iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Child Nutrition: Congress Sends Bill To Obama

MARY CLARE JALONICK   12/ 2/10 11:19 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — More children would eat lunches and dinners at school under legislation passed Thursday by the House and sent to the president, part of first lady Michelle Obama's campaign to end childhood hunger and fight childhood obesity.

The $4.5 billion bill approved by the House 264-157 would also try to cut down on greasy foods and extra calories by giving the government power to decide what kinds of foods may be sold in vending machines and lunch lines. The bill could even limit frequent school bake sales and fundraisers that give kids extra chances to eat brownies and pizza.

The first lady said in a statement after the vote that she was "thrilled" about House passage. She called the bill "a groundbreaking piece of bipartisan legislation that will significantly improve the quality of meals that children receive at school."

Republicans said the bill is too expensive and an example of government overreach. Even former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has weighed in, bringing cookies to a speech at a Pennsylvania school last month and calling efforts to limit junk food in schools a "nanny state run amok."

Democrats said the legislation is needed to stem rising health care costs due to expanding American waistlines and to feed hungry children in tough economic times.

The new nutrition standards would be written by the Agriculture Department, which would decide which kinds of foods may be sold and what ingredients can be used on school lunch lines and in vending machines.

The new standards would likely keep popular foods like hamburgers and pizza in school cafeterias but make them healthier, using leaner meat or whole wheat crust, for example. Vending machines could be stocked with less candy and fewer high-calorie drinks.

Bake sales and other school sponsored fundraisers that sell unhealthy foods could be limited under the legislation, which only allows them if they are infrequent. The Agriculture Department would determine how often they could be held. Public health advocates pushed for the language, saying they are concerned about daily or weekly fundraisers that allow children to substitute junk food for a healthier meal.

The bill would increase eligibility and accessibility for school lunches by using Medicaid and census data and provide money to serve more than 20 million additional after-school meals annually in all 50 states. Most states now only serve after-school snacks.

The legislation would increase the amount of money schools are reimbursed for free lunches by 6 cents a meal, a priority for schools that say they don't have enough money to serve the meals.

Some public school organizations have criticized the bill, saying they are concerned it will set new requirements without providing enough money to carry them out.

"This will just add a new burden for schools to pay for another unfunded mandate at a time when there are critical budget shortfalls," said Anne L. Bryant, executive director of the National School Boards Association.

The Senate passed the legislation in August. Republicans attempted to send the bill back to the Senate on Wednesday – instead of straight to President Barack Obama – by using a procedural maneuver to try and amend it with language that would require background checks for child care workers.

Democrats said the amendment was an attempt to kill the bill in the last few weeks of the congressional session because there would be no time for the Senate to pass it again and send it back to the House. They avoided the Senate detour and gave members of their party political cover by passing the background checks in a separate bill Thursday.

The child nutrition bill stalled in September when some liberal Democrats opposed it because it is partially paid for with $2.2 billion in future dollars for food stamps. But those Democrats dropped their opposition after Republicans made large gains in the November elections and the White House promised to find a way to restore the money.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the measure gives USDA the chance to make significant changes to school lunch programs for the first time in more than 30 years.

"Our national security, economic competitiveness and health and wellness of our children will improve as a result of the action Congress took today," Vilsack said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

WASHINGTON — More children would eat lunches and dinners at school under legislation passed Thursday by the House and sent to the president, part of first lady Michelle Obama's campaign to end c...
WASHINGTON — More children would eat lunches and dinners at school under legislation passed Thursday by the House and sent to the president, part of first lady Michelle Obama's campaign to end c...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 196
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
02:41 PM on 12/07/2010
I appreciate this bill for what it's trying to do, but it's not going to change the way parents feed their kids home, so I don't think it's going to make a real impact in childhood obesity rates. Plus it's not going make kids put down the video game controller and go outside to play tag or four-square.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Endotoxin
Blast Corps
02:04 PM on 12/07/2010
Hands down this is the cheapest and most practical way to prevent 90% of disease occurrence in your future population. Neglect nutrition in primary and secondary schools and you will be paying for it all across the board as soon as that generation hits their 30's and 40's.

Our nation has hit a disgraceful low in terms of public health.

When I was 14 back in 2000, people my age having type-II diabetes was practically unheard of and doctors didn't even screen for it. Now only 10 years later they are saying it is a growing pandemic in concurrence with obesity amongst children of all ages. This is preposterous. How could it have gotten this bad in just 10 years?

Easy, two words: Diet and exercise.

This is both a Democrat and Republican problem. Quit the bickering and handle the real issues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keraz
The Road to Serfdom was paved Nov. 6, 2012
09:10 AM on 12/07/2010
Well, it looks like the HP is at it again. I posted a comment on here opposing this bill and the comment was posted and now it's gone.

Again, freedom of speech is only free if you agree with the left.
Eppur Si
One of the majority who are not part of the "99%"
09:45 AM on 12/07/2010
Absolutely correct. Half of my posts get censored, even though I scrupulously follow the rules. Meanwhile, lefties call me all kinds of names and engage in personal attacks, and those posts are just fine with HP. The TOS are a sad joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p456
Walking Tall.
01:14 AM on 12/07/2010
I'm starting a Fan party for the First Lady and all she is doing for our youth, and for our troops and for all of the unemployed, homeless but not forgotten Americans. Will you join me If you Fan me I will fan you right back. I know we can do this.

Let me be the first I FAN THE WHOLE HUFFINGTON POST RIGHT NOW F&F! WHO WILL BE NEXT?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bthechangeyouseek
09:24 AM on 12/06/2010
Since when is setting guidelines and funding for nutrition in school taking over the role of a parent? There are some lame comments on this post. Kudos to Mrs. Obama for raising this issue. The typical western diet has become unsustainable for many reasons, and corporations have no business pandering processed garbage passed off as food to our kids through school.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DMSmith
03:51 AM on 12/06/2010
I'm 65 yrs old and when I was in elementary school there were FDA guidelines re: what could and couldn't be served using Federal funds.
People are freaking out as if this is something new and sinister. It's not. In fact it's been many decades since these guidelines have been updated. It's been with us for a long time and needs updating. Calm down.
03:06 AM on 12/05/2010
gosh there was such an aggressive negative push of comments...really partisan bitter ones of surprising number for such a reasonably benign and certainly transparently well meaning bill that managed to get bipartisan support even in this partisan climate. It sure is interesting.
02:55 AM on 12/05/2010
it is possible, at least on the small scale at home, to make the healthier of two choices (wheat vs white bread...side dish of stirfried garlic ginger broccoli or French fries) for very little, if any, increase in cost. I can't imagine there are not at least some choices that schools can be making better that will not cost or not cost much. And, since they are saying Obesity might very well cause a Decrease in our lifeexpectancy for the first time ever (ie in this generation of kids)...it might be worth the cost. ON the other end, society pays for sick diabetics who got diabetes due to overweight (as many do). Heck it may even be cost effective, just like preventative healthcare turns out to save money in the long run.
photo
ywcachieve
President Barack H. Obama supporter.
06:47 PM on 12/04/2010
Any time there is good news reported on this site (which is rare), it is met with a rush of negative comments. Some people just don't want to hear anything good happening for this country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:45 AM on 12/04/2010
Whose bright idea was it to fund this bill with money from the food stamp budget? Isn't there enough money in government that's going to waste (in Iraq and Afghanistan, for example) that we couldn't pull some money from that, so that we didn't have to take it from poor people who were already struggling to feed their families???
10:29 AM on 12/04/2010
What? Waste taxpayer money on feeding children? Outrageous! How can we ever support our wars? I can't believe the republicans allowed this to happen. I guess some of the are purveyors to the schools systems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jourdankr
Play nice!
09:48 AM on 12/04/2010
As a parent and teacher, I can tell you that I have gone to school board members/administrators about nutrition in my school. Many of us have! That is why our veggies are coming from local growers as part of a farm-to-school initiative. Cafteria workers are cooking a lot more, instead of just reheating frozen junk - though the occasional pre-made PB&J sandwich does arrive from the main warehouse for them to serve. I know they hate it when that happens. If this bill helps to stop that so our cooks get to really cook more often, I know they will be happier. We will all be happier.
02:57 AM on 12/05/2010
and that mass produced frozen junk was not cheap, as you personally know. thats why they can afford to get really good stuff (fresh local produce!) on same or similiar budget! people saying it's going to be exorbitantly expensive need to check facts first...it may not be. It may be a win win even
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teaksmama
09:15 PM on 12/11/2010
triple win when you count the jobs of bringing school kitchens up to date and having an actual kitchen staff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yellowdogminnesotan
I like my women in binders!
09:32 AM on 12/04/2010
You know I agree with Former Governor Palin, we need to save money. Just feed the kids hotdogs and Cokes all day, it's cheap, and will have NO long term effects. Exhibit A, B, C, the Palin kids@
04:10 AM on 12/04/2010
It makes me so sad that this sort of legislation is even necessary. Where are the parents, the teachers, the school boards? Why are we so eager to sell out our children's health for a few bucks from a vending machine? I understand the "nanny state" argument, but maybe the government wouldn't need to step in if people would act like adults! Maybe all of the "adults" have been so brainwashed by the food/agri corporations that they are powerless to make good decisions on their children's behalf? The whole thing just makes me shudder.
02:58 AM on 12/05/2010
lazy at times
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mombabytiger
Looking into the heart of an artichoke.
09:34 AM on 12/06/2010
Most of us are not lazy. We can't watch our kids 24/7 to protect them from food. If you are depending on the free breakfast/lunch program, you have no say in what your child will be fed in a school cafeteria. Yes, I could pack lunches and when I get back on my feet, I will. But right now, he's fed at school.
09:27 PM on 12/03/2010
Scott: You aren't aggravatin­g me at all - I love to prove when a lib is wrong.

First you're practicing medicine by counseling patients and dispensing medical advice. Now you're working at an elementary school when challenged on that falsehood.

So - you're counseling parents of babies and giving medical advice at your elementary school job? LOLOL

You're bogus.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:38 PM on 12/03/2010
You cant even argue the issue at hand. This bill which has passed congress LOL
09:41 PM on 12/03/2010
Nice attempt to backpedal away from your posts below :)