More

Tax Cut Deal: White House, GOP Leaders Close To Agreement

First Posted: 12/06/10 05:22 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

Obama Tax Cut Compromise

UPDATE: President Barack Obama announced "a framework for a bipartisan agreement" Monday night over the impending expiration of the Bush tax cuts.

Addressing the press after having discussed the arrangement with congressional Democratic leadership, Obama said he was unwilling to let "working families" become "collateral damage for political warfare here in Washington." He also stressed that his preference remained to let the rates for the wealthy expire. But Republicans wouldn't budge from their perch, he added. And securing a 13-month extension of unemployment benefits and other administration-favored tax credits in exchange for a two-year extension of all rates was, Obama stressed, a decent deal to make.

"I'm not willing to let our economy slip backwards just as we're pulling ourselves out of this devastating recession," said Obama. "I'm not willing to see two million Americans, who stand to lose their unemployment insurance at the end of this month, be put in a situation where they might lose their home, or their car, or suffer some additional economic catastrophe. So, sympathetic as I am with those who prefer a fight over compromise, as much as the political wisdom may dictate fighting over solving problems, it would be the wrong thing to do."

Shortly after Obama announced the formal arrangement, incoming House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) both offered their support.

"It's encouraging that the White House is now willing to stop all of the job-killing tax hikes scheduled for January 1," said Boehner spokesman Michael Steel. "We look forward to discussing this proposal with House Republican Members and the American people."

"I appreciate the determined efforts of the President and VP in working with Republicans on a bipartisan plan to prevent a tax hike," said McConnell.

In a conference call with reporters shortly after Obama's formal announcement, a senior administration official said the compromise "does not worsen the medium- and long-term deficit," although that does not square with the White House's earlier positions on a sweeping extension of the tax cuts, which Obama referred to no fewer than 50 times as "for millionaires and billionaires."

During his weekly radio address on Sept. 25, Obama referred to a full extension as "tax breaks we cannot afford." A few days later, he said "98 percent of Americans wouldn't see any benefit from it."

For more details on the deal, see The Huffington Post's earlier reporting below...

* * * * *

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration and Congressional Republicans were close to finalizing a deal on the expiring Bush tax cuts late Monday afternoon. But a senior administration official cautioned that, as of 4:30 p.m., they remained "a phone call away" -- a conversation between the president and GOP leadership.

That said, the contours of a final package emerged with more detail than ever before. While it's clear that the White House gave in on its main front -- the desire to let the tax levels for the upper-income levels revert to pre-Bush rates -- administration officials claimed that they were able to secure major victories in return.

In exchange for allowing those rates to continue for two years, Republicans agreed to extend unemployment insurance for an additional 13 months, to offer a two-percent employee side payroll tax credit (at a cost of about $120 billion), and $40 billion in tax breaks for families and students (including a $1,000 child tax credit extended for two years and an expansion of the earned income tax credit)

The final deal would allow businesses to write off 100 percent of purchases of outdated equipment -- another key element of Obama's fiscal plans. There also would be a compromise on the estate tax, which will be set for two years at 35 percent, with a $5 million exemption amount, according to the Daily Caller, which first reported the arrangement.

Briefing The Huffington Post about the deal, which could be announced as early as Monday night, the two senior administration officials claimed that they were able to get more bang for their buck than previously imagined. The costs for the payroll tax holidays, UI and other refundable credits come in at roughly $215 billion over two years. The extensions of the income tax rates strictly for the wealthy is estimated to cost about $95 billion. All of it is unpaid for. But the former provisions are more stimulative than the latter.

The question remains, however, whether those provisions will be enough to placate Democrats. Earlier in the day, the president convened a meeting with Congressional Democratic leadership to lay out the forthcoming arrangement. And in speaking to The Huffington Post, Obama's aides seemed hopeful.

"[W]e look at this from the sense of the economy and I think that this is a very good deal for a fragile economic recovery, moving that fragile economic recovery to a sustained job producing economic recovery," the senior administration official said. "First and foremost, that's what animated this whole thing. I think that being able to keep the refundability of the recovery act, the tax credits for working families, for college, and for children is a big victory. Ensuring 99 weeks of unemployment [insurance] is important for those who were looking at a Christmas with their benefits disappearing."

The deal also sets up a re-litigation of the tax cut fight during the height of the 2012 presidential debate. Then, as now, the income rates will be set to revert for everyone to pre-Bush levels, and the Federal Reserve projects that unemployment at the end of 2012 will still be 8 percent.

Nevertheless, the White House seemed willing to muster up a campaign to let the rates for the wealthy expire in two years.

"We are in a tough economic time, so the argument is a tougher one to make," said the senior administration official. "This will help jolt the economy and 2012 will be about whether or not we can afford to borrow more money from china for tax breaks for the rich. That's what 2012 will be about and that's an argument we will be happy to make."

The administration, of course, will face a serious trust deficit on tax cut matters in the future, owing to the capitulation that just took place. Over the past three months, Obama described the Bush-era program as "tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires" no fewer than 50 times, according to a review of his stump speeches, weekly addresses, and comments to campaign donors and members of the news media.

The rhetoric was deliberate: Obama was trying to cast Republicans as the party of the wealthy while his fellow Democrats represented the middle class. But in addition to the political contrast, he also described the tax cuts as bad policy, both unaffordable and ineffective.

During an event the White House billed as a "backyard discussion" at the home of an Albuquerque, New Mexico, family, Obama said the nation would "have to borrow the $700 billion" -- the estimated cost of the cuts over 10 years -- "from China or the Saudis or whoever is buying our debt, and then we'd pass off on average $100,000 check to people who are making a million dollars up to more than a billion dollars."

On Monday night, Obama seemed to recognize that he was doing the thing he had admonished. "I have no doubt that everyone will find something in this compromise that they don't like, in fact, there are things in here that I don't like," the president said.

With additional reporting from Shahien Nasiripour

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
UPDATE: President Barack Obama announced "a framework for a bipartisan agreement" Monday night over the impending expiration of the Bush tax cuts. Addressing the press after having discussed the a...
UPDATE: President Barack Obama announced "a framework for a bipartisan agreement" Monday night over the impending expiration of the Bush tax cuts. Addressing the press after having discussed the a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26,757
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (573 total)
  1 of 44  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Caru 06:57 PM on 12/06/2010
"If policymakers were to allow all of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts to expire as scheduled at the end of 2010 — or fully offset the cost of extending those tax cuts they choose to extend — this alone would shrink the fiscal gap by almost two-fifths, from 4.9 percent of GDP to 3.0 percent. The effect is this substantial because the budgetary benefits would start almost immediately (in 2011), and those  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftLeaner
Solution: Public Financing
07:46 PM on 12/13/2010
Is anyone here suprised that the Dems (when it was too late) decided to show a "hint" of strength.

Where was this indignation and anger BEFORE the 2010 election.

They're all full of it.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
04:15 PM on 12/09/2010
So you oppose the compromise, and you want to pay higher taxes and forego the extension of unemployment insurance protection at a time when a tax hike would risk another recession and an increase in unemployment because the tax hikes would take at least $300 billion a year out of the economy.
 
Without compromise­­­, a single person making $40,000 in wages will pay $100 a month more income and payroll taxes than he/she would with a compromise including the payroll tax credit.
 
Here's an easy calculator provided by the Tax Foundation­­­, a nonpartisa­­­n tax research group in Washington­­­, DC.
 
http://www­­­.mytaxbu­r­d­en.org­/
 
Try it out on yourself and then tell me you prefer paying higher taxes right now. 
 
Actually, I would have been happy paying my extra $100 a month until the UI extension was at stake, and we know GOP would have blocked UI extension had it been proposed on its own merits.  I happy that the extension did not give GOP what they really want-- PERMANENT tax cuts.  They expire in two years, immediatel­y following the 2012 elections, unless congress and the president all agree on something different.  Dems will still have the White House and a slim majority in the Senate (that could be broken by Lieberman and blue dogs, but the remaining Dems could filibuster­).  This was brilliant politics by Obama and a concession he negotiated from the GOP who wanted the extensions of tax cuts to be permanent.  The two-year expiration of tax cuts under this compromise guarantees that tax cuts for the wealthy will be a hot-button campaign issue in 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scodwyer
04:45 PM on 12/11/2010
I have 3 kids and am a single parent making 40k and I am willing to give it up so the wealthy stop increasing the deficit. Don't kid yourself. If these extensions go through, they will be permanent! Sometimes everyone needs to suffer in order to see whose side these politicians are really on....People who are poor republicans are not going to understand unless they take away their unemployment benefits because they did not get their way on continuing welfare entitlements for the wealthy.There is nothing brilliant about Obama and his politics. It is quite the opposite.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
evgolightly
---------------------------------
02:16 PM on 12/09/2010
In 2009, President Obama halted the DEA from raiding mari.j.uana growers by decriminalizing it on the Federal level.

Obama left the criminality of pot to indivudual states.

This is a VERY good thing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ejfreeman
11:50 AM on 12/09/2010
The 2% payroll tax cut means the working poor is continuing to pay for America and Rich are out
looking for a new condo to go with there yacht.I am not fooled.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
03:58 PM on 12/09/2010
So, you prefer that the middle class pay higher taxes? 
04:49 PM on 12/08/2010
Tax Corporations "0" and incent them to bring JOBs back to America. The heck with Globalism...it has failed America....

There will always be the RICH and a Ruling Class....get over it....we need jobs and lower taxes and LESS GOVT....no more wars (drug or military).....

Enforce our current Immigration Laws....that alone will save our nation $ billions......
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
03:59 PM on 12/09/2010
Corporations hire when they need employees, not when their taxes are cut.  They won't need employees until they have more customers/sales revenues.
04:13 PM on 12/08/2010
The truth is all taxes should be cut a great deal. The problem lies with a gov. that wastes our money on foreign wars, foreign aid, wars on drugs, and a ton of other massively-inefficient and morally corrupt enterprises. We we could spend half as much, have lower taxes, lower debt, and a beautiful and innovative modern country that the world could once again admire! (WTF am I smoking???)
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
04:00 PM on 12/09/2010
You are Joe King, aren't you   :-)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
smarttart001
Live! Love! Left!
03:23 PM on 12/08/2010
There is still time to squash this. Maybe Bernie really will filibuster.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
04:03 PM on 12/09/2010
It takes 41 to filibuster; Bernie can't do it by himself.  But why would you want to kill the compromise?  So that you can pay higher taxes and have less unimployment insurance protection while the tax increase sends the economy into another recession and more people lose jobs?  I think Bernie isn't serious, he's just singing to the choir to win fans and favs.
02:24 PM on 12/08/2010
Obama flip-flops on this important issue of givng lots of borrowed money to people who don't need it....and taxes to those that need a break. His compromise tax bill reflects the souls of the bill makers: It is grossly unfair and morrally corrupt;.. and so are they!
Not only did he lay down with the mad dogs and get fleas; But, he stepped it dog poop and now leaves dog poop tracks all over the White House and us Americans. The is no way, I can respect a flea ridden and poopy leader.
He has lost credibility with me. He proves that there is really no difference between a Repub and a Dem.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
04:06 PM on 12/09/2010
Your lack of discernment is matched only by your scatalogical rhetoric.  The compromise is truly that; GOP are giving up some things, and they are allowing tax cuts for the rich to be a hot-button issue when the extension expires shortly after the 2012 elections.  Brilliant political strategy on Obama's part.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
04:07 PM on 12/09/2010
BTW, the GOP wanted permanent tax cuts, but they did not get it; they compromised that away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rolf618
They call me Mr. Fahrenheit.
12:26 PM on 12/08/2010
Rachel Maddow did an excellent piece yesterday on how Obama is on the road to irrelevancy - using a very apt reversal of a famous Ghandi quote:

"First you win, then they fight you, then they laugh at you, then they ignore you."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#40560139
04:09 PM on 12/08/2010
Let's not rush to judge the preemptive surrender approach before it has time to work. Sorry if I offended anyone!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kurt
Creates: sculpture. Loves: husband & chihuahuas. V
08:34 AM on 12/08/2010
RIGHT NOW the immediate needs of the many unemployed outweigh the whims of the über rich who should have their taxes raised and restored to the pre-Reagan era levels. It turns out "trickle down" economics was a lie and the Laffer curve was a fraud which anyone with a basic knowledge of freshman economics should understand.  The über rich do not need more expensive trinkets Hermes briefcases, Louis Vuitton IPad cases, or Rolls Royce cars.

The working classes do need an extension of unemployment insurance, another tax break, and a massive infrastructure program which provides good jobs, at good wages, for good people. 

The economy as a whole needs these basic programs more than the rich need more expensive junk.

Yet, in the short run it seems the working classes needs the money a lot more than than the wealthy need more Cartier bracelets. And, if the price to get the working classes more help is to toss Donald Trump another Armani suit, I suppose I have to accept that, in the short run.

Yes, it is tacky and it is blackmail but RIGHT NOW the immediate needs of the many unemployed outweigh placating the whims of the über rich.
photo
Truthb4u
Return to reality.
07:19 AM on 12/08/2010
The President did a good and courageous thing. He knew there would be opposition to this, but he did the right thing and compromise. He reassured the middle class will have their tax cuts, unemployment benefits will continue and relief for salary earners.

While everyone else is going off on a soak the rich rant, the President has to govern the whole of America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel R Cobb
12:36 AM on 12/08/2010
I favor Obama's principles much more than I do those of the right wing. But Obama believes too much in compromise, and the nation has shifted too much to the right to compromise so easily. When I buy a car, I don't walk into the dealer and give up, paying full price after three minutes I drill the sales guy because frankly, he is an enemy, he would soak me if he could. So I drill him, and if I don't win, I walk away. He'll be there tomorrow. Obama has more leverage than he wants to use. Even with the Republicans in control of the House, Obama has leverage and he needs to use it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theobserver4
progress is a process not an end result
08:45 PM on 12/07/2010
So it is now our Administration's policy to negotiate with terrorists? We're talking about millions of Americans being held hostage in the name of St. Ronnie's disproven BS.

Get a f'in spine Obama.
09:49 PM on 12/07/2010
too funny
04:09 AM on 12/08/2010
That was my thought, too... so much for not negotiating with terrorists, and the greedy thugs in the GOP fit the label. So they lose the right to scream about the deficit, because they obviously don't really care about it. We could go back to the rates under Eisenhower, when the tax rate on the wealthy was 91%. Then they might have cause to squeal like pigs.
07:54 PM on 12/07/2010
i really love this guy and i want to believe that what he is about to do holds more strength over what needs to be done. Something is definitely askew here. he should be talking to America on tv but he's not,his base that got him elected is totally neglected. Mr.Obamas most eloquent wife is not around, America needs her right now to assuage our pain. I'm just now beginning to believe that the executive office encompasses way to many responsibilities for one mere soul. It's a shame that a man of such empathy,intellect,charisma and most important of all a compassionate vision,has to be dragged into a quagmire of his predecesors doing. And instead of his foes recognizing the eight years of their failure they continue to proceed in the same manner. Are they out of touch with the malady that grows and is growing into a malignancy,or is the take over in full motion.At a time when our country is going down on both knees the rank and file is totally off balance and the same enlarged prostrates are donning their unscrupulous vision upon us.it isn't over folks we better get used to it.
09:50 PM on 12/07/2010
so you are in pain and the first chick can help you

wow
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
toldyeso
07:34 PM on 12/07/2010
like EVERYTHING he does

this is about reelecting obama