iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

START Treaty Clears Major Senate Hurdle

DONNA CASSATA   12/21/10 09:26 PM ET   AP

Start Treaty Senate Vote

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama locked up enough Senate Republican votes Tuesday to ratify a new arms control treaty with Russia that would cap nuclear warheads for both former Cold War foes and restart on-site weapons inspections.

Eleven Republicans joined Democrats in a 67-28 proxy vote to wind up the debate and hold a final tally on Wednesday. They broke ranks with the Senate's top two Republicans and were poised to give Obama a bipartisan win on his top foreign policy priority.

"We know when we've been beaten," Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah told reporters hours before the vote.

Ratification requires two-thirds of those voting in the Senate and Democrats need at least nine Republicans to overcome the opposition of Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Jon Kyl of Arizona, the party's point man on the pact.

The Obama administration has made arms control negotiations the centerpiece of resetting its relationship with Russia, and the treaty was critical to any rapprochement.

Momentum for the accord accelerated earlier in the day Tuesday – the seventh day of debate – when Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, the No. 3 Republican in the Senate, announced his support.

The treaty will leave the United States "with enough nuclear warheads to blow any attacker to kingdom come," Alexander said on the Senate floor, adding, "I'm convinced that Americans are safer and more secure with the New START treaty than without it."

"START" stands for Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.

Five other Republican senators – Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Johnny Isakson of Georgia, Bob Corker of Tennessee and Robert Bennett of Utah and Thad Cochran of Mississippi – said they would back the pact.

"We are on the brink of writing the next chapter in the 40-year history of wrestling with the threat of nuclear weapons," Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., said after the vote.

Obama has insisted the treaty is a national security imperative that will improve cooperation with Russia, an argument loudly echoed by the nation's military and foreign policy leaders, former Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton and six Republican secretaries of state.

In a fresh appeal for ratification, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday that the treaty would "strengthen our leadership role in stopping the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and provide the necessary flexibility to structure our strategic nuclear forces to best meet national security interests."

Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made a rare visit to the Capitol Tuesday to lobby lawmakers.

Conservative foes of the accord – among them possible GOP presidential candidates Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich and Tim Pawlenty – argue the treaty would restrict U.S. options on a missile defense system to protect America and its allies and lacks sufficient procedures to verify Russia's adherence.

"The administration did not negotiate a good treaty. They went into the negotiations it seems to me with the attitude with the Russians just like the guy who goes into the car dealership and says, 'I'm not leaving here until I buy a car,'" Kyl said.

That opposition withered in the face of forceful statements from the military establishment, including Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen who said Monday that the treaty "enhances our ability to do that which we in the military have been charged to do: protect and defend the citizens of the United States."

Obama, who postponed his holiday vacation, lobbied hard for the Senate to complete the treaty before January when Republicans increase their numbers by five and the accord's outlook would be bleak.

Weeks after Republicans routed Democrats at the polls – seizing control of the House and strengthening their numbers in the Senate – Obama has prevailed in securing overwhelming bipartisan approval of a tax deal with Republicans and getting repeal of the 17-year-old ban on openly gay military members, a crucial issue with the party's liberal base.

The White House had made steady progress in its efforts to persuade Republican lawmakers despite McConnell and Kyl's opposition.

Later in the day, Democrats turned back Republican efforts to change the treaty, rejecting an amendment to add mention of rail-based launchers on a 63-32 vote and another to delay the treaty until U.S. military equipment confiscated during Russia's 2008 invasion of Georgia was returned. That measure failed, 61-32.

Any changes to the treaty would effectively kill the pact, sending it back to negotiators.

The treaty, signed by Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in April, specifically would limit each country's strategic nuclear warheads to 1,550, down from the current ceiling of 2,200. It also would establish a system for monitoring and verification. U.S. weapons inspections ended a year ago with the expiration of a 1991 treaty.

In announcing his support, Alexander said he was reassured by a letter from Obama, in which the president reiterated his commitment to modernizing the remaining nuclear arsenal with projected spending of $85 billion over 10 years. A significant amount of that money would go to nuclear facilities at Los Alamos, N.M., and Oak Ridge, Tenn., a critical issue with Alexander and Corker.

"My administration will pursue these programs and capabilities for as long as I am president," Obama wrote in letters to Republican Sens. Alexander and Cochran and Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Daniel Inouye.

All 57 members of the Democratic caucus are expected to back the treaty; Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., underwent cancer surgery on Monday and is likely to miss the vote. Republicans who have previously announced they will vote for the treaty are Richard Lugar of Indiana, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Scott Brown of Massachusetts and George Voinovich of Ohio.

"I think it's going to pass and more than just pass," Corker told reporters.

Announcing they would oppose the treaty were Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Utah's Orrin Hatch, a Republican facing re-election in 2012 and a possible primary challenge from tea party-backed candidates.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama locked up enough Senate Republican votes Tuesday to ratify a new arms control treaty with Russia that would cap nuclear warheads for both former Cold War foes...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama locked up enough Senate Republican votes Tuesday to ratify a new arms control treaty with Russia that would cap nuclear warheads for both former Cold War foes...
Filed by Whitney Snyder  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,269
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (36 total)
03:38 PM on 12/22/2010
It's enough for me to know that Sen Lugar (R) says that this treaty needs to be ratified. He arguably knows more about nuclear weapon reduction and verification than any other sitting member of the senate. In fact, I believe he should have been awarded the Nobel Peace prize for the work he's done in WMD threat reduction over the past two decades.

http://www.dtra.mil/missions/NunLugar/NunLugarHome.aspx
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
03:43 PM on 12/22/2010
Agreed on all points.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jnw147
11:54 AM on 12/22/2010
Now let's pass the damn bill.
11:30 AM on 12/22/2010
Most here would blindly cheer the fact that a new nuclear treaty was signed. While it is good the terms of this agreement are certainly not pro USA. We gave up inspection and verfication protocols and exempted their most destablizing missile factory from inspction. We also limit our abillity to depoloy missile defense. In my opinion we surrender to much to get this done. A bad treaty should be renegoiated not ratified.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Le Facteur 99
Jeremiah was right.
11:47 AM on 12/22/2010
We didn't give up missile defense. That has long been debunked.
12:52 PM on 12/22/2010
What we gave up ws this:

The Russians can now opt out of the treaty whenever they like if they feel our MDS become a treat to them. Their view on this i hugely different from ours.

___


What is an actual threat to Russia is the unlimited build-up of the U.S. global ABM system. That is why Russia made a special statement on the ABM problem during the signing of the new START Treaty in Prague. The statement declared that the Treaty can work and be vigorous only in the absence of qualitative and quantitative build up of the U.S. ABM capabilities. The Russian Federation can withdraw from the Treaty under Article XIV of the Treaty if the threat posed by the U.S. ABM capabilities leads to the devaluation of Russia’s strategic nuclear potential.

http://www.ewi.info/russian-view-start
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gevan
Give bees a chance
10:00 AM on 12/22/2010
Note to Hatch and Graham: The Tea Party is in favor of global thermonuclear war since when?
09:23 AM on 12/22/2010
this is what obama calls two of the most productive years in the history of congress

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-22/no-congress-since-1960s-makes-most-laws-for-americans-as-111th.html
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
02:01 PM on 12/22/2010
Sounds right then.

Passing legislation is one of Congress' jobs. Bloomberg says no Congress since the 60s has done as much work.

Do you have some kind of disagreement with their metric?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Wallysmom
"I'm taking on stupid wherever it exists"
09:02 AM on 12/22/2010
No news on this but what would a Wednesday morning be without PalinNews. Her latest facebook rant is about Getting Tough With Iran. She is desperately trying to appear relevant, even though the news d'jour is about Russia and the US making a strategic arms agreement. The post, under her "notes" tab, goes on with commentary that sounds old and worn. The "next Holocaust", "poised to strike the US". It's as if she picked up a newspaper from 2007 and decided to weigh in. Intellectual gravitas is not her strong suit. In a line "But we also need to encourage a positive vision for Iran. Iran is not condemned to live under the totalitarian inheritance of the Ayatollah Khomeini forever." Palin fails to realize that it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who as president of Iran, calls the shots and has been the main player in their ramp up of nuclear programs. It does nothing but attention to her and her presidential aspirations -- confused and misguided as they are.
08:59 AM on 12/22/2010
Mr. President

It has been a long time since I have written to you and so many things have happened since. I don't think you have ever been down and out, so I have not felt the need to do so. Your poll numbers have remained constant and your base ( although very disappoint­ed with you negotiating at all with the radicallly extreme right wing hostage taking senators ) have been there for you.

As have I.

You are staying the course Sir, that you plotted out even before you were inaugarate­d on that special day of long ago when hope and change were part of the air that we breathed in. On that day, even though America itself was still teetering on the cliff of financial ruin, there was a positive belief in America and ourselves. No matter what lay out there on the horizon, banding together as a singular populace would help make it through.

The political minority that was soundly rebuked by the electorate decided by themselves that the ''American people '' did not want you to govern Sir. They pared down their vocabulary to singular wording and tried to act superior at the same time. Two years went on that they did this Sir, and even though that happened, you enacted a stimilus ...HC reform and a multitude of other things that has put America BACK on the road to greatness.

There is no comeback SIr. You are just staying the course.

Regards,
An Irish Friend.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StillIRise
The past, present and future are one
12:27 PM on 12/22/2010
Thank you.
 
Have a wonderful holiday my Irish friend!
 
Faved!!!
12:40 PM on 12/22/2010
likewise little smiley face ..*gootcha koo :o)
08:51 AM on 12/22/2010
You know that couple that snuck in the White House with no credential­­s?

Well, they're still there
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:54 AM on 12/22/2010
Where have you been? They left january 20, 2009.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeffrey hoffman
08:55 AM on 12/22/2010
you righties will lose in the end
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
08:50 AM on 12/22/2010
Oh what you can get done with a trillion dollars worth of bribe money. NOW, keep our internet FREE and UNREGULATED to the designs of the greed merchants what want to wreck it like the rest of this country.
01:01 PM on 12/22/2010
too late.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Hobay
Refuse addictive oxycodone pain meds
08:38 AM on 12/22/2010
I call for a Mitch McConnell resignation, and an apology to the American People.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeffrey hoffman
08:57 AM on 12/22/2010
i think we ought to organize the largest rally Washington has ever seen and demand his resignation and also some of his cohorts like KYL
photo
Gneirre
I'm anti anything that's anti to the anti...
08:30 AM on 12/22/2010
The treaty will leave the United States "with enough nuclear warheads to blow any attacker to kingdom come,"

.....bottom line for the GOP!!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
DearAgony10
08:24 AM on 12/22/2010
I am seriously watching in glee at the poutragers on the left and right on this blog lose it while President Obama gets business done.

The right on this blog hates him because he's a Marxistsocialistc0mmieMuslim, and the "left" on this blog hates him because "he's set liberalism back decades/he's a right wing Republican/he's worse than George W, Bush/Ronald Reagan," etc etc etc... all baseless hyperbole based on emotion not fact.

The "liberals" on this site need to realize that they did not in fact vote for a Democratic Bush with Barack Obama. The man campaigned on being pragmatic and practical, not being a bully.

Being pragmatic and practical means making compromises, not "standing on principle" and getting nothing done. Notice that the people who "stood on principle" Alan Grayson and Russ Feingold LOST in the mid-terms, and Obama polls higher than either of them?

That being said, President Obama continues to prove he's the only adult in the room. He has been calm, which many mistake for weakness. I don't call it weak when he has had more legislative accomplishments than ANY President of the past 30 years, New START soon to be yet another accomplishment of his.

No Drama Obama is how he has governed and how he will continue to govern. Don't like it, get out of the way and quit standing in the way of progress!
photo
Gneirre
I'm anti anything that's anti to the anti...
08:29 AM on 12/22/2010
POST OF THE DAY!!!!! SAID ELOQUENTLY AND DIRECTLY!!!!! SO FANNED!!!
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
08:32 AM on 12/22/2010
A thoughtful post especially the "poutragers" tag. The votes in the past week may indicate that the extremes of the tea party may help the more centrists Republicans to be more helpful to the President. Nice to see them break ranks with McConnell!!

Fanned and fav'd.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:19 AM on 12/22/2010
The legacy of the democrats years of control of house, senate and white house will be they couldn't do squat on their own, they always had to rely on republicans to "get er done".
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
DearAgony10
08:26 AM on 12/22/2010
That's the legacy according to re-written history by FoxSnooze.

If the Democrats got "nothing done," then how come the right wing whines about how the stimulus actually drove up unemployment?

If the Democrats got "nothing done," then how come the right wing whines about healthcare costs going up because of the healthcare legislation they passed?

Face it, your entire post is a lie and falsehood.
photo
BUSTERtheCAT
SNL owes me MONEY
08:28 AM on 12/22/2010
the list of accomplishments is staggering, in 2 years with nonstop OBSTRUCTION from the people who caused the mess
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hoz Hoven
08:12 AM on 12/22/2010
Whip the elephants Mr President. MAKE THEM WORK. They've been standing in the way the past 2 years.