More

Deportation Looms For 50-Year Legal Resident

First Posted: 12/20/10 10:00 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Immigration Detentiontransfers

WASHINGTON -- Mike Burrows, who has been in the United States legally since 1962, could be detained by immigration officials at any moment. The 51-year-old, who lives in Los Angeles, was ordered for deportation in 2003, making him one of many immigrants to enter a pathway of rigidly-structured immigration laws and processes that can force deportation for even longtime lawful immigrants.

As the Obama administration steps up immigration enforcement, immigrant rights groups say situations like Burrows' are far from rare. Unlike in criminal convictions, non-citizens facing immigration charges have no right to an attorney and can face double jeopardy. A person born in the United States convicted of a minor crime often pays a fine or performs community service. For those born elsewhere, the same offense can lead to a life turned upside down.

"I don't think there's this guy in Washington who is picking on me, but this is how the machine works," Burrows told HuffPost. "This is the way the machine would treat -- and does treat -- anybody in my situation."

Burrows said his path toward potential deportation began in 1978, when he was charged as an 18-year-old with a misdemeanor after police found a stolen eight-track in his car. A friend had stolen it, but "in a misguided act of loyalty" Burrows took the fall. He was given probation and a 365-day suspended sentence. Burrows completed his probation and never served time in jail.

Burrows had the misdemeanor expunged in 1983 and thought he was done with the incident. But in 1988, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act created a new classification for crimes of non-citizens, called "aggravated felonies." The term is somewhat of a misnomer: the crimes do not necessarily involve violence, nor are they necessarily felonies. They include a far broader range of crimes, ranging from certain theft offenses to rape and murder.

Burrows' 1978 misdemeanor would fit into the guidelines for aggravated felony, had it happened after 1988. Because he was given a 365-day suspended sentence, the misdemeanor would be considered an aggravated felony under the 1988 law.

The government does not release data about who it has deported on aggravated felony grounds, but the charges were used in at least 156,713 cases, some involving legal permanent residents, between 1997 and 2006, according to data obtained by Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse.

In 2001, Burrows discovered that he was in deportation proceedings. He said ICE claimed to have sent him a final order of removal, but said he never received it, making it impossible for him to meet a 30-day deadline to appeal the order.

When he finally went before an immigration judge to appeal his case, Burrows said the judge seemed uninterested in the details of his case, instead focusing on the fact that he had missed the previous deadline. Burrows was given a final order of deportation in 2003.

Burrows said the deportation ruling is based on his 1978 misdemeanor conviction and that an immigration judge told him one way to avoid deportation would be to get one day of his 365-day suspension dropped, making it too short to be classified an aggravated felony. Burrows also has three other misdemeanor convictions from between 1998 and 2001, but said none qualify as aggravated felonies. One, which he explains on his blog, was for violating a restraining order filed against him by his then-wife while they were moving toward divorce. (He said he called the woman's mother and left a message on her answering machine.) In 1998, Burrows was arrested for driving under the influence, a misdemeanor, and in 2001 he received a misdemeanor for failing to pay a fine for a vehicle operation violation.

Burrows declined to sign a waiver allowing ICE to discuss the specifics of his case publicly, but the agency defended its actions in a statement. "Ultimately, it is up to the U.S. courts to weigh the facts in these cases and determine whether an alien has a legal basis to remain in the United States. ICE is then responsible for carrying out the courts' decisions."

Since 2001, Burrows has been fighting his deportation charge, appealing multiple times to no avail. His most recent petition to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to consider his case was dismissed in October.

Now, Burrows said he feels "depleted financially, mentally and spiritually." There are only a few options: ICE could put off his deportation and allow him to stay in the United States indefinitely, although they could detain him for deportation at any time. Immigration reform -- unlikely in the next two years with little Republican support -- could change laws that would classify Burrows' convictions as non-deportable.

His best chance to stay in the United States could be receiving a pardon from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R). Although he has not yet applied, Burrows has a petition from Change.org with about 850 signatures aimed at persuading the governor. He plans to file an application with the governor once 1,000 people have joined the petition. Schwarzenegger has issued pardons in six cases since becoming governor in his seven years in office, but none have been for immigrants facing deportation.

There is some precedent for pardons for legal immigrants, like Burrows, who are facing deportation for criminal convictions. In New York, Gov. David Paterson (D) announced in March that he will issue pardons on a case-by-case basis for legal permanent residents who had served time for their crimes and could demonstrate they are not a danger to society. Paterson has since stopped deportation for six people.

A spokeswoman for Schwarzenegger told HuffPost the governor "seriously considers each request on its own merit," but has no time frame for making a decision on pardon requests.

Burrows said he is starting to lose hope that he will be allowed to stay in the United States, where his children, mother and girlfriend -- all U.S. citizens -- live. He said he always felt American and would never consider moving back to his native Canada.

"I'm sitting here peeking out my window waiting for them to roll up like I'm a bank robber or something," Burrows told HuffPost. "It's not a very settling way to live. I'm getting to the point where I don't think I'm ever going to get due process."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Mike Burrows, who has been in the United States legally since 1962, could be detained by immigration officials at any moment. The 51-year-old, who lives in Los Angeles, was ordered for d...
WASHINGTON -- Mike Burrows, who has been in the United States legally since 1962, could be detained by immigration officials at any moment. The 51-year-old, who lives in Los Angeles, was ordered for d...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 484
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
10:49 PM on 02/16/2011
Sorry Mr Burrows but you seem to have had, since 2003, more than your share of due process, at considerable cost to the taxpayer.
I think you meant to say "I'm getting to the point where I don't think I'm ever going to get what I want"
01:48 PM on 12/23/2010
He should go back to Canada and get his automatic BC medicare coverage instead of living in constant fear of being deported anyway.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hnorc
Lover of all that is Jazz
05:39 PM on 12/22/2010
Canada, come get him. We have enough homegrown knuckleheads.
10:42 AM on 12/22/2010
Bye, see you....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jbarelli
I don't belong to an organized political party.
03:47 AM on 12/22/2010
I'm strongly in favor of immigration reform, but looking at this individual's record, including theft, DUI, and domestic abuse, I have to wonder if this individual is the best example of the problem.

I'm also hearing a lot of "it's not my fault" here. The stolen 8-track player in his car was "stolen by a friend". He "never received" the ICE letter.

While he's certainly not the worst person ever to live in the United States, I'm having a really rough time working up a lot of sympathy for the man.

The immigration judge told him how to avoid deportation by asking that his sentence be reduced by one day. Either he chose not to do that, or the court decided that the sentence was justified.

If California's Governor wants to pardon him, I'm not going to lose any sleep about the dangerous felon let loose on society. As I said, he's not the worst person living in the United States.

But if he gets sent back to Canada and told not to return, I'm not going to lose much sleep over that, either.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeeSC
08:13 PM on 01/28/2011
Couldn't have said it better.  Faved.
photo
azlegalcitizen
INDEPENDENT
12:53 AM on 12/22/2010
Anyone who cares to find the facts about the obama gang cooking the books on the increase of deportations by obama just follow the this road to education via the website here. – http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/05/AR2010120503230_3.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2010120503239
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jenna T
you can get cream for that
10:41 PM on 02/16/2011
Thanks for the link, and the information.

Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ugly american
Just say "No!" But to What?
06:35 PM on 12/21/2010
People would listen to immigrant rights groups alot more if they did not advocate illegal entry into the US. This man got into trouble as many teenagers do and it is lasting the rest of his life. One young fellow I know of lost his rights as a citizen because his friend got him into an arson charge he had little to do with.
This is not a case of an immigrant's rights being violated.
When you go to another country and want to stay, the lesson everywhere is keep your nose clean. In his case it came back to haunt him.
At least he does not have to hire a coyote to bring him back.
photo
Soule23
Anti-micro-biol
06:58 PM on 12/21/2010
No one advocates illegal entry. They advocate increased legal entry and a workable path to citizenship for those who have come here illegally during an era where immigration of low-skill immigrants was effectively verboten.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
frixx
10:54 PM on 12/21/2010
Advocating rewards like citizenship for illegal invasion IS advocating for illegal entry.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeeSC
08:15 PM on 01/28/2011
I agree with pretty much all you say... except maybe the "increased legal entry".  And you're correct to point out that back in the day... no one was really complaining about low-skill immigrants.  That's why I support DREAM.
photo
jesushammer
Anon flmthrower
05:46 PM on 12/21/2010
He's from Canada.... why all the hoopla, all he has to do is get on the greyhound back to US.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Emma2011
04:22 PM on 12/21/2010
Obama chose to squander the sizeable majorities the Dems held in the House and Senate. If Obama fails on comprehensive immigration reform in 2011, he should use his executive powers to grant deferred action or parole to the illegal immigrants. If not, he should pass the torch in 2012 to someone who is willing to lead and fight for comprehensive immigration reform.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
frixx
04:50 PM on 12/21/2010
Can you enlighten the rest of us how an open borders policy make the United States a better or safer country?
05:17 PM on 12/21/2010
Enlighten me why illegals would immigrate if they weren't able to freely find jobs from agribusiness?

Are they here to take in the sights? No? Then stick to the real problem. It's not the borders. It's the jobs.
photo
Soule23
Anti-micro-biol
06:17 PM on 12/21/2010
No one's arguing for open borders. Most of us would like to see the lettuce pickers and Canadians allowed in order to focus on real national security threats--unlike many on your side, white nationalism is not our priority. We're arguing against the nati.vist nutte.ry that leads to the sorts of abuses detailed in the article. I can see where you wouldn't understand that, though, if appearances are correct and you're coming from the big.oted nati.vist, nationalist viewpoint though.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjr101
Liberal Kennedy/Obama Democrat.
03:24 PM on 12/21/2010
This guy seems to have screwed up more than once. Why didn't he seek citizenship after such a long time in this country. He definitely should shoulder most of the blame for his own situation, a lack of smart thinking.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
sparkandy
03:48 PM on 12/21/2010
I think several readers of this story caught onto those little subtleties and agree with you.
03:04 PM on 12/21/2010
I feel that the writer tried to downplay this man's criminal record for us to feel compassion for him. Domestic abuse, DUI, theft. He could've killed someone and the wrtier would've written something like "he was convicted of killing an store clerk, but he was is a tight finacial situation he felt he had no choice, besides all the clerk had to do to stay alive was hand over the money" blah blah, blah, also he could've applied for citizenship if he had long term plans in this country and avoided this situation
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robin J
02:57 PM on 12/21/2010
Seriously? Lets try being rational for just a second folks:

1) this is a VERY poorly written/researched story with huge holes. Any follow up with the wife on the violating the restraining order?

2) This person is being deported to Canada, because he apparently cannot BEHAVE. He apparently CANNOT BEHAVE over and over. Most folks have somehow managed to live in this country for 30 or more years without getting ANY misdemeanors, he had 4!

3) He did not break the speeding limit by 5 mph, pass on the right, etc- he got a DUI! A DUI means that he is more than probably driven drunk up to 500 time before getting caught. This SHOULD have gotten him deported, even if it did not.

4) Yes, our rules for those VISITING our country are higher than those born here.

5) this man had MANY opportunities to get his life in order- get citizenship, get a lawyer with a clue to argue habius corpus (1978 happened BEFORE 1988), get a 1 day reduction in sentence/pardon, etc.

If this is the best you can do to argue that our immigration policies are out of whack, well you failed.

Here is the problem: there are MANY GOOD, valid stories of abuse in the immigration system- this was not one. You invalidate your POV (and one I might add that I share) when you try to use this as your poster child for immigration policy abuse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:40 PM on 12/21/2010
After 50 years living legally in the US and he's not yet a citizen, maybe he's not interested? Something doesn't add up...
photo
Soule23
Anti-micro-biol
02:58 PM on 12/21/2010
He had a record going back thirty years, not a serious one, mind you, but he had a record. If you go before an immigration judge to try to go from being an LPR to a Citizen, they will catch you on technicalities like that, and deport you rather than making you a citizen.
02:31 PM on 12/21/2010
We're supposed to feel sorry for this guy? With his criminal behavior?

If he likes living in the USA so much, why not just keep his nose clean and stop with breaking the law? Simple.

1978: Theft arrest. Probation and a year jail suspended. (Doesn't take responsibility & blames someone else.)
1998: Violated a restraining order his wife had against him. (I'd like to hear the whole story of what she went through to finally take out the restraining order.)
1998: DUI arrest. (How many other times he didn't get caught driving after drinking?)
2001: Failure to pay fine for vihicle operation violation.

Writer, Elise Foley, do you have a tendency to minimize criminal behavior? I think so.

Guess what, Mr. Burrows, it looks like you may finally get to fully experience the consequences of your bad behaviors here in the USA.

Surely it would have been easier to just be a law-abiding citizen, but it appears you have no respect for the law and now you want the law to step up and protect you. Oh well.
02:28 PM on 12/21/2010
Assuming this Mike Burrows is white (since he's Canadian), my guess is he will not be deported. If this was Miguel Sanchez from Mexico, probably a different outcome.
photo
Soule23
Anti-micro-biol
02:44 PM on 12/21/2010
Prosecutorial discretion allows them to pick and choose.