More

North Korea 'Won't Hit Back' Over South Korean Drills

FOSTER KLUG and AHN YOUNG-JOON   12/20/10 09:59 PM ET   AP

South Korea North Korea

YEONPYEONG ISLAND, South Korea — South Korean President Lee Myung-bak gathered his national security leaders for strategic talks Tuesday as troops braced for possible North Korean retaliation a day after conducting artillery drills on an island the North bombed last month.

North Korea has so far backed off threats to strike the South again for conducting live-fire military drills on Yeonpyeong Island. Similar drills last month triggered a North Korean artillery attack that killed four South Koreans, including two civilians.

Still, South Korea's military said it was prepared for any unexpected North Korean provocation.

"We will mobilize reconnaissance and surveillance assets of South Korea and the U.S. combined force and intensively monitor North Korea's military activities," Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin told lawmakers before leaving for the security meeting.

Meanwhile, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson praised North Korea's "statesmanlike" restraint as he wrapped up a four-day trip to North Korea.

Richardson, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations who has served as an unofficial envoy to North Korea in the past, told Associated Press Television News in Pyongyang that his trip yielded "positive" results.

"It was a good visit – positive results in our discussions with North Korea," he said Tuesday morning before boarding a plane in Pyongyang.

Richardson said the North agreed to let U.N. atomic inspectors visit its main nuclear complex to make sure North Korea is not producing enriched uranium for a nuclear bomb, according to a statement from his office.

The United States, however, indicated skepticism that North Korea would do anything more than talk.

"North Korea talks a great game. They always do," U.S. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said in Washington. "The real issue is what will they do. If they are agreeable to returning IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) inspectors to their country, they need to tell the IAEA that."

The North expelled U.N. inspectors last year, and last month showed a visiting American scientist a new, highly advanced uranium enrichment facility that could give it a second way to make atomic bombs, in addition to its plutonium program. Richardson also said that Pyongyang was willing to sell fresh fuel rods, potentially to South Korea.

"This is the way countries are supposed to act," Crowley told reporters. "The South Korean exercise was defensive in nature. The North Koreans were notified in advance. There was no basis for a belligerent response."

The North's apparent conciliatory gestures came after South Korea launched fighter jets, evacuated hundreds of residents near its tense land border with the North and sent residents of islands near disputed waters into underground bunkers in case Pyongyang followed through on a vow to attack over the drills.

"We have to show North Korea that we are committed to respond to any kind of North Korean provocation," a senior South Korean government official said Tuesday.

He said the lack of response Monday did not mean Pyongyang was backing down, noting that North Korea thrives on "surprise" attacks and that South Korean military was braced for possible provocations in coming days. The official spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the matter.

North Korea has previously been accused of using a mix of aggression and conciliatory gestures to force international negotiations that usually net it much-needed aid. Real progress on efforts to rid the North of its nuclear weapons programs has been rare.

On Nov. 23, the North shelled Yeonpyeong Island, a tiny enclave of fishing communities and military bases about 7 miles (11 kilometers) from North Korean shores in response to an earlier round of South Korean live-fire maneuvers.

The artillery barrage killed two marines and two construction workers and was the first attack targeting civilian areas since the 1950-53 Korean War.

The Korean peninsula, still technically in a state of war, has remained tense for weeks, and U.N. diplomats holding an emergency meeting in New York on Sunday failed to find a solution to the crisis.

Pyongyang is believed to be seeking one-on-one talks with Washington before returning to stalled nuclear disarmament negotiations hosted by China. The U.S. and South Korea, however, say resuming the talks without requiring meaningful movement on past nuclear commitments would reward North Korea for bad behavior.

China has urged a resumption of the talks, and diplomats said Beijing successfully prevented Sunday's U.N. Security Council meeting from issuing a statement condemning the North's shelling – as the U.S. and others had wanted.

China's deputy U.N. ambassador Wang Min urged both sides "to exercise maximum restraint," avoid increasing tensions and solve differences through peaceful dialogue and engagement.

"China will continue to make every efforts towards this end," he said Monday. "Calm rather than tensions, dialogue rather than confrontation, peace than warfare – this is the strong aspiration and voice of the peoples from both sides of the peninsula and the international community."

Diplomats at the U.N. blamed China for refusing to condemn North Korea for two deadly attacks this year that helped send relations to their lowest point in decades.

China is the North's most important ally and has come under pressure to leverage its influence to rein in the North in the wake of the attack.

Beijing, which provides crucial food and fuel aid to Pyongyang, is wary of pressuring the North in a way that could destabilize it, fearing in part a government collapse and a flood of refugees into northeastern China.

It was unclear if China persuaded North Korea not to react to Monday's drills.

Richardson appeared to suggest that his visit contributed to the North's backing down.

"During my meetings in Pyongyang, I repeatedly pressed North Korea not to retaliate. The result is that South Korea was able to flex its muscles, and North Korea reacted in a statesmanlike manner," Richardson said in a statement. "I hope this will signal a new chapter and a round of dialogue to lessen tension on the Korean peninsula."

North Korea called Monday's drills a "reckless military provocation" but said they held fire because Seoul had changed its firing zones.

The official Korean Central News Agency carried a military statement that suggested the North viewed Monday's drills differently from those that provoked it last month because South Korean shells landed farther south of the North's shores.

The North claims the waters around Yeonpyeong as its territory. Several bloody naval skirmishes have occurred in recent years along the Koreas' disputed western sea border, which the North does not recognize.

___

Klug reported from Seoul. Associated Press writers Jean H. Lee, Kim Kwang-tae and Kelly Olsen in Seoul, Gillian Wong in Beijing, Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations, and Matthew Lee and Lolita Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

YEONPYEONG ISLAND, South Korea — South Korean President Lee Myung-bak gathered his national security leaders for strategic talks Tuesday as troops braced for possible North Korean retaliation a ...
YEONPYEONG ISLAND, South Korea — South Korean President Lee Myung-bak gathered his national security leaders for strategic talks Tuesday as troops braced for possible North Korean retaliation a ...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,207
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (52 total)
07:16 AM on 12/22/2010
Leader of north Korea Kim Jong-il and his sons: Succession speech

http://olderime.wordpress.com/2010/11/23/leader-of-north-korea-kim-jong-il-and-his-sons-succession-speech/
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
06:27 AM on 12/21/2010
Looks like macho man likes the smell of Kopi Luwak in the morning, after all.
photo
DanoX
I'll be your snack-pack baby!
10:01 PM on 12/20/2010
How much oil and rice did you give them this time Mr Richardson?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LiberalLee
Yes I am a witch. Deal with it.
09:35 PM on 12/20/2010
China say, " Sit! Heel! Shut up!"
Or no groceries.
04:56 PM on 12/20/2010
We have to give Richardson an “E” for an effort. However, let’s not be fools at the same time by giving a “credit” or presuming that the North’s withdrawing from their tough words as being “Statesmen.” Richardson’s attitudes and his words appear kowtowing the North because he thinks he has had relationships with the North whatever that means, all of which appears self-serving rather than being an effective diplomat. We’ve seen the North’s conning and criminal behaviors since the war. The south has been nothing but patient and showing good will throughout. God be in the peninsula should there be a war. However, we all know that the North has more to lose than the South even with their nuclear weapon. What has been surprising and disappointing is that international community has been pressuring the South for restrain after the North’s recent despicable behaviors. One has to come to stand up and draw a line and say enough is enough. Let’s hope that for humanity’s sake, the war should be the last resort but you cannot tell the South to lie down and play dead after taking 60 years of bully.
03:33 PM on 12/20/2010
North Korea to Allow Nuclear Inspectors to Return
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency have been granted permission to return to a North Korean Nuclear site. The news comes following a visit by Bill Richardson, former US ambassador to the United Nations. http://www.newslook.com/videos/276378-north-korea-to-allow-nuclear-inspectors-to-return?autoplay=true
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wuud52
02:12 PM on 12/20/2010
A bunch of bluff and bluster, but no bite.

The fact is, North Korea is ruled by a centralized dictator style government that has a very strong desire to pass the mantle on to future family members. A war would take that family out of power, that is why a war will not happen by the choice of the leadership. He is too greedy and self centered to start a war that will boot him from power. He does not want to be the guy that lost the family holdings on the country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mdbmama
Southern liberal, lonely here
04:29 PM on 12/20/2010
Don't hold your breath on the "no bite" part. They have a long habit of waiting until your back is turned to "bite." I'd be very careful turning my back on them.

IMHO, North Korea is, has been, and will be the most dangerous country we face.
01:21 PM on 12/20/2010
The difference between now & 68-69 and what didn't start a war!
"68" A war with North Korea would have constitute a second front stretching troop & equipment between Korea and Vietnam . Being pushed by Russia and China then.
The Pueblo was taken along with 126 of it crew in Dec. a hostage situation.
On Jan.30th (same day as Tet in Vietnam) 30 North Korean assassins entered the Presidential Palace in Seoul to kill the President but failed.
There was a total of 600 cease fire violations in 68 (that were logged).
In the Dec. 68 or Jan. 69, North Korea INVADED South Korea sending 120 troops (to liberate the enslaved population that would rise up given the chance). Number of NK troops confirmed by body count.
Seoul was buzzed by 4 migs in April testing ADA response by South Korea & US.

These "minor incidences" were not enough to start a war then and the happenings now does not even come close to this level in my estimation. Also, unlike then, Russian and China are not trying to push the issue and it is probable that there is not enough fuel in NK to get there army to the DMZ let alone over it.

Just as soon as Daddy is certain that his son is secure, thing will return to normal.
01:20 PM on 12/20/2010
I wouldn't lose to much sleep over this current situation in Korea. We have been through this whole thing before. Dec. 27, 68 Pueblo was captured and Kim il song, (Kim jug il's father) was insuring his son would be his predecessor. 2010 - South Korean ship sunk and Kim jug il is insuring his son will also take over. The military exercises that are being conducted are scheduled every year at exactly the same time nothing out of the normal. Next exercises will occur in Feb-March.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Red Herring
Retired Miner, living in third world
01:16 PM on 12/20/2010
Cooler heads prevailed. The Pentagon must really be ticked off that they could not get the North Koreans to retaliate. No war before Christmas. The Generals in the Pentagon must be wondering where they went wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jspkim
01:21 PM on 12/20/2010
It's abt time for cooler heads, not the time for more provocative military drills.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:51 PM on 12/20/2010
And you really believe that the U.S. wants open war to resume with North Korea?
01:01 PM on 12/20/2010
Blink. I am dam glad they did.
12:21 PM on 12/20/2010
A picture is worth a thousand words? When one reads more artillery being fired towards the shores of the DPRK, this might be something visually to bear in mind.

http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&msa=0&msid=118016932219314777497.000495b412715637a481f
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jspkim
12:35 PM on 12/20/2010
The NLL was unilaterally defined/ declared by the US right after the Korean war.
12:01 PM on 12/20/2010
What did they receive in compensation? It has always been their way to "hold up" other countries for monetary compensation of some sort.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UberdanSounds
I make music(al), funnies.
11:51 AM on 12/20/2010
See, if we had destroyed this moronic useless dictator instead of Saddam, we would be much better off today. Imagine those people starting over now, talk about being deprived.

"After studying more than 2,300 refugees who have fled the north over the past four years, anthropologist Sunyoung Pak has found that the average young northern male is 5.9cm (2.32in) shorter than his southern contemporary. The difference for women is 4.1cm (roughly 1.62in)."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/dec/05/northkorea
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:07 PM on 12/20/2010
Do you think several hundred thousand people that would have been killed in the initial N.K. artillery barrage (including many thousands of U.S. personnel) would have been "better off" had we gone to war with North Korea?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UberdanSounds
I make music(al), funnies.
12:27 PM on 12/20/2010
No, but I'm just saying if we're gonna go to war, go to war for a real reason...as in...freeing the slaves of North Korea who have no idea that they're slaves. It would also relieve a lot of tension over there as well between all of Asian countries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jspkim
02:04 PM on 12/20/2010
I even do not talk to my father because he thinks the war with NK is a good thing.
photo
Dead Che
Reunite Pangea!
11:50 AM on 12/20/2010
Peace through strength.