iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The Clinton Crew Takes Over

First Posted: 12/09/10 12:13 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Clinton Obama

WASHINGTON -- The tax-bill fight is revealing a crucial fact about President Obama's new, post-"shellacking" White House: it is increasingly being run by veterans of the Clinton era.

House Democrats, who voted in caucus today to oppose the tax deal, are in essence at war with the Clinton years -- with Obama in the middle.

Barack Obama swept to power promising a new day and a new way, and he brought with him a cadre of top aides forged in the fire of the presidential campaign and the politics of Chicago.

The most visible Clinton alum, Rahm Emanuel, returned to Chicago to run for mayor.

But an array of other Clinton vets has stepped up to handle the sales job on taxes on the Hill and in town. Key names include: Lawrence Summers, Gene Sperling, Ron Klain, Jack Lew and John Podesta. Austan Goolsbee, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, is an early Obama advisor, but he's philosophically in tune with the economic views of the Clinton types.

Meanwhile, campaign honchos David Axelrod and Jim Messina -- two Obama Originals -- will soon be headed back to Chicago to lay the groundwork for the president's 2012 campaign.

The significance of this staff shift is beyond the operational. The Clinton-era alums, by outlook and experience, represent a centrist, pragmatic, pro-business "wealth-creation" wing of the Democratic Party that flourished during the Clinton presidency in the 1990s.

For tactical and substantive reasons, Barack Obama ran for president largely ignoring the economic record of Clinton's time. Obama, after all, was running against Sen. Hillary Clinton, and he also admired the game-changing sweep of the Reagan presidency.

But now the president finds himself in the same kind of environment that Clinton -- as governor -- encountered (and learned to thrive in) during his rise in the 1980s. It is one in which conservative Republicans control the terms of debate, if not all the levers of power.

It is therefore not surprising that Obama would turn to the Clintonites to sell some $800 billion worth of tax cuts to his fellow Democrats.

The Clinton people share certain traits: they are brilliant, like a lot of the Obama folks, but they also are cold-blooded and now have many years' experience at the intersection of money and power.

Attention has focused on Vice President Joe Biden's role as the new "enforcer," but the key to that operation is his chief of staff, Ron Klain, who once ran the Senate Judiciary Committee staff and who then served as chief of staff for Vice President Al Gore.

(Klain could become Obama's chief of staff if interim chief Pete Rouse doesn't want the job.)

Much of the substantive sales spin has been handled by Gene Sperling -- who began his career in the Clinton campaign war room and who essentially did the same job in the Clinton White House -- and Jack Lew, who was working for Hillary at the State Department before coming back to the White House to head the Office of Management and Budget, an upgraded version of the budget work what he did in the Clinton adminstration.

Of course there is also Obama's chief economic adviser, Dr. Larry Summers -- who is essentially playing the Dick Cheney role of scaring the bejeezus out of anyone who dares oppose the president.

Summers was a Clinton Treasury Secretary.

Outside the White House per se, the president is getting key support from John Podesta, whose Center for American Progress has placed dozens of staffers in key positions inside the administration.

CAP supports the tax-cut deal, perhaps not surprising given that Podesta was once Bill Clinton's highly regarded chief of staff.

And what about Obama Interim Chief of Staff Rouse? He's an Obama guy. Before becoming Obama's top Senate aide in 2005, he'd spent much of his career with then-Sen. Tom Daschle, the South Dakota Democrat who was the party's skilled leader in the Senate.

Rouse is a popular consensus builder, and several cabinet members have told the president that they want Rouse to get the job permanently. They include, according to a cabinet member who declined to be named, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis. "Pete has made a big effort to involve the cabinet and many of us want him to agree to stay on."

No one has worked for Obama longer in an official governmental capacity, and he is well liked -- even adored -- by the Obama originals.

But it is not clear that Rouse, 64, wants the job on a permanent basis.

If he doesn't, it's not clear which Obama original could or would step in.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The tax-bill fight is revealing a crucial fact about President Obama's new, post-"shellacking" White House: it is increasingly being run by veterans of the Clinton era. House Democrats,...
WASHINGTON -- The tax-bill fight is revealing a crucial fact about President Obama's new, post-"shellacking" White House: it is increasingly being run by veterans of the Clinton era. House Democrats,...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,854
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (61 total)
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
davidpkronmiller
03:32 AM on 01/06/2011
Um Obama's old chief of staff worked in the Clinton white house and the current sec of state is an actual Clinton. I'm concerned about fineman....
02:57 AM on 01/06/2011
Only by privatizing Social Security could Obama be *more* pro-business than he already is. At Microsoft, as they laid off 5,000 people (actually more through stealth) did Obama or any Democrat question why we have a federal work visa policy? I mean surely when there is high unemployment and tech giants (who use the majority of these visas) are laying off Americans there is obviously no reason for federal interference (wage suppression) in the job market. Nope. Obama still gives speeches talking about the need to "ensure our businesses have acres to the world's best talent" which is code for wage suppression.
06:26 PM on 12/18/2010
Take over? Not in DADT - a Clinton policy that was handily defeated today! Yippee!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:58 AM on 12/15/2010
It's about time they got some people who know what they are doing in there.
07:45 PM on 12/11/2010
"Tax them beacause they can afford it." Using this simplistic idea Is not going to be embraced by the large majority.
That is the logic that criminals use to rob banks. There are reasons the rich should pony
up and start paying their fair share. The most fundamental and the most
expensive function that US government performs is the protection of
wealth through the military, judicial system, intelligence and other
agencies. And this protection serves the wealthy more than the non
wealthy. The 9\11 terrorists targeted big buildings and big business.
The terrorist didn’t target the middle class. The top 5% of Americans
own 60 trillion in assets. If the share that we all had to pay to
protect our assets was in proportion to the size of our assets, it would
be fair. That's how insurance works to protect our investment in our
homes. A big house equals big premiums. And we pay premiums every year
relative to the cost of replacement and cost that government inccurs to provide
all the protective services. How this concept could be
implemented into the tax code is beyond my expertise, But First, the
logic and truth of it needs to be embraced by us citizens.
07:27 PM on 12/11/2010
Obama the Pres who gave away the "HOLY GRAIL". Obama said that the tax break for the Wealthy was their Holy Grail and it IS! They desperatly need it to pay back their donors. And He gave it away????????
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myrtle1909
I am an artist and a free lance writer
06:38 PM on 12/11/2010
Obama has lost his way. He wanted Clinton to find it for him. Sorry but even the two of them together can't fix this mess. It should be thrown out like dishwater and start with a clean bill with no tax cuts for anyone, and no tax increases the poor folk can't afford a tax increase like the one in this deal.
11:53 AM on 12/11/2010
Change.
10:16 AM on 12/11/2010
It's nice to see the two of them together. I love badboybilly!
08:07 PM on 12/11/2010
You mean it's telling to see them together. Bill was the best Republican president we've had in 30 years: he sold out the working class through NAFTA; and rigged the financial system to enrich Wall Street through Commodity Futures Modernization Act and Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act.

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/9/7/robert_scheer_on__the_great

If Obama follows Clinton's lead, he will become the 2nd best Republican president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ODixon
08:02 PM on 12/10/2010
Wow! Just when I thought my opinion of Obama couldn't sink any lower... At this point, I'm wondering what Obama is thinking and how he is going to convince those of us who formerly supported him. Clarence B. Jones is correct when he writes progressives need to identify and support someone to challenge Obama is 2012.
07:49 PM on 12/10/2010
With friends like this, who needs enemies. . .If Obama can't stand on his own two feet, maybe he should consider stepping aside.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shacking
“Everything you can imagine is real.”
07:15 PM on 12/10/2010
Maybe some people in charge who actually know what they are doing would be a good start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
didereaux
The Flying Spaghetti Monster is my Lord & Saviour!
07:03 PM on 12/10/2010
The truth suffers greatly in this article as exampled in this:"But now the president finds himself in the same kind of environment that Clinton -- as governor -- encountered (and learned to thrive in) during his rise in the 1980s. It is one in which conservative Republicans control the terms of debate, if not all the levers of power."
---------------------------

Clinton faced, as governor, the conservatives but had solid support all along from the democratic base. This is something that is very much in jeopardy with Obama. If he loses even one fourth of the Progressives, and half the independents that voted for him, he cannot win. Unless Palin is his opponent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:55 PM on 12/10/2010
Obama is doing everything he can to alienate his former supporters. How pathetic is that?