iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Job Market Booming Overseas For Many American Companies

Job Market

PALLAVI GOGOI   12/28/10 04:39 PM ET  AP

Corporate profits are up. Stock prices are up. So why isn't anyone hiring?

Actually, many American companies are – just maybe not in your town. They're hiring overseas, where sales are surging and the pipeline of orders is fat.

More than half of the 15,000 people that Caterpillar Inc. has hired this year were outside the U.S. UPS is also hiring at a faster clip overseas. For both companies, sales in international markets are growing at least twice as fast as domestically.

The trend helps explain why unemployment remains high in the United States, edging up to 9.8 percent last month, even though companies are performing well: All but 4 percent of the top 500 U.S. corporations reported profits this year, and the stock market is close to its highest point since the 2008 financial meltdown.

But the jobs are going elsewhere. The Economic Policy Institute, a Washington think tank, says American companies have created 1.4 million jobs overseas this year, compared with less than 1 million in the U.S. The additional 1.4 million jobs would have lowered the U.S. unemployment rate to 8.9 percent, says Robert Scott, the institute's senior international economist.

"There's a huge difference between what is good for American companies versus what is good for the American economy," says Scott.

American jobs have been moving overseas for more than two decades. In recent years, though, those jobs have become more sophisticated – think semiconductors and software, not toys and clothes.

And now many of the products being made overseas aren't coming back to the United States. Demand has grown dramatically this year in emerging markets like India, China and Brazil.

Meanwhile, consumer demand in the U.S. has been subdued. Despite a strong holiday shopping season, Americans are still spending 18 percent less than before the recession on furniture, and 10 percent less on electronics, according to MasterCard's SpendingPulse.

"Companies will go where there are fast-growing markets and big profits," says Jeffrey Sachs, globalization expert and economist at Columbia University. "What's changed is that companies today are getting top talent in emerging economies, and the U.S. has to really watch out."

With the future looking brighter overseas, companies are building there, too. Caterpillar, maker of the signature yellow bulldozers and tractors, has invested in three new plants in China in just the last two months to design and manufacture equipment. The decision is based on demand: Asia-Pacific sales soared 38 percent in the first nine months of the year, compared with 16 percent in the U.S. Caterpillar stock is up 64 percent this year.

"There is a shift in economic power that's going on and will continue. China just became the world's second-largest economy," says David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's, who notes that half of the revenue for companies in the S&P 500 in the last couple of years has come from outside the U.S.

Take the example of DuPont, which wowed the world in 1938 with nylon stockings. Known as one of the most innovative American companies of the 20th century, DuPont now sells less than a third of its products in the U.S. In the first nine months of this year, sales to the Asia-Pacific region grew 50 percent, triple the U.S. rate. Its stock is up 48 percent this year.

DuPont's work force reflects the shift in its growth: In a presentation on emerging markets, the company said its number of employees in the U.S. shrank by 9 percent between January 2005 and October 2009. In the same period, its work force grew 54 percent in the Asia-Pacific countries.

"We are a global player out to succeed in any geography where we participate in," says Thomas M. Connelly, chief innovation officer at DuPont. "We want our resources close to where our customers are, to tailor products to their needs."

While most of DuPont's research labs are still stateside, Connelly says he's impressed with the company's overseas talent. The company opened a large research facility in Hyderabad, India, in 2008.

A key factor behind this runaway international growth is the rise of the middle class in these emerging countries. By 2015, for the first time, the number of consumers in Asia's middle class will equal those in Europe and North America combined.

"All of the growth over the next 10 years is happening in Asia," says Homi Kharas, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and formerly the World Bank's chief economist for East Asia and the Pacific.

Coca-Cola CEO Muhtar Kent often points out that a billion consumers will enter the middle class during the coming decade, mostly in Africa, China and India. He is aggressively targeting those markets. Of Coke's 93,000 global employees, less than 13 percent were in the U.S. in 2009, down from 19 percent five years ago.

The company would not say how many new U.S. hires it has made in 2010. But its latest new investments are overseas, including $240 million for three bottling plants in Inner Mongolia as part of a three-year, $2 billion investment in China. The three plants will create 2,000 new jobs in the area. In September, Coca-Cola pledged $1 billion to the Philippines over five years.

The strategy isn't restricted to just the largest American companies. Entrepreneurs, whether in technology, retail or in manufacturing, today hire globally from the start.

Consider Vast.com, which powers the search engines of sites like Yahoo Travel and Aol Autos. The company was founded in 2005 with employees based in San Francisco and Serbia.

Harvard Business School Dean Nitin Nohria worries that the trend could be dangerous. In an article in the November issue of the Harvard Business Review, he says that if U.S. businesses keep prospering while Americans are struggling, business leaders will lose legitimacy in society. He exhorted business leaders to find a way to link growth with job creation at home.

Other economists, like Columbia University's Sachs, say multinational corporations have no choice, especially now that the quality of the global work force has improved. Sachs points out that the U.S. is falling in most global rankings for higher education while others are rising.

"We are not fulfilling the educational needs of our young people," says Sachs. "In a globalized world, there are serious consequences to that."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Corporate profits are up. Stock prices are up. So why isn't anyone hiring? Actually, many American companies are – just maybe not in your town. They're hiring overseas, where sales are surging ...
Corporate profits are up. Stock prices are up. So why isn't anyone hiring? Actually, many American companies are – just maybe not in your town. They're hiring overseas, where sales are surging ...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,131
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (116 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KyDude
All the fish in the sea & I'm in land-locked state
09:08 PM on 01/10/2011
More reasons I'm still not working, sitting here day after day sending resumes into the Internet job-site abyss, and scouring Craigslist for low paying one off jobs. Anybody need a website or some graphics work done?
05:14 AM on 01/10/2011
Eeesh. I suppose I get what the writer is saying, but UPS is a terrible example. How, exactly, would UPS grow overseas WITHOUT hiring overseas workers? The Coke example is not great either. Coca-Cola wants to sell it's stuff in China. The Chinese will drink it. Do they ship it from the US (Cola is perishable, sort of), or do they build there? They build there. Why? Because it makes sense. Foreign firms do the same. Alabama, for instance, has Hyundai, Mercedes, Fiat, Honda, among others, manufacturing products for US consumption.

This is, in the long term, progress. The days of the robust American middle class of the 50's are gone, for a couple of reasons: one, manufacturing has changed from local to global, and two, the rest of the world no longer lies in post WW II rubble. Add to that more women participating in the workforce (and African Americans too), and there you go. Your daddy isn't bringing home the bacon for mommy to fry up in the pan.

I might suggest to those pining for the good old days to stop and think about what they are wishing for. In the meantime, read the article by Nitin Nohria, referenced above. And the sooner America comes to grip with the fact that it ain't the only game in town, the quicker we get to building the policies, particularly in education, that drives job creation.
luminavi
Love kicking over anthills on both left and right.
10:02 PM on 02/07/2011
Education drives job creation? WHAT exactly should I study to get a decent JOB nowadays? We already have too many damned lawyers and English majors in this country.

Should I continue with my B.S. in Computer Science, with a minor in Math?
Why should I? The jobs in the technology field I'm aiming for are all being shipped out to India. It would take 5 to 10 Indians to do what I'd do, but it'd still be cheaper, wouldn't it? The quality of their software design and programming may be shoddy, but who cares, it's still cheaper. Corporations don't care about quality any more. It's all about keeping up that string of record profits every quarter, right?

So tell me - WHAT should I study to get a job nowadays?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
03:04 PM on 01/05/2011
A recovering economy won't restore office jobs lost in the recession because businesses have found foreign workers or technology to do those jobs for less.

The U.S. economy added fewer jobs than expected in November, and the unemployment rate rose to 9.8% from 9.6% the prior month. Private-sector hiring totaled 50,000 jobs, about half the level economists predicted, despite a rising trend of corporate revenue and profits.

A pickup in holiday spending and improving manufacturing data suggested the recovery was building strength. But the jobless numbers show most of the unemployed aren't catching the wave. One reason: Companies are continuing to cut office staff even as business recovers, according to research by corporate finance and management consultants at The Hackett Group (HCKT).

Since the recession began in 2008, 1.3 million jobs in information technology, finance, human resources and procurement functions have been eliminated, Hackett reported in research published last month. Over the next four years, Hackett estimates an additional 1 million back-office jobs will follow a similar path as companies find foreign workers and computer technology to do the tasks for less.

By 2014, nearly half of the back-office jobs that existed in corporations in 2000 will have either been eliminated or moved overseas, Hackett estimates.

From here: http://webreprints.djreprints.com/2564290999469.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:34 AM on 01/04/2011
if the train of thought is that building things overseas to be in close proximity to the markets in which the companies are selling, it makes sense to do so.

however, don't plan on bringing those items back here to sell. those companies who want to sell to americans can hire americans in america.

seems logical to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
10:59 PM on 01/01/2011
The close of 2010: The Lost Decade:

"The number of very long term unemployed was 15 times as high as it was in 2000 at the close of the prior decade when US labor markets were operating close to full employment­.

The 15 million official unemployed were accompanie­d by 9 million underemplo­yed, 6 million hidden unemployed (wanting work but no longer actively looking), and 10 million malemploye­d college graduates working in jobs that do not require a college degree. Over 40 million American adults were facing one of these four labor market problems in 2010, the largest number by far in the past 50 years."

From here: http://www­.huffingto­npost.com/­andrew-sum­/ringing-o­ut-the-old­-year-_b_8­02711.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenrynne
Smiling Skeptic, Former Senate & House aide.
08:13 PM on 12/31/2010
I HAVE FINALLY FOUND JOBS FOR AMERICANS!

Like many recovering Democrats, a progressive born a liberal Democrat in 1955 Boston (redundant), now under- or just plain un-employed, who had academic and theoretical concerns about NAFTA's impact on hard-won labor and environmental protections working on the Hill in the 80s, I have looked in vain since 2008 for a plan "to create American jobs."

I have found them. I HAVE FOUND THEM. They are in China. They are in India. They are in Africa. The jobs are in the growing economies of the world. GROWing economies. They are NOT 'American' jobs any more than an Ohio-made Honda is a 'Japanese' car. Jobs follow growth. That train left the station long ago, we just didn't hear the "sucking sound" in Ross Perot's quotable words. Or "Benedict Arnold" corporations as John Kerry intoned.

In law school, I learned that corporations are formed to (1) limit liability and (2) achieve life perpetual.

In business, I learned that senior management whose personal wealth is tied to their company's stock performance can be quite committed to (1) and (2) with a happy coincidence of serving the acceptable capitalist goal of (3) personal wealth. Everything else - (4) investor dividends, (5) political contributions, (6) community donations, and (7) employee wages and benefits, ("Yes, that pesky minimum wage") comes in a distant, very distant fourth - at best.

Don't look to corporations to create jobs here. Not their job.
Look to your government.
Or learn Chinese.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
07:57 PM on 12/31/2010
Weighing in on saving the American job......even the highly skilled ones....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1LJ8YbXMcc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mumi009
"The truth will set you free"
07:29 PM on 12/30/2010
Looks like American business is writing off America. The greene pastures are elsewhere. They don't give jacksh**t about American workers and familes.

The companies want to be able to move capital, meaning money, around the globe to invest it most efficiently. That means in plain English where companies can make the most profit.

Not only do these companies turn their backs on American workers and families, they move their headquarters offshore to avoid paying American taxes.

That means the American government has to take on more debt in order to pay for running the government and two wars.

It seems the American companies are writing off America.

Next thing you know, they will be petitioning Congress for a "market depletion allowance".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
04:17 PM on 12/31/2010
And all those people who have been shopping at Walmart and Target for the last fifteen years? Also, turning their backs on American workers and families.... all in the name of 'cheap'. Little do they know, they just spend more over time - replacing the badly made things they bought....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hikerguy22
This is your carbon footprint
06:31 PM on 01/01/2011
Many of us keep looking for "Made in the USA" without much luck. Some of us try to not buy at all and use Recycle groups. Thing is, no matter how smart or educated we become,
there are plenty of nations who have people who will, or are forced to do what we use to do, even if it is of poor quality, because they know we have no choice but to buy their products or do without.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
05:55 PM on 12/30/2010
Last week I was checking out the products in Martha Stewart Living for pets at my local PetCo...every single item (except for shampoos) had 'Made in China' on the label.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
05:13 PM on 12/30/2010
What are the biggest domestic industries we have? Consumer debt, energy and insurance? And we have a dysfuntional private health care system that eats up close to 23% of our GDP.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
03:56 PM on 12/30/2010
If we'd invest in OUR roads, Caterpillar would find a healthy market here for their products. Problem solved. But that's just too easy...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hikerguy22
This is your carbon footprint
01:08 PM on 12/30/2010
It use to be you could work hard and at least keep your job. Not anymore. I am just glad I am near retirement. Listen up, kids, get an education and learn a new language but don't expect to do better than your parents if you plan on working to for the top companies. And forget about unions and fair treatment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
04:01 PM on 12/30/2010
Learn an exotic foreign language-the governemnt will need translators...China, Middle East, Far East.
10:20 PM on 12/31/2010
Education in language may be the only thing that saves you, becuase an education for anything else is a moot point.. lady living in her car, with a multitude of bachelors degree's, and still cant find employment, pretty much says all that education isnt important anymore?..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
06:38 AM on 01/10/2011
Education in things like religious studies, philosophy etc is useless since one doesn't need to be taught those things.

Education in IT, health care, environmental management science is still very useful
photo
rak6748
Love-Respect-Integrity
01:01 AM on 12/30/2010
Change the corporate tax structure, NOW.
11:41 PM on 12/29/2010
America needs to TAX the heck out of ANY company that puts others to work BUT not Americans and don't go whining about they will move overseas if we do that, WAKE UP you DAs, they already have and do NOT care about America.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
04:02 PM on 12/30/2010
Do you EVER shop at Walmart?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
10:52 PM on 12/29/2010
Look, no one says anyone has to own a million plastic gadgets made in China. The need for this was pushed on American consumers and they fell for it. This was obvious to many people for years. Unfortunately, no one pays attention until it effects them directly.

A society which bases it's existence on mass consumption of things which require quick replacement due to poor quality is ultimately non-sustainable on many levels. The drive to compete for the cheapest manufacturing on a global scale will obviously result in wages eventually reaching an equilibrium across the entire planet... which in theory will have everyone across the planet making the same depressed wage - maybe $20 a day. (continued below)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
04:03 PM on 12/30/2010
A nation that shops at Walmart. Is it's own demise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
04:39 PM on 12/30/2010
Like lemmings.....