iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tax Cut Package Passed By Congress: See The Bill's Highlights

The Associated Press   12/17/10 04:03 AM ET   AP

Irs

Highlights of the tax package passed by Congress late Thursday and sent to President Barack Obama. It would cost about $858 billion; most provisions, which were to expire Jan. 1, would be extended for two years, unless noted.

The package extends:

_Lower rates for taxpayers at every income level. The top rate, on taxable income above $379,150, would stay at 35 percent, instead of increasing to 39.6 percent. The bottom rate, on taxable income below $8,500 for individuals and $17,000 for married couples, would stay at 10 percent, instead of increasing to 15 percent. Cost: $186.8 billion.

_More generous itemized deductions for high-income households. Cost: $20.7 billion.

_A more generous $1,000 child tax credit. Cost: $71.7 billion.

_Marriage penalty relief, increasing the standard deduction for married couples. Cost: $18 billion.

_A more generous Earned Income Tax Credit for low-income families. Cost: $15.7 billion.

_A series of tax breaks for students and their families, including interest deduction for student loans and an exemption for employer-provided educational assistance. Cost: $3.3 billion.

_A deduction for tuition and related expenses for higher education, for 2010 and 2011. Cost: $1.2 billion.

_A tax credit of up to $2,500 for students' higher education expenses. Cost: $17.6 billion.

_The top capital gains tax rate of 15 percent. Cost: $25.9 billion.

_The top tax rate on dividends of 15 percent. Cost: $27.3 billion.

_Through 2011, enhanced jobless benefits for people who have been unemployed for long stretches. Cost: $56.5 billion.

_A series of incentives for selling, using and producing alternative fuels, including ethanol. Many of the provisions expired at the end of 2009. They would be extended through 2011. Cost: $11.3 billion.

_A $250 deduction for out-of-pocket classroom expenses by teachers, for 2010 and 2011. Cost: $390 million.

_A federal income tax deduction for state and local sales taxes, taken mostly by people who live in the nine states without state income taxes, for 2010 and 2011. Cost: $5.5 billion.

_The ability of older Americans to withdraw up to $100,000 a year from Individual Retirement Accounts, tax-free, to donate to certain public charities, for 2010 and 2011. Cost: $979 million.

_A business tax credit for research and experimentation expenses, for 2010 and 2011. Cost: $13.3 billion.

_Tax breaks for capital improvements to restaurants and other retail buildings, for 2010 and 2011. Cost: $3.6 billion.

_A tax break for active investors in foreign-based banking, securities and insurance firms, for 2010 and 2011. Cost: $9.2 billion.

_Increased depreciation and expensing for capital investments by businesses. Cost: $21.8 billion.

The package also:

_Spares more than 20 million middle-income households from tax increases averaging $3,900 from the Alternative Minimum Tax in 2010 and 2011. Cost: $136.7 billion.

_Imposes a lower estate tax for the next two years, allowing couples to pass estates as large as $10 million to heirs tax-free. The balance would be taxed at 35 percent. Cost: $68.1 billion.

_Provides a one-year Social Security tax cut for all wage earners, from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent. Cost: $112 billion.

___

Source: Joint Committee on Taxation.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,443
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
02:33 PM on 12/19/2010
The top capital gains tax rate of 15 percent. Cost: $25.9 billion???
The top tax rate on dividends of 15 percent. Cost: $27.3 billion???

R U sh*tting me, right? You telling me that the cuts from 39% to15% for what accounts as a bulk of the wealth for the top 1% only "cost" us $53 Billion??? This can mean one thing and one thing only: The wealthy have ALREADY HIDDEN most of their PROFITS and CAPITAL GAINS from the tax man, and don't pay a lot in taxes to begin with!
Last time the nation had such level of deficit was during the WWII, when top tax rates were 89%, and GNP growth was reaching 10%! No, i do not imply any causality, i'm just saying that history shows that high taxes do not necessarily prevent high growth... The fix for this country is 3-fold:
A) 89% tax on millionaires NOW to fix infrastructure, etc
B) A disgorgement of the ill-gotten gains during the 1981-2012 thievery regimes of Reagan, Bush (II) and Obama, the corporatist of the worst kind.
C) Cutting the costs of health care and education by 2/3 - there's no reason why a orthodontist gets $300K a year for average of 5 hours of work per day. $100K for 5 hours, or $150K for 8 hours should suffice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Enid
02:13 PM on 12/19/2010
Now our government instead of borrowing the money from our SSI will just take it as income from you. Tax it and use it as they like and not have to pay it back into SSI. Business's get cash benefit of not paying SSI matching dollars for employee's SSI. There will be now no convenient or good time to return to SSI deduction as employers will scream. Employees will not want to return to SSI deductions because it would be a take home pay reduction.Youth and good health make people feel self secure but with time they will realise the wisdom of SSI and SSI will not be there. Republicans Thank you President Obama for destroying SSI as they have tried since FDR created SSI.
Mr Obama I will never again vote for you. MY opinion You are a political fool.
photo
Sigger
We're all in this together - most understand that
01:05 PM on 12/19/2010
_The top capital gains tax rate of 15 percent. Cost: $25.9 billion.

_The top tax rate on dividends of 15 percent. Cost: $27.3 billion.

Since the top 1% owns more wealth than that the bottom 90% combined, guess who pays a lesser tax rate than a $30,000 per year laborer? Essentially every dime of this provision is to benefit the rich.

_Imposes a lower estate tax for the next two years, allowing couples to pass estates as large as $10 million to heirs tax-free. The balance would be taxed at 35 percent. Cost: $68.1 billion. The republicans, with the complicity of Obama, just created a "aristocracy forever" class of people who can just clip their 15% dividends. Americans will be escaping to Canada to escape poverty in another 25 years.

_Provides a one-year Social Security tax cut for all wage earners, from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent. Cost: $112 billion. Why didn't they insure that social security won't be available for our grand-children by cutting it another 2%. Primarily, they just wanted to cripple the fund, so that it would be politically popular to privatize it for the financial well-being of that top 1%. After all, Congress has just proven it is not fiscally astute enough to stop from destroying the futures of average Americans.

This bill benefits the rich, and destroys the middle class - PERIOD.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Enid
02:10 PM on 12/19/2010
Now our government instead of borrowing the money from our SSI will just take it as income from you. Tax it and use it as they like and not have to pay it back into SSI. Business's get cash benefit of not paying SSI matching dollars for employee's SSI. There will be now no convenient or good time to return to SSI deduction as employers will scream. Employees will not want to return to SSI deductions because it would be a take home pay reduction.Youth and good health make people feel self secure but with time they will realise the wisdom of SSI and SSI will not be there. Republicans Thank you President Obama for destroying SSI as they have tried since FDR created SSI.
Mr Obama I will never again vote for you. MY opinion You are a political fool.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
larry putman
pyrgist
07:14 AM on 12/19/2010
i believe the taxpayers can spend their own money better then the government can.
photo
Sigger
We're all in this together - most understand that
01:22 PM on 12/19/2010
Tim Rutten: "Arguments that the existing estate tax frustrates initiative simply are nonsense. Has anybody noticed a shortage of rich people lately?

It's also no mystery how such advantages are obtained. Again, Roosevelt's appraisal of the first Gilded Age is sadly resonant. "The man of great wealth owes a particular obligation to the state," he said, "because he derives special advantages from the mere existence of government."

Unless you're in that upper 1%, in the years to come, your standard of living will continue to deteriorate, and your children will even be poorer, by today's standards.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockyroad
05:15 PM on 12/18/2010
A tax break for active investors in foreign-based banking, securities and insurance firms, for 2010 and 2011. Cost: $9.2 billion.

Why? Who actually benefits? US-based Banks, hedge funds, millionaires, securities and insurance firms?
photo
Dislikessocialism
Conservatives have better ideas
03:29 PM on 12/18/2010
This is great news. I have a feeling the economy will pick up soon. The goverment is not going to lose money it was never theirs to begin with. Cut social services and privatize the remaining ones and gov will save billions.
06:52 AM on 12/19/2010
Hey up yours too
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:24 PM on 12/18/2010
It is a sick misdirection when congress mandates the need to pay off the middle class in order to justify a much larger pay-off to the priveleged, of which they are a part of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gemzenith
03:18 PM on 12/19/2010
There is a middle class? Where did it go? I haven't see it around here, lately, just alot of working poor . underemployed and unemployed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:21 PM on 12/18/2010
Unemployment in California is over 12.5%.

California has over 10% of the nation's entire population.

The Bush Tax Cuts Redux did not create jobs before, and will not now.

And the money this bill is supposed to encourage consumers to spend with to jump start the economy will go where it has been for the last 3 years--bills, food, mortgage and will supply no kick start at all. The rich will just bank their money or put it into more derivatives to skroo us even further.

This is a guaranteed loser.
03:46 PM on 12/18/2010
the rich won't be banking their money in the US. They just got a big incentive to ship their money offshore:
"_A tax break for active investors in foreign-based banking, securities and insurance firms, for 2010 and 2011"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:10 PM on 12/18/2010
You're right. That money is already gone and any 'stimulus' Obama stretched out of that notion will never, ever, happen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
russ Milnes
07:56 PM on 12/18/2010
Tell John Boehner
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:27 PM on 12/18/2010
What a non-starter for a response.

Please try to do better next time, will you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:42 PM on 12/18/2010
Somebody's got to pay for Bush's $1.2 Trillion Iraq war for oil and un-budgeted Medicare drug program.

Republicans want to destroy the middle class. No middle class, no democracy.
11:54 AM on 12/18/2010
Looks like we'll be borrowing more money from China. It also looks like it is the first step towards doing away with social security. With so many people complaining about the lack of funds in ss it hardly seems like a logical thing to do. In the long run it has got to effect the solvency of ss. The bill does require the Treasury Department to replentish ss with other government funds that will have to be borrowed. SS had accumalted a 2.5 trillion trust fund since 1980's but the government has borrowed that money to pay for other programs. They said they will be repaid with interest but that sustains the argument that ss would be going broke in 2037 and would give then an excuse to cut benefits which most pay into. The tea baggers are all for doing away with ss but don't hold your breath about cutting back congressional pensions or even having congressmen contribute to ss. Bush sure did push to privatize ss to put money in the stock market and that sure would have been a disaster given our economic crash. They make all these predictions about ss going broke in 2037 but couldn't see the economic crash coming right in front of their eyes. I don't see any reason to trust these people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:17 PM on 12/18/2010
but but but...Obama was forced to make this deal. That darn party of 'no' has all the power in DC, we just didn't get the memo.

Faved, btw!
06:32 AM on 12/19/2010
Borrowing money from China? The Republican Way.
05:55 AM on 12/18/2010
I am disappoint­­­­­ed .

I am angry.
I am sad.
I wanted more .
I wanted him to make a stand
I wanted to see a debate on the floor(s)
I want to throw a sponge brick at the screen everytime I see a republican on it.
I feel helpless that RIGHT NOW I cannot do anything about it .
I feel good that SOME people are going to get help.
I feel the cost was too high to do so.
I FEEL IT WAS A TRAVESTY TO LEAVE THE 99'ERS OUT.
I worry about my future for myself and my kids.
I want America to succeed and as an extension the rest of world.
I am HAPPY a MILLION people will NOT lose their jobs ( economists­­­­' prediction )

I am a liberal and proud of it and STILL support the President until the end of the term.

Having said that ...the deal has a cost of around 900 billion and the top 2% tax cuts taking up approx 120 of that. There are real tax incentives to promote business and THAT needs to be done if the Democratic party along with the President have ANY chance at reelection in 2 years.

AND ..there are real benefits for REAL people in the short term.

come out in two years and make the RIGHT PAY.

with regrets saying it so,
An Irish Lover...
photo
wonketteRAWKS
Hypocrisy is prevalent in BOTH parties!
12:58 PM on 12/19/2010
O-bummer!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justin Stamper
04:37 AM on 12/18/2010
This bill should have added a 10% income tax to all Corporations and individuals, one that stays in effect until active military operations and occupations are ceased.

You would likely see "Defense Spending" decreased rapidly, and the wars end rapidly. We would see a massive burst in the small business private sectors, and we could also appropriate our defense funds towards research and border protection.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justin Stamper
01:54 PM on 12/18/2010
“This bill should have added a 10% income tax to all Corporatio­ns and individual­s, one that stays in effect until active military operations and occupation­s are ceased.

You would likely see "Defense Spending" decreased rapidly, and the wars end rapidly. We would see a massive burst in the small business private sectors, and we could also appropriat­e our defense funds towards research and border protection­.”
photo
Tinkets
Sometimes you just want off the planet
11:21 PM on 12/17/2010
Is it me or is this whole disaster starting to sound like Scrooge? This one however, has no ghostly visits to see the what happened past and learn from it, then to know what is actually happening in the present to the real people, and what the future will hold if circumstances are not altered.
I'm scared for Tiny Tim
10:25 PM on 12/17/2010
If they just extended the Bush tax cuts you would see no change in our economy because we are use the the cuts for the past 8 years. So they had to add the other cuts to get $$ in peoples pockets to spend so the tax cuts would appear to be working.
07:26 PM on 12/17/2010
And nothing for the 99ers, shame on Obama's Administration & Congress' Legislative Leaches.