iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama's Got (Found) Game

Obama Basketball

First Posted: 12/22/10 05:47 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

WASHINGTON - People who play basketball with Barack Obama say he's more dogged than flashy, more determined than skillful, more adaptable than unique. He'll trash talk on a dribble-drive with Reggie Love, but in the old days he was a studious, unselfish passer with classroom colleagues at Harvard Law.

And often, they say, he ended up with more points than you thought he'd have. No one noticed until it was over.

As in basketball, so it is now: his life on the court is a parallel to the first two years of his up-and-down-and-now-sort-of-up-again presidency.

It hasn't been pretty; it certainly hasn't been easy. Pundits, including this one, have dismissed him as a lousy negotiator, a dreamy academic or worse. He's been a New Dealer one minute, Reaganite the next. He's been rigidly partisan one minute and too eager to cut a deal with the Republicans leadership the next.

He's been called a Socialist by the Tea Party and a Wall Street toady by MoveOn. His public standing is weak; the public thinks the country is headed in the wrong direction. Beltway-wise guys think he can be had.

But through dogged patience, and adaptable style and a refusal to panic, the president has piled up the longest list of new laws, treaties and administrative actions anyone has seen here in decades.

That list may or may not get him reelected. The economy is what matters, as will the nature of his GOP competition in Congress and in 2012. The academic comparisons to LBJ and FDR won't be worth the bluebooks they're written on if the unemployment rate is 10 percent.

But everyone should accept that the fact that Obama's got game. Or found it.

He played the first year by dribbling for the most part to the left, cutting deals primarily - almost exclusively - with his Democrats, who had what seemed to be overwhelming majorities in Congress.

That got him a stimulus bill, various bailouts and monumental, if highly controversial, health-care and financial-services legislation.

In the post-shellacking lame duck, he moved right on taxes, which, in turn, created a sense of momentum and confidence that helped him and Democrats pass food-safety and child-nutrition laws and a measure to aid 9/11 first responders.

Perhaps the president's best move of all was when he was choosing up sides two years ago. He asked George W. Bush's Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, to stay on - and then passed Gates the ball repeatedly.

It was Gates who helped the president this week to sell a history-making repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and to convince the U.S. Senate to ratify the New START nuclear arms treaty with Russia. Both were major accomplishments.

It's just the end of the first half. But, as Obama heads to Hawaii, he's entitled to point to the scoreboard with pride - and to feel that he's at least got a fighting chance to win it all when he comes back out onto the court.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON - People who play basketball with Barack Obama say he's more dogged than flashy, more determined than skillful, more adaptable than unique. He'll trash talk on a dribble-drive with Reggie L...
WASHINGTON - People who play basketball with Barack Obama say he's more dogged than flashy, more determined than skillful, more adaptable than unique. He'll trash talk on a dribble-drive with Reggie L...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,530
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
09:52 PM on 01/05/2011
"The academic comparisons to LBJ and FDR won't be worth the bluebooks they're written on if the unemployment rate is 10 percent."

I don't now and never have seen ANY comparison between Barack Obama and either LBJ or FDR. Both comparisons are LAUGHABLE.

The only presidential comparison that makes any sense is the one he made himself - or, rather, the president who he said he intended to model his presidency after; Lincoln. The problem is, Obama sees himself as president during a terrible division and that he needs to reunite the country - as Lincoln did. While we are divided, the REAL problem we are facing that's far worse is the economic disaster, for which FDR would be the appropriate model.

And there you have it ; what's wrong with Barack Obama's presidency in a nutshell.
05:02 PM on 12/29/2010
Quote from NPR today:

"Every year, taxpayers risk losing their favorite tax breaks, if they are not renewed. That's what happened to millions of homeowners. For 2008 and 2009, homeowners who didn't itemize their deductions were able to get an extra deduction -- on top of the standard deduction -- for paying local property taxes. Individuals could reduce their taxable income by as much as $500; couples could cut theirs by $1,000.

The provision, which has saved homeowners about $1.6 billion a year, expired for 2010 and was left out of the new tax law.

"A lot of Americans don't make so much money that they itemize their tax returns. But those same Americans own property," said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who sponsored the original tax break. "It seems to me that they, too, should have the ability to deduct it. It's a matter of equity."

Tax breaks for the fat cats but citizens cut out of the deal. A real man of the people- Hoops Obama.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:06 PM on 12/27/2010
Yep, Obama's got game, alright. The GOP game.

Maybe Obama will be re-elected because of poor competition. On a hog farm, Miss Piggy is beautiful.

But it doesn't make a huge difference whether Obama wins or a sane and intelligent Republican wins. Neither will give the country to terrorists.

Unfortunately, neither will make any efforts at strengthening the middle class; helping the poor; cutting into corporations' brazen greed and fraud; stopping government welfare for drug companies; protecting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; stopping the war in Afghanistan and getting us out of Iraq, really out; prosecuting those who commit war crimes or fraud; seriously regulating the banks; improving our schools and infrastructure; making the rich and business pay a fair share of taxes; or cutting the deficit without doing so on the backs of the least able Americans.

It would be disastrous to elect a nitwit or a grandiose grandstander, both of which the GOP has several. But would it really matter, except on a few of the issues with narrower appeal, if we elect Obama or a Republican who can read and write and has some integrity?
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
09:55 PM on 01/05/2011
Supreme Court appointments matter to everyone.

But I get your point. That's why he needs competition from the left. I'd love to see Dean, Feingold, Weiner, or (unlikely) Warren run - and, of course, better than all of them is Kucinich.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Turtleposer
I have micro-bios in my tummy.
02:34 AM on 12/24/2010
Obama has game now that he's made the strategic decision to score a few points for the other team. The mainstream media is eating up now. Way to go!
11:11 PM on 12/23/2010
who is Obama's favorite Lap Dog . . when John Harwood is unavailable??? . . hum . .
09:50 PM on 12/23/2010
As I read through the comments on this article and many others discussing what President Obama has or hasn't accomplished in support of the progressive agenda, I'm always left with one question for the folks that complain about things like the lack of a public option in HCR or any other legislation where they feel like he didn't go far enough or fight hard enough..."What is the political strategy that YOU would have pursued to get the legislation passed?" I mean, realistically, how do you get a public option through a Senate where Blue Dog Democrats, Joe Lieberman and an intransigent Republican minority simply will not cede their support? It's easy to armchair quarterback this stuff and I by no means think the President or Democrats in the 111th Congress get a pass or shouldn't be held accountable. But unless people are more realistic in their expectations, they're always going to be disappointed.
12:29 PM on 12/25/2010
Agreed.
Like it or not, there is a quasi-corporate dictatorship in our legislative branch, and it is called the United States Senate.
Get on their bad side (say, by browbeating them for opposing the public option), and you may never get another thing passed, even though you, the President, used to be a member of their "august" body just a couple of years ago.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:14 PM on 12/27/2010
The missing factor is leadership. When a president can't enact anything of import, even though he has a majority in both houses, something is seriously wrong. The majority of presidents have divided houses, and this bickering partisanship is not new. Does anyone think the Republicans loved Bill Clinton? Or FDR? Or even Jimmy Carter?

Another missing factor is focus, appropriate focus. Everyone talked about W taking his eye off the ball and dropping pursuit of bin Laden to invade Iraq. Very true. But how about dropping jobs to pursue HCR. No, not even that. He didn't pursue HCR. He asked Reid and Pelosi to pursue it and backed no one up, but rather sat quietly in the WH, not even expressing an opinion, let alone promoting and defending his allegedly first priority.

Still another factor - lack of explanation, promotion, explaining things to the people, clarifying what he wants and why.

And last and maybe worst - preemptive give-away of the farm to the Republicans. When even they express surprise at how much they got and there was no fight, you know you have a negotiator who is, instead, an appeaser.

Obama is supposed to be the leader of the Democratic Party. You see any sign of that? I didn't. He wouldn't even come out and play, even when senior Democrats begged him to as HCR was tanking. Some leader. Some president. He gets no more respect from me.
03:45 AM on 01/12/2011
bjwtaylor:
"The missing factor is leadership­. When a president can't enact anything of import, even though he has a majority in both houses, something is seriously wrong. The majority of presidents have divided houses, and this bickering partisansh­ip is not new. Does anyone think the Republican­s loved Bill Clinton?"

And how good was Clinton's leadership? His involved proposing his own plan, sending it to Congress, and watching it summarily ignored.

"Another missing factor is focus."

Hmm, I seem to remember Obama monitoring the situation daily (albeit privately, not publicly), delegating the drafting of the main bill to Finance, though conferring with Baucus on what he wanted in it, and then coming through with a big September speech to resurrect the push after the August townhall death knell, and the summit in spring after the Scott Brown election, thereby turning another near-death experience for the bill into, ultimately, final passage.

"lack of explanatio­n, promotion, explaining things to the people, clarifying what he wants and why."

This one is true, but even Obama knew it and explained what happened: He focused like a laser on simply passing the bill through Congress, usually to the exclusion of the war for public opinion on the issue, in favor of simply getting his 60 Senators and 258 Representatives to PASS THE BILL.
It worked in terms of passage, but the price was the public's short-to-medium term view of the bill, before implementation actually exposes the rhetoric as mostly false.
03:45 AM on 01/12/2011
bjwtaylor:
"And last and maybe worst - preemptive give-away of the farm to the Republican­s. When even they express surprise at how much they got and there was no fight, you know you have a negotiator who is, instead, an appeaser."

He does this because he promised to work with Republicans, and he apparently is a man of his word, to a fault. I wish he would have ignored them more, but as illustrated by his bringing out of Susan Eisenhower during the campaign, he intends to retain (what little there is left of) moderate Republican support.
He is acutely aware that you cannot win a national election with the 20% of Americans who are liberals or even the 30% who are Democrats.

"Obama is supposed to be the leader of the Democratic Party. You see any sign of that? I didn't. He wouldn't even come out and play, even when senior Democrats begged him to as HCR was tanking."

I don't know what 'come out and play' means, but if you're referring to not using the bully pulpit to push for public support, then I've responded to that contention above.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katrina Taylor
Be the change you want to see
08:39 PM on 12/23/2010
Whoosh! I've said it before and I'll say it again. When considering President Obama, one would do well to remember the story of the tortoise and the hare.

If you thought Washington could change with the wave of a hand, you're delusional. Circumspection, flexibility, strategy and time are key. A really big brain helps too.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Sweetbay
Centrist Socialist
07:42 PM on 12/23/2010
This is a repost because I think it needs to be said again.

“I'm glad for:

Equal Pay for Equal Work

Huge investment­s in Clean Energy research for the first time

Substantial investment­ in real educationa­l reforms

My tax cuts, if only temporary

Continued progress for equality and civil rights

Health care access for millions of children who had fallen through the cracks

Health insurance industry reforms

Modernization of food safety standards

Sensible school menus

Renewed opportunit­ies for finding medical cures through stem cell research

Reduced budget deficits

A revived auto industry

The rescue of nearly 3.5 million jobs

A consumer protection agency fighting the abuses of the financial industry

Renewed funding for Music and the Arts

Renewed international respect for our nation

A more diverse Supreme Court

Strong, smart, competent women like Nancy Pelosi and Elena Kagan- and as others pointed out .....Elizabeth Warren and Sonia Sotomayor

And, thanks to Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats...............

I'm grateful for the armored vehicles and the protective gear for our soldiers who had to fight without protection for nearly four years because the republicans wouldn't pay to protect the very people they sent into war.............and for the improved medical services for our injured veterans............and for the extension of FMLA benefits for those who need to care for their severely injured family members.

Thank you, Democrats.  Thank you, Mr. President.

If 2011 is only half as productive as 2010, it will also be a very good year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jadeba
04:27 PM on 12/23/2010
Okay, I was worried, really worried. It appeared that he was just a doormat - run over by the bullies on the right. Well, I think they must be feeling as if they were outflanked - they didn't see this coming. Good strategy. I still disagree with the tax bill, the weak health care bill, etc, but I can't deny it - a lot of really good legislation was accomplished, in spite of the party of mean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katrina Taylor
Be the change you want to see
08:44 PM on 12/23/2010
That's why fair-weather friends are not the kind to be. Imagine what could have happened with real help from his "base" rather than the pile-on from the left & right? In half a term this President and Democratic Congress have accomplished more for the people than the last 3
07:42 AM on 12/24/2010
You've been fanned! The Dems never learn. All of their carping and whining is not only unattrative, but it's also counter-productive. All of the naysayers should hang their heads in shame. The President revealed his mode of operation during the campaign. Underestimate him at your own peril. He's a doer not a grandstanding braggart.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Turtleposer
I have micro-bios in my tummy.
03:28 AM on 12/24/2010
Exactly! By 2012, Obama will be able to call them out on the lack of jobs created by this terrible tax bill. We'll all forget come 2012.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yougg
just a citizen
04:09 PM on 12/23/2010
I don't think Obama likes to lose. Which is good. The Republicans acting like butt heads-just to be butt heads has probably run it course. Remember-tea baggers are coming to the House and Senate. The Repubs/Baggers maybe, probability will be fighting with each other. The Republicans made themselves look bad all by themselves over the extension of the tax cuts for the very wealthy.Everything takes time and it seems to involve timing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CateManhattan
Common sense is way too uncommon.
03:23 PM on 12/23/2010
I never doubted Obama - though there have been many times of worry about the wreckage left by the power politics. President Obama is a chess player, a play maker. He is working toward good for all of this nation, rather than being driven by political wing thinking.

But the 'dominance­' people can't tolerate his accomplish­ments -- they are blinded by their need for power over others. They expected President Obama to get into their pocket like a 'good little boy'. They are upset that President Obama knew what their game was -- long ago -- and had no intention of playing their self-centered game.

We are looking forward to a better new year!
03:23 PM on 12/23/2010
Funny how ‘winning’ (or that appearance) seems to be everything. Even tho the demise of DADT was inevitable (only 18% of high school grads who apply for service are acceptable physically and can pass the basic test); the START treaty was going to pass anyway, tho I bet the GOP would have preferred to claim it; the Tax Cuts were a debt disaster; and Obama gave away the internet to telecoms via the FCC when he didn’t need to. Oh yes, and the food supply is now completely under corporate control….

Move along now, your treadmill needs you!
03:17 PM on 12/23/2010
groovy!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
The Lone Stranger
Yes, I am a lousy typist. OK!
01:49 PM on 12/23/2010
Obama has game? The why is he bending over backwards to make sure that the other team wins?
03:01 PM on 12/23/2010
The time when the Republicans were his "other team" were gone. He's got game now because he changed teams.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terragazelle60
05:05 PM on 12/23/2010
Since when is useing what you can to get what you want making sure the other team wins?

The repubs were blind sided...
12:29 PM on 12/23/2010
Well no matter what this President does it seems it will never be enough for some. Continue on Mr. President!