More

Rescued Banks Teeter Towards Collapse

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 12/27/10 12:08 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Banks

Nearly 100 banks previously rescued by the federal government are again poised to fail, despite billions of dollars of support from the American Treasury.

The number of banks on the brink of collapse rose from 86 to 98 during the summer months, according to analysis of federal data from the Wall Street Journal. The banks in question have received $4.2 billion dollars in aid through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Most of the troubled institutions are relatively small.

The latest sign of distress in the financial system suggests the bailout may have simply been a stopgap solution for a sector still contending with the aftershocks of the greatest banking crisis in 80 years.

The continued weakness of some banks now threatens to impede a tentative economic recovery, say experts. With many banks still troubled, lending remains tight, depriving businesses of capital to expand and hire. With expansion and hiring rare, the economy remains weak, depriving the banks of healthy customers--in short, a feedback loop of trouble.

The Wall Street Journal defined "troubled banks" as those with less than 6 percent of their primary assets both reliable and liquid.

Through TARP, the government has purchased hundreds of billions of troubled assets from banks in danger. Though the program was purportedly meant to benefit healthy institutions with a good chance of survival, these latest failures suggest that many banks were in tenuous shape to begin with. Seven TARP recipients have already failed, at a loss of $2.7 billion.

But some analysts pointed to the fact that most of the failing institutions are relatively small in dismissing concerns.

"If Citibank and Bank of America were going under, that would be a problem," said Mark Blyth, a political economy professor at Brown and a fellow of the Watson Institute for International Studies. "The bailout was meant to deal with a global systemic crisis. It was not to make sure that some bank in Utah with dodgy commercial real estate would be okay."

Blyth expects some smaller banks to continue to fall, due in large part to the lack of growth in the economy.

"People aren't borrowing," he said. "The reason they're not borrowing is because they're up to their eyeballs in debt."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Nearly 100 banks previously rescued by the federal government are again poised to fail, despite billions of dollars of support from the American Treasury. The number of banks on the brink of collapse...
Nearly 100 banks previously rescued by the federal government are again poised to fail, despite billions of dollars of support from the American Treasury. The number of banks on the brink of collapse...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,781
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (110 total)
10:27 AM on 12/30/2010
"People aren't borrowing," he said. "The reason they're not borrowing is because they're up to their eyeballs in debt."

People aren't borrowing because banks aren't lending.
09:38 AM on 12/30/2010
Of course the largest banks matter, and the little guys don't.
THAT IS PRESENTLY-----THE GRAND AMERICAN WAY !!!
The big guys then buy the little guys @ pennies on the dollar,
which then makes them even the BIGGER guys.
Same done with the rich and middle class.
Do you feel the screw here??????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canoeal
Wooden Boatbuilder, Luke 6:37-38
11:23 PM on 12/29/2010
So now those banks will be turned over to bigger banks... Can banks still get "to big to fail"??? What hapens when they do???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gavrielle
Empty... Empty... Empty...
09:05 AM on 12/30/2010
Yuppers! They can indeed still be too big fail. All of the megabanks still are, btw. And if they did fail? Uh, we'd have a short, sharp disaster and eventually recover. The banksters? Not so much. I'm thinking of going into the guillotine rental business. I will have many middle class customers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
02:51 PM on 12/30/2010
When the banking system failed in 1929, we did not "have a short, sharp disaster and eventually recover...".  We had the Great Depression that ended in world war II.  Only GOP and Libertarians think bank failures are healthy for the economy.
10:29 AM on 12/30/2010
The Big Banks may be too big to fail, but the US Government is not!
09:15 PM on 12/29/2010
"With many banks still troubled, lending remains tight, depriving businesses of capital to expand and hire." Wait a minute, what about all those reports of big business sitting on billions of dollars and not investing it? Why do they need to borrow when they won't spend what they already have? The reason they're not spending to expand is that consumers have no money to buy. Giving banks the ability to loan more won't help that.
photo
Indigo1941
Time Traveler
04:22 PM on 12/29/2010
It's best to let them collapse. That should scare some of the big boys. Even if it doesn't and even if it leaves them with bigger pieces of the pie, letting some banks collapse established the precedent of letting go. That's a good thing and, in the future, could become a vital issue when Wells Fargo and Banc of America are called to account for investments that were . . . um . . . imprudent?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gavrielle
Empty... Empty... Empty...
09:07 AM on 12/30/2010
Letting small banks collapse does not upset the big banks. It makes them feel all warm and loved inside, because they get even more free government money to help keep them safe. Letting big banks collapse is what needs to happen, since they are the ones causing the smaller ones to fail in the first place.
photo
Indigo1941
Time Traveler
09:42 AM on 12/30/2010
A good point but I wonder . . . if enough small banks collapse, will the domino effect build pressure on the big banks? I'd like to see that experiment run in the real world, just to see how much the banksters panic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:05 PM on 12/29/2010
My new bank: Sealy, Simmons and Kerr.

Huzaa
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
2garen
01:02 PM on 12/29/2010
I wonder how many of the ceo's and top management received bonuses over the last four years...
02:07 PM on 12/29/2010
Total 2009 compensation executive pay for the CEOs at six of the biggest banks that received government bailout funds (their multimillion-dollar lobbying efforts worked):

Bank of America Corp___Thomas Montag_____$29,930,431

Citigroup Inc__________John Havens________$11,276,454

Goldman Sachs_______Lloyd Blankfein_______$9,862,657

JPMorgan Chase______James Dimon________$9,274,494

Morgan Stanley_______Walid Chammah_____$10,021,969

Wells Fargo__________John Stumpf________$21,340,547

Don't you just wish that you could screw up your job as badly as these guys did and get the kind of pay they did last year?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
2garen
05:02 PM on 12/29/2010
F and F by the way
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:26 PM on 12/29/2010
As long as China is amused by the US kleptocracy and the Banana Banksters, all is quiet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canoeal
Wooden Boatbuilder, Luke 6:37-38
11:25 PM on 12/29/2010
According to some european new agencies China is not going to be supporting us any longer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gavrielle
Empty... Empty... Empty...
09:08 AM on 12/30/2010
Then China will be in trouble. The man who owes 3 million dollars to the bank is owned by the bank. The man who owes 3 trillion owns the bank.
11:05 AM on 12/29/2010
The same banks that orchestrated the housing crisis are now buying up homes at pennies on the dollar while still collecting fees and adding charges. They are going to eventually help all those they have driven out of their jobs and out of their homes by organizing these former neighborhoods into camps so that the poor can be concentrated in smaller areas to maximize the aid delivery systems that they are putting together.
01:27 PM on 12/29/2010
LOL! I had to sign in just to LOL you! Next will be the return of debtors prison.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JUSTIANA RIGHT
02:56 PM on 12/29/2010
What, you think bluesky is kidding?! With the even huger growth in privatized prisons and the scam immigration crack down to add more bodies to the prison system, it's not far-fetched at all. Have YOU done any research on how many companies use prison labor, which again cuts jobs for Americans? Bet you haven't!
10:36 AM on 12/30/2010
The banks keep collecting all of these homes and are not the least bit interested in selling them. More and more Americans will soon be out of work and no money or jobs to buy homes with. So who will buy all of these homes? I have a sneaking suspicion that the legions of Chinese consumers with money to invest and Chinese funding sources which hold enormous US debt and a failed US economy will converge into something not very appealing for Americans.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
08:11 AM on 12/29/2010
If they had bailed out main street (say, send every taxpayer $1 million) there would be no toxic mortgages, no zombie banks, no foreclosure crisis, and no recession. And it would have cost 90% less.
10:07 AM on 12/29/2010
Yeah. But that just makes too much sense. It's not like "Main St." made any campaign contributions to get anybody in office or anything. We just vote.
01:28 PM on 12/29/2010
Cant give our money back to us! No, cant do that!
07:17 AM on 12/29/2010
Cmon peopke let's all pitch in and help out. These banks need our money now to gamble to defraud some new ppl
06:35 AM on 12/29/2010
"People aren't borrowing," he said. "The reason they're not borrowing is because they're up to their eyeballs in debt."

I'm sure if we had just handed the TARP money to the tax payers instead of these as.swipes the economy would be in way better standing
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quinny
My micro-bio has been seized by the Feds
02:15 AM on 12/29/2010
Since the FDIC is - for all intents and purposes - flat broke,
I am more that a little concerned how the effect of ANOTHER 100
banks going under is going to play out. Will the Fed bailout the
FDIC next? Hey Bernanke, keep those billions coming, Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac are standing next in line.

Sleep Tight America...
12:26 AM on 12/29/2010
No! No! They are to small too fail! Or are they too big to fail? With all of the bail out money that was given to these financial institutions and bankers and top level employees taking home million dollar bonuses, these banks should go under. It would be better for the markets and the economy. It is the way "The Free Enterprise System" is supposed work. One business fails; new ones replace them. I hope The Obama Administration doesn't keep wasting tax payer money trying to keep these crooks rich!!