iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

DREAM Act Vote Fails In Senate

Congress

First Posted: 12/18/10 11:31 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- The Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of bypassing a filibuster of the DREAM Act, but fell five votes short on Saturday, dealing a harsh blow to the bill that would have allowed some undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children to gain legal status.

The final vote total was 55-41 -- well above what would be needed for the bill to pass in a normal vote. Many previously undecided Democrats voted in support of the bill, as did Republican Sens. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Bob Bennett (R-Utah).

But others voted mostly along party-lines. Five Democrats voted against the bill: Sens. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Jon Tester (D-Mt.), Max Baucus (D-Mt.) and Kay Hagan (D-N.C.), who switched her vote to a "no" at the last minute. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) skipped Saturday's votes for a Christmas party.

Given the incoming Congressional leadership's harsh views on immigration, the vote was likely the last chance to pass the bill for at least two years.

Students in graduation caps sat in the gallery to watch the vote, most of whom have spent months advocating for the DREAM Act. To be eligible for the act, undocumented students must have entered the country when they were 15 or younger and graduated high school or obtained a GED. To receive a green card, the bill requires them to complete two years in the military or two years of college -- plus a 10-year waiting period. Only six years later would they be eligible to apply for citizenship.

Some DREAM Act-eligible students face deportation -- despite clean criminal records -- and hoped the DREAM Act could help them gain legal status. Others will now be unable to attend school, join the military or serve in certain jobs if they are not eligible to work in the United States.

Lorella Praeli, 22, came to the United States when she was 10 years old from Peru after years of treatment in the country for her above-the-knee amputation. Now a student at Quinnipiac University, Praeli said she was denied funding for a fellowship she received because of her immigration status.

Watching proceedings on the floor, Praeli said she became emotional about her months of advocacy for the bill.

"Some senators proudly put their thumbs down, and with each thumb down I felt like my heart was a tighter knot," she said. "All i could think was 'can I continue to live like this?'"

The DREAM Act was first introduced in 2001 by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and came closest to passage in 2007, when it fell eight votes short of bypassing a filibuster. But previous Republican supporters, most notably Hatch and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), have since made a radical shift to the right on immigration.

Coming off of a harsh anti-immigration law in Arizona, SB 1070, and a campaign season with numerous Republicans ads stoking fear about the border, the current Republican message is "secure the borders first."

A $600 million border security bill passed by the Senate in August did not silence these complaints.

Debate on Saturday was no different, with most Republicans claiming it would be wrong to pass the DREAM Act when illegal immigrants can still enter the country. (An estimated 50 percent of illegal immigrants did not enter the country illegally, but overstayed their visas.)

"To those who have come to my office, you're always welcome to come but you're wasting your time," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). "We're not going to pass the DREAM Act or any other legalization until we secure our borders. It will never be done stand-alone. It has to be part of comprehensive immigration reform."

Democrats criticized Republicans' statements on the floor about the DREAM Act, decrying them for calling the bill "amnesty" and claiming it would lead to a flood of illegal immigrants entering the country. "They're preying to peoples' worst fears," Reid said of Republicans. "The DREAM Act couldn't be further from amnesty. It's hard work. It gives so many the incentive to contribute to our nation and its economy."

After the vote, key supporters said the DREAM Act will be passed eventually as part of comprehensive immigration reform. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the key sponsor of the bill, said he would work with the leader of the Senate's immigration subcommittee, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), to ensure the bill be included in any larger immigration bills.

Schumer said finding bipartisan support for immigration reform would be difficult, but "possible." "It's going to have to be done in a comprehensive way," Schumer said. "We showed our goodwill -- we're not against building up the border. It's not the full solution. We've done border bill after border bill, and it doesn't solve the problem."

If they can re-introduce the bill, lawmakers will have high-level supporters. The president and a number of administration officials came out in support of the DREAM Act in the weeks prior to the vote, including Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Attorney General Eric Holder and Defense Secretary Robert Gates. The Pentagon included the act in its 2011-2012 Strategic Plan as a way to help the military "shape and maintain a mission-ready All Volunteer Force." The Congressional Budget Office estimated that enacting the DREAM Act would reduce deficits by about $1.4 billion over the next decade.

President Barack Obama said after the vote that he would continue pushing for the DREAM Act and other steps toward immigration reform.

"It is disappointing that common sense did not prevail today," he said in a statement. "But my administration will not give up on the DREAM Act, or on the important business of fixing our broken immigration system."

DREAM Act supporters, many of whom are undocumented, said they plan to work on other immigration issues, such as in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants, while organizing for comprehensive immigration reform.

Praeli said she decided she can deal with the realities of living undocumented in the United States, especially because of the tight group of advocates that formed in support of the DREAM Act.

"We've stepped out of the shadows and with that has come liberation and freedom and an opportunity to organize," Praeli said. "I feel a renewed commitment and a strong sense of our responsibility going forward. We have a lot of work to do."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of bypassing a filibuster of the DREAM Act, but fell five votes short on Saturday, dealing a harsh blow to the bill that would have allowed some ...
WASHINGTON -- The Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of bypassing a filibuster of the DREAM Act, but fell five votes short on Saturday, dealing a harsh blow to the bill that would have allowed some ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14,589
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (137 total)
06:35 PM on 02/16/2011
I think it's breathtaking that illegal immigrants have anybody "advocating" for them. They are breaking the law. Why don't these "advocates" think our nation's laws should be enforced? The US allows 1,000,000 legal immigrants enter the country each year, more than any other country in the world. That's pretty impressive. But some people don't want to apply to immigrate legally. They don't want to wait in line. So they just sneak in. And when they get here, illegally, they amazingly find "advocates" advocating for them. Only in America, where lawbreakers have people working to help them beat the system.
02:28 PM on 02/16/2011
this is great
02:23 PM on 02/16/2011
wow this is good
photo
TexasTreader
Fluffy, the yard dog
01:09 PM on 12/24/2010
The DREAM Act is just another political stationary bike. It LOOKS like work but does nothing toward fixing immigration issues. Will people who sneaked across the border of a country whose language they don't speak and whose laws they ignore suddenly going to get conscientious and start filling out paperwork? Are high school administrators going to fulfill their requirements for reporting graduates honorably? Will the Obama administration choose to create another bureaucracy for monitoring high schools or trust that no one will corrupt the new system? Give me a break!
photo
justsayno
All politicians lie
09:14 PM on 12/23/2010
It might help thier cause by getting American citizens approval if they would just try to become Americans. I get so sick of hearing them speak in tongues in my local store. How rude and disrespectful they are to our culture. If they want to be rude and disrespectful to my culture in my home.... they can go home. end of story. In America WE SPEAK ENGLISH learn the language!
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
03:23 AM on 12/24/2010
That's what the Native Americans said when the first illegal alien Europeans invaded this land. They didn't go home and history is repeating itself, get used to it and learn Spanish. Also gotta remember that a big chunk of the U.S. was Mexican so they didn't cross the border the border crossed them. They aren't speaking a foreign language you are.
photo
justsayno
All politicians lie
08:26 AM on 12/24/2010
Oh good God not that again. Look way way back then there were no laws nor boundaries. Boo hoo. You don't like America - go away- This is our land, we have given blood and treasure to make her what she is today. I could care less what was I am living today in the what is. The what is - is this is MY nation and In MY nation we have a culture all our own and it is called the American culture. It is a diverse nation where anyone of any race - religion- creed or color can come and assimilate and become an American through the proper procedures. They speak in tongues I speak English and if they want to stay and get any support from Americans it is as I said. Become American and learn OUR language and speak it because there in not a lot of things that irritate me more than for you to come into my home and disrespect me... oh and bud... I am not alone in my thinking - you are
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
01:34 PM on 12/22/2010
to huffyandpuffy
My post is being flagged maybe here it will stay up.


If the dreamers could come back the right way, or get in line and do it the right way, there would be no need for the Dream Act.
Immigrating to the United States LEGALLY is impossible, (and for Dreamers it is even worse,) unless you're a skilled worker and not enough people here can do your job ( example Mariachi musician), an educated professional and no one here can do your job, have a million dollars to start your own company, or have a legal parent or spouse here in the U.S. who can qualify to sponsor you.
Odds are, someone who's willing to, in many cases, risk their lives to come here so they can 1)work in the fields on 100+ degree valley days, or 2)clean rooms in the kinds of motels where bodily fluids probably represent a health hazard, or 3)mow the lawns of people who are too lazy or busy to do it themselves won't qualify.
So to all you people who say they should do it the "right" way, please don't insult our intelligence. It doesn't exist, and to suggest otherwise is disingenuous
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:21 PM on 12/22/2010
Ever heard of Craig Ferguson? He has no special skills, he is a decent actor and late night talkshow host but many US citizens can do those jobs just fine. He is also an admitted former herion addict. Yet somehow he can here legally, did his time, took the test and was made a US citizen.

So I guess it does exist and suggesting it doesn't is disingenuous.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:02 PM on 12/22/2010
Bah, it did show up and I replied but now my reply is gone. Comment system is wonky today. Anyway, I agree with ddpalmerr, it is possible. That being said, I think the Dream act is a waste of money and resources. I think that money and resources should be used to make the process of LEGAL immigration EASIER and faster. I agree with you that it's extremely difficult, and while not impossible, completely infeasible in most cases for people to immigrate. If the process was easier, we wouldn't have near the problem with illegal immigration that we do.

My point is, fix the underlying system, don't just slap a bandaid on top of it. Make it easier and faster for people to live the American dream.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:20 PM on 12/22/2010
" -- despite clean criminal records -- "

This is such a tough issue. Yes the kids are criminals, however they were brought here by the adults responsible for them. My heart goes out to these kids, but they're still here illegally. Don't blame enforcement agencies for actually enforcing our laws, blame the parents / family members who brought the kids here in the first place and put them in that situation. But, these kids have been here, been educated, they can come back the right way if they want. Come back legally, get a work visa and apply for citizenship. That's what this is all about, not this lunacy of accusations of racism. It's about the law that needs to be enforced to protect our country, even though it is unfair at times. It's not the end-all...there is a citizenship process. Getting deported doesn't prevent them from ever being an American citizen.
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
01:29 PM on 12/22/2010
If the dreamers could come back the right way, or get in line and do it the right way, there would be no need for the Dream Act.

Immigrating to the United States LEGALLY is impossible, (and for Dreamers it is even worse,) unless you're a skilled worker and not enough people here can do your job ( example Mariachi musician), an educated professional and no one here can do your job, have a million dollars to start your own company, or have a legal parent or spouse here in the U.S. who can qualify to sponsor you.

Odds are, someone who's willing to, in many cases, risk their lives to come here so they can 1)work in the fields on 100+ degree valley days, or 2)clean rooms in the kinds of motels where bodily fluids probably represent a health hazard, or 3)mow the lawns of people who are too lazy or busy to do it themselves won't qualify.

So to all you people who say they should do it the "right" way, please don't insult our intelligence. It doesn't exist, and to suggest otherwise is disingenuous
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:42 PM on 12/22/2010
There's nothing disengenuous about it. I'm totally for LEGAL immigration. I think the invested would be much better spent fixing the broken process and making it actually easier for people to do it legally instead of throwing a bandaid on top of it.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
theerrantsoul
03:14 PM on 12/23/2010
My problem with hanging the "criminal" tag on all illegal immigrants is that taken at face value, the same term can be applied to anybody who has, say, broken a speed limit or fudged their taxes.  It's technically true, but oversimplification of their situation.
07:21 PM on 12/21/2010
In another Huff Po article it states 1 in 4 students can't pass the military entrance exams. Watch the stink being raised when 1 in 4 applying through the DREAM Act won't qualify
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
06:35 AM on 12/22/2010
Per The DREAM Act ~ these students will be granted hardship waivers
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schweik
06:32 PM on 12/21/2010
I formerly announce formation of an encounter moderated hug group to protest against politically incorrect label "Undocumented Immigrants" used by some pretend liberals.

The properl politically correct term is " Permanent Indigenous Guests." ( P I.G ) for short.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Phil11514
05:38 AM on 12/22/2010
I formally announce formation of an official military M.P. moderated group to protest against the user-name "Schweik" as used by the poster above.
 
The proper politically correct term is "Sgt. SeigHeil".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schweik
10:39 AM on 12/22/2010
Sir, if I said anything to offend you, please believe me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
03:55 PM on 12/21/2010
Supreme Court seems split, but leaning in favor of Ariz. immigration law

The law, in part, requires Arizona employers to determine worker eligibility through an Internet-based system called E-Verify.

Through E-Verify, employers can quickly match a job applicant's information with Social Security and Department of Homeland Security databases.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2013631089_immigration09.html?syndication=rss
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Phil11514
05:41 AM on 12/22/2010
E-Verify is completely incompetent and very easy to defeat.
 
All an undocumented immigrant needs to do is spend about $100 to purchase the name of a legal resident and I.D. in that person's name. A fake I.D. will defeat E-Verify quite nicely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
06:30 AM on 12/22/2010
Granted there is a possibility of illegals defrauding the E-verify Program

There is also a possibility of illegals defrauding The DREAM Act Program

So I guess we should just trash both programs & do nothing

I don't think a 100% of 11 million illegals will obtain a "fake I.D."
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
11:45 AM on 12/22/2010
RE: Viper1st 8 minutes ago (10:59 AM)
Then is it safe to say ~

Whitman/Ha­rsh, using E-verify as their source of employee verificati­on via USCIS

Were duped by an unscupluou­s illegal prospectiv­e employee applicant, {name withheld as a client of Gloria Allred} submitting a "full-hous­e" of fraudulent I.D. documents, i.e. visa #; CA D.L.; I-9; & U.S. SSN
~~~~~~~~~~~
Whitmen knew her house keeper's status was illegal. She just lied about it. When whitman paid SS taxes for Dias for a SS # that didnt exist she recieved a letter informing her of this, but ignored it. Dias found one of those letters in the trash.
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
07:29 AM on 12/22/2010
My sister who has an Hispanic surname was asked by office staff to be a guinea pig for e-verify.To her surprise and the shock of all office staff, her status was flagged by e-verify as being illegal even though she is an American citizen who is bonded by the fed gov. because has worked as DEA agent for past 11 years.


Expanding Flawed E-Verify System Will Hurt Lawful Workers

A misleading report by an anti-immigration "think-tank" doesn't change the fact that the system isn't reliable.

The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) is up to it again, releasing a new and highly misleading "report" claiming that the E-Verify employment verification program is 99.5 percent accurate. This is yet another in CIS's long series of dubious "studies" issued to stall meaningful immigration reform and push its deportation-only agenda.

Even the government has disputed CIS's 99.5 percent conclusion. In fact, Richard Stana of the Government Accountability Office testified at a May 2008 Congressional hearing that it was "misleading" to claim that the E-Verify error rate is less than 1 percent. In fact, many of the tens of thousands of workers who receive final non-confirmations are actually work-authorized.

http://www.alternet.org/immigration/102662/expanding_flawed_e-verify_system_will_hurt_lawful_workers/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
07:49 AM on 12/22/2010
Please use 2010 dated sources

A lot has changed since October 2008
02:12 PM on 12/21/2010
I wish the Democrats would stop the pretense and just call this bill what it really is, the "adding millions of new voters to the Democratic voting pool bill".
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
06:34 AM on 12/22/2010
Let me remind you of the law created and supported to this day by Republicans that gives instant amnesty and citizenship to any illegal immigrant from Cuba. It's called the, "adding millions of new voters to the REPUBLICAN voting pool LAW".
08:18 PM on 12/23/2010
Truth in advertising
02:09 PM on 12/21/2010
"undocumented immigrants"

You can change the wording all you want (much like the switch from Global Warming to Climate Change), but the fact remains, these are ILLEGAL immigrants, as in, they committed a crime.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
03:22 PM on 12/21/2010
NAHJ Urges News Media to Stop Using Dehumanizi­ng Terms When Covering Immigratio­n Calls for stopping the use of “illegals” as a noun, curbing the phrase “illegal alien”

http://www.ask.com/web?qsrc=2990&o=0&l=dir&q=journalists+not+to+use+the+word+illegal+aliens
.
04:01 PM on 12/21/2010
Just another rung on the ladder to political correctness insanity.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Phil11514
05:45 AM on 12/22/2010
They DID NOT commit ANY crime. They were CHILDREN when they were brought to the U.S. by their parents. They had NO CHOICE in the matter. They did NOTHING AT ALL "wrong".
09:25 AM on 12/22/2010
That's funny, because federal law says otherwise. Are you saying ignorance of the law negates the law?
02:43 PM on 12/22/2010
Their parents made them culpable. Their parents put them in the position of living illegally. If the USA accepts responsibility for their actions the flood of people will never stop. Why should anyone have to be accountable when the USA will shoulder the responsibility?? Just how much can the USA shoulder? Are we there yet?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schweik
10:45 AM on 12/21/2010
North Carolina, RAEFORD FARMS PROCESSING PLANT IN COLUMBIA WENT FROM 80 % ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT TO 70% LEGITIMATE AFRICAN AMERICANS after the plant was raided and illegal were fired.

This MUST be done in other factories, plants of U.S.
Americna law enforcement must be forced( no pun intended) to carry out the laws intended to protect low income American citizens and legal immigrants from the illegals locust invasive species.
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
06:13 AM on 12/22/2010
The Reaford Farms incident is isolated because unless a business is located in a city with enough Blacks who are willing to do these jobs white Americans wont do them, so the only alternative is to outsource the jobs.

Once these low skilled jobs are outsourced, the jobs as managers, office workers, line supervisors, company truck drivers and many others disappear.

Just proves the point that legalizing low skill immigrants who are willing to do these lower paying jobs increases jobs for higher skilled Americans. Each immigrant who works low skilled job, creates 5 higher skilled jobs up the ladder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samuel Nnadi
Detail Oriented
05:00 AM on 12/21/2010
This is sad for American. These are American children, the only country they know. Dream Act is a well crafted bill with a bipartisan input. I encouraged Harry Reid to bring up the vote again this week like he did with DADT bill. It will be morally wrong to deport these children to countries they do not know.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
05:04 AM on 12/21/2010
If these were "American children"

They wouldn't need The DREAM Act which pertains to undocumented children ~ read the proposed bill
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
08:01 AM on 12/21/2010
They are more American then any person of European ancestry will ever be because of the indigenous blood running through their veins.
02:10 PM on 12/21/2010
No, actually they aren't American children.
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
05:20 AM on 12/22/2010
Anyone who was born on this American Continent is an American whether or not you object.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Phil11514
08:19 PM on 12/26/2010
They have lived in the U.S. most of if not their ENTIRE lives. They do not know any other home, the overwhelmi­ng majority of them have never consciousl­y or knowingly lived anywhere else. They are as American as anyone who was born here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
04:53 AM on 12/21/2010
Again, the question stands ~

If the U.S. already has a 15.1 million job deficit with no change for the last consecutive 19 months and no positive change forecasted in the near future

Why do we need to add any additional legal / ille­gal immigrants into the U.S. Workforce

Just so we can increase the number of unemployed­­s to 16.1 million, or 17.1 million, or 18.1 million ~ or more

When do we say enough unemployed­­s are enough