iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Hide/Seek' Portrait Draws Calls For Congressional Investigation

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 12/01/10 07:35 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

Jack Kingston Hideseek Art Gallery Investigation

A GOP lawmaker from Georgia is breaking ground on the party's ambitious new agenda by calling for a congressional investigation into a recently removed artwork in the National Portrait Gallery that featured a controversial video showing a figurine of Jesus Christ covered in ants.

Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) spoke on Fox News Wednesday morning and explained his outrage over the critically acclaimed installation.

"This is a museum that gets $5.8 million in taxpayer dollars and in the middle of a high deficit, 15 million unemployed Americans, they decide to have money to spend like this. This is a museum that, by the way, has next to it a display of the American presidents, on the other side, Elvis, and then you go through this -- which is really perverted, sick stuff -- ashes of an AIDS victim, in a self-portrait, eating himself. Male nudity, Ellen DeGeneres grabbing her own breast - lots of really kinky and really questionable kind of art."

Kingston continued, explaining his concern that federal funds, though not at all related to the materials in the gallery, were being used to subsidize the building that the specific piece was housed in:

"They claim that this is not paid for by tax dollars, yet this is a public building with a publicly paid staff, public heat and air-conditioning, if you will, public security. So there's no question the taxpayers are subsidizing this. It's no different than the Pentagon going out and paying $500 for a hammer or the National Park Service paying $300,000 for an outhouse."

GOP leaders John Boehner and Eric Cantor spoke out against the display Tuesday, an exhibition entitled "Hide/Seek." The video in question was created by AIDS victim and late artist David Wojnarowicz.

"Smithsonian officials should either acknowledge the mistake and correct it, or be prepared to face tough scrutiny beginning in January when the new majority in the House moves [in]," Boehner spokesman Kevin Smith said.

Cantor also demanded its replacement, and called it "an obvious attempt to offend Christians during the Christmas season."

The Catholic League piled on the criticism of the video, which was originally intended to run from Oct. 30 to Feb. 13. as part of an exhibit that cost of $750,000, money that, according to the Washington Post "was funded by the largest number of individual donors for a Portrait Gallery show" and "underwritten by foundations that support gay and lesbian issues."

More from the Post's report:

The Catholic League objected to the "homoerotic images" and said the exhibition offended Christians. Donohue, in an interview Tuesday after the video was removed, said he had watched it on YouTube and that "the material is vile."

He called on the House and Senate appropriations committees to reconsider future funding for the Smithsonian.

"My immediate concern has been relieved. But this is hate speech," [Catholic League President] Donohue said. "It is designed to insult. This is a sad commentary on the judgment of the Smithsonian."

With Kingston's announcement, it appears that Donohue's calls for a probe may be heeded, despite the fact that no federal funds actually go toward the commissioning of specific works of art.

WATCH:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
A GOP lawmaker from Georgia is breaking ground on the party's ambitious new agenda by calling for a congressional investigation into a recently removed artwork in the National Portrait Gallery that fe...
A GOP lawmaker from Georgia is breaking ground on the party's ambitious new agenda by calling for a congressional investigation into a recently removed artwork in the National Portrait Gallery that fe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,886
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (73 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
benney44
01:52 PM on 01/21/2011
If this GA congressman is offended by art he is too weak to be in office. Offensive is our soldiers getting killed and wounded for oil. Offensive is millions of Americans unemployed and a US Congressman spending a second of his time speaking about this. Offensive is millions of Americans unable to access affordable health care and you voting to repeal the affordable health care act. Please resign before you do any more damage!
01:06 PM on 01/21/2011
I don't agree always with the conservative mind set but why trash the religion for the sake of trashing it. It does no one any good and in the end just creates more hard and bitter feelings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SionShankel
My opinons are all done sans pants
12:11 PM on 01/21/2011
Yea, keep you ants off of my precious dead tortured corpse idle of my imagery friend...LOL...ants are not part of the divine circle of life.
12:34 PM on 01/21/2011
In avoiding real issues, it's amazing what most Georgia politicians dream up for the myrmidons who believe them.
11:33 AM on 01/21/2011
Dear God..

Please Protect me from Christians and Republicans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeffrey hoffman
02:43 PM on 01/21/2011
thank you for your comment
11:24 AM on 01/21/2011
Can we use the phrase "degenerate art" without being accused of making a completely irrelevant, unsupportable, reprehensible N.azi reference?

What about if we suggest a portrait of Rep. Kingston astride a white horse, wearing gleaming armor and proudly carrying an American flag?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stuoverit
"What year did Jesus think it was?"-GC
10:33 AM on 01/21/2011
When I think cultured and conscious of what constitutes "art", I think Republican.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DamonIcke
Boognish Disciple
10:16 AM on 01/21/2011
A bleeding man nailed to a cross is completely acceptable. Put a few ants on it and a line has been crossed? Could someone please explain?
11:20 AM on 01/21/2011
We can't stand the thought that our deities might be biodegradable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madtek
Beam me up Scotty...Scotty...SCOTTY!!!
09:44 AM on 01/21/2011
DAMN!!! It offends Republicans, christians AND catholics and I gotta miss it!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftyandproudofit
Jesus was a liberal
09:22 AM on 01/21/2011
"This is a museum that gets $5.8 million in taxpayer dollars and in the middle of a high deficit, 15 million unemployed Americans, they decide to have money to spend like this. This is a museum that, by the way, has next to it a display of the American presidents, on the other side, Elvis, and then you go through this -- which is really perverted, sick stuff..."

No, actually, perverted, sick stuff is Haliburton receiving billions of taxpayer dollars in unsolicited contracts in Iraq while its former CEO is Vice President of the United States. And while that was happening, not a single GOP politician complained. Not one. Rep. Kingston, your priorities are a little screwed up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dilgar2000
09:04 AM on 01/21/2011
If they decide to put up art depicting the last supper can hardcore feminists find it offensive because it depicts nothing but men in it?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:56 AM on 01/21/2011
The Christian Taliban will decide what is acceptable in society.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:50 AM on 01/21/2011
"They claim that this is not paid for by tax dollars, yet this is a public building with a publicly paid staff, public heat and air-conditioning, if you will, public security. So there's no question the taxpayers are subsidizing this. It's no different than the Pentagon going out and paying $500 for a hammer or the National Park Service paying $300,000 for an outhouse."

The man who said that apparently cannot think logically. If he's drawing a comparison to non-publicly-funded art works being displayed in a publicly-funded building, then the appropriate comparison would be to Pentagon hammers that have been decorated, at no taxpayer expense, by artists, or "scandalous" art being displayed, at no taxpayer expense, inside that Park Service outhouse. Since tax dollars did not pay for the art works, why does he make comparisons to taxpayer-funded acquisititions?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
08:09 AM on 01/21/2011
Hypocrites, finding obscenity in art but none in their own sick and obscene self-serving political machinations.
Kettle, meet Pot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JeanRR
08:06 AM on 01/21/2011
Aren't ants god's creatures too?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 AM on 01/21/2011
i guess since they're lower creatures? maybe they weren't in the garden with adam and lilith
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
buckunstoppable
A small frame housing huge ideas.
09:11 AM on 01/21/2011
Ants didn't show until the first picnic, Lilith Fair.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:00 AM on 01/21/2011
Isn't there another group that gets themselves into similar big hissy fits about art, music, books, etc. Oh yeah it's the TALIBAN.