percent of those at high risk have never been tested.

"If you don't know your HIV status, you can't effectively protect yourself and your partners," he said.

The CDC estimates that about 1.1 million Americans have HIV, but about 20 percent don't know it. About 56,000 new infections occur each year in the U.S.

The CDC report was based on nationwide health surveys and state reports on infections.

Dr. John Bartlett of Johns Hopkins University called the testing figures disappointing.

"It's an incremental gain," said Bartlett, an infectious disease specialist.

He said that when the CDC changed its guidelines, many states still had laws that required special counseling before and after HIV tests. Most have since dropped the restrictions, but there are still some barriers. Maryland, for example, still requires doctors to note the patient's consent on charts, he said.

He said more screening could be done if hospitals were pressured to adopt routine HIV testing of patients by Medicare or hospital groups.

___

Online:

CDC report: http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns

HIV test: http://www.hivtest.org

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

NEW YORK — Fewer than half of Americans have had an AIDS test since guidelines were expanded to include routine screening, according to a government report released Tuesday. Last year, an estim...
NEW YORK — Fewer than half of Americans have had an AIDS test since guidelines were expanded to include routine screening, according to a government report released Tuesday. Last year, an estim...
Filed by Rachel Martin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
superjules
10:58 AM on 12/05/2010
My niece was only 22 years old when she found out she got HIV from her boyfriend. She was pre-med, had everything going for her and then BAM! Use condoms, get tested. Make sure your partner gets tested.
photo
StThomas
Not until I see the holes of the nails....
06:18 PM on 12/04/2010
_Fewer_ than half, surely!
11:52 AM on 12/04/2010
I disagree about universal testing. Military personnel, active and reserve, are universally tested now, and its a waste of gobs of money. No judgements here, but is a fact that when a person enters the miitary HIV-free, they stay that way. The number of exceptions are miniscule. Again, no judgements, but not all lifestyles share the same risk. Common sense says concentrate the resources where the risk is highest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
superjules
10:49 AM on 12/05/2010
Yeah, cause those military boys and girls are never promiscuous, right? Just saying.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPMac
08:02 PM on 12/02/2010
The scary part of the story.."He said 28 percent of those at high risk have never been tested."

Wow!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sunnybunny
09:12 AM on 12/02/2010
I would think about half of the population wouldn't even be at risk. If they are celibate or in a monogamous relationship and don't use needles or have any occasion to be exposed for example.
04:39 AM on 12/02/2010
A friend of mine died on Nov 1st.He had never been tested.He got tested in Jan of this year aftr being sick for months.Because of not knowing it was too late for him.But a ounce of knowledge goes a long way.
11:09 PM on 12/01/2010
he concept of aids has been manipulated into the minds of men as well as scores of other illnesses just to sell drugs,and that is all.
All for a better mind, and body be treated by a type of Chiropractor called as a group- upper cervical specific,and don't have the symptoms of aids or whatever. Drs lie, and give poisons like formaldehyde in jars preserving various dead things. The presumed benevolence of the health care industry is killing humans with the callousness of giving dead mice to raptors. Richard duff in Francisco is a fantastic U,C,S, Other techniques, Pettibon, Knee Chest, Light toggle recoil, SAM,.Atlas orthogonal. Sherman collage teaches AO,and Duff method ,and strait Chiropractic also teaches upper cervical specific,but learn only U,C,S, and stay away from cavitating full spine, and diversified techniques that only pop the joints.
02:05 PM on 12/01/2010
We shouldn't test everyone for AIDS. Anyone with a knowledge of Bayesian probabilities knows that universal testing produces more false positives than actual diagnoses. If you have a positive result on your AIDS test, your actual chance of having AIDS is far, far lower than most people actually realize. Just testing everyone won't work. We need to identify at-risk populations and test them intelligently. Otherwise, we're just wasting time and resources.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
02:00 PM on 12/02/2010
I agree. Wasting resources on wide testing that could be used for treatment of those suffering does not make sense.

Global testing for an infection with relatively limited channels of infection is a bit like ordering full body CT for everyone in the country. Will they find anomalies? Definitely. Will it actually save additional lives? Probably not. Some will find tumors that might have harmed them later, sure. But many more than that will have invasive biopsies or even surgery to find benign tissue.
12:02 PM on 12/01/2010
View the Award winning documentary "House of Numbers" to see why questions about this
must be raised, and why deeper issues about HIV and AIDS need to be
discussed. Lives are at risk. This is the first documentary ,with the worlds
foremost authorities, that highlights the fundamental problems with HIV
testing, science, and statistics, It sheds new light on a misunderstood
phenomenon., for which there is still no cure. GO to
houseofnumbers.com to see the trailer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dyson
debunking pseudoscience, one fallacy at a time.
12:27 PM on 12/01/2010
What awards would those be?
Best propaganda film? Best misquotation exerpts? Greatest number of untruths per sentence?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
02:37 PM on 12/02/2010
You mean the foremost authorities who explain that the film maker cut and pasted their interviews and mis-quoted them? If anyone is interested, just look it up on Wikipedia or anywhere else beside their own website.

It's won no awards, except maybe by Peter Duesberg.

HIV causes AIDS. The fact that a number of other conditions also cause immune deficiency is irrelevant. The fact that people were diagnosed with AIDS before they'd identified the virus and made a test is irrelevant. The fact that some people test HIV-positive and never get AIDS is irrelevant (it's true of other infections as well). The fact that some people have diagnosable AIDS but don't test HIV-positive is irrelevant (once your immune system is destroyed, you're not going to produce antibodies).

It's the equivalent of a birther movement.