More

Larry Summers Replacements Said To Be Either Sperling, Altman Or Levin

First Posted: 12/13/10 08:10 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Larry Summers Replacements
The leading contenders for NEC director, left to right: Treasury adviser Gene Sperling, Evercore chairman Roger Altman and Yale president Richard Levin

As Larry Summers nears the end of his term as director of the National Economic Council, the list of potential replacements has been whittled down to three, according to Obama administration officials familiar with the deliberations: Treasury adviser Gene Sperling, Wall Street banker Roger Altman and Yale president Richard Levin.

The three represent a range of ideologies, from sympathy for Wall Street to vigilant consumer protection. At this critical point in the economic debate, the president's choice will send a powerful signal about the administration's leanings. If it's Sperling or Altman, critics say, the country can likely expect a continuation of a Wall Street-sympathetic approach to policy for the next two years.

The stakes are high, both for how the administration is perceived and how it determines policy. As Peter Orszag, Obama's former director of the Office of Management and Budget, has taken a senior position at Citigroup, pundits like Joe Klein and Jim Fallows are griping about the government's ties to Wall Street.

"This move only reinforces my growing sense that the Democratic party has to pry control of its economic policy away from the Wall Street caucus -- the Rubin, Summers, Geithner, Rattner and now Orszag etc. gang," Klein writes.

On the other hand, Wall Streeters have been whining in recent months that Obama -- despite presiding over a policy of historic bailouts and, more recently, record corporate profits -- isn't sympathetic enough to their interests. "He hurt their feelings," said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic Policy and Research in Washington. When Summers' departure was first announced in September, pundits speculated that the replacement would be someone with real-world business experience. Altman, and even Sperling, would fit that bill.

The appointment of either Sperling or Altman would cement the administration's symbolic ties to the financial sector. A Levin appointment, however, would signal a break from previous policy, and a step toward tight Wall Street regulation, with a more muscular job-creation agenda.

Judging by Sperling's record in government and on Wall Street, he would likely favor a policy of lenient regulation of the banking sector. Like Summers, Sperling has ties to Robert Rubin, the former Treasury Secretary, Goldmanite and, more recently, chairman of Citigroup, who pushed for deregulation under President Clinton.

After serving as deputy NEC director, Sperling took the commission's top spot in 1996, overseeing a policy of deregulation of Wall Street. Under Sperling's watch, Congress repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, a rule-easing that many believe contributed to the financial crisis less than a decade later.

Sperling has made his share of Wall Street cash. Before becoming adviser to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, he did time at Goldman Sachs. The year before taking office, he reportedly earned nearly $900,000 as a Goldman consultant.

If Sperling's background is mostly policy with some business experience, Altman's is mostly business with some policy. Altman is the founder and chairman of Evercore Partners, a boutique mergers and acquisitions firm that advised General Motors through its bankruptcy, pulling in fees that the Department of Justice called "unreasonably rich." In the early years of the Clinton administration, Altman served as a deputy Treasury secretary.

It seems likely that Sperling or Altman, if appointed, would continue the policies of their predecessor. But Sperling, for his part, would likely depart from Summers in style. Whereas Summers has been known for his assertiveness in the administration, Sperling is more inclined to defer to others' opinions, Baker said.

"The biggest difference is if they're a Summers type, calling the shots, or a bureaucratic type, getting the ideas," Baker said. "[Sperling's] particular views on stimulus probably wouldn't matter much."

While it's difficult to say how assertive Levin would be as NEC director, his views make him stand out from the pack. As HuffPost has reported, his appointment would signal a departure from previous administration policies, a move toward the Elizabeth Warren camp of tight Wall Street regulation and proactive job-creation.

According to Robert Shiller, Levin's colleague at Yale, and judging by speeches Levin gave last year, the Yale president would likely support a second stimulus, with job-creation as a focus.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
As Larry Summers nears the end of his term as director of the National Economic Council, the list of potential replacements has been whittled down to three, according to Obama administration officials...
As Larry Summers nears the end of his term as director of the National Economic Council, the list of potential replacements has been whittled down to three, according to Obama administration officials...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 182
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
07:45 PM on 12/14/2010
It is beyond me how anyone with a brain can continue to support policy based on neo-liberal economic theory.

It has been proven false, both theoretically and pragmatically.

Of these three, Levin is clearly the only acceptable candidate.

JM
05:48 PM on 12/14/2010
Why change things? Everything is going so well...not!
04:39 PM on 12/14/2010
Three Jews? Now THAT is a coincidence!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
03:20 PM on 12/14/2010
Quelle surprise!!

Three white, privileged elites without a clue?

Who'da thunk?
02:57 PM on 12/14/2010
Obama already has wall street predators in the white house. Why should we believe he won't gladly add another one?
02:34 PM on 12/14/2010
When one is thrust into a position of awesome power and responsibility that require great leadership skills, only to discovers one does not have them, then........probable be a Wall Street guy.
photo
MyFatCat
Slacktivist no longer
12:59 PM on 12/14/2010
After reading this, I think Levin doesn't have a serious chance, because he'll upset things. He's there to lull us into believing that something will be done for us, that there's room at the table. He's there to buy time.

The CEOs whose "feelings" are hurt, but whose bank accounts are not, will pour so much money into the GOP campaign that the entire country will remember Meg Whitman's campaign as a prophecy.

And it's because the CEOs are having emotions, not feelings: I'll claim a distinction between being aware of some powerful non-rational need in yourself, and sharing humanity with others of different gifts. It may not be in the OED, but frankly I don't believe finance people think of the middle class as real human beings. Their money has alienated them for too long. Try this out for a proof: hang out with a few people of a dramatically different income bracket than yours. What do they talk about? How do they talk? When do they fall silent? How do they dress?

It's not about a difference in "lifestyles." It's about a difference in access. People calculating how to get the car fixed and the grocery shopping done by public transit are not going to be gushing over what they're getting the kids for Christmas or where the teens want to go to college. Those conversations are not filled with hope. They are filled with dread.

And some insist that only CEO emotions matter.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
12:09 PM on 12/14/2010
So Wall Street has not said who they want to do this yet?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Thinkster Paulson
A concerned American moderate
11:50 AM on 12/14/2010
What a farce! As if there's any chance that President "Big Bank" Obama would appoint a Wall St. outsider. It should be perfectly clear by now that the President supports the needs of the People in rhetoric only. In every policy decision, the man first feigned egalitarian ideals, but in each and every case bailed on the good fight before it even became a fight and instead offered up tribute to America's economic elite. Obama is best friend to Wall St. and Santa Claus for Big Money. His "the best we can get" shtick is completely honest, but the "we" he's talking about is his fellow top 1%. Altman will likely get the nod because he's the best choice to help the President continue painting the White House green.
Ironquill
Give me a reason to vote Republican.
11:46 AM on 12/14/2010
President Obama is staking his second term on the tax cut "compromise"--which is essentially a back door stimulus plan to get the unemployment rate down sufficiently to be re-electable. But large chunks of the Democratic base are angered by more tax cuts to the rich and may bolt to a third party candidate.
Let me put it this way. If the President doesn't select Levin, I'm calling Bernie Sanders office and offering him the $2200 I would otherwise contribute to the President's re-election.
12:52 PM on 12/14/2010
Fanned and faved, Bernie for Prez. I have had it with Obama, enough is enough.
photo
MyFatCat
Slacktivist no longer
01:14 PM on 12/14/2010
# 133. I like the idea of redirecting contributions. The only way ordinary people can counteract the plutocrats is by directly supporting people who have the will to speak up on behalf of them.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
11:02 AM on 12/14/2010
I like option number 4, none of the above.
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
11:00 AM on 12/14/2010
Well Levin will be a bit late as this new tax bill is Simulus II or III depending on how you look at things.
 
My bet is Sperling....Altman might now want to tke a pay cut right now.
 
So tired of hearing how the GOP is all abt big business...Obama has proven he is ALL abt big business and wall street
photo
MyFatCat
Slacktivist no longer
01:20 PM on 12/14/2010
The GOP is all about big business. I'm not sure what Obama has proven, other than he's got a learning curve and is far too deferential to people from Goldman Sachs.

Which makes me wonder if people who aren't from monied backgrounds are too intimidated to deal with plutocrats...and people who are from monied backgrounds are too comfortable with them.
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
02:04 PM on 12/14/2010
You might be right abt how people behave around the "money", but I think now Obama was always around money....he did attend a very upper class private High School, then Harvard...not exactly growing up around country folks...lol
10:52 AM on 12/14/2010
I'm sure the winner will bring with him the most angels.  Because nothing can ever be done in this Administration until the last angel is marched onto the point of the pin.  In fact, I'm sure the winner will bring with him an infinite number of angels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PengieP
10:47 AM on 12/14/2010
Frankly, I'm surprised Levin is still in the running. But we all know it will be Altman, the Wall Street Bankster.
10:21 AM on 12/14/2010
Place your bets on the Wall Street banker. He'll know best how to screw you.