More

WikiLeaks Distracts US From Mideast, Israel Claims

TIA GOLDENBERG   12/ 7/10 04:15 PM ET   AP

Israel Wikileaks

JERUSALEM — Israel's defense minister claimed Tuesday that the WikiLeaks crisis was distracting Washington from efforts to restart Mideast peace talks. But the U.S. denied those efforts were on hold and countered sharply that perhaps Israel was distracted by fighting a wildfire.

Hours later, however, U.S. officials said they had abandoned efforts to reinstate a freeze on new building in Jewish settlements in the West Bank, concluding that was not the best way to restart the talks.

Israeli-Palestinian peace talks restarted in September after a long hiatus but stumbled to a halt three weeks later after a 10-month Israeli moratorium on new construction in West Bank Jewish settlements expired – as Israel said all along it would – and the government refused to renew it.

Palestinians say they won't resume talks unless Israel halts all building in the West Bank and east Jerusalem – lands they want for part of their future state.

The U.S. had been pressing Israel to renew the moratorium in exchange for security and diplomatic assurances.

It was not clear whether any other formula was in the offing to resume the talks.

Ehud Barak told a parliamentary committee that talks with the American side have been postponed because Washington was busy dealing with the fallout from secret U.S. diplomatic documents released on the WikiLeaks website, as well as with tensions between North and South Korea.

"For now the matter has been stopped entirely, because of the Americans' lack of attention and concentration," Barak said.

In Washington, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley denied that the U.S. was holding up the talks.

"The process has not stopped," he told reporters. "Our efforts are not suspended."

He pointedly said that perhaps it was Israel that was preoccupied with putting out a huge forest fire that burned until Sunday.

___

Matthew Lee contributed to this report from Washington, D.C.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

JERUSALEM — Israel's defense minister claimed Tuesday that the WikiLeaks crisis was distracting Washington from efforts to restart Mideast peace talks. But the U.S. denied those efforts were on ...
JERUSALEM — Israel's defense minister claimed Tuesday that the WikiLeaks crisis was distracting Washington from efforts to restart Mideast peace talks. But the U.S. denied those efforts were on ...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 138
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
02:09 AM on 12/10/2010
Why do we continue to call them 'peace talks'? My advice: Zero-out all gifts of $$$ to israel, sit on our hands and wait for them to come crawling to us with a more constructive attitude. And my advice after that - still no foreign aid to Israel.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
XPLSV
07:19 PM on 12/10/2010
It fills me with joy to see people are finally starting to open their eyes on this issue. NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL! We can't be sending 2.5 billion per year so they can fight their little holy war and experience economic growth, while our own economy crumbles. Since when do we report to Israel? Oh, almost forgot, we ARE Israel's puppet and will be for as long as we keep placing these Zionist moles within our government.
08:51 AM on 12/09/2010
And who made this Napoleonic entity center of the unniverse?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
01:45 AM on 12/10/2010
When Netanyahu sees Obama coming he licks his chops.
04:09 AM on 12/09/2010
The people of Gaza probably feel a bit distracted knowing that at any minute they can be blown apart by US supplied weapons.
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
04:09 PM on 12/08/2010
"Distracted"?

What, both governments are only staffed by 5 people?
02:57 PM on 12/08/2010
The Israeli government does not want peace, it merely wants:

1. An uninterrupted flow of money from American taxpayers,
2. American weapons technology, and
3. American troops to fight proxy wars for Israel in Iraq and Iran.

And The Great Capitulator will give AIPAC, Lieberman, the Christian End Timers, and Israel's other American agents everything they demand unless somebody else manages to huffs and puffs louder, in which case Obama will not know which way to bow.
05:52 AM on 12/09/2010
fanned Epimenides . . . well said . . . . the one sure thing about israel is that is always wants wants wants demands demands demands . .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
XPLSV
07:22 PM on 12/10/2010
You just made my day. It's a good day when you see people are finally starting to open their eyes. NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL!
01:36 PM on 12/08/2010
"Israel's defense minister claimed Tuesday that the WikiLeaks crisis was distracting Washington from efforts to restart Mideast peace talks."

But isn't this what Netenyahu's coalition which includes the defense minister always worked for that's why they came to power?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gingershot
One man, one vote, from the river to the sea
11:38 AM on 12/08/2010
In order to swindle the Palestinians and Arab League to even show up for another round of this Dennis Ross/Israel Lobby manipulated charade - the Palestinians and Arab League demanded a written document promising to assign blame for failure of these talks

The Israelis have failed - epically failed - at these talks. Continuing to build settlements in occupied Palestine, with impunity and a 3rd finger salute, despite all efforts by international community, the US, and the Palestinians to stop them

Where is the public annoucement assigning blame for Israel? - where is the worldw spotlight for the history books that will finally stop put to rest the coming revisionist Israeli lies?

Here's the article promising blame Israel if Israel scotches these talks... so where's the blame for Israel in BIG BOLD FONT in the NYTimes, Washington Post, and Fox News? - Hillary? Obama? Dennis Ross?
==

Exclusive: U.S. vows to assign blame if Israel-PA talks fail

U.S. emphasizes goal of a viable, independent and sovereign Palestinian state in a document sent to PA.
By Akiva Eldar

The United States government has committed to playing a role in indirect talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, and promised that if the talks were to fail, the U.S. will assign blame and take action, according to a document sent by the U.S. to the Palestinian Authority, which Haaretz obtained on Friday.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/exclusive-u-s-vows-to-assign-blame-if-israel-pa-talks-fail-1.266351
02:17 PM on 12/08/2010
Bravo! The US foolishly failed to tell Netanyahu: we do not care if your coalition collapses. STOP BUILDING MORE ILLEGAL HOUSING FOR ILLEGAL JEWISH SETTLERS IN THE WEST BANK.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
XPLSV
07:24 PM on 12/10/2010
OMG, I love today.
10:39 AM on 12/08/2010
Every time U.S "crosses the line" by annoying Israel, it is a billion dollar fine. U.S disputes the charges, the price goes up to two billion.
exacly what a judge does to demonstrate his/her authority in the courtroom. the fines duable on every U.S mishap. poor America.
02:19 PM on 12/08/2010
Naville - - Grim humour, but true. Israeli tail wags American dog, year in and year out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
10:14 AM on 12/08/2010
Wikileaks is (at least for the moment) more important than the Israel/Palestine conflict. I would say that the Israel/Palestine conflict distracts from Wikileaks.
01:34 PM on 12/08/2010
q> Wikileaks is (at least for the moment) more important

 G O S S I P.

And we can be sure when the Israel cables are released, the apologists will consider them less important or irrelevant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lawrence of america
07:58 PM on 12/08/2010
exactly..wikileaks is bs..its a bunch of hearsay and opinions written by embassy personel and such. it is really meaniingless.
However i agree with Trollstien on one thing..the israel/palestine issue is a distraction, not one comment on the Mohamed ElBaradei / egypt elections story, this is just as important to middle eastern peace as the IvsP conflict.
Israel is only one reason/excuse extremists have..just if not more importantly is the development of free and open societies in the region were people of different classes can air their greivances without fear of prison or worse resulting in less desperate individuals lured by the likes of the bearded ones.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lawrence of america
07:59 PM on 12/08/2010
ok there are 4 comments now, still maybe if the put palin in the headline more people would be interested.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:16 AM on 12/08/2010
While Israel plays the same old game, the entire world is moving to recognize Palestine.

"Argentina joins Brazil in recognition of Palestinian state
Argentine President sends Abbas letter stating it recognizes Palestine defined by 1967 borders; Uruguay says it will recognize Palestine in 2011; Israel calls announcement 'regrettable'."

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/argentina-joins-brazil-in-recognition-of-palestinian-state-1.329220
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeLogical1234
01:34 PM on 12/08/2010
And this is going to actually going to help the Palestinians how?

Palestinians need to work towards something that will actually help them-- this means negotiating, compromising, making efforts towards state-building, etc.. Continuing to wage what is a futile PR war is not going to help them. International support will always be against Israel in some form or another-- it won't push Israel to end a blockade that they claim is for their own self-defense.

True Palestinian supporters would be supporting real measures that would help the lives of Palestinians (including an end to the terrorist activity that caused the blockade shortly after Israel ceaded the gaza strip), not solely efforts to demonize Israel.
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
07:54 PM on 12/08/2010
"end to the terrorist activity that caused the blockade"

Interesting. Which comes first, the "terrorist activity" or the "blockade"?
08:56 AM on 12/09/2010
Heard it all before - give it a rest.
Facts indicate otherwise.
09:13 AM on 12/08/2010
ADHD aside, I would like to talk to you people about the peace talks. Neither all of us nor I am are distracted about the peace talks! Peace... Piece... I want piece of pie! American Pie! it was a great movie! A great movie premiered last summer called "Avatar". Speaking of Avatar, do you like mine? It is a Google QR code bar... Bar.. I want to go to a bar to drink some beer... Beer... Does it sound like I am talking about Bear? Oh BTW, Russian bears are big! And speaking of Russia, did you hear that they want to sponsor the peace talks between Israelis and Palestinians? :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Rozgonyi
Writer and traveler
09:01 AM on 12/08/2010
I'm sure this leak is rather convenient for both sides to drop the peace process. By both sides, of course, I mean the US and Is.rael.
08:56 AM on 12/08/2010
duh what a joke . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BcemXAHA
Yerushalaim shel zahav
08:41 AM on 12/08/2010
What difference does it make as to who was distracted more or less?
Does it matter, when the negotiations failed.
Does it matter, when nothing changed.
Does it matter, when the Palestinians continue to live in their current conditions.
Does it matter, when Israel can't get the security guarantees.

Very sad.
08:14 AM on 12/08/2010
Person 1: "Please stop building on other people's land"
Person 2: "NO"

Person 1: "Okay we'l give u these expensive fighter planes"
Person 2: "NO.... wait, how many?"

Person 1: "Well, equal to ur annual aid"
Person 2: "Can i have it in writing>"

Person 1: "We'v been bending over backwards, negating our security concerns for u all these years and ur asking for a guarantee?"
Person 2: "Yes, we want to ensure this is the last time u ask us to stop building"

Person 1: "But if we do that then everyone will laugh at us, this is the main contention of the other party. We're 'supposed' to be impartial"
Person 2: "Write down that u won't ask us to stop building again!!!!"

Person 1: "We can't do that sorry"
Person 2: "Then NO we won't stop building"

Person 1: "Are u sure u wanna take us up on that? I mean ur hardly in a strong position to throw ur weight"
Person 2: "Yes"

(Phone rings)

Person 3 to person 1: "Shut up and drop this freeze demand, NOW"

Person 1 to Person 2: "Ok fine we won't ask u to stop building, happy???"
Person 2: "Yes"

Person 2: "Can we keep the planes?"
Person 1: "NO!!!"

(Phone rings)
10:35 AM on 12/08/2010
Sadly, it is that aburdly amusing. Imagine them sitting at starbucks. what a joke.