More

Hexavalent Chromium: EPA Announces Plan To Address Chemical In Tap Water

Lisa Jackson

NOAKI SCHWARTZ   12/22/10 06:37 PM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES — The head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said Wednesday it would likely tighten drinking water standards to address potential health risks of a carcinogen recently detected in the tap water of 31 cities across the country.

EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson said she was troubled by the prevalence of the chemical hexavalent chromium, also known as chromium 6.

Jackson detailed a series of actions to be taken by the EPA, including working with state and local officials to determine how widespread the contaminant is and issuing guidance to all water systems on how to test for the carcinogen.

Jackson said the agency will likely tighten standards based on a draft chromium 6 risk assessment the agency released in September that is expected to be finalized next year.

"EPA has already been working to review and incorporate the groundbreaking science referenced in this report," her statement read. "However, as a mother and the head of EPA, I am still concerned about the prevalence of chromium 6 in our drinking water."

The Environmental Working Group released a study Monday that analyzed drinking water across the country and found the five cities with the highest levels of chromium 6 were Norman, Okla.; Honolulu, Hawaii; Riverside, Calif.; Madison, Wis.; and San Jose, Calif.

Following the report, Jackson met with 10 U.S. senators to discuss the issue. That same day U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein sent a letter to the EPA urging the agency to move quickly to set drinking water standards for the carcinogen.

The senators called the agency's current chromium standard outdated because it was set nearly two decades ago. The agency currently requires tests for total chromium levels in drinking water, but the results don't show precise amounts of chromium 6.

Boxer, a California Democrat who chairs the Senate environment and public works committee, welcomed the agency's new push.

"The EPA is being vigilant and acting properly to address the issue of chromium 6," Boxer said in a statement to The Associated Press.

Following the tap water survey, Boxer and Feinstein, another California Democrat, called on the EPA to move quickly to protect the public from hexavalent chromium.

The senators said they planned to introduce legislation that would set a deadline for the EPA to establish an enforceable standard.

Studies show that chromium 6 can cause cancer in people and has also been found to cause damage to the gastrointestinal tract, lymph nodes and liver of animals.

The federal government's current total chromium standard is 100 parts per billion. California has proposed a goal for safe limits for chromium 6 at 0.06 parts per billion.

Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, said he was surprised federal officials prioritized the issue during the busy end of the congressional session and the holidays.

"That signals that they're taking it quite seriously," he said.

____

Online:

http://bit.ly/g6gTQy

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 111
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:44 PM on 12/29/2010
After Erin Brockavich and a hugh motion picture made out of it and still nothing done, It's about 30 years late.
photo
derrickhoyle
...it's a league game, Smokey.
04:47 PM on 12/28/2010
It's about friggen time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
09:27 AM on 12/28/2010
I love the rationale for allowing "just a bit" of these carcinogens in our water. What a joke. This is why I simply do not drink tap water. Our food and water is hopelessly poisoned by Corp USA.
photo
subdolphin
I do not read replies!!!
11:37 AM on 12/24/2010
I'm just glad to finally have an administration that will even acknowledge the presence of hex chrome in anything.
Unfortunately, this will mean that metals industry polluters will start negating concerns with "heck, it's already in your drinking water".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David01
texan Badges, I don't got no badges. I don't need
10:01 PM on 12/23/2010
They should come to Graham, Texas and check us out. There's a former computer tape manufacturer that produced a lot of tape for the government and they were pretty cavalier about environmental rules. Lots of cancer around here. The oil industry used to be big here too, but it's been dying out.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
02:20 PM on 12/23/2010
The senators called the agency's current chromium standard outdated because it was set nearly two decades ago. The agency currently requires tests for total chromium levels in drinking water, but the results don't show precise amounts of chromium 6.-I am certain that the senators are the right people to ask what the correct test standards are. What a bunch of dopes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:53 PM on 12/23/2010
As Chromium 6 does not naturally occur in nature this is another case of our underwriting the profits of the top 1% by sacrificing our, and our children's', health to their god the $.

We know which companies are polluting our drinking water (see http://www.epa.gov/) so why aren't we demanding that they stop destroying our health and clean up the pollution they've already created? Come on all you members of the TEA party; don't you love your children and want them well and healthy just like we liberals?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
02:14 PM on 12/23/2010
Cr 6 does occur in nature.

For God's sakes, do your homework.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tom Joad
"While there is a lower class, I am in it "
11:18 AM on 12/23/2010
"EPA Announces Plan To Address Chemical In Tap Water"

EPA: 'This is a bad chemical in water'

GOP-Controlled House of Reps: 'Time to eliminate the EPA!'
12:45 PM on 12/23/2010
not every post has to be about your pathetic two party game.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:43 AM on 12/23/2010
And, how long has this been in our water?
09:41 AM on 12/23/2010
Zero is an acceptable level. Got a problem with that?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
02:15 PM on 12/23/2010
If something is naturally occurring, how do you remove it down to zero level? You know there are a lot of chemicals that are at a "background level" concentration.
08:19 AM on 12/24/2010
Clarification: Un-naturally occurring in nature. The kinds of toxins that are dumped into our environment and deemed "safe at these levels" by studies bought and paid for by special interests, ie the polluters.

On a lighter note, happy holiday Lance.
07:56 AM on 12/23/2010
Good.  The EPA should also look into those houses where you can light your tap water on fire!
07:55 AM on 12/23/2010
We should demand that the U.S. adopt the RoHS standard for electronic equipment.  This standard is in place in Europe and a similar one in China in order to prevent dangerous elements from being used to build electronics.  This prevents these chemicals from leaking into the environment when electronics are disposed of.  This standard includes prohibitions on lead and hexavalent chromium, plus a few other substances.
01:06 PM on 12/23/2010
RoHS doesn't prohibit these materials, but limits them. For hexavalent chromium, the maximum permitted concentrations is 0.1% or 1000 ppm. RoHS acknowledges that certian technologies require certain materials. That is why lead is exempt when used in medical and telecom applications. And car batteries.
05:41 PM on 12/25/2010
Limiting them is better than doing nothing at all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
07:12 PM on 12/23/2010
What about all the "dangerous" chemicals used to make chips? Just stop making them? We should never follow any EU standard.
05:42 PM on 12/25/2010
The RoHS standard allows a small percentage of these chemicals in chips, but limits them to reduce pollution.  Having this standard is better than not having it.  We don't have to stop making chips, we can just make them better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Palaver
Men make laws, but the people follow custom.
06:01 AM on 12/23/2010
If polluters had to pay into our health care system, i.e. there was an incentive to self regulate or raise standards, we wouldn't ever have to wait on the EPA.
photo
undertheinfluence
POW in my own home country
09:35 AM on 12/23/2010
Great theory, that worked out real well with the tobacco industry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
02:08 AM on 12/23/2010
We live in a major southern city. When my son went to work for the state emergency management agency and I became aware of how they treat sewage spills (the city has combined sewage and storm runoff collection via a single pipe system back to the wastewater treatment facility) with a 55 gallon drum of chlorine being dumped into the "spill".....well, I now drink bottled spring water that I filter again at home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Palaver
Men make laws, but the people follow custom.
05:49 AM on 12/23/2010
It's only California that drinks it waste-water, but that is out of necessity.
photo
undertheinfluence
POW in my own home country
09:28 AM on 12/23/2010
I can see the necessity, California is located right next to the Pacific ocean, no access to water there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:45 AM on 12/23/2010
Drinking out of plastic containers will kill you too. Plastic is a scourge and we must abandon it as soon as possible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
11:58 AM on 12/23/2010
Yes, but I'm on my way outta here anyway.
But I am major disappointed that we are SHIPPING our recyclables to other countries.
CRAZY! Say it ain't so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
07:14 PM on 12/23/2010
BPA was last week, now it is Cr-6? Get real. This is just environmental alarm-ism.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:42 AM on 12/23/2010
Yet life expectancy continues to slowly increase.

http://www.demog.berkeley.edu/~andrew/1918/figure2.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
02:00 AM on 12/23/2010
In this country? It's increasing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
05:10 AM on 12/23/2010
increases for who ? old white women who live in the country ?
photo
undertheinfluence
POW in my own home country
09:46 AM on 12/23/2010
The only thing increasing in America is the level of stupiity. The forty and younger age group, measure thier IQ by how many mohawks grenades they have saved up on thier Wei.