More

Top Army Official Peter Chiarelli: Soldiers Need More Time At Home Between Deployments


First Posted: 12/26/10 10:44 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

BUFFALO, N.Y. -- Repeated troop deployments are putting an enormous strain on members of the U.S. military who are forced to deploy to Iraq and/or Afghanistan with an insufficient amount of time at home between rotations, according to a top Army official.

On ABC's "This Week," host Christiane Amanpour asked Peter Chiarelli, the Army's vice-chief of staff, how U.S. servicemembers are affected by repeated deployments. There are approximately 2 million men and women who have been rotated through the two wars.

"You want to get at these issues, we need more time at home before deployment," said Chiarelli. "I was just down range, and I went to an aviation for a day of about 1,500 folks. Those senior pilots in that unit, those individuals who have been flying mission after mission, 62 percent of whom are on their third -- their third deployment, and over 40 -- 40 percent, almost 40 percent were on their fourth deployment, with very, very little time at home."

He added that the stress of these repeated deployments also has serious repercussions for servicemembers' civilian lives:

It affects everything. It affects the divorce rate. It affects substance abuse. It affects everything. And we've kind of taken our focus and shifted it to ensure that we're getting at that.

You know, the problem with post-traumatic stress is that in the United States, the National Institute of Mental Health will tell you, for regular civilians, it is 12 years between the initiating event and when someone first seeks help. Now the issue there isn't that they finally seek help. It's all the things that happen in between. Everything from high-risk behavior to drug abuse to prescription drug abuse, anger management issues, to divorce. I mean, those kinds of things are affected when people don't get treated for post-traumatic stress.

Homelessness is also a continuing issue for America's veterans. Anywhere from 10-25 percent of the county's adult male homeless population used to serve in the U.S. military, and approximately 9,000 veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are estimated to be homeless.

The New York Times, however, notes that the number of homeless veterans has gone down in recent years, aided by "$3.5 billion spent on housing, health care and other programs by the Obama administration." Nevertheless, according to comments made by Paul Rieckhoff of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America on "This Week," women servicemembers are becoming homeless at twice the rate of men.

Chiarelli said that the Army is "working very, very hard to get at high-risk behavior." "We're looking at programs that, first of all, ensure that we are identifying early on those who are going to have a rough time reintegrating," he said. "And then taking soldiers and putting them in high-stress kind of events that are safe for them, such as water rafting and out doing those kind of sports to burn off that adrenaline, rather than getting on a motorcycle and traveling down the road at 100 miles an hour without a helmet on."

Another major problem the military is trying to address is simply getting over the stigma of traumatic brain injuries.

"We're not there, and as the chief says, he used to go into a room and ask 100 people, 'How many people think that, if they went and sought help, it would affect their career?' and he'd get 90 hands up," Chiarelli added. "Now he goes into a room and asks the same question and 50 hands come up. So we're making progress, but we've got to keep on it. I brief every single brigade combat team that goes to Iraq today. The leadership of that brigade, I do a video teleconference where we talk about traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress and try to explain to them what happens in the body when this occurs and that they've got to seek help."

More here on the Army's Wounded Warrior Program and resources from IAVA.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
BUFFALO, N.Y. -- Repeated troop deployments are putting an enormous strain on members of the U.S. military who are forced to deploy to Iraq and/or Afghanistan with an insufficient amount of time at ho...
BUFFALO, N.Y. -- Repeated troop deployments are putting an enormous strain on members of the U.S. military who are forced to deploy to Iraq and/or Afghanistan with an insufficient amount of time at ho...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 406
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Valentine
Retired SEIU Member
02:15 PM on 12/30/2010
Supporting the troops means more then yellow ribbons.

Start the draft.
photo
dfranz
With Liberty and Justice for all
02:42 PM on 12/28/2010
This was the famous chicken hawk, Rumsfeld’s dream, an all volunteer Army nimble and ready to go where ever he wanted them to go. Throw in highly paid civilian contractors to destroy their morale and you end up with what we have, troops over used, their families strained or destroyed feeling like they are nothing but cannon fodder.

I met a young marine who had just come back from his 3rd tour and found out that they weren't going to let him out of the service even though his term of enlistment was over; Stop loss it’s called. On top of that he was going to be transferred to a unit that was going back in a month. He did what he needed to prevent that and got a tattoo of a dragon that can be seen on his neck because he knew the Corps does not allow visible tattoos.

These 2 million men and women will suffer in silence because no one but those who have been there know the toll it takes on your psyche and the military still looks at PTDS as a weakness. Thanks in part to the most famous PTSD victim of all, John McCain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LifeChangeStartsNow
I am love, discernment, confident, resourceful, as
03:14 PM on 12/27/2010
Good article. I notice our TOP ARMY OFFICIAL neglected to mention the "S" word - SUICIDE which is increasing.

It is heartening to hear him mention PTSD since they denied it's existence for decades: the fallout of whichl can be found among the homeless all across the "great" USA - too little too bloody late.

He talked about what they're doing now but has anything been put in place for those neglected, ignored and shunted aside since that war-mongering triad NotMyBush/Rumsfeld/Cheney began this obscene farce?!

More dollars are needed for their care and becoming mired in Afghanistan is costing too many lives on both sides (AFTER they return home).

These 2 wars give new meaning to the term "walking wounded". When is this crap going to end?

There is NOTHING to WIN. The other side has ten more waiting to take his/her place because their religion says 21 virgins await or allah is great and so I fight to avenge those who died....

The fundamentalists have god on their side, they say, and they know what they are fighting for - THEIR LAND.

So what are we fighting for?

We pulled out prematurely but still ended up with the baby for christ's sake! Time to put Pakistan's nuts in a wringer, give that Afghan leader some guts and a backbone and leave them to it!
03:09 AM on 02/05/2011
Actually, Chiarelli has probably been the leading voice in or out of the military on the suicide issue and has spoken about it on the same show in the past. Whatever one can say about the military or about the government as a whole, when it comes to soldier issues, he more than anyone "gets it," though he often fights against the tide.
09:08 AM on 12/27/2010
The Huffington Post tries to make itself appear that it's a friend of the the troops, but all that it's really interested in doing is placating its liberal base. This story isn't so much about the troops as it is showing the war fatigue -- aka one more excuse liberals can try to use to leave the mid-east.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Thunder Chicken
Libertarian = Republican Who Owns A Bong
09:22 AM on 12/27/2010
I have all the reasons I need for wanting to leave the ME, it's the reason for being there in the first place I can't seem to find.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BurtR
09:58 AM on 12/27/2010
Afghanistan is not in the Mid East, not that that matters, just a point.
If there were a draft, these "wars" would have been over a long time ago because people would see the futility and more would have been affected. It is criminal what is being done to the military. Those who say they are supporting the troops by encouraging endless war are hypocrites
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhatDaBleep
Left is Right and Right is Wrong
08:13 AM on 12/27/2010
Yes, how about giving them a 20 year rest at home? End the war.
07:44 AM on 12/27/2010
The reason some people deploy more than others is that certain Jobs arent need as much as others. There is no reason to send a person that works in the chow hall out more than a lets say a cop. There is a need for more of those types of Jobs than a person who works at the gym.
08:57 AM on 12/27/2010
You have no clue, do you?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
NoahVail
...a curmudgeon from So. Arizona
09:18 AM on 12/27/2010
I don't believe he does....
05:22 PM on 12/27/2010
Those jobs are done by locals, not the US military.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:27 AM on 12/27/2010
here's another thought off the top of my head. how about if we only sent them into harm's way for valid, legitimate reasons?

just for clarification, the profit margin for bechtel, blackwater & halliburton are not legit reasons.
photo
CanuckistanCommie
I ain't no Commie but Pat Buchanan thinks so!!
06:22 AM on 12/27/2010
Canadians commanders knew that 2 years ago and this is what we got.

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2009/03/22/8847666-sun.html

Ignorance is a sad thing.
04:07 AM on 12/27/2010
Costs of Iraq & Afghanistan:
$275 Million per day, every day, for 10 years.
Annually: $100 Billion.
Grand Total: $1.1 Trillion and counting.
www.costofwar.com
05:26 AM on 12/27/2010
And what is the cost of the rest of the American empire? I know some people hate that word, 'empire', but that's what it is. We could save a fortune by bringing ALL the troops home. Great link.
photo
CanuckistanCommie
I ain't no Commie but Pat Buchanan thinks so!!
06:31 AM on 12/27/2010
If the US government were to step back and allow the domestic armies of these 2 nations take control even if they were to pay them 3 times what they are paid now, the US would save over $100 billion a year.
A salary of $10k/yr is 5 to 6 times what a typical Iraqi or Afghani makes now.
150,000 troops in Iraq @ $10k = $1.5 billion
150,000 troops in Afghanistan @ $10k = $1.5 billion

Total cost $3 billion or roughly $10.00 in taxes per American citizen.

Would you pay that to save $300/per yr per US citizen.

That's the simple economics of it.

But more importantly are the soldiers lives worth it?
02:51 AM on 12/27/2010
. I can't believe how many marriages are falling apart with both parents in the military & they have children that relatives are raising up. Most Armed Force members know how bad it is looking for jobs with benefits, health insurance & housing. I'm starting to think that some people high up in government had a grand scheme to get people in uniform without a draft. If there was a draft I'm sure there would be demonstrations against the draft, it would be very political just like Viet Nam peace protest & anti draft. The soldiers are paying hell for what is asked of them so much rotation in & out of country. Something going to give simply saying we know how to get in war, but have a hard time ending them. We are actually in about several countries fighting right now. It's not a secret we have drug wars going on in South America, Central America & Asia. Were fighting in Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen & likely in two other countries. I think the USA is always going to be in war. I feel sorry for every military family more then ever. It's not right to have to join the military because there is no jobs and who can really afford college today. Finding a job in the USA is entering the military. . This country has got to stop the crap going on & on & ON!
05:23 AM on 12/27/2010
They absolutely wanted a volunteer Army. I remember talk of a draft in the Bush administration, but support for the war would have wained even further if they had enacted a draft. I joined the Army for college tuition prior to the Iraq war. You're right that the military destroys families and it is the children who suffer. Because of the age difference and unexpected deployments, the military has a culture that promotes marriage at a young age. Upon return from Iraq, my team leader came home to an empty house. His wife had taken his son and all his belongings and left the state. He didn't find her until a year later. She and their son were living with another man. It really is sad. Thankfully I realized this and knew marriage while in the military was a bad idea.
10:00 AM on 12/27/2010
Don't forget Contractors, who may make more money, but cost the Gov't less because they don't have to pay medical or retirement benefits, no re-training either (these things cost more, so they hire contractors who end up getting killed or hurt). Oh, when they get hurt they have to fight AIG to get it paid for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
norby413
Don't Mess with the Pengiwolf...
04:43 PM on 12/30/2010
Yet the majority of the "family values" party still approves of this war.
01:53 AM on 12/27/2010
Although it is true that there are some that haven't deployed while others have been on multiple deployments, there are some jobs that are not allowed to deploy and there are others that have medical reasons why they can't deploy. In my field we fairly evenly spread the deployment taskings around but this is a relatively small Army and the need is large. The other problem is that commanders are always going to ask for more troops than they probabably need "just in case" and it adds to the burden of time away from home and money spent. No one can deny the stress the force is under right now. We either have to curtail/eliminate the need or have more soldiers/Marines to go around. It's simple math but with enormous human consequences.
12:32 AM on 12/27/2010
My Father is a war Veteran and I have nothing but respect for our troops. With these deployments being so frequent for some soldiers, I was wondering how Track Palin only had to serve a year of service. Does anyone know?
EndTheGOP
Smedley Butler is ashamed of us.
12:19 AM on 12/27/2010
Message to those who are thinking about enlisting: Don't.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
12:14 AM on 12/27/2010
There isn't any need for deployment in the first place.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
12:04 AM on 12/27/2010
What troops really need is to be exempt from repeated deployments. One soldier should not have to keep returning to the field of battle, while so many others aren’t obligated to go at all. Maybe a legitimate method of rotation is in order. And above all, avoid unnecessary wars.
08:58 AM on 12/27/2010
Everyone is required to go except for those that have been injured and can no longer deploy. Sorry, but you don't know what you're talking about.