iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Amygdala Study: Brain Structure Size Tied To Socializing

Party

MALCOLM RITTER   12/26/10 01:51 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK — Do you spend time with a lot of friends? That might mean a particular part of your brain is larger than usual.

It's the amygdala, which lies deep inside. Brain scans of 58 volunteers in a preliminary study indicated that the bigger the amygdala, the more friends and family the volunteers reported seeing regularly.

That makes sense because the amygdala is at the center of a brain network that's important for socializing, says Lisa Feldman Barrett, an author of the work published online Sunday by the journal Nature Neuroscience.

For example, the network helps us recognize whether somebody is a stranger or an acquaintance, and a friend or a foe, said Barrett, of Northeastern University in Boston.

But does having a bigger amygdala lead to more friends, or does socializing with a lot of friends create a bigger amygdala? The study can't sort that out. But Barrett said it might be a bit of both.

She said her study now must be replicated by further research.

The work, supported by the federal government, was aimed at uncovering basic knowledge rather than producing any immediate practical payoff, she said. But it might someday lead to ways to help people maintain active social lives, she said.

People have one amygdala in the left half of the brain and another in the right half. The findings of the new study held true for each one.

Arthur Toga, a brain-mapping expert at the University of California, Los Angeles, who didn't participate in the study, called the work well done and the statistical results strong. The idea of linking a brain structure to human behavior is "interesting and important," he said.

Amygdala research made headlines earlier this month when researchers reported on a woman without a working amygdala. The woman felt no fear in threatening situations.

___

Online:

http://www.nature.com/neuro

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:22 PM on 12/28/2010
So if I stay home with my kids is mine getting smaller ??

And if I start a facebook page it won't stretch either ?? I'll just have to catch up with all those nerds in high school ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colred
03:19 PM on 12/28/2010
I'm finding a couple of things interesting. 1) The headline that a part of the brain is larger than usual. Wouldn't the size of the amygdala be usual for these social individuals? In society we develop both the social or extroverts and the introverts. That diversity makes the society stronger as a whole. 2) the tenor the the comment threads. It's interesting that people are assuming that being social or not is bad in one way or the other. It just is. Also, remember being social doesn't indicate the "life of the party". Frequently people are social, but not the type to party. They just enjoy people and might run something like salons of the past. Social people just like people and have a lot of people in their lives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MerryW
03:06 PM on 12/27/2010
I would guess that social networking means in the real world where all our senses and being comes into play. The computer can be much less stretching than a room or even a table full of real people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
02:06 PM on 12/27/2010
I lost all my friends due to my addiction to making friends on Facebook.
01:00 PM on 12/27/2010
Then again, maybe it isn't, eh?
10:52 AM on 12/27/2010
I'm trying to meditate so I can connect with the universal spirit. Not sure if it's working.

Socializing is only so fun. It has to be productive then it's really fun. Peace y'all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennis Yuen
10:22 AM on 12/27/2010
Remember, a large Facebook friend list doesn't count.
IreneNH
Please feel free to disagree
10:16 AM on 12/27/2010
Wonder how that relates to intellect levels. Some of the smartest people I know are not very social and often prefer solitude to socializing.
10:26 AM on 12/27/2010
Being properly social can be very hard... Etiquette is a serious game with huge real-world effects... Rocket Science may sound harder, but I would measure both experts as very intelligent.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hark
09:55 PM on 12/27/2010
Wouldn't you suppose it's like anything else in the body? What parts of our brains and bodies we use with regularity and intensity get larger and stronger and more efficient. No surprise here at all. And don't you suppose we inherit mental tendencies and abilities to begin with, just as we do physical attributes?

No surprise at all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:46 AM on 12/27/2010
The military apps. are frightening...after all it was Govt. funded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Zhang
09:35 AM on 12/27/2010
Weird. I've met people who never want to socialize and avoid it like the plague but when they do socialize, they are far better at it than others who socialize often.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HighSierra1981
Is there no sanity left?
10:25 AM on 12/27/2010
That would be me...I just choose not to socialize all the time :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Zhang
10:40 AM on 12/27/2010
Socializing can be a real waste of time...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldTart
Let it begin with me...
09:01 AM on 12/28/2010
I'm with you. I value time with myself, for thinking about things, for quiet, to relax. When I do socialize, I demand quality. Otherwise, I prefer my own company. Some of us are introverted by nature and there are valid tests for such things, which I have taken as well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hark
09:56 PM on 12/27/2010
I never noticed that. I'd say your experience is weird.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Zhang
10:26 PM on 12/27/2010
Well, it would be hard to notice it if you haven't met someone like this.

It's not so weird if you think about it. Socializing is a skill and like all skills, our proficiency in it depends in part on our aptitude as well as the effort and work we put into it. I've met people who spend every waking moment socializing and for some reason, fail to be well-received in social settings. I'm sure you have noticed this? Some just don't have the innate abilities to grip others in social settings. No amount of socializing would help you beyond a certain point if this were true. Naturally then, you would have people on the opposite end of the spectrum whose innate abilities to perceive what is tactful, be intelligent without exceeding what's tasteful based on the circumstance, be funny without piquing others' emotions, talk just enough to be noticed and appreciated yet listen just enough to be perceived as a participant, react in all the appropriate ways so as to produce an air of familiarity while maintaining a sense of novelty, accord with others just enough to be relatable but not so much as to be perceived as having no personality, smile and be pleasant to the extent that it makes you seem fake, etc...
photo
laaambchop
Cheerfulness is a sign of wisdom
11:00 AM on 12/28/2010
I have noticed the same...
09:14 AM on 12/27/2010
Brilliant... I wonder if that can explain my obsession with social networking.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProudToBeVeryLiberal
Science is the antidote to the poison of religion
08:02 AM on 12/27/2010
I guess having a larger-than-normal Amygdala implies having smaller other parts of the brain, because party animals aren't usually known for their intellectual prowess...
photo
Soulsurfer
Solar Electrician,Longtime Surfin'Fool
09:02 AM on 12/27/2010
But they're great at small talk.
10:17 AM on 12/27/2010
I disagree, it's only a recent phenomenon that the life of the party should be so drunken as to be incoherent... Think back to our famous party animal liberal intellectuals... F. Scott Fitzgerald, Mark Twain, and it's said that Doris Duke spoke 9 languages... It's not for nothing that Rachael Maddow has a cocktail segment...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hark
09:57 PM on 12/27/2010
I don't think you are addressing the comment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldTart
Let it begin with me...
09:05 AM on 12/28/2010
I think you have missed the point entirely. "Life of the party" and "intellectual" are hardly related and are quite often opposites.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MohammedAbbasi
Co-Director, Association of British Muslims
08:00 AM on 12/27/2010
Shucks!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:59 AM on 12/27/2010
So "real science" finally found out what sociologists already knew a 100 years ago... that humans become who they are through social interactions with other human beings.
As always, the humanities and social sciences are too "complicated", "wordy" and "boring" for a journalist to care. So we had to wait a hundred years until a "real scientist" decides to measure people's brain so that a journalist would finally care about what should already be common sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HighSierra1981
Is there no sanity left?
10:26 AM on 12/27/2010
Hrm....a little bitter?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hark
10:02 PM on 12/27/2010
You can't know anything without evidence to support it. That a hypothesis is confirmed by rigorous scientific investigation is a triumph of human intellectual prowess, not a waste of it. As a matter of fact, for every thing that you "know" has been confirmed, ten times as many things have been debunked.
05:45 AM on 12/27/2010
"Amygdala research made headlines earlier this month when researchers reported on a woman without a working amygdala. The woman felt no fear in threatening situations."
- But does she ever have any fear of people?