iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Top States For Solar Power: Best 11 For Solar Energy Deployment According To OSDI (PHOTOS)

First Posted: 12/02/10 08:10 AM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

From The W.P. Carey School Of Business At Arizona State University's Professor Matt Croucher:

As the movement toward using more sustainable energy continues, many states look to build their renewable energy portfolios. However, too often, the focus is placed only on states that are optimal renewable-energy generation states. That would only be appropriate if the infrastructure were designed for self-sufficiency conditions. Instead, a combination of factors tied to both generation and consumption should be involved in determining the ideal locations for advancing solar power development and infrastructure across the nation.

New research by Professor Matt Croucher from the W. P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University, called the Optimal Deployment of Solar Index (OSDI), provides a ranking of ideal states for solar power based on several different considerations.

Ideal states should have: a relatively high level of solar insolation (ability to generate a significant amount of solar energy), a fairly large amount of economic activity resulting from solar energy being deployed, a reasonably low cost of energy installation, higher than average current prices for electricity, and the potential for electricity production through solar power that would offset large amounts of carbon emissions.

Interestingly, the states that ranked highly varied in geography, size, population, and climate. Surprisingly, some of the states one might quickly point to as ideal locations for solar power are noticeably absent from the top (e.g. California and Utah - tied at No. 30, Nevada - No. 21, and Florida - No. 15), when focusing on self-sufficiency conditions.

The research also explains that states - save Hawaii or Alaska - don't exist in isolation, and power grids are typically not built strictly with state boundaries in mind. So, there could be a great opportunity for states that generate solar power more effectively and at greater rates to distribute power both within their own borders and to nearby states that are viable targets for efficient consumption.

#1 - Hawaii
1 of 12
With the highest average cost of electricity and relatively high carbon emissions, Hawaii (No. 1) ranks at the top because solar deployment would be so beneficial under those conditions. Being the state closest to the equator and all the sunny days help, too.
Total comments: 162 | Post a Comment
1 of 12
This State
Not Surprising
Solar Shocker!

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Most Shocking Solar States
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

*L. William Seidman Research Institute, W. P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University

Research by:

Matt Croucher, W. P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University
Assistant Research Professor, Department of Economics
Senior Research Economist, L. William Seidman Research Institute

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

From The W.P. Carey School Of Business At Arizona State University's Professor Matt Croucher: As the movement toward using more sustainable energy continues, many states look to build their renewable...
From The W.P. Carey School Of Business At Arizona State University's Professor Matt Croucher: As the movement toward using more sustainable energy continues, many states look to build their renewable...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 162
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:21 PM on 12/06/2010
Ok I can understand Solar Energy and saving money but to understand what is being said here is important. Using Solar Power to "offset large amounts of carbon emissions" they are saying the air you are exhaling is carbon emissions and as Ted Turner says "needs to be culled." Disturbing when you hear a billionaire say that he is for a 1 child policy when he has 5 kids himself. So how do you choose which of the 4 out 5 kids do you sacrifice for the cause? Crazy people. www.awakentotruth.net you can go there and click on the solar energy tab and help with the saving yourself money but it will not help with culling carbon emissions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
11:22 AM on 12/04/2010
The Missouri legislature controlled by Republicans is hostile to solar & wind development. The 2009 Freeing the Grid Report gives Missouri a "C" on their net metering law and an "F" on their grid interconnect rules. The net metering law was written by the state's investor owned utilities for the benfit of the investor owned utilities. Under the net metering law, the investor owned utilities only have to pay their avoided cost for solar power sold into the grid, not the wholesale or retail rate. Getting connected to the grid in Missouri is, well, an "F" grade process. The investor owned utilities add more insult to injury by keeping the excess credits at the end of each calendar year.

The voters passed Proposition C in 2008 which requires investor owned utilities to pay a $2 per watt rebate to residential and commercial property owners who install solar. For example, a residential property owner who installs a 10 kilowatt solar pv systems would be entitiled to a $20,000 rebate on top of the 30 percent federal invvestment tax credit. The backward looking state legislature needs to fix the grid interconnect rules and make the utilities pay at least the wholesale rate for solar energy sold into the grid and then it will become a great solar state.
"


http://www.newenergychoices.org/uploads/FreeingTheGrid2009.pdf
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Ipswich, Mass. 1641
09:54 AM on 12/04/2010
Look at the beetle kill in #3. It will be bad when it burns.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
b525
11:36 AM on 12/03/2010
Much of the world's oil/gas usage comes from driving cars.

If we installed a few solar panels on our garages to charge electric car batteries we couild eliminate much of this oil/gas usage in the U.S.

Importing oil into the U.S. is generating a trade deficit of about 30-50 billion dollars a month.

Of course the garage-top solar panels need to have emergency covering to protect from hail damage.

Although few of us can afford to power our entire houses with solar panels, we can afford to put a few solar panels on our garages to power our electric or electric/hybrid cars.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
10:10 AM on 12/03/2010
Where I live in New Hampshire there are too many trees people (not me) don't want to cut. I just remodeled a house and the owner an old fart doesn't think the location would be good for solar panels.(it would be good for solar panels). The house has too many close trees choking the sunlight out and their is a dampness problem on the north side because of too many trees.
02:59 AM on 12/03/2010
I think the study is interesting, but I wouldn't take it too literally or seriously. Solar is good really in any state as far as I'm concerned, as it is liberating from both emissions and dependence on dirty and/or foreign suppliers. Insofar as the variables that the good professor used, they are -- excuse the pun -- "varying" all the time anyway! hahaha.

I'm in Alabama and I've been using solar for nearly ten years now (battery based small systems). Before I had a grid-tie system, with the help of solar power and energy efficiency, I had even reduced my monthly consumption to less than 80 KWH at times (though the average was usually closer to 160-200 KWH a month). Of course, I'm smart :) - not everyone (Republicans, and Al Gore [prior to a conservative rag publishing his pre-solar energy usuage] for example) would probably be able to do what I did! :)

A little over a year ago, a grid-tie installer (an expatriate from Pennsylvania now living in Dothan) installed a 6 kilowatt system for me! It was just short of producing 10000 KWH in its first year! One month - I think it was last April or thereabouts - it produced 11 times what I used! And the "worst" month, last August, when I used the airconditioners a lot, it still produced over twice the KWH that I used.

Of course, most people are not as brilliant and debonair as I am! :)
IMOPINIONH8D
because I want it empty...
03:42 PM on 12/04/2010
Sabwafare is everywhere!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wanderthewest
macrobiologist
10:15 PM on 12/02/2010
The picture for Missouri doesn't show the state, but rather the Missouri River in Montana! Journalism is dead.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:55 PM on 12/02/2010
Oh My God , so NOT shocked !!! Was this under " solar energy for dummies " ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
08:49 PM on 12/02/2010
If Missouri and Arkansas are on the list, why not Illinois and Kentucky? This really makes no sense to me.
10:08 PM on 12/02/2010
I think it mostly has to do with wage rates for installers. 

A while ago I visited a local solar installer with my resume, expecting that my electrical engineering degree might be useful. The guy basically said that I was overqualified, that this isn't a difficult job, and that they're looking for cheap labor. Construction workers, not electrical engineers.
06:51 PM on 12/02/2010
Solar is the worst - most expensive, ruins landscapes, trash is unmanageable, most unreliable, fixing various panels and isolating them is ridiculous, and did I mention, it is most expensive.

Psychological impact of the word solar is to think free energy from the Sun.

However, it is a disaster.

I don't have to worry about it taking over, because whoever goes for it, would be first in line for bankruptcy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NioOnMaui
08:18 PM on 12/02/2010
You should educate your self about today's solar energy capabilities. Your comment about solar being a disaster is laughable. ever heard of oil?

jeez. From sunny Hawaii, ALOHA!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RyanCSmith
Locke for people, Hobbes for corporations
08:54 PM on 12/02/2010
This is based on what sources besides your opinion?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
06:29 PM on 12/02/2010
Great article, I would say CA and AZ and all southern states would be great. In reality is more complicated than that. Because of subsides and electricity costs, NJ and Connecticut do well for the individual solar installer too.
Save money, cut the deficit, employ everyone, cut energy dependence:
Immediately order energy retrofits for all gov buildings.
Rooftop PV Solar, Offshore wind, and Waste Bio char, can supply the worlds energy and fuel needs: cleanly, safely, Forever, within 12 years and cheaper in the long run 2-6 cents now, and 26$ per barrel bio oils.
http://www.ecobusinesslinks.com/solar_panels.htm
about 1$ per Wp solar panels, new.
install solar plants for about $1.30 per watt, compared with an industry average of about $1.75, according to Hardy." http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20602099&sid=a7K1FZoNgJ0w
rooftop solar plus offshore wind and waste bio fuels can supply the world energy need 24/7 forever. Wind: “between two and six cents today, depending on location.12 Wind power approaches competitiveness with conventional generation at this price point.
http://www.repp.org/articles/static/1/binaries/wind%20issue%20brief_FINAL.pdf
http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/publ/BiofBioproBioref%203,%20547-562,%202009%20Laird.pdf
26$ per barrel bio oil from waste bio char.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
06:05 PM on 12/02/2010
I had expected to see California and Arizona.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
05:55 PM on 12/02/2010
if coke and pepsi can convince Americans to buy bottled water I'm sure exxon and BP can get us to pay for sunshine some way
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:37 PM on 12/02/2010
who do you think owns all the Big Solar? Chevron, BP, Goldman Sachs, etc. Killing wilderness for money is their business model - Big Solar is perfect!

they will do anything to make sure that WE can't own the renewable revolution. tens of billions of dollars of OUR money are going straight into the pockets of these mercenaries, who are getting greenwash treatment from the Big Enviros.

it is faster, cheaper and much cleaner to install solar power in the built environment, and we can eliminate the Big Energy parasites from the supply chain, since they add nothing, and take everything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
09:13 PM on 12/02/2010
best comment today!
04:54 PM on 12/02/2010
Weird, the guy doing the research is from Arizona state, and yet Arizona is not even on the list.

Considering our economy, the 300 days of sunshine and the fact that I see solar panels popping up on roofs all over the place in AZ, that's hard to believe.

We have solar companies already here and large solar manufacturing companies looking to come here.

The real story is that we aren't going to make any progress with renewable or alternative energy until this technology is affordable for the average American. The people who can least afford it are the ones who need to benefit from these technologies the most, and yet the price of solar panels and installation (even with rebates and grants from gov't or energy companies) is still out of reach for most people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
09:14 PM on 12/02/2010
Maybe the guy knows how easy it is to work with Jan Brewer and John McCain. Those are powerful disincentives for any public works project.
04:03 PM on 12/02/2010
Here in Indiana, we've gone wind power crazy. People said that these wind turbines would be eyesores, but when you actually see these turbine fields in person, it's rather majestic. The future is here. It's a shame we rarely get enough sun to use solar.