More

Tax Cut Bill Signed By Obama Packed With Obscure Stocking Stuffers For Businesses

Obama Tax Cut Bill Sweeteners

STEPHEN OHLEMACHER   12/24/10 11:41 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The massive new tax bill signed into law by President Barack Obama is filled with all kinds of holiday stocking stuffers for businesses: tax breaks for producing TV shows, grants for putting up windmills, rum subsidies for Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

There is even a tax break for people who buy race horses.

Millions of homeowners, however, might feel like they got a lump of coal. Homeowners who don't itemize their deductions will lose a tax break for paying local property taxes.

The business tax breaks are part of sweeping legislation that extends Bush era tax cuts for families at every income level through 2012. Obama signed the $858 billion measure a week ago. It also provides a new payroll tax cut for wage earners and extends jobless benefits to the long-term unemployed.

Most of the business tax breaks – about 50 in all – are part of a package that expires each year, creating uncertainty for tax planners but lots of business for lobbyists. Many of these tax breaks have been around for years but expired at the end of 2009 because lawmakers couldn't agree how to pay for them.

The new law extends most of them through 2011, some through 2012. They will be paid for with borrowed money.

Nearly 1,300 businesses and trade groups formed a coalition urging Congress to extend the business tax breaks. Others lobbied for specific provisions, including a generous tax credit for research and development and subsidies to produce alternative energy.

There is a generous tax break for banks and insurance companies that invest overseas, a tax credit for railroad track maintenance, more generous write-offs for upgrading motorsport race tracks, and increased deductions for businesses that donate books and computers to public schools and libraries.

Many of the tax breaks are designed to encourage economic activity. But passing them each year at the last minute, or skipping a year and passing them retroactively, isn't terribly efficient, said Clint Stretch, a tax expert at Deloitte Tax LLP.

"It gives it a lot of dignity to call it a `system,' " Stretch said.

Every year, taxpayers risk losing their favorite tax breaks, if they are not renewed. That's what happened to millions of homeowners. For 2008 and 2009, homeowners who didn't itemize their deductions were able to get an extra deduction – on top of the standard deduction – for paying local property taxes. Individuals could reduce their taxable income by as much as $500, couples could cut theirs by $1,000.

The provision, which has saved homeowners about $1.6 billion a year, expired for 2010 and was left out of the new tax law.

"A lot of Americans don't make so much money that they itemize their tax returns. But those same Americans own property," said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who sponsored the original tax break. "It seems to me that they, too, should have the ability to deduct it. It's a matter of equity."

Taxpayers who itemize will continue to be able to deduct local property taxes. About two-thirds of tax filers don't itemize.

Among the provisions in the new law:

_A tax break that allows profitable companies to write off large capital expenditures immediately – rather than over time – giving some companies huge tax shelters.

The tax break, known as bonus depreciation, benefits automakers, utilities, heavy equipment makers like Caterpillar Inc., and John Deere, air freight companies like Fedex Corp., and wireless companies like Verizon and AT&T, said Anne Mathias, director of research for the Washington Research Group, which provides research to institutional and corporate investors. It will save companies nearly $21 billion over the next decade.

"It helps companies that use expensive capital equipment, that spend a lot of money," Mathias said. "It also helps places where the economy is growing, like wireless infrastructure, because there is a pretty big wireless build out right now."

The tax break is also available to people who buy race horses and farmers who buy cattle for breeding or dairy, according to a depreciation list produced by the Internal Revenue Service.

_An exemption that allows banks, insurance companies and other financial firms to shield foreign profits from being taxed by the U.S. through 2011. Cost: $9.2 billion.

The tax break is important to major multinational banks and financial firms, such as Citigroup, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, and to the financing operations of other international companies, Mathias said.

_A tax credit for research and development, benefiting a wide range of industries, including pharmaceutical and high tech companies. The law extends the tax credit through 2011, at a cost of $13.3 billion.

"The House and the Senate are in the holiday spirit and giving US companies a present of $13 billion in potential R&D Tax Credits!" says a press release by Braithwaite Global Inc., a firm that advises companies on applying for research tax credits.

_Increased tax rebates to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands from a tax on rum imported into the United States. The U.S. imposes a $13.50 per proof-gallon tax on imported rum, and sends most of the proceeds to the two U.S. territories.

Previously, the rebate was $10.50 a gallon. The new law extends a more generous rebate of $13.25 a gallon through 2011. Cost: $262 million.

_Extends a grant program for the production of wind, solar and other renewable energy through 2011. Cost: $3 billion.

"This is a great holiday present for the 85,000 American workers in the wind energy industry, tens of thousands of whom will now be able to get back to work in a sector that has been a bright spot in the recession so far," Denise Bode, CEO of the American Wind Energy Association, said in a statement.

_Extends a 50 percent tax credit for expenses related to railroad track maintenance through 2011. Cost $331 million.

_Enhanced deductions for companies that donate food to the needy, books to public schools or computers to public libraries, through 2011. Cost: $537 million.

_A tax break that allows TV and movie productions to more quickly write off expenses, extended through 2011. Sexually explicit productions are ineligible. Cost: $101 million.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The massive new tax bill signed into law by President Barack Obama is filled with all kinds of holiday stocking stuffers for businesses: tax breaks for producing TV shows, grants fo...
WASHINGTON — The massive new tax bill signed into law by President Barack Obama is filled with all kinds of holiday stocking stuffers for businesses: tax breaks for producing TV shows, grants fo...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,096
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (31 total)
  1 of 9  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
noaxe397 11:23 PM on 12/24/2010
So just to get a lousy 35 billion to extend unemployment benefits ,which should NEVER have been an issue or questioned in the first place and never was in past recessions, required an additional 50 tax cuts for businesses on all sorts of defecit exploding pet whims.
 
If Obama wanted to demonstrate real leadership he would have used the bully pulpit to pass UI extensions and take it off the  Read More...
01:47 AM on 01/15/2011
could "little barry" (as hi gov abercrobie--an ageist--calls him) be in the pocket of big finance? are we being mislead...big time?? given "little barry's" history this makes no sense--unless someone really mislead us on his background & philosophy (ruppy murdock??)
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
08:22 PM on 01/05/2011
Doah!

LIES.

I got here, to this lie, and stopped: "The business tax breaks are part of sweeping legislation that extends Bush era tax cuts for families at every income level through 2012."

WRONG!

That legislation actually INCREASES the taxes on those making $20,000 per year AND LESS by $400 per year!

I then glanced up and saw it was an AP story and I immediately knew. Yup, krapola.

I didn't read the rest.
photo
froidytoidy
Underwhelmed Independent
02:14 PM on 12/31/2010
....Taxpayers who itemize will continue to be able to deduct local property taxes. About two-thirds of tax filers don't itemize.

Real estate taxes go up every year - and now an itemized tax return is mandatory in order to claim them as a deduction. Did I get that right? Another low blow to the middle class and less than middle class home owner.

But hey!!!! Rum gets the write off.

But by all means give that tax break for the rum!!!!!!!!!!!!!
08:24 PM on 12/27/2010
JeeezzzUS. This article should be reposted to the headlines on HuffPost!!!! It might get buried as it WAS posted on Xmas Eve!!!
John Cheney 88
08:20 PM on 12/27/2010
Dear Friends,

Lobbyist paided for tax breaks, if you do not give 5K a year to a lobbyist you have no reason to complain, every American needs to understand we have the best government money can buy.
10:10 AM on 12/27/2010
When you give or take away a tax deduction you are changing the effective tax rate. Now Obama promised not to raise taxes on the middle class. The property tax provision just did so. It will effect mostly older workers who have paid down their home loans to a point where they are now paying mostly principal. In states like NJ and TX where property taxes are high it is going to hurt.

It is time to toss out that mess of a tax code.
08:35 AM on 12/27/2010
We were told several months ago that the recession ended in 2009 because the U.S. economy has been in a positive growth cycle. Hence, the claim by Republicans that we should never raise taxes during a recession flies in the face of this claim that the recession ended in 2009. I guess what they mean is that you cannot raise taxes because rich people don't want it.

Why can't the dems and progressives get their messaging together? The vast majority of Americans are stupid. The last 30 years have been spent raising our health care costs, taking away pensions that corporations offered and in 2008 Wall Street stoles everyone's 401k's. Now the republicans have a foot hold in the next congress and the propaganda has started for the next big steals. Grover Norquist is asserting that States should be able to go bankrupt so that the unions could be broken up, Peggy Noonan on Meet The Press asserted that we need to cut Social Security spending in order to get our fiscal house in order and John Boehner wants to attack and cut the Obamacare legislation in order to enable the Healthcare Industry to continue to rip us off. Where is the progressive message? Where is the Democratic message? Compromise is not leadership especially when you put our entire economic system at further risk by giving the rich and corporate america more transfer payments of the vast majority of our wealth. Wake up America. It might be too late.
08:21 PM on 12/27/2010
Dear Bogu,

You need to stop drinking the coolaid,our government is owned by the lobbyist, and they own both parties, if the last 2 years did not teach you anything, you should have at least learned this.
11:03 AM on 12/28/2010
Yes, you are correct. Never liked coolaid though ...
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
08:27 PM on 01/05/2011
"Where is the progressiv­e message? Where is the Democratic message?"

Only half, at best, of the Dems are actually Democrats. The rest are Rs in sheep's clothing. We have Very Few progressives out there today speaking the message. They include Dean, Kucinich, Feingold, Weiner, Warner, and a few others - so few I can actually name most of them without trying.

The REASON is because we have no free media any more - it's now corporate controlled and corporations are HARD RIGHT organizations, who now, thanks to Roberts, have people-like status....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
08:11 AM on 12/27/2010
You go Obama. Keep taking care of the wealthy and special interest groups at the expense of the people who put you in office.
08:22 PM on 12/27/2010
Dear Kiv,

You will vote for a Democrat no matter what, why should he care about you, and the lobbyist own both parties.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
10:26 AM on 12/28/2010
Sorry. Obama will never get my vote again
Yasmine
the DEFENDER in CHIEF
11:17 PM on 12/26/2010
The criticism may be valid.........but if we are in this all together as some would say..................well the Financial Sector if it does well will benenfit all those involved in it too.
like Wall St coming back 70% has made those people ordinary and otherwise who have their savings there benefit.
PLEASE do not be so ANTI-BiZ and anti Wealthy...........it is not constructive.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
08:29 PM on 01/05/2011
"Business" - and here we mean big-business - and the wealthy belong not under the bus, but in the BACK of the bus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andra Claudia Garcia
Avant-Garde Journalist
10:04 PM on 12/26/2010
Obama signs papers and puts them in stockings and sends them to Congress...that would have been epic
09:38 PM on 12/26/2010
What does a ordinary citizen have to do around here to catch a break...hire a lobbyist? I wish I could spend money I don't have ...then depend on my neighbor to pay the bill. Oh by the way...I want to buy a race horse...2 million....oh I need the government to give me a break on that purchase.....thanks. These representatives are out of control and we the ordinary need to remember this when we vote next....our vote is all we have left so use it wisely.
08:23 PM on 12/27/2010
Dear Ordinary,

Yup, or you could vote for somebody that is not a republicans or democrat in 2012, because the lobbyist own both parties, only if we vote for somebody in neither party can we take back the power.
07:25 PM on 12/29/2010
It doesn't matter what affiliation an elected official has, once in office he/she will now spend most of his/her energy and resources staying in office. How do you keep 'em down on the farm now that they've seen payolla!
08:52 PM on 12/26/2010
"a generous tax break for banks and insurance companies that invest overseas"...yes. let's reward the bankers some more for shipping money (and jobs) overseas


what a great country we live in!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
vippy
Carpe Diem!
07:51 PM on 12/26/2010
Jobs are gone and they won't come back.  The service industry is ahead these days but even then, when the average person does not get adequate wages, this will dry up as well.  I don't know why the politicians can't figure this out  "one has to pay the people first before they can spend."  I am all for flat tax and I have not heard any argument that it should not be done that made sense.  Of course, don't tax the ones who are already getting screwed with minimum working hours and minimum wage. 
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
08:40 PM on 01/05/2011
A flat tax royally screws the poor.

Suppose we're all taxed $10,000 this year - flat tax, right? What happens?

The poorest person, who only made $12,000, has 2000 to live all year on - and paid about 80 cents on the dollar. The person who made $20,000 paid half their money in tax. The person who made 100,000 paid ten cents on the dollar, and the person who made $1M paid one cent on the dollar.

That's Patently Unfair.

Even if you use "equal percentages" instead of equal amounts, it still doesn't work out as fair because the poor have so little resource and things cost so much. You WANT the poor person to not be so desperate - they should have hope so they don't turn to violence or vice.

Things become more fair when the tax rate is skewed such that the poor can afford the basics of life more readily. That actually helps them help everyone else because now they have money to actually BUY things and thus help the economy so much more. ...The Rich basically horde their money, the middle and lower classes actually spend it, and it's the money in circulation that helps us all enjoy a vibrant economy.

So taxing the rich more than the poor is a good policy for everyone - even the rich! And, it's called "enlightened self interest" for a good reason; it is enlightened to understand the benefit to YOU of having a neighbor who isn't dirt
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
08:40 PM on 01/05/2011
poor.
05:58 PM on 12/26/2010
When will politicians on both sides of the aisle get it? Americans are fed up with pork and insane inclusions in our bills. We want straightforward, honest governance? As this article (http://www.upyourservice.com/learning-library/customer-service-improvement/to-build-your-business-appreciate-the-customers-you-already-have) suggests, building business demands appreciating customers. Our politicians sure don’t seem to appreciate theirs!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ronkw
Wake up and smell the whiskey
05:36 PM on 12/26/2010
Despite what they claim, the Dems continue to stick it to the working men and women.
this LAW is more proof, if you need it, or ask a steel worker or a coal miner or an oilfield worker or auto assembly (CAFE standards) and on and on.....thanks Dems
They and the R's habitually steal our $$ and our liberty, while telling us to be angry with the Individual, that makes >$250k.
And "they" have spent ALL the money plus $trillions more in debt.....stole the money from SS, medicaide and Caire.....Freddie & fannie still out there costing us many millions per month.