iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

BP Challenge To Oil Spill Size Could Affect Fine

DINA CAPPIELLO   12/ 3/10 10:57 PM ET   AP

Bp

WASHINGTON — BP is mounting a new challenge to the U.S. government's estimates of how much oil flowed from the runaway well deep below the Gulf of Mexico, an argument that could reduce by billions of dollars the federal pollution fines it faces for the largest offshore oil spill in history.

BP's lawyers are arguing that the government overstated the spill by 20 to 50 percent, staffers working for the presidential oil spill commission said Friday. In a 10-page document obtained by The Associated Press, BP says the government's spill estimate of 206 million gallons is "overstated by a significant amount" and the company said any consensus around that number is premature and inaccurate.

The company submitted the document to the commission, the Justice Department and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

"They rely on incomplete or inaccurate information, rest in large part on assumptions that have not been validated, and are subject to far greater uncertainties than have been acknowledged," BP wrote. "BP fully intends to present its own estimate as soon as the information is available to get the science right."

In a statement Friday, the company said the government's estimates failed to account for equipment that could obstruct the flow of oil and gas, such as the blowout preventer, making its numbers "highly unreliable."

BP's request could save it as much as $10.5 billion or as little as $1.1 billion, depending on factors such as whether the government concludes that BP acted negligently. For context, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's entire federal budget for 2010 was $10.3 billion. President Barack Obama has said he wants Congress to set aside some of the money BP pays for fines for the Gulf's coastal restoration. Louisiana lawmakers are pushing legislation that would require at least 80 percent of the civil and criminal penalties charged to BP, and possibly other companies, to be returned to the Gulf Coast.

William K. Reilly, co-chairman of the presidential commission, expressed amazement at BP's case Friday. Reilly headed the Environmental Protection Agency under President George H.W. Bush.

"They are going to argue that it is 50 percent less" than the government's total? Reilly asked. "Wow."

Under the Clean Water Act, the oil giant – which owned and operated the well – faces fines of up to $1,100 for each barrel of oil spilled. If BP were found to have committed gross negligence or willful misconduct, the fine could be up to $4,300 per barrel.

That means that based on the government's estimate of 206 million gallons, BP could face civil fines alone of between $5.4 billion and $21.1 billion.

"They are going to argue it was less," said Priya Aiyar, the commission's deputy chief counsel. "BP has not offered its own numbers yet, but BP has told us that it thinks the government's numbers are too high and thinks the actual flow rate can be actually 20 to 50 percent lower."

Rep. Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., a member of the House energy panel that is investigating the spill, said in a statement Friday to the AP that BP has done whatever it could to avoid revealing the true flow rate of the spill.

"With billions of dollars at stake, it is no surprise that they are now litigating the very numbers which they sought to impede," Markey said. "The government engaged independent scientists and multiple techniques to arrive at their estimate. Additional independent peer-reviewed studies have corroborated their estimate. BP has a high bar to meet to overturn this estimate."

BP's argument could be bolstered by the federal government's missteps in coming up with a final estimate for the spill's volume. The Obama administration has offered nearly 10 estimates of how much oil flowed from the BP well, coming up with a refined conclusion late last month of 206 million gallons, which is likely its last.

Internal documents released late Friday under the Freedom of Information Act show that the White House was intimately involved in deciding how scientific information was portrayed to the public, particularly when it came to the August 4 release of a document that showed where the spilled oil had gone. The five-page report, which was touted by Carol Browner, the president's energy adviser, on morning talk shows and at White House press briefing showed that half the oil was gone – either from evaporation, burning, skimming or recovery at the well head.

The 3,500 pages of documents reveal that the administration wanted the oil budget to show its efforts to respond to the disaster were working, despite objections from top EPA officials, including Administrator Lisa Jackson, over how some of the data was presented.

An earlier version of the press release issued with the paper said that 33 percent of the oil released was captured or mitigated by recovery efforts.

A final version, changed hours before its release, said "the vast majority" of the spilled oil was addressed by recovery efforts or had naturally dispersed or evaporated.

That morning, Browner appeared on national television saying that an initial assessment by federal scientists showed "more than three-quarters of the oil is gone."

In an e-mail sent later that morning addressed to Browner's assistant, Heather Zichal, NOAA chief Jane Lubchenco finds fault with the White House's interpretation of the report's numbers and attribution of the report solely to NOAA. The report was drafted by several agencies.

"I'm concerned to hear the oil budget report is being portrayed as saying that 75 percent of the oil is gone and that this is a NOAA report," Lubchenco writes. "Please help make sure that both errors are corrected." The White House acknowledged Browner had misspoke.

Lubchenco explains it was only accurate to say half the oil was gone.

___

Associated Press writers Seth Borenstein and Matthew Daly in Washington and Harry R. Weber in New Orleans contributed to this report.

___

Online:

National Oil Spill Commission: http://www.oilspillcommission.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — BP is mounting a new challenge to the U.S. government's estimates of how much oil flowed from the runaway well deep below the Gulf of Mexico, an argument that could reduce by billio...
WASHINGTON — BP is mounting a new challenge to the U.S. government's estimates of how much oil flowed from the runaway well deep below the Gulf of Mexico, an argument that could reduce by billio...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 151
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
01:04 AM on 12/06/2010
Bp wants to down play even farther what their partner in crime (the gov't) has already been down playing and LYING about since the beginning...

http://www.care2.com/causes/environment/blog/gulf-submarine-exploration-finds-missing-oil/
03:10 PM on 12/04/2010
This article, dated July 11, 2010, discusses BP’s strategy to limit its liability in regard to the Deepwater Horizon blowout. This strategy includes, but is not limited to, intentionally underestimating the rate of flow of oil that’s being released into the Gulf of Mexico, prohibiting independent measurement of the BP oil gusher by unbiased third party scientists and engineers, the excessive and unprecedented use of dispersants (both on the surface and underwater), systematically and intentionally collecting as small an amount of oil as possible from the waters of the Gulf of Mexico, and controlling and restricting media access to the areas affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil gusher.

http://renergie.wordpress.com/2010/07/12/bps-strategy-to-limit-liability-in-regard-to-its-gulf-oil-gusher/
12:56 PM on 12/04/2010
Waite until BP has decided the bad publicity has died down enough for them to figure they've paid enough.

When it hits the appeals courts level we'll see the effects of electing judges with campaign money straight from the coffers of big oil.

These guys are not the American public.

They looked ahead.

The bought and paid for Conservative Judges are already in place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler James Lee
12:37 PM on 12/04/2010
This is why BP used the dispersant chemicals to keep the oil off the surface, on the grounds that "what you can't see you can't blame us for", and THAT worked fine...
What about their responsibility for those chemicals, which have been demonstrated to be more dangerous than the crude oil? Has anyone estimated the tonnage used, or the toxicity? Is this even part of the current consideration?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ThermoChemist
"Forewarned Is Forearmed"
12:34 PM on 12/04/2010
"BP Challenge To Oil Spill Size Could Affect Fine"
===========

AS expected..!

: (
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
McKMN
Hard Rock Union Miner
11:54 AM on 12/04/2010
I recall BP's claim that they couldn't measure what was coming out of the blown well. But when the "hat" was put on they were gauging 10000 barrels a day with some still escaping. Do the math.
But BP says they are going to" present their own evidence as soon as the information is available to get the science right". What information? I gotta say personally I'm shocked BP is fighting this, from the very beginning, Tony Haywhatever seemed like such a stand up guy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keramos
Guns don't kill, bullets do. Tax the bullets
12:14 PM on 12/04/2010
I trust you're being sarcastic about Heyworth.

The last thing BP wanted was an accurate count of what was coming out and they managed to keep that from occurring.  I commented to this effect during the spill and maintain it to be so now.  Why wouldn't they want an accurate count - there are 4,300 reasons per barrel why.
11:52 AM on 12/04/2010
Why don't we just exonerate BP completely? Next, BP will be trying to tell us the explosion and subsequent oil spill was "just a dream".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keramos
Guns don't kill, bullets do. Tax the bullets
12:15 PM on 12/04/2010
We can send Joe  the 'pologizer Barton in to do the exoneration.  He knows how to stroke these guys.  Lovingly.
12:29 PM on 12/04/2010
Yes, Barton would grovel to BP in a heartbeat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabrobst
Return the top rate to 91%.
11:42 AM on 12/04/2010
Seize BP and arrest the executives.
11:24 AM on 12/04/2010
They already lowered the estimates for this FOREIGN CORPORATION WHICH CAUSED SUCH HARM

The Brits are becoming too greedy for words
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keramos
Guns don't kill, bullets do. Tax the bullets
12:15 PM on 12/04/2010
The Brits invented greed and avarice.
photo
robadeaux
Your labels have expired....
01:05 PM on 12/04/2010
No, I believe that was human nature from day one.
11:10 AM on 12/04/2010
Shut down BP
11:09 AM on 12/04/2010
I'll bet no one saw this coming!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
11:36 AM on 12/04/2010
Oooo Ooooooooooo I did I did!
11:04 AM on 12/04/2010
This is just disgusting!
BP needs to payup! Thousands of peoples live's were destroyed, not to mention the environmental devastation! Someone needs to be accountable to these people and the environment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keramos
Guns don't kill, bullets do. Tax the bullets
12:16 PM on 12/04/2010
There are a bunch of clowns that you're going to be seeing regularly in January that have Rs after their names.  Watch them carefully.
10:38 AM on 12/04/2010
Who thought this was going to end any other way than this...We have total confidence in our government to screw up everything it touches and it got involved in the spill and in the settlement…and now BP will just tell everyone that they were right about their estimates and that will be it…Obama will go oh…ok…and go play basketball or whatever he does these days..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
2garen
10:08 AM on 12/04/2010
Just goes to show you that the American Taxpayer is going to get stuck with the bill AGAIN