iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

4 Million Americans Set To Lose Unemployment Benefits Even If Congress Passes Extension (CHART)

Unemployment

First Posted: 12/03/10 05:58 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

Even as Congress debates whether to extend emergency unemployment checks for more than six million Americans who are approaching the 99-week limit, some four million others are facing the certain end of their benefits over the next year, unless an entirely new program is crafted.

This is the sobering conclusion of a report released by the President's Council of Economic Advisers on Thursday. The study forecast that the exhaustion of unemployment benefits for so many will curb spending power enough to significantly impede an already weak economic recovery.

The typical household now receiving emergency unemployment benefits would see their income fall by a third should they lose their checks, according to the report. Among the roughly 40 percent of households in which the person receiving a check is the sole breadwinner, income would fall by 90 percent.

The existing emergency unemployment program, which extends benefits for nearly two years, expired on Wednesday. Without an agreement to extend the program, the economy will lose about 600,000 jobs, as the spending enabled by continued unemployment checks ceases. National economic output--which expanded at an annual pace of 2.5 percent during the summer months--would fall off by 0.6 percent.

That disturbing prospect does not even account for the roughly four million people who would exceed even the extended limits in the emergency program. Were that many jobless people left to fend themselves without unemployment checks, that would pose significant risks for the broader economy, say economists. They cite the fact that consumer spending accounts for roughly 70 percent of all economic activity.

"If you're looking for economic recovery supported by consumers, it's discouraging," said Henry J. Aaron, an economist at the Brookings Institution, a research institution in Washington. "It's drag on the economy."

Many economists argue that paying unemployment benefits is among the most effective ways the government can spur the economy: Jobless people tend to spend nearly all of their unemployment checks, distributing those dollars throughout the economy.

"There's very few things we can spend money on that probably have such an immediate impact on household consumption as unemployment benefits for the long-term unemployed," said Gary Burtless, a former Labor Department economist and now a fellow at Broookings.

But even as the White House pushes Congress to reauthorize the existing emergency program, little discussion centers on what to do to prevent another four million jobless people from losing public assistance. If any active proposal exists to support this group, it remains well hidden.

"That's not where the war is being fought right now," said Aaron. "Given the current configuration of political forces, nobody is proposing to do anything about it."

A senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the White House is now focused on trying to persuade Congress to reauthorize the existing emergency unemployment program, which would protect 6.7 million unemployed workers from losing their checks over the next year. (See the below chart from the CEA's report.)

Given that even this goal is now uncertain, seeking yet another program for the four million jobless people at risk of exhausting emergency assistance seems futile, the official said.

"The President will continue to work to ensure that Americans fighting to find a job can keep food on the table and make ends meet," White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage said in an e-mailed statement.

The diminishing support for the growing ranks of the long-term unemployed seems certain to add to demands on an already strained social safety net. Research shows that the longer a worker has been without a job the harder it is to find a new one, raising the likelihood that many of those losing their checks at the end of their 99-week term will have great difficulty securing a paycheck.

Yet even those who lose their unemployment checks will not necessarily qualify for other forms of aid, like food stamps, said Burtless.

"Only a pretty small fraction of the people who exhaust benefits are going to qualify," Burtless said. Many of these workers have long been employed and have accumulated savings and assets such as houses, which makes them ineligible for support, he said.

More than 6.3 million workers were out of a job for at least 27 weeks in November, comprising nearly 42 percent of all unemployed Americans, according to Labor Department data released Friday.

The Federal Reserve forecasts that the unemployment rate will still be as high as 9 percent this time next year, and about 8 percent at the end of 2012, according to minutes from the central bank's Federal Open Market Committee meeting last month.

"What we're seeing right now is the Christmas present from Scrooge," said Aaron, the Brookings economist. "Merry Christmas, we're cutting off your benefits."


*************************

Shahien Nasiripour is the business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 646-274-2455.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Even as Congress debates whether to extend emergency unemployment checks for more than six million Americans who are approaching the 99-week limit, some four million others are facing the certain end ...
Even as Congress debates whether to extend emergency unemployment checks for more than six million Americans who are approaching the 99-week limit, some four million others are facing the certain end ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12,680
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (184 total)
09:05 AM on 12/16/2010
Okay so What I dont understand is the whole extended benefits...My boyfriend just got 12 weeks of regular unemployment and he is already cut off. Even though he received a letter that said he was approved from the EUC 08 tier 1. Now they are saying he can't get that until congress passes for the additional extended benefits. So people that have been getting for 80-90 weeks should be happy. He got 12 and that is all. And this was after he was told to file for Dec 4, and Dec 11 and he would have money on his card on that Monday the 13th. Talking about being angry. Any idea on when Congress might pass for the additional money???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
06:26 PM on 12/19/2010
Every state's UI system is a bit different, but EU went unfunded from December 6 to a couple of days ago when Congress finally approved the Tax Cuts thing. So long as he continued to file UI as is normally required, he's still in the system. The next check should have the money for 'lost days' included. EU money comes from the Federal Government. States are unable to make payments on it. 12 weeks regular UI; that's not very much. Even Texas has 24 weeks regular.
11:45 AM on 12/12/2010
I have been following this issue diligently on various television channels. Not one person has even mentioned that those who have expired all benefits will be left out or that those who are included will soon expire all benefits. The President's "deal" is not a deal at all. There is no justifying giving $100K to each person in the top 2% while millions suffer without a dime. I have been a registered Republican since 1972 and I voted Democrat last election. I voted for President Obama because I believed he meant what he said about change -- well, he proved me wrong. While others may not fully comprehend how the unemployment tiers work I know that he does and that could only mean that he is intentionally concealing the fact that he knows he is leaving the hardest hit people to suffer so that millionaires and billionaires get a break. He could have at least tried to help the millions of truly long term unemployed but he didn't bother. He settled into agreement to put his efforts into caring for the rich instead of the poor in his very first attempt. I will not vote for him again. He's a fake.
12:10 PM on 12/10/2010
THE good news for Obama in all this is that the 4 million 99ers, like myself, will no longer be statistics. I guess it will mean the since we are no longer counted as Unemployed, because we are no longer receiving benefits..even though we are STILL unemployed.....that the stats for unemployment will improve........4 million less on the benefit roles......
08:00 PM on 12/08/2010
So we were tricked again? The unemployment extension that was supposed to help "the 99ers" still ends at 99 weeks like all the previous extensions? Other than this article, I don't think anyone knows about this, everyone thinks this extension is supposed to help all unemployed people.
08:07 PM on 12/10/2010
Yes, you're exactly correct. A large segment of people, legislators and journalists included, don't know the difference.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miamivalleyjournal
04:36 AM on 12/08/2010
At the same time as millions are loosing benefits, banks are imposing outrageous fees.

What legislation is responsible for this: CHASE is changing their checking account policy.

According to the literature I received via mail, CHASE is will begin charging me a monthly Service Fee of $10 bucks starting in Feb. IF I do not meet ONE the following criteria:

1. Have at least one direct deposit of $500 or more;
2. OR, keep a minimum daily balance of $1,500 or more in checking;
3. OR, keep an ave. balance of $5,000 or more in a combination of deposit accounts with Chase and/or investment accounts with Chase Investment Services Corp;
4. OR, pay $25 or more in qualifying account fees (not including the monthly Service Fee)

IF I meet any one of the above four criteria, according to the literature they sent me in the mail, I will not be charged the $10 monthly service fee for keeping my money in the bank.

BUT should I not hit any one of the the criteria for that month, CHASE will charge me a fee to keep my money in their bank. Is this the latest banking trend?

Has anyone else received this information from CHASE?

I would appreciate hearing similar reports from those who have received similar packets from banks.
08:46 PM on 12/07/2010
As of December 06, how many 99ers have lost benefits. Go to: http://acompanyofone.org/widget.htm
08:18 PM on 12/07/2010
so has the unemployment extension passed or not? Will it be this week a done deal?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
06:32 PM on 12/19/2010
It was passed with the tax cut thing. It's a done deal for the next 13 months.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Social Shrink
06:15 PM on 12/07/2010
We got a question from someone who hates their job and wants to quit - our advice: stick with it, they should be happy they have a job: www.thesocialshrink.blogspot.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
06:33 PM on 12/19/2010
"Miserable? No, I was happy. I just didn't know it."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:40 PM on 12/07/2010
The president did not even mention the 99ers. No help in sight. Lost home car know what do i do. This coundtry helps the rich but the unemployed and the poor are so screwed.
02:46 PM on 12/07/2010
How many millions of people have passed 99 weeks? How many every week reach 99 weeks?
If you know the answers Please Post.
03:10 PM on 12/07/2010
OK I found it so right now more than 4.5 million people have exhausted their benefits, that number will grow to 10 million plus over the coming months. As more lose benefits their will be more job loses due to the reduced spending.
What does our elected representatives think will happen when we have 10 million plus people with no job and no money?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KWiedemer
Denver Unemployment Examiner
12:31 PM on 12/07/2010
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is threatenin­g to filibuster the President'­s proposed 'tax cut compromise­', which will extend the Bush tax cuts for all Americans - including the wealthiest­, top 2 percent income earners - in exchange for an extension of the federal Emergency Unemployme­nt Compensati­on program (EUC) for a period of 13 months.

This deal is not only obnoxious and unbalanced­, it will not help 4.5 million 99ers (those who have exhausted all UI benefits. Based on the way the President addressed the nation last evening, this proposal will extend the filing deadline for EUC benefits only - meaning it will help the millions of Americans who have not yet reached the end of the UI benefit payments. In addition to the 4-5 million 'existing' 99ers, there are another 4 million unemployed Americans who will exhaust their benefits in the next few months. for a total of more than 8 million unemployed workers with no remaining unemployme­nt insurance compensati­on.

Rep. Alan Grayson is also looking for informatio­n. Here is a legitimate link to immediatel­y send feedback to Rep. Grayson:

PLEASE GET INVOLVED IN THE FIGHT TO HELP 4.5 MILLION 'EXISTING' 99ERS - AND 4 MILLION WHO WILL BECOME 99ERS IN A FEW MONTHS...

For informatio­n on how to respond how to get your letters/em­ails to be HAND-DELIV­ERED to, please see my article:

http://www­.examiner.­com/unempl­oyment-in-­denver/99e­rs-letters­-to-sen-sa­nders-rep-­grayson-re­garding-ta­x-cut-comp­romise

Denver Unemployme­nt Examiner
10:40 AM on 12/07/2010
There is a much bigger problem. Educashun. If there are 5% unemployed with college degrees, and 10% unemployed with high-school diplomas, then 85% of the unemployed haven't even completed high school.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiddleMolly
Working to better the USA!
11:03 AM on 12/07/2010
I believe you are reading the statistics wrong. The unemployment rate among those with at least college degrees is 5.1%, and that has gone up a bit. The unemployment rate among those without high school degrees is 15.7%. That has also gone up over the past year.

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christine Gallo
America, best democracy corporations can buy
10:24 AM on 12/07/2010
Perhaps, more accurately, the President would use his Emergency Powers, rather than the War Powers to enact the seizure of banks etc.

Expanding on the use of Emergency Powers, since the country is in a state of emergency, (again, created by the banks that the public bailed out) massive creativity in terms of continuing unimployment, food stamps, health care etc. could be employed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Downrivers
Siskiyou Mountains
10:21 AM on 12/07/2010
It seems most Americans prefer the Fox Lies over the painful truth

On February 14th, 2003 the last vestige of ethical telejournalisim died. THIS is the debate we should be having......

"On February 14, a Florida Appeals court ruled there is absolutely nothing illegal about lying, concealing or distorting information by a major press organization. The court reversed the $425,000 jury verdict in favor of journalist Jane Akre who charged she was pressured by FOX Television management and lawyers to air what she knew and documented to be false information. The ruling basically declares it is technically not against any law, rule, or regulation to deliberately lie or distort the news on a television broadcast.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Downrivers
Siskiyou Mountains
10:23 AM on 12/07/2010
Posting error....but still true
stingingstar
Lover of Humanity ,Truth and Freedom
10:28 AM on 12/07/2010
In short we are now under the illusions that are produced by 'propaganda.'
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christine Gallo
America, best democracy corporations can buy
10:10 AM on 12/07/2010
One suggestion: the government needs to retroactively make the banks responsible for the state of this country. They have not been held accountable, legally, but that doesn't mean that the President doesn't have the power to seize assets, in times of war...

The banks would be told, not asked, to refinance loans, (with government guarantees), for longer terms at lower interest rates, BUT not to exceed the total of the original note. The banks would also be told to provide low interest (2-3%) loans of X, amount, monthly, to small businesses.

Those banks not cooperating would be seized. Harassment of home owners attempting to refinance would cease immediately. Excuses of "this is the policy", by the bank or its loan collection bodies, would not be accepted.
These steps would begin to turn the economy around, while banks would apparantly be allowed to continue to gamble, making trillions in stocks, bonds and other manufactured paper investments (aka derivatives).
Their hollering that they would be financially wrecked by having to "lose so much money" would be laughed at in light of how much they have cost the country and its citizens, and of course, the afore mentioned gambling.
Of course the banks would take this to court, and so declaring this a time of war, thereby empowering the President to take unusual steps to nationalize banks, is key. Having a President with the will power and spine to do it is another thing entirely.