More

FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz On The Cyber-Stalkers Violating Our Privacy

First Posted: 12/14/10 02:03 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Ftc Chairman

Federal Trade Commission chairman Jon Leibowitz is not happy with the Web's current state of affairs.

"Although there are some good actors in this area, Internet privacy is a mess," he told The Huffington Post in an interview Monday.

The most concrete recommendation for remedying online privacy outlined in the FTC's report on the issue was a "do not track" system that would allow users to prevent websites from collecting information about their browsing behavior.

As the FTC hopes to rally support for its proposal from consumers, advertisers, content providers, and others, Leibowitz translated the privacy problem into terms even the most Luddite web surfer could understand.

He evoked a trenchcoat-wearing stranger stalking your window shopping to explain the trouble with cookies, a tech term arcane to most that describes a means of tracking one's activity online and is at the heart of the "do not track" debate.

Imagine you're walking around New York City's SoHo neighborhood, Leibowitz said, and "There's a guy following you and he doesn't know exactly your name, but he knows where you live. He's sending out emails to stores in front of you: he wants to buy a jacket, he's using a MasterCard."

"If he's following you, I think you'd be kind of troubled by that and if he's following your 13 or 15 year-old daughter, you'd want to punch him out," Leibowitz continued. "[The] notion that someone can embed software in your computer and track you around, it's a violation of your privacy."

Those who make their living serving up ads on the Internet dismiss the accusation that their product amounts to a violation of privacy. They direct specific ads to individual Web surfers based on a reading of what other pages someone has visited, but this they portray as a consumer convenience. What the FTC now brands a concern worthy of regulation they sell as a practical solution that allows sites like Facebook and AOL to tailor their promoted content to individual visitors.

The FTC's plan aims to give consumers control over their information by empowering them to choose whether a site can or cannot collect data about their interests, preferences, and browsing patterns. While users currently have the means of masking their digital footprints, the tools can be tricky for the less technical to take advantage of.

But despite some vocal opponents, Leibowitz said the consumer protection agency's recommendation is attracting some unlikely allies from the very organizations that could stand to lose from a "do not track" option making its way onto the Internet.

"I am told that there is a schism brewing within the Internet advertising community and perhaps even within the IAB [Interactive Advertising Bureau] about companies that actually think the practice of third party tracking is a bad one," he explained.

In its efforts to rein in the information free-for-all on the web, the agency is not only making suggestions, but also cracking down. Although the FTC cannot comment on active investigations, Leibowitz hinted that the agency was in the process of investigating privacy violations and would be bringing cases to light "over the next few months."

While hardly the Internet's worst privacy offender, Facebook is the website that illustrates for many on a deeply personal level the risk of trusting the Internet with too much. The social network's changes to its privacy policy, which triggered a wave of criticism and even boycotts when the site announced it would allow users' information to appear on third party sites, have not gone unnoticed by the FTC.

"We've [...] watched as they [Facebook] have changed a variety of settings that have arguably caused harm to consumers by making data public that I think many consumers thought would not be," said Leibowitz.

He disagreed with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's assessment that privacy is no longer a "social norm" in the digital age. "I have a lot of respect for the founder of Facebook, but I think privacy is still a critically important for American consumers," he said.

Liebowitz also endorsed proposed recent new rules from the Federal Communications Commission aimed at barring large Internet providers from impeding Web traffic flowing to sites that partner with competitors.

Though critics have argued that the FCC's plan is riddled with loop holes, the FTC Chairman portrayed them as the best that could be hoped for given the need to balance competing interests.

He turned a more critical eye on the net neutrality debate, seeing little truth to the "dystopian future" dreamed up by net neutrality's advocates and opponents.

"There's a little disconnect between the reality of net neutrality and the big fight of net neutrality," said Leibowitz.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Federal Trade Commission chairman Jon Leibowitz is not happy with the Web's current state of affairs. "Although there are some good actors in this area, Internet privacy is a mess," he told The Huffi...
Federal Trade Commission chairman Jon Leibowitz is not happy with the Web's current state of affairs. "Although there are some good actors in this area, Internet privacy is a mess," he told The Huffi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:25 PM on 12/15/2010
Indeed, there's a big disconnect between the "debate" and reality. In reality, no regulation of the Internet is needed. Large corporate interests are pushing for regulation of the Net in an attempt to forestall competition or fatten their bottom lines.
11:58 AM on 12/15/2010
Truly amazing! Someone from the government lecturing us on privacy! Hilarious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gvscmr
www.seanbond.me
11:27 AM on 12/15/2010
So Tell me then Chairman Leibowitz, if this is the way you and the Federal government feel then just why is it NO ONE lifted a finger for my cyberstalker who issued a death threat against me?Not the local police, not the State Attorney General and Not the FBI.

Even with the assistance of two other bloggers we basically handed over the investigative information it took us 3 months to compile and pretty much gave the FBI and the State of Virginia this person's name and aliases and YOU All did NOTHING!

Perhaps just maybe when individuals are issuing death threats through the internet ALL of you had better start paying attention and start tackling that first as the last time I checked, that was a felony that could lead to something more serious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brett Schnaper
my microbio is empty. that's so sad!
08:57 AM on 12/15/2010
Cyberstalking is a crime in many states, and is usually best described as being stalking that incorporates use of computers over the internet. Cookies, mallware, and spyware aren't illegal, despite the best efforts of various lawmakers over the years.

I personally recommend https://www.grc.com for basic security information and solutions related to everything from cookies to network bindings, they've been a reliable and useful site for over a decade with several free on-line test options. The public (free) version of a firewall like Zone Alarm can be helpful in monitoring for spyware, because it reports outgoing as well as incoming packets.
07:49 AM on 12/15/2010
I am more concerned about the NSA, CIA, FBI, DHS and any other Gestapo type organization using my internet content with out my approval.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tomjones
07:33 AM on 12/15/2010
I think Federal Trade Commission chairman Jon Leibowitz is misinformed. The industry won’t be best served by this "do not track" nonsense. It would be better if companies or individuals develop privacy software to sell to the public. We could boost the economy with this type of software. digitalundivide.com
07:00 AM on 12/15/2010
As Wikileaks reported 2 years ago. AT&T, SPrint, Verizon, Quest and T-Mobile have set up law enforcement divisions to help fulfill requests from federal agents and cops to have easy access to your GPS, Texts, Call Registers and real time taps listening in all with user friendly computer interfaces that are directly wired to every patrol car computer and cop's desk in the country. They do not need warrants or court orders as long as they pay the differing fee's for each service. The telecoms tried to keep the amount charged a secret from the courts but as long as the cops 'pay' they get the info. Typically starts at $10 for call registers and up from there. Sprint alone had 250 million request in ONE year. Think about it...that's just one company...total would be over a billion. Yes some are repeat requests on one person but as many as 1 out of 2 Americans have been monitored. GPS and texts were the most commonly requested. Telecom execs should do jail time over this. But Obama as senator and all the repubs voted to give them immunity so they betrayed us in my opinion and are true stalkers.
07:54 AM on 12/15/2010
Too bad we cannot find out how much the tele-coms are paid yearly to allow us to be spyed on. I know that before the shrub got elected, AT&T was not in very good shape but after getting BILLIONS to spy on us, they are once again, a healthy Wall Street company.

DHS slogan should be "Billions to spy on Americans, Nothing for the un-employed".

Exactly how are AT&T, SPrint, Verizon, Quest and T-Mobile helping Americans?
08:05 AM on 12/15/2010
I know...they got some federal money besides protection from lawsuits nullifying the the third branch of government. The real problem though is letting every cop on the bet and every investigator,not just feds tracking bigger fish, access to every word you text for a small price.
ruthem
Willful ignorance is NOT a virtue!
09:43 AM on 12/15/2010
Those companies were some of the biggest contributors to the Tea-partiers and other right wingers who just got elected (under the new political finance law caused by the Supreme Court sell-out to corporations). They have bought and paid for their power (including the justices appointed by Republican presidents), and we will all pay the price!
02:30 AM on 12/15/2010
Beware of the free shiny baubles dangled in front of your innocent eyes while surfing the internet. It diverts your attention while it's owners rifle your entire social and financial life style. Google, Facebook, Yahoo, AOL etc, etc, etc. Just how do you think they make most of their money. THE OLD FASHIONED WAY, MINING OF COURSE.
01:58 AM on 12/15/2010
'cyber stalking' is normal.

If you don't want to be followed, or are paranoid - then don't use the web.
12:55 AM on 12/15/2010
Now you can use Facebook but still keep your messages private. And you don't have to depend on Facebook privacy settings. Just ‘CLOAK’ your messages with your own private keyword using the free CloakGuard browser plugin. This garbles your message and only the people you've shared your keyword with (and not Facebook) can read your messages.

Free Cloakguard plugin for Facebook available from:
Download - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/194385/
Demo - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4qN3TBqx08
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Henry Owen Creque V
12:37 AM on 12/15/2010
you dont need cookies or any kind of temporary internet files really. just disable that in your internet options that no information is saved. use browsers that have private browsing so no information is retained. its like walking across a freshly waxed floow with trash bags over your shoes.

there is more advanced ways of hiding your activity. this is just the Novice approach. still good to use if you are worried about it. and want to adoid those pesky rogue anti virus programs
photo
ls1z28chris
We're on the side of the demons, chief.
12:24 AM on 12/15/2010
Meanwhile, the 6th Circuit has to tell the federal government they need a warrant to obtain our emails from our providers. This after companies like Google and Microsoft failed in their attempts to lobby Congress to amend the Stored Communications Act to make clear that which should be perfectly obvious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HansMundt
09:32 PM on 12/14/2010
Yeah, that do not call list works great eh? So I guess you now expect us little people to fall for do not track.. And how many millions of dollars will it take to fund it and support it?
09:31 PM on 12/14/2010
We are being tracked whenever we are on the computer, there is no way around it unless you not use the internet. mainstreethost
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plages
Take a plunge
07:15 PM on 12/14/2010
Do not Track, and Net Neutrality, the only way to go!
photo
ls1z28chris
We're on the side of the demons, chief.
12:29 AM on 12/15/2010
I bet you still have an Obama sticker on your vehicle.

"Do not track" is a farce. Google and Microsoft lobbied Congress to make it clear that a warrant is needed for the government to retrieve our emails from providers. Congress failed to act. Instead, the 6th Circuit had to step up and state the obvious, that the government needs a warrant to read our emails.

Jon Leibowitz and "do not track" are a distraction from things like that, and the government's other plans to track our online activity.

"Net neutrality" is just as much a farce. We saw how much of a neutral actor the government will be in relation to the internet when we saw single phone calls force companies like Amazon into capitulation on the Wikileaks issue.

Stop shouting slogans. Take the stickers off your car. Pay a little attention.
photo
JWerner
Beware Macduff; beware the thane of Fife!
03:43 AM on 12/15/2010
Erm. . .net neutrality is the idea that the internet should be in the hands of the people, not business. The reason stuff like what's going on with the Wikileaks site happens is because there IS no net neutrality. A few corporations have far too much power over internet providing.

So. . .having 'net neutrality' is a good thing. It makes it HARDER for singular organizations or groups to muzzle organizations or websites that they dont like.