More

'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal Faces Landmark Senate Vote

ANNE FLAHERTY   12/17/10 11:13 PM ET   AP

Dont Ask Dont Tell Repeal Vote

WASHINGTON — The Senate was headed toward a landmark vote Saturday on legislation that would let gays serve openly in the military, testing waning opposition among Republicans and putting Democrats within striking distance of overturning "don't ask, don't tell."

Passage would be a historic victory for President Barack Obama, who made repeal of the 17-year-old law a campaign promise in 2008. It also would be a political win for congressional Democrats who have struggled repeatedly in the final hours of the lame-duck session to overcome Republican objections.

A procedural vote was expected by noon Saturday. If at least 60 senators vote to advance the bill as expected, the legislation could pass as early as late afternoon. Republicans could demand extended debate time, but early indications were that they may not draw the process out further.

Gay rights groups said Saturday's vote was their best shot at changing the law because a new GOP-dominated Congress will take control in January.

Despite signs the bill was close to passage, advocates vowed to leave nothing up to chance and stepped up lobbying efforts in the hours before the vote, including a silent protest in the visitor seats overlooking the Senate floor.

"We simply cannot let the clock run out and lose this historic opportunity," said Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, whose supporters vowed to sit in the Senate gallery until the law was repealed.

"If senators support repeal they will vote yes. No more excuses," Sarvis said.

Repeal would mean that, for the first time in U.S. history, gays would be openly accepted by the military and could acknowledge their sexual orientation without fear of being kicked out.

More than 13,500 service members have been dismissed under the 1993 law.

Under the bill, the president and his top military advisers – the defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff – are required to certify to Congress that lifting the ban won't hurt troops' ability to fight. After that, 60 days must pass before any changes go into effect.

The House approved the bill earlier this week by a 250-174 vote. Senate passage would send the bill to the president's desk.

The bill appeared all but dead earlier this month when Senate Republicans voted for a second time this year to block the measure on procedural grounds. The measure was tucked into a broader defense policy bill that many GOP senators said required more debate time than Democrats would allow. They also objected to taking up any legislation before addressing tax cuts and government spending.

The GOP's united front pleased a small but vocal group of Republicans led by Sen. John McCain, who said the law shouldn't be changed during wartime.

"We send these young people into combat," said McCain, R-Ariz. "We think they're mature enough to fight and die. I think they're mature enough to make a judgment on who they want to serve with and the impact on their battle effectiveness."

In recent days, Senate Democrats were able to address many of the procedural objections, including a vote to pass tax cuts legislation. They also stripped the repeal provision from the defense policy bill.

The Democratic push for repeal was also strengthened by the release of a major Pentagon study that concluded gays could serve openly without affecting combat effectiveness. The assessment found that two-thirds of troops predicted little impact if the law is repealed.

The study was strongly backed by the Pentagon's top leadership, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen.

McCain has dismissed the study as flawed and cites concern among troops assigned to the front lines. Some troops predicted openly gay troops would cause problems. Most of them were in combat arms units such as infantry and special operations.

The chiefs of the Army and Marine Corps warned Congress that repeal could pose serious problems if the law is overturned when troops are still fighting in Afghanistan.

Gen. James Amos, the head of the Marine Corps, has become the most outspoken opponent and claims letting gay troops serve openly could cost lives.

Gates and Mullen say this fear is overblown. They note the Pentagon's finding that 92 percent of troops who believe they have served with a gay person saw no impact on their units' morale or effectiveness.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The Senate was headed toward a landmark vote Saturday on legislation that would let gays serve openly in the military, testing waning opposition among Republicans and putting Democr...
WASHINGTON — The Senate was headed toward a landmark vote Saturday on legislation that would let gays serve openly in the military, testing waning opposition among Republicans and putting Democr...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,230
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Hoodoo X 08:28 AM on 12/18/2010
Let me start out by saying it wouldn't bothered me a bit to serve with anyone, and I support the repeal of DADT.  But it does have real problems.  Over 50% of Marine combat units say they won't re-up if it passes, and the Army combat troops aren't far behind.  I entered the Coast Guard Reserves after a decade as a merchant mariner.  I was older (mid-thirties). We did life saving, some  Read More...
04:22 AM on 01/06/2011
CaliforniaFree is sexually attracted to men but cannot admit this to himself. This is why he posts obsessively against gay rights (even on articles that have nothing to do with gay rights) : )
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaliforniaFree
04:24 PM on 12/19/2010
The winning of your chosen lifestyle is an illusion but just wait when the SUPREME COURT comes to JUDGE you....
03:23 PM on 01/05/2011
To all the tro//s posting negative comments on this thread, here is a link to study showing that h0m0ph0bic men get aroused to gay p0 rn, but non h0m0phobic men do not:

http://www­.ncbi.nlm.­nih.gov/pu­bmed/87720­14
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaliforniaFree
04:21 PM on 12/19/2010
Wow, they worried more about giving special rights to gay folks who "Choose" their personal lifestyle, INSTEAD of creating JOBS for Americans.......

Where is the real justice in this supposedly right vote? Unemployment is at historical highs while they invested 2 years on FORCING us to accept the chosen gay lifestyle.....

Where are the Jobs?
09:17 AM on 12/22/2010
This post is sarcastic right?
03:25 PM on 01/05/2011
Sexually, you like men, but have not been able to admit this to yourself
03:37 PM on 12/19/2010
I really do not think any soldier would care who has his back....
03:37 PM on 12/19/2010
amen,amen,amen
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaliforniaFree
04:22 PM on 12/19/2010
Stop using religion to further your corrupt chosen practices
06:40 PM on 12/23/2010
I have no idea what you are talking about, I am not using religion for anything... DADT has nothing to do with religiion// try reading before posting and hitting enter
03:27 PM on 01/05/2011
you need to come out, cl0set case
04:19 PM on 12/18/2010
to all my HP bruces...please protect me from my heterophobia
04:18 PM on 12/18/2010
Do any of you HP bruces have some lipstick that I can borrow...gonna be a long...he he...night at Nancy pelosies biker bar for boys
04:12 PM on 12/18/2010
darn I broke one of my fake nails...off to the nail salon tonight before I have to perform my TV show at the biker bar
04:09 PM on 12/18/2010
I want all my gay friends at Hp to know that I have a man crush on PFC Manning. can one of you hackers get a message to him in the brig that wee gays love you
04:01 PM on 12/18/2010
two snaps for stymies pretty boys
04:00 PM on 12/18/2010
I told everyone I know that stymie is a queer as a $3 bill
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
KenClay
REPEAL DOMA
01:41 PM on 12/18/2010
It's Finally done!
photo
ez duz it
οὐκ ἔστιν θεός
02:49 PM on 12/18/2010
SWEET! OMG! SWEET!

XO to all !

--ez
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaliforniaFree
04:22 PM on 12/19/2010
Nop, just an illusion....wait for the supreme court!
12:50 PM on 12/18/2010
Poor Senator McCain - failed again! Senator flip-flop still thinks that anyone remembers his military service - does anyone under the age of 65 remember the vietnam war? Gays have always been serving our country and undoubtedly McCain served with many of them - is he an example of what happens to old soldiers in their dottage?

Once this hurdle is passed, the country can concentrate on more important issues - like the economy!
photo
mick e
Poor Mitt...He;s got a silver foot in his mouth
11:50 AM on 12/18/2010
It's time to stop all this foolishness. Repeal DADT now. We started to emerge out of the dark ages in 1964, with the civil rights act. 46 years later, isn't it time to include ALL Americans? Why are we denying inclusion, based on bigotry, and false assumptions?
11:03 AM on 12/18/2010
Bummer when the end of the sentence is on the next page............huh harry. LOLOL