iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Earmark Lovers Feast On Pork Before Tea Party-Backed GOP Insurgents Storm Congress

12/14/10 09:34 PM ET   AP

Gop Earmark Ban

WASHINGTON — The spending barons on Capitol Hill, long used to muscling past opponents of bills larded with pet projects, are seeking one last victory before tea party-backed GOP insurgents storm Congress intent on ending the good old days of pork-barrel politics.

You might call it the last running of the old bulls in Congress.

In the waning days of the lame duck congressional session, Democrats controlling the Senate – in collaboration with a handful of old school Republicans – are pushing to wrap $1.27 trillion worth of unfinished budget work into a single "omnibus" appropriations bill.

Their 1,900-plus-page bill comes to the floor this week stuffed with provisions sought by lawmakers. It contains thousands of pet projects, known as earmarks, pushed by Democratic and GOP senators alike – despite a pledge by Republicans to give up such projects next year.

"That omnibus bill will be loaded down with earmarks and pork-barrel spending, which is a direct – a direct – betrayal of the majority of voters on Nov. 2 who said 'Stop the earmarking, stop the spending, stop the pork-barrel projects,'" protested Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

Altogether, the bill contains about $8 billion worth of earmarks, less than in previous years since House Republicans didn't ask for any. The earmarked funds equal less than 1 percent of the measure.

The catchall bill is designed to bankroll the operations of every Cabinet agency for the budget year that started Oct. 1, as well as $158 billion to pay for Pentagon operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

It also challenges President Barack Obama. One administration-opposed provision would block the Pentagon from transferring Guantanamo Bay prisoners to the United States. Another would provide $450 million for a program to develop a second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter despite a veto threat by the administration, which says it's a waste of money.

The architect of the measure, Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, has been working with senior Republicans on the panel – Thad Cochran of Mississippi, Robert Bennett of Utah and Kit Bond of Missouri, among others – to line up the 60 votes needed to repel a filibuster promised by GOP Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina and other conservatives.

"We remain cautiously optimistic," said Inouye spokesman Rob Blumenthal.

Inouye's optimism was based on earlier private conversations with Democrats and Republicans alike, but it remains to be seen whether key Republicans will stick with him in the face of fierce opposition from tea party activists. But Inouye allies like Bennett, Bond and George Voinovich, R-Ohio, are already leaving politics and may be immune to pressure.

Inouye's measure would replace a slightly less expensive bill that the House passed last week. The House bill doesn't contain earmarks like road and agricultural research projects, water treatment plants and grants for local anti-drug campaigns.

House Democrats, however, would gladly accept the fatter Senate version. Its many earmarks include $80 million in grants to states and Indian tribes to preserve Pacific salmon and $13 million in clean water grants for Alaska native villages and other rural communities in the state.

There's also $4 million sought by Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell for the Kentucky National Guard's marijuana eradication efforts and $8 million sought by GOP Sen. John Thune of South Dakota to help maintain the B-1 bomber fleet in his state. Though their states would benefit, both Republicans oppose the bill, and McConnell said Tuesday he's asked for his earmarks to be removed.

"This is exactly what the American people said Nov. 2 they didn't want us to do," he added.

The year-end logjam continues a long tradition in which a dysfunctional Congress is unable to do its most basic job of providing money to run the government on time.

Rather than debating a dozen separate appropriations bills, the omnibus spending measure rolls all the spending bills into a single piece of legislation that is likely to be brought to the floor in a way that keeps opponents from trimming it down.

Democrats hope to pass the measure by a midnight deadline Saturday. That would give them the latest – and perhaps last – victory over conservatives who contend the annual appropriations bills spend too much money and contain too many pork-barrel projects.

Incoming House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, is a long-standing opponent of doling out federal dollars for sewer projects, community development grants and the like based on special requests from lawmakers.

Boehner will become the single most powerful member of Congress next year, and he has laid down the law, promising to cut as much as $100 billion from 2011 agency budgets and ban earmarks. He signed a letter last week asking Obama to veto the omnibus bill because of its earmarks, and issued a statement Tuesday calling the legislation a "disgrace" and "a smack in the face to taxpayers."

For now, though, Boehner still is outnumbered by Democrats.

And across the Capitol, Democrats control the Senate with 58 votes. But their numbers will shrink to 53 in January, and many of the 13 incoming Senate Republicans are replacing eager earmarkers like Bond and Bennett, who follow the rich Appropriations Committee tradition of banding together, regardless of party, to beat back critics of their spending.

McConnell said he's actively working to defeat the giant spending bill. And GOP conservatives are irate over provisions that would begin to pay for Obama's overhauls of the U.S. health care system and financial services regulations.

Still, the measure never would have gotten this far without, at least, McConnell's tacit approval of the negotiations that produced it. Indeed, there's considerable suspicion among bill opponents and within Washington's lobbying community that McConnell actually wants it to pass. A key sign is that top McConnell ally, Sen. Bennett of Utah, has voiced support for the idea.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The spending barons on Capitol Hill, long used to muscling past opponents of bills larded with pet projects, are seeking one last victory before tea party-backed GOP insurgents stor...
WASHINGTON — The spending barons on Capitol Hill, long used to muscling past opponents of bills larded with pet projects, are seeking one last victory before tea party-backed GOP insurgents stor...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 515
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloyd
Return to original Republicanism to save America
08:27 PM on 12/15/2010
$277,000 for potato pest management in Wisconsin
$246,000 for bovine tuberculosis in Michigan and Minnesota
$522,000 for cranberry and blueberry disease and breeding in New Jersey
$500,000 for oyster safety in Florida
$349,000 for swine waste management in North Carolina
$413,000 for peanut research in Alabama
$247,000 for virus free wine grapes in Washington
$208,000 beaver management in North Carolina
$94,000 for blackbird management in Louisiana
$165,000 for maple syrup research in Vermont
$235,000 for noxious weed management in Nevada
$100,000 for the Edgar Allen Poe Cottage Visitor’s Center in New York
$300,000 for the Polynesian Voyaging Society in Hawaii
$400,000 for solar parking canopies and plug-in electric stations in Kansas
08:22 PM on 12/15/2010
What is the difference between Congress and a drunken sailor?

A drunken sailor stops spending when he runs out of money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloyd
Return to original Republicanism to save America
08:20 PM on 12/15/2010
And, in what has become a grand holiday tradition, the Senate stuffed the bill with more than 6,000 earmarks, including:

•$450,000 for the World Food Prize in Des Moines, Iowa;
•$500,000 for the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate in Boston;
•$100,000 for YouthCare in Seattle;
•$550,000 to rehabilitate Beacham Street in Massachusetts;
•$300,000 to renovate the Josephine Bakhita House in Wilmington, Delaware;
•$150,000 to renovate the Tibbits Opera House in Michigan;
•$500,000 for streetscaping in Porter County, Indiana;
•$200,000 to install solar panels at the Community Food Bank, Inc., in Arizona;
•$700,000 to reconstruct Norwood Drive in Pennsylvania;
•$500,000 for Denver Bike Sharing;
•100,000 for the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Transportation Museum in Columbus, Mississippi;
•$3.5 million to research Formosan Subterranean Termites in New Orleans;
•$1 million for peanut research in Athens and Tifton, Georgia;
•$500,000 for oyster safety in Florida;
•$600,000 for the Lewis and Clark Legacy Trail in North Dakota;
•$750,000 for the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Project in California;
•$125,000 to develop a walking trail in Mississippi;
•$2 million for an Ice Age National Scenic Trail in Wisconsin;
•$250,000 for Pigeon Point Lighthouse in California
07:12 PM on 12/15/2010
Pirates of the Potomac.
photo
Independent66
www.linkedin.com/in/harveyring
07:07 PM on 12/15/2010
Any congress person who votes for this bill will put their job in jeopardy in 2012. The last election's message was to cut the budget, not increase it with this kind of bill. it does not matter what party a congress person represents. The swing votes are with the Independent voters and they have the information and means to track what happens. Actions will speak much louder than words in 2012.
06:17 PM on 12/15/2010
a good bill to say NO to. Didnt the President promise, at one time, no earmarks? CR this bill and wait until next month...change is coming and the Dems and old guard Repubs, porkers all, will feel it
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:12 PM on 12/15/2010
At what point does BO cross the line from "campaign rhetoric" and lying? I'm confident it started at least on the day he was inaugurated. What a disappointment and what an outrage this junior varsity-experienced but professional politician (Illinois style) is!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:05 PM on 12/15/2010
I guess this is Democrats giving up. There is no possible way this is good political strategy for them. After the American public just rose up and DEMANDED fiscal responsibility, they have the nerve to flip the bird to voters? And after all this hypocritical complaining that the Tea Party wasn’t more outraged about the tax compromise because it would increase the deficit? Screw you too liberals. You aren’t going to get elected again for a VERY, VERY long time.
05:32 PM on 12/15/2010
Maybe if we had members of Congress paticipate in physical activity to determine winners we'd get better results. Example: http://viralfootage.com/?p=9823
photo
Xenobion
Lord of Cacti
05:30 PM on 12/15/2010
Oh wow look at all the hypocrite Republicans coming up for seconds on the pork. They know they can't have any because they are supposed to start their diet in January. Lets see how well their new year's resolution is before they start loading up on heaps of the stuff. But I wouldn't hold them to it.
05:47 PM on 12/15/2010
99% of it is Democrat Pork. OINK
photo
Xenobion
Lord of Cacti
06:20 PM on 12/15/2010
The Republicans motto remains, "Do what I say, not what I do." We've already hear the commentary on McConnel on what constitutes "good pork" and "bad pork" and its all based off of where it goes. Democrats are pork junkies too, but the first step to dealing with it is acceptance of the habit. Republicans are 1 step backward and I frankly wouldn't bet money or elections on this fact.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
thinklib
I will not mince words.
05:28 PM on 12/15/2010
Seems to me that most people actually AGREE with the Tea Party's goals:

Reduce spending, reduce deficit, get rid of pork, streamline and simplify government.

Whether they succeed or not is anyone's guess. But they seem to have worthy goals that are supported by most people. Which is odd given the demonization and name calling they have ad to endure.
05:50 PM on 12/15/2010
So true.

I think most people recognized the liberals were demonizing the Tea Party out of fear and ideologica­l hatred, not because of the Tea Party members principles­.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:23 PM on 12/15/2010
It's going to be Shellacking the sequel in 2012
05:21 PM on 12/15/2010
They do virtually nothing for all of this past year. They don't pass a budget, specifical­ly and on purpose they don't pass a budget because it's an election year, and they don't want people to know who they are and what they stand for because they would have been shellacked even greater had they done so, had they put together a budget as required by law prior to the election.

Now they're trying to make next year's budget theirs. They didn't do a budget. They lost. Even Mike McConnell got ticked off about this.

Obama called him, Mike McConnell, the Senate minority leader. It really takes a lot to get Mitch McConnell upset, and this has even ticked him off. No matter what how they spin this they can come off as only duplicitou­s and desperate, which is of course what they are.
05:17 PM on 12/15/2010
"The spending barons on Capitol Hill, long used to muscling past opponents of bills larded with pet projects, are seeking one last victory before tea party-backed GOP insurgents storm Congress intent on ending the good old days of pork-barrel politics."

I think I will remain independent but this is nearly enough to join the tea partly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:09 PM on 12/15/2010
Let’s let these people understand that they will not just be able to get a cushy lobbying job after they’re booted out of office. They will be collecting the unemployment they love to dole out. And if there were a way to stop that too it would be great.