iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

NY 'Fracking' Ban: Governor David Paterson Orders Natural Gas Hydraulic Fracturing Moratorium For Seven Months In New York

MARY ESCH   12/12/10 03:34 PM ET   AP

Natural Gas Drilling

ALBANY, N.Y. — Environmental groups and energy companies both claimed victory after Gov. David Paterson ordered a seven-month moratorium on some natural gas drilling in the state, although environmentalists would have preferred the broader ban that the Legislature had approved.

The outgoing Democratic governor vetoed a bill on Saturday that would have suspended all new natural-gas drilling permits until May 15. Instead, he issued an executive order prohibiting high-volume hydraulic fracturing of horizontally drilled wells, such as those in the Marcellus Shale region of southern New York. The order stands until July 1.

High-volume hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, involves blasting millions of gallons of chemical-laced water thousands of feet underground to crack shale and release natural gas trapped inside it. The Environmental Protection Agency is examining the process to see if it imperils drinking water supplies, as opponents claim.

Permitting of gas wells in New York's part of the Marcellus region, which also underlies parts of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, has already been on hold for two years while the state Department of Environmental Conservation reviews its potential effects on the environment.

In vetoing the Legislature's oil and gas-drilling moratorium, Paterson said it would have applied to all conventional, low-volume, vertically drilled wells, effectively shutting down an industry that has been operating safely for decades.

Low-volume hydraulic fracturing of conventional, vertical wells uses several thousand gallons of water per well, versus up to 8 million gallons per horizontal well with high-volume fracturing.

Paterson's budget office estimated that such a broad ban would cost thousands of industry jobs, stop landowner payments and significantly reduce state and local revenues from permit fees and taxes.

The Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York said the Legislature's moratorium would have threatened the viability of more than 300 producing companies and the jobs of their 5,000 employees.

The state Farm Bureau also lobbied for Paterson's veto, saying its members have benefited from vertical gas drilling for many years and invested the royalty payments into their farms.

The oil and gas association said the Legislature's bill would have cut in half the number of months drilling could take place next year, resulting in a net loss of nearly $800,000 in real property taxes and $1.4 million in royalty payments.

"The moratorium bill would have forced me to evaluate my company's future in New York," said John Holko, president of Lenape Resources, a gas-drilling company in Genesee County.

A coalition of about a dozen environmental groups released a statement praising Paterson's moratorium while warning that it creates a "loophole" that industry can exploit. That is, it doesn't apply to vertical wells, "exactly the kind of wells that were responsible for ruining nine square miles of aquifer and poisoning the drinking water of more than a dozen families in Dimock, Pa.," the groups said.

In Dimock, homeowners sued last year after Houston-based Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. drilled faulty wells that allowed methane and, possibly, toxic drilling chemicals to escape into their drinking water aquifer.

The environmental groups, which include Environmental Advocates, Earthjustice, the Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club and others, said they would call on Gov.-elect Andrew Cuomo to "fix the loophole."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ALBANY, N.Y. — Environmental groups and energy companies both claimed victory after Gov. David Paterson ordered a seven-month moratorium on some natural gas drilling in the state, although envir...
ALBANY, N.Y. — Environmental groups and energy companies both claimed victory after Gov. David Paterson ordered a seven-month moratorium on some natural gas drilling in the state, although envir...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 723
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Andrew Reinbach
is Grand Vizier of ReinbachsObserver.com
03:16 PM on 12/15/2010
This story from the Associated Press on outgoing Gov. Patterson's executive order #41 [http://www.state.ny.us/governor/executive_orders/exeorders/EO41.html] is partial, unbalanced, and misleading. I'm sorry to have to embarass Mary Esch in public.

The story Ms. Esch posted ignores the main thrust of the executive order and makes it seem as though the order is just a slight extension of the moratorium passed by the legislature.
In fact, the eventual end of the moratorium is contingent on completing a fully re-vamped draft supplemental generic environmental impact statement [the famous dsgeis] that is directed to be widened in scope, re-investigated, and re-written, with a view to only approving fracking if it can be proven to be safe. This will take years and, considering that fracking is at best an operationthat operators can at best manage in ways that minimize possible dangers--not eliminate them--can't be proven.

Thus, what you've got there is a very long de facto moratorium that could easily result in a total ban [after many years of study--the current regs toook 15 years to formulate and pass]--or, at a minimum, much stricter regs that greatly improve the safety angle. Ms. Esch's story completely ignored this aspect of the executive order and, as an added subject for complaint, is unbalanced, since it gives a great deal of attention to gas industry scare tactics, and very little to the reactions of the environmental lobby.
09:40 AM on 12/15/2010
Not to stray too far from an important issue, but any BSG fans out there definitely get an alternative meaning from 'fracking.'
07:30 AM on 12/15/2010
If the energy companies were forced to invest only 20% OF ALL THE MONEY THEY SPEND on their phony PR campaigns and litigation to manufacture solar panels and and other renewable energy sources we wouldn't need to pump toxic chemicals into the ground for natural gas. We need a nationalist movement to force energy companies to invest in AMERICAN Made RENEWABLE energy products and technologies. This would offset all the jobs that these polluters say we will lose by banning fracking.
photo
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
12:34 PM on 12/14/2010
When natural gas wells are drilled, steps are taken to mitigate impacts to ground water. Wells are cased by cement. Most of the time frac’ing does not result in contamination (if it did, all groundwater near gas development would be contaminated. That’s just not the case). However, I’m pretty sure that sometimes it does result in contamination. Casing can fail. And if there’s a fault in the formation, frac’ing fluids can move up the geologic layers and possibly into the water table.

Frac’ing must be regulated, and the ingredients must be disclosed. It’s just common sense. Don’t give me any BS about trade secrets.

The gas industry gets what is deserves. This is what happens when you hide information and get loopholes. If they would have been upfront about frac’ing from the beginning, companies could have worked with the states to get a regulatory plan in place. By taking certain precautions, they could be allowed to continue to frac. They could have come out with transparency and put all the facts on the table instead of letting opposition define the debate.

Instead, this happens. The cat is out of the bag. People are scared and they’re going to act. The gas companies are losing the PR battle because they’ve been caught hiding something. States are going to start banning the practice altogether. Hope the industry has learned their lesson on this one. Somehow I doubt it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sock De Jour
Democracy is an illusion
09:54 AM on 12/14/2010
The EPA already knows fracking not only imperils drinking water, but kills_people.

Think of the EPA (and all government agencies) as an arm of big business interests, and not as a protector of the environment.
09:26 AM on 12/14/2010
I admit I still prefer the sound of "Fracking" over "Frelling!
Grobbbbbbbb
08:51 AM on 12/14/2010
Lulz. do any of you remember what it was like before fracing? I'm not talking about last month when you first heard of it or 'when it started in 2005'. Back in the ole oil boom days where there were rigs as far as the eye could see. Now, you have one well doing the work of twenty. There maybe a temporary ban on frac'n, they'll just drill more wells to reach the same deposits. lulz.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
09:30 AM on 12/14/2010
no they won't. You obviously have no clue how the companies extract gas/oil from shale.
10:07 AM on 12/14/2010
I'm sorry, but what kind of experience do you have in the energy industry? I've personally frac'd wells before. Have you?
democles
swords-r-us
11:38 AM on 12/14/2010
Do you have any clue what you're even talking about? Do you know what hydrology is, or where clean water comes from? Do you understand the process by which fracking works, and finally: fracking isn't for extracting oil it is for extracting natural gas, at a huge environmental cost.
08:28 AM on 12/14/2010
2005? Fracin has been goin on for the better part of the last century. Gasland is bogus. That guy couldnt even get the completion process right. Any questions for a former frac hand?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
11:23 PM on 12/14/2010
It should be illegal and anyone that participates in it should be shunned and reviled for the remainder of time.
08:06 AM on 12/14/2010
7 months? Please, we saw what happened in the Gulf. These people are so high on wealth and power - real or perceived - they will destroy anything in sight. What planet do these people suppose their children will be living on? Shortsighted monsters have no place leading us into the future, and if the rest of us don't snap out of our own addictions and hold all these people accountable for planetary destruction, what hope have we? So much for natural gas being clean.
08:40 AM on 12/14/2010
Those short sighted monsters have been employing this technique for over 30 years, including the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex, with minimal ,if any, groundwater contamination.

But have a propaganda short provide miss-information and that will provide cover for NIMBY
photo
southingtonian
"I'm a Capricorn and you can't make me do sh*t.."
07:02 AM on 12/14/2010
Houston-based Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. drilled faulty wells that allowed methane and, possibly, "toxic drilling chemicals to escape into their drinking water aquifer."

The word 'possibly' is in there because the companies refuse to divulge the contents of the fracking liquids. Hmmm....
08:40 AM on 12/14/2010
Source please?
photo
southingtonian
"I'm a Capricorn and you can't make me do sh*t.."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
personal beliefs
Things never go according to plan, so plan accordi
09:29 AM on 12/14/2010
not true. The only reason they are being targeted is because they failed to test the water before they fraced.
photo
southingtonian
"I'm a Capricorn and you can't make me do sh*t.."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:54 AM on 12/14/2010
How much of this stuff has been injected into the earth since the process began? There is an answer to this question.
I do not believe that the great polluting can clean itself -- ever. Wouldn't It do the job of fracturing all the way up to water tables. How, ever, did they not expect to find these chemicals in water, eventually, everywhere? What is the effect on cancer rates?
06:38 AM on 12/14/2010
If it did, wouldn't the gas be going into the water-table and not into the gas lines into your house?

And would not all the oil and gas companies be brokealready since they had no gas to sell to you but had spent billions trying to get it?

Get real folks. This is not about pollution. This is good old Californian NIMBY
democles
swords-r-us
11:41 AM on 12/14/2010
OK, if you took algebra at community college let's try this: if we inject 500 metric tons of toxic chemicals into your backyard and extract 25 metric tons of gas, what remains?
08:07 AM on 12/14/2010
It's only been done since Bush gave his blessing in 2005. And already there are problems. Watch the documentary 'Gasland' sometime.
08:41 AM on 12/14/2010
You might want to check unbiased sources as well.
photo
mariusvinchi
Saint Lucia is looking better and better every day
01:47 AM on 12/14/2010
Fracking should be banned outright, not some half-arsed moratorium! Haliburton should be required to disclose ALL of the chemicals used in this process and clean up the previous fracking sites that are dangerously contaminated. Secondly, the exclusion to the Clean Water Act they (Haliburton) enjoy should be repealed post haste!!
06:42 AM on 12/14/2010
The industry colloquialism is 'Frac'. One can then assume that you are spouting off without having read any real information.

Like the thousand of feet of casing and cement between the Hydraulically FraCture Stimulated formation and the potable acquifers.
08:18 AM on 12/14/2010
You know your industry speak terminology - goody for you. The real information is that you can never separate the greedy from a potential money source, no matter the cost. You think they give us real information? Ha - take a look at the tobacco industry and how long it took for them to be held accountable? Do you think our food supply is healthy - take a look at our obesity rate. And that's just the tip of the deregulated iceberg.

Unless you're a mouthpiece for the industry - pray tell us what you think it is you know. Why can people light their tap water? I suggest you go buy yourself a piece of prime real estate on 'hydraulically fractured' land and go live there if you like it so much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The other mike
10:16 PM on 12/13/2010
Even between consenting adults?
10:12 PM on 12/13/2010
With an unemployment rate of only 8% who needs these jobs??
08:20 AM on 12/14/2010
Because we only think of the here and now. What of our children?
08:07 PM on 12/13/2010
W.T.F!!! No s.e.x for 7 months!!??­? How can the government even do this??!!