iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal Fails, Blocked By Senate Republicans

Dont Ask

First Posted: 12/09/10 04:11 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- A major defense authorization bill carrying the repeal of the military's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' law was blocked on Thursday by Senate Republicans and one Senate Democrat after negotiations between the parties failed. A number of moderate Republicans who said they supported a repeal, including Scott Brown (R-Mass.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), voted to filibuster the measure. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) joined their efforts.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the prime negotiating partner of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's, voted to bring the bill forward but only after it was clear that the 60 needed to end a filibuster would not be achieved. Her vote came after she angrily roamed the Senate floor, rolling up text of the legislation and waving it around, smacking it on Sen. Dick Durbin's desk and hitting him on the arm with it. The final tally was 57 Senators in favor of moving forward, 40 opposed.

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), a lead proponent of repeal, promised after the vote to introduce stand-alone legislation quickly to repeal the ban. "Reid [told Lieberman] he would bring it up by the end of lame duck," a Reid aide said. "That is all that I know right now. And Reid will cosponsor it."

Lieberman said it would be easier to get 60 votes on a stand-alone bill, listing off Brown, Murkowski and Collins as likely backers. He said he is willing to stay in session until January 4 to finish up legislation.

"It ain't over until it's over," Lieberman said. "We're going to keep fighting until the clock runs out, and as I look at it there's still a lot of time to get this done."

Sens. Brown and Murkowski had previously said they supported repeal of DADT but demanded an "open amendment process" to ensure Republicans can make changes to the defense bill. Reid, in turn, offered Collins 15 amendments -- 10 for Republicans and five for Democrats -- but she countered with a request for four days of floor debate.

Democrats on the floor conferred closely with Manchin, apparently in hopes of changing his vote. If he switched and Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) showed up to vote, Democrats would've gotten to 59, putting even greater pressure on Murkowski, but particularly on Brown, who is up for reelection before a liberal electorate in 2012.

An aide to Reid said that he wasn't immediately aware if the Majority Leader knew that Manchin was going to vote no. The West Virginia Democrat did, however, express his desire to review the issues more fully and was giving off indications that his vote was gettable. "I would say that if he was somehow the 60th vote, I do not think he would have voted the way he did," the aide said.

Reporters in the gallery watched closely for Lincoln, who ultimately arrived a considerable time after the vote ended. "I would like to have been recorded as voting yes," she said to a largely empty chamber. Lincoln, whose two-term career ends at the end of this session, was told that the rules do not allow such a revision. "Had I been here I would have voted yes," she said. (Lieberman said after the vote that Lincoln was in the dental chair as the vote was taking place. Had she been the 60th vote, the process could have been held open.)

Given the brief time left before the Senate ends its session, Reid said there is not enough time to allow for all of the Republicans' requests and proceeded to a cloture vote.

"My colleagues on the other side want more each time," he said. "They say we need to wait and we need as much time as possible to debate the bill -- you can't do both."

During the drawn-out vote, Collins waved a copy of the bill at Reid's empty desk while speaking animatedly with Lieberman and Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, both prominent supporters of repeal. She repeatedly pointed to language in the bill in her hand. Eventually, she stood alone at her desk, intently scanning the document. At one point, something jumped out at her and she underlined certain language in pencil, then went looking again for Lieberman and Levin.

Murkowski criticized Reid for shutting down the negotiations and said she was waiting for a "reasonable process."

"I'm sorry that we're at this point but I think we had a path forward and he chose not to do it," Murkowski said. "I don't know whether he didn't want to take it up or what the issue is but he chose to close the door and I think it's most unfortunate."

Levin said on the floor on Thursday there may not be time to "hammer out a final bill before the end of the session" if the Senate does not proceed with the bill this week.

"It's clear that Republicans don't want to hold a vote on 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,'" Reid said. "They want to block a bill on this at all costs, even if it means not passing the defense authorization bill for the first time in 48 years."

The defense authorization bill also includes a number of other provisions, including bonuses for service members and improved health coverage for troops, Reid pointed out. He said the bill is necessary and must move forward.

Collins said she was disappointed with the decision.

"I thought we were extremely close to getting to an agreement yesterday," Collins said after the announcement. "I think there was such a clear path to get this done and I am perplexed and frustrated that this important bill is going to become the victim of politics."

Sam Stein contributed reporting

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A major defense authorization bill carrying the repeal of the military's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' law was blocked on Thursday by Senate Republicans and one Senate Democrat after negotiati...
WASHINGTON -- A major defense authorization bill carrying the repeal of the military's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' law was blocked on Thursday by Senate Republicans and one Senate Democrat after negotiati...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11,429
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (221 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patricia013
American made - what have you done with my badges?
03:17 PM on 01/11/2011
What a joke this is turning out to be! They are wasting time and money on something that is so blatantly unconstitutional. When does this immature nonsense stop! This whole business is so foolish! DADT will be banned eventually or we are not the country we say we are! I think everyone should take note on just who is trying to repeal it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madbunny
Prison Guard - FireFighter - now a School Teacher
05:51 PM on 01/10/2011
Imagine if this man:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Turing

Had not been allowed to serve his country. Many of us would be speaking a different language right now.
06:35 PM on 01/06/2011
Hopefully Obama will live up to his promise to end DADT.

http://blogs.micds.org/chrouse/tag/nonfiction/
01:54 PM on 01/02/2011
Don’t ask don’t tell repeal: How Europeans have reacted to the news

http://olderime.wordpress.com/2010/12/21/don%e2%80%99t-ask-don%e2%80%99t-tell-repeal-how-europeans-have-reacted-to-the-news/
11:57 AM on 12/29/2010
this still shouldnt show on HP I dont think. The date shows but you read this today and could be misinformed. Maybe the date should be displayed bigger or something.

To quote the man in charge, "...this is done."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fourex
11:21 AM on 12/13/2010
The bottom line is all the Republicans voted against repeal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
04:50 PM on 12/12/2010
Gay people already are serving and have served honorably, for generations....it is US who are dishonoring them by not acting quickly to repeal DADT....the shame is ours.
photo
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
10:44 AM on 12/12/2010
From the party of "Get the guv'ment out of our lives!"

:roll:
08:00 PM on 12/13/2010
Doesnt matter..someone will lose. If it got repealed then the people who were against it rights are infringed. The Guvment is still infringing by forcing them to deal with people they don't want to.
photo
malwoden
common scold
08:10 PM on 12/13/2010
The same things were argued when African Americans were seeking civil rights. I assure you, many Americans considered African Americans with the same dislike and hatred they now direct at gays. Sometimes it's tough to do the right thing.
photo
malwoden
common scold
08:12 PM on 12/13/2010
P.S. Has the "guvment" not stepped in regarding African American civil rights, some states might yet have segregation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p c r
Compassionate and Conservative are polar opposites
07:54 AM on 12/12/2010
Manchin from WV has voted with the Republicans on every major issue since arriving in Congress. I guess the fact that his constituents voted for a Democrat didn't matter to him. What a poor choice to carry on the torch for the late Robert Byrd.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
enigma2
Moby..One of these mornings
12:42 PM on 12/13/2010
Agreed..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p c r
Compassionate and Conservative are polar opposites
07:51 AM on 12/12/2010
I don't understand the problem. 70% of the soldiers serving voice support for the repeal. The leaders in the Armed Services voice support for the repeal. Courts have ruled, as well as common sense, that DADT denies basic rights to gay soldiers. There always have been and always will be gay soldiers. These soldiers are being forced to lie, or be refused the right to serve their country and be denied rightfully earned benefits for risking their lives to defend our freedom. They are open to blackmail under the current system, as well as being forced to lie.
Wake up and smell reality. Passing the repeal of DADT is a no-brainer. The Republicans should fit right into that state of mind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Berettasskeeter
For what we are about to receive, may we be truly
09:24 AM on 12/12/2010
The only poll that actually asked the troops whether they support repeal revealed that over 50% oppose repeal. The study just unveiled did NOT ask that question.
Semper fi
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
04:26 PM on 12/12/2010
Real soldiers could care less if the soldier fighting with him is gay or not...it simply does not matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
06:21 PM on 12/12/2010
Ah, but over 70% said that they'd follow orders. You remember orders, don't you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
04:52 PM on 12/12/2010
F&F....Thank you....!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CrankyCurmudgeon
Livin' La Vida Retiredo (but still working a bit)
12:17 AM on 12/12/2010
Take a good look everyone. We have ceded "leadership" in our country to cowards, criminals, and charlatans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Richard Brown
01:10 PM on 12/11/2010
I am tired of hearing about McCain's so called expertise on military matters... he was a friggin' prisoner for godsake. How much expertise does that take?
09:11 PM on 12/11/2010
agreed
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
funnybuthurts
11:11 AM on 12/11/2010
These guys are worthless. You wanted a real reason to push Brown out of Massachusetts instead of handling it to the democrats? You got one now.
08:05 AM on 12/11/2010
Let this be a lesson to Obama and all the Democrats out there who think that because we placate the rich and Republicans with tax cuts they will capitulate on other issues.

It does not work that way. We must hold our ground against them on issues we hold dear.
05:33 PM on 12/11/2010
That would make a whole lot of sense if the Republican thugs had not screamed from every mountain that they will block every thing until they get their frigging tax cut. But it's Obama's fault as usual. I think Obama and the Dems know the Repugs are going to block everything. That is why this lame duck session has to pass the tax cut deal in some form. Do you think we should wait until the Tea party congress is in session and expect "them" to be any different?
12:51 AM on 12/13/2010
Of course the tea baggers won't be any different, but we can't keep appeasing the Republicans to win small concessions. Notice, right after this "compromise" the Republicans voted against DADT. What makes you think they will follow through with their UI promise?

The Washington leadership is letting more and more ground slip away to these people. I for one am with Bernie, Dean, and Krugman . . . we have to stand for our ideals.
09:13 PM on 12/11/2010
of course .....go for it
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nmaddog7
03:29 AM on 12/11/2010
The republicans have become a serious threat to democracy- not to say it's only their fault-Congress has had over a decade to pass campaign finance reforms that may have allowed for a moderating 3rd party. Anyways, the game is predictable- Repugs block, Dems eventually bend. If the Democrats had okayed their cards right with the tax reform they could have showed the American public the Rethugs were willing to let 9/11 heroes go unhelped just so they could give billions to millionaires and billionaires.
Today's the day my sarcastic skin has been punctured, I truly believe our country is now in freefall mode and we will crash similarly to the way the SU's empire collapsed and out emerged many different countries, many who did more successful than the Russia, the SU's power base, whose wealthy oligarchs ate each other and middle class Russians alive. Lucky for Russia it had lots of energy, the same can't be said of The US. We have ALOT of prisoners though, maybe we can restart slavery?
09:14 PM on 12/11/2010
911 workers have worker's comp
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
06:22 PM on 12/12/2010
Which doesn't cover very much at all....