More

Rep. Buck McKeon Praises Gen. Amos, Says Repealing DADT Right Now Would Be An 'Affront To The Military' (VIDEO)


First Posted: 12/15/10 03:27 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), the incoming chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said on Wednesday that Democrats' last-minute push to repeal the military's ban on openly gay servicemembers has stalled the passage of the larger defense authorization bill. Passing a repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" by the end of the year, he added, would be an "affront to the military" because it wouldn't allow time for full and proper consideration of the matter.

"It will have such far-reaching effects, that I think to do it at the last, dying gasp of a Congress that's basically been voted out in a lame duck session is an affront to the military," said McKeon in a briefing with reporters. "It's an affront to the country, who just voted on Nov. 2 for a different way of doing things."

McKeon said he disagreed with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) over whether to include the DADT repeal in the National Defense Authorization Act, and took issue with the Obama administration's roll-out of the Defense Department's report looking at implementation of such a change. Although the Senate Armed Services Committee had two days of hearings after the study's release, McKeon said that his committee did not have that opportunity, and he would like the chance to interview battlefield and company commanders.

Although McKeon stated he hasn't yet taken a personal position on the issue, it was certainly clear that he has deep reservations about repealing the ban on gay men and women serving openly in the military.

He cited concerns by Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey and Marine Commandant Gen. James Amos, who said Tuesday that repeal would be a distraction that could cost soldiers their lives. "I don't want to lose any Marines to the distraction," said Amos. "I don't want to have any Marines that I'm visiting at Bethesda [National Naval Medical Center, in Maryland] with no legs be the result of any type of distraction."

When asked if he believed Amos went too far, McKeon praised the general:

I applaud Gen. Amos, because he has the concerns of every Marine on his mind, and he represents...240,000 Marines. The easy thing for him to do in this town, in this environment, in this climate, would be to say, 'We're Marines. We'll do it. Whatever you tell us to do, we'll do it.'

I applaud him for his courage to speak up, and if I were a Marine out there in the front, I would sure feel good about my commander, however I felt on the issue, because he's looking out for them, and I think that's his constitutional responsibility, but it's a hard thing to do.

WATCH:

On Afghanistan, McKeon said he has not yet received a copy of the Obama administration's strategic review, which will be released on Thursday, although he was hoping to have some time to look through the findings.

"I want to have Gen. Petraeus come and report to us on what's happening over there," said McKeon. "I think we'll find that he's made some pretty good progress. ... I was hopeful that we would be given a chance to see the report. If it's just coming to the president, we just hear what the president has to say about it. I've been supportive of the president. I think I was supportive of the 30,000 additional troops he sent to Afghanistan. I would have preferred to see more -- I think we know that Gen. McChrystal had asked for more, and I think I would have liked to have seen more. But I was supportive of the president, and I continue to be supportive. I'll just have to wait to see what he says about the report before I'll have any comment to make."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), the incoming chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said on Wednesday that Democrats' last-minute push to repeal the military's ban on openly gay se...
WASHINGTON -- Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), the incoming chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said on Wednesday that Democrats' last-minute push to repeal the military's ban on openly gay se...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 79
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
the pilgrim has landed
12:05 PM on 12/27/2010
Would it also be "an affront" to the gays currently serving? I don't think it would.
07:14 PM on 12/18/2010
What IS an affront to the military is to assume that they are afraid of the gay fellow service members among them, and to require service members to lie about who they are. Fortunately, McKeon was outvoted by more sensible and able colleagues.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ebanks84
Grandma knows best!
12:09 PM on 12/18/2010
It's more of an affront to those who believe in that crapo than the military on a whole, so shove it! We know better.
photo
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
09:26 AM on 12/16/2010
'Ol Buck looks like one of those " Wide Stance" Republican'ts
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rcmfla
I'm not concerned about the very poor ~Mitt Romney
09:16 AM on 12/16/2010
I'm more afraid not allowing gays to serve their country is an affront to their civil rights. All these excuses are simply ploys for inaction and self-serving the bigots.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:26 AM on 12/16/2010
This genius is an affront to humanity
08:13 AM on 12/16/2010
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. This is DADT.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bob5148
08:07 AM on 12/16/2010
'We're Marines. We'll do it. Whatever you tell us to do, we'll do it.' If that is the case, Buck, then why doesn't General Amos and the Marine Corp, just do it! The President is their Commander and Chief and is the ultimate officer. If the rule of the land is to repeal DADT, then that is what we are telling them to do and just do it!
08:04 AM on 12/16/2010
So when did Howard serve? He didn't. He was busy with other things, like being an LDS missionary.
07:57 AM on 12/16/2010
Republicans would object their right foot if it gained them in another buck.
07:53 AM on 12/16/2010
Repealing DADT is an "affront to the military" and to gays serving with honor. We all have our secrets.
photo
SCboy
Dogs are people too.
06:26 AM on 12/16/2010
With a name like "Buck" ...well...I don't know what to make of that. The only affront I see here comes from him. It's an affront to humanity.
02:45 AM on 12/16/2010
What are they afraid of?
photo
SCboy
Dogs are people too.
06:28 AM on 12/16/2010
They are afraid that somewhere, someone is happy and comfortable in their own skin.
07:46 AM on 12/16/2010
Allowing gays to have any rights... that the floodgate of wanting full rights will open and we might ask for... the things everyone else has in the country.
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive
02:31 AM on 12/16/2010
How is this an affront to the military. You've had the military survey and 70% of the military say it's no big deal. Gen Patreous has come out against DADT. Most of the brass are for the overturning of DADT.

So you've picked a couple of commanders that agree with you. So what. The majority of the people have spoken. They want to overturn DADT.

Please provide a reason why DADT should not be overruled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Iarossi
A proudly progressive veteran and educator
11:05 PM on 12/15/2010
I detest warhawks who never served.

Retired 1SG
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]