iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

European Anarchists Grow More Violent, Coordinated

European Anarchists

NICOLE WINFIELD and DEREK GATOPOULOS   12/28/10 04:23 PM ET  AP

ROME — A loosely linked movement of European anarchists who want to bring down state and financial institutions is becoming more violent and coordinated after decades out of the spotlight, and may be responding to social tensions spawned by the continent's financial crisis, security experts say.

Italian police said Tuesday that letter bombs were sent to three embassies in Rome by Italian anarchists in solidarity with jailed Greek anarchists, who had asked their comrades to organize and coordinate a global "revolutionary war."

Identical package bombs exploded at the Swiss and Chilean embassies in Rome on Dec. 23, badly wounding the two people who opened them. A third bomb was safely defused at the Greek Embassy on Monday.

"We're striking again, and we do so in response to the appeal launched by our Greek companions," the Italian group known as the Informal Anarchist Federation wrote in a claim of responsibility for the third bomb that was released by police here Tuesday.

Extreme left-wing and anarchist movements have existed for decades in Europe – waging deadly attacks across the continent in the 1960s and 1970s that trailed and became sporadic in recent decades. Officials, meanwhile, focused far more intensely on the threat of Islamist terrorism.

But the European Union's police agency, Europol, reported this year that attacks by far-left and anarchist militant groups jumped by 43 percent in 2009 compared to the previous year, and more than doubled over 2007, with most of the incidents in Italy, Spain and Greece. Spain and Greece have been hit particularly hard by government cutbacks and unemployment resulting from a continentwide debt crisis. Italy has also been growing tense in recent months in response to austerity measures and a political duel between Premier Silvio Berlusconi and a former ally that for weeks threatened the government's survival.

Last month, 14 letter bombs were mailed to embassies in Athens by a Greek group that urged stepped-up attacks by anarchists worldwide. Two of the devices exploded, causing no injuries.

"Anarchists-insurrectionists work to try to raise the level of clashes when there are problems" said Marco Boschi, a criminologist who teaches a course on terrorism at the University of Florence and has written about anarchists. "They exploit every occasion."

A Greek group calling itself the Conspiracy Nuclei of Fire claimed responsibility for sending the 14 mail bombs in Athens. Panagiotis Argyros, 22 and Gerasimos Tsakalos, 24, were arrested on Nov. 1 in connection with the mailings and were charged with terrorism-related offenses. At least a dozen suspected members of their group are due to go on trial Jan. 17 for other offenses.

The Conspiracy Nuclei of Fire called on militants around Europe to step up their actions before the trial.

"We will organize internationally and take aim at the enemy. We can't wait to see the subversive elements flooding the streets and the guerrilla groups striking again and again," the group wrote.

But European anarchists are not always in step.

The solidarity boasted by the Italian anarchists who targeted the Rome embassies apparently irritated a Greek militant group, whose membership included Lambros Foundas, who was killed in a shootout with police in Athens earlier this year.

Three imprisoned members of Revolutionary Struggle claimed in a communique Tuesday evening that their group never carries out actions "that would result in the injury of someone, like a random embassy official." The Italian anarchists, in their claim of responsibility for the embassy bombs, said their cell was named after Foundas.

Italian officials have said the Swiss Embassy was targeted by the latest attack in Italy because intensified Swiss-Italian cooperation led to two well-known arrests of anarchists.

Swiss anarchist and environmentalist Marco Camenisch, a hero to many anarchists, was arrested by Italian police in 1991 and imprisoned over the 1989 murder of a Swiss border police officer. After serving nine years in an Italian maximum-security prison, he was extradited in 2002 to Switzerland, where he was later sentenced for the murder.

In April 2010, Swiss police with the help of Italian authorities arrested two men and a woman who idolized Camenisch and were members of an Italian eco-terrorist group. They were suspected of planning to bomb an IBM Corp. research facility near Zurich.

Chile, meanwhile, was targeted because a Chilean anarchist, Mauricio Morales, was killed when a bomb in a backpack he was carrying blew up in Santiago in 2009, Italian officials have said.

Alessandro Ceci of the Center of Superior Studies for the Fight Against Terrorism and Political Violence theorized the Italian anarchists may be trying partly to take advantage of the political climate in Italy: Premier Silvio Berlusconi has seen his parliamentary majority fall and just barely survived a no-confidence vote this month. In addition, protests against university budget cuts turned violent on Dec. 14, thanks in part to anarchist infiltration of student demonstrators.

"If I were an Italian (police) investigator, I'd be worried," Ceci said, comparing the highly charged atmosphere to that of the late 1960s, just before the Red Brigades leftist domestic terror group launched into action.

But political science professor Franco Pavoncello at Rome's John Cabot University said he didn't foresee a return to that era of leftist terror.

"If this were the anarchists' goal, they would not be focusing on embassies," he said.

He noted that no one really knows how many people are behind the group that claimed responsibility.

"They are surely not of an international level, maybe European, but I would better describe them as the result of pathological behaviors often of an individual nature, and very domestic," he said.

Another Italian anarchist group, the Italian Anarchist Federation, which happens to use the same acronym as the one behind the letter-bomb campaign, discounted the possibility of highly coordinated and organized anarchist offensives in the future.

"Anarchism by its own nature is not a hierarchal organization, and all the participants enter in a confederation on the same level and act freely," said Donato Randini, who edits the group's periodical.

___

Gatopoulos reported from Athens. Martino Villosio, Frances D'Emilio and Alberto Mucci in Rome, Nicholas Paphitis in Athens and John Heilprin in Geneva contributed to this report.

(This version corrects anarchist group name from Association to Federation.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ROME — A loosely linked movement of European anarchists who want to bring down state and financial institutions is becoming more violent and coordinated after decades out of the spotlight, and m...
ROME — A loosely linked movement of European anarchists who want to bring down state and financial institutions is becoming more violent and coordinated after decades out of the spotlight, and m...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 520
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
PaiaGirl
Progressive Engineer
02:38 PM on 12/31/2010
Isn't anarchists "becoming more coordinated" an oxymoron?
06:10 PM on 12/31/2010
By all means let's be the 31st person to jump on a an apparent contradiction that instead displays a stunning ignorance to the theory and practice of a centuries old political movement. Sorry if I'm cranky, but I'm hoping we can move past this.
photo
PaiaGirl
Progressive Engineer
06:16 PM on 12/31/2010
jeeze lighten up.  If being an anarchist means I've gotta check my sense of humor at the door, then I'll pass.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
02:36 PM on 12/31/2010
Anarchism is a utopian ideal like communism and objectivism that can't work unless everybody and everything is perfect. When that isn't the case, the best system is a democratic system.
photo
PaiaGirl
Progressive Engineer
02:39 PM on 12/31/2010
Unless it is a corporate controlled democracy...then things begin to go downhill...naming no names, mind you
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
05:54 PM on 12/31/2010
Democracy may have its flaws, but it's the best there is.
07:31 PM on 12/31/2010
Agreed, PaiaGirl.
F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slider79
08:22 PM on 12/30/2010
Most Libertarians begin life as a spoiled upper-middle cla.ss and very white teen who fails to comprehend that not everyone else in the world is a spoiled upper-middle cla.ss white teen.

At first, the young libertardian-to-be has only a vague dissatisfaction. He begins to ask himself questions like:

- "What political philosophy can I both b@sta.rdize and miss the point of, so that I can justify being an even more selfish pr1.ck than I am now?"
- "How can I reconcile that I hate those who I deem aren't productive, with the fact that I don't need a job because daddy gives me a generous allowance?"

The answer comes to them in two little words. Ayn Rand. With sixth-grade level vocabulary, and fourth-grade level philosophy, Rand's book have all the emotional depth of a two-year old's temper tantrum. "MINE!!!" She speaks the words so perfectly, the words they want to hear:
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
08:39 PM on 12/30/2010
^ slider is regurgitating the tired bitter old lefty talking point about little Ayn... She continues to put the left's pant!es in a twist from beyond the gr.ave... This amuses me to no end. ^ Slider and his masters confuse a healthy self-interest with selfishness ... The irony is that the left promotes the concept that other people's property should be redistributed to preferred constituencies. (talk about selfishness)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slider79
10:20 PM on 12/30/2010
"You don't lack comp@.ssion! You just want people to get by on their own merits!", She says. "You're not a selfish @s.sh0le! You just have a sense of rational self-interest!", She affirms. "You have no obligation to the society in which you live! Governments are only there to lift up those not as good as you!", She declares.

And lo, it was good. Because if there is one thing that makes financially comfortable white people feel good about themselves, it is that they earned the benefits of being financially comfortable, clearly by their own merits.

It wasn't daddy's money that bought you your head start in life. It wasn't the better schools, the better nutrition, the better neighborhoods. It wasn't the country you were born in, or the system of laws that protected and to this day protects you.

No, my young privileged white boy, you did it all. You, and only you, are responsible for all your success. And anyone who isn't as well off just didn't work as hard. And the government can only take from a productive member of society like you to give to the leeches. And there should be no laws. And even though there are laws, they don't really apply to you, because you're special. Be as selfish as you want. It's all you.

And thus, a libertardian is born.
08:49 PM on 12/31/2010
Dude you need to read some psychology books. The development of self awareness in relationship to other human beings is a maturing process. Not being able to objectively weigh ones value and importance in relation to other humans leads to anti-social behavior. This level of low social maturity is what is most obvious about conservatives. How one would think and function in 1880 Wyoming effectively (which would have lower level social needs) would probably be viewed poorly in Tokyo in 2010 (which calls on a high level of low friction social interaction). If in a social setting as in Tokyo if everyone pressed the individualism beyond a certain point social friction would be high. Rand is like other writers that dream up make believe worlds that could never exist in reality to fit their way of thinking. Her thinking lacks rigor and understanding of systems of human social interaction. Social systems survive on cooperative mutual self interest that have to maintain delicate balance. In a democracy that balance is even more important.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slider79
04:01 PM on 01/01/2011
uuhhhh...you know this article pretty much proves my point, right?

"Using this schema, Haidt and his fellow researchers suggest that people who are dispositionally (level 1) low on disgust sensitivity and high on openness to experience will be drawn to classically liberal philosophers who argue for (level 2) the superordinate value of individual liberty. But also being highly individualistic and low on empathy, they feel little attraction to modern liberals’ emphasis on altruism and coercive social welfare policies. Haidt and his colleagues further speculate that an intellectual feedback loop develops (level 3) in which such people will find more and more of the libertarian narrative COPACETIC [my emphasis] and begin identifying themselves as libertarian."

This article pretty much proves that libertarians give a rats a.ss about other human beings, or the impacts that their views impose on other people. Which makes sense, because, if you are privileged and not feeling the brutality of the system you champion, it is easy to be 'emotionally removed'.

But I've always said, give me the strongest libertarian, let me take them to a third-world country, have them work in a sweatshop, live in extreme poverty, see their children go without food or medicine, have to root through garbage dumps for food, and see how quick that ideology changes.

But, of course, none of this matters, because libertarians believe in reason, not emotion. Which is easy sitting in that ivory tower.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
objectivist510
Atheists Against Altruism
04:27 PM on 12/30/2010
Anarchists are advocates for gang warfare.
05:05 PM on 12/30/2010
The US government is one giant gang terrorizing the world.
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
05:08 PM on 12/30/2010
*chuckle*

This is why nobody takes you guys seriously.
11:29 AM on 12/31/2010
yet you want them to run your healthcare, your retirement, and everything else you can possibly think of.

why is that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slider79
05:20 PM on 12/30/2010
uuhhhh...wrong. read some anarchist theory.
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
05:46 PM on 12/30/2010
See, that's the problem right there... it's theory.

In practice, anarchism is simply a vacuum of power that is quickly filled by overeager political entrepreneurs who ravage societies.

Perhaps you guys should go to some remote isolated area and put some of those anarchic theories into practice and see how it works before tearing down centuries of cultural and civilizational inheritance that billions of people rely upon.

The bottom line is that I trust centuries of human evolution of the System more than I trust a bunch of angry kiddos that want to bring down the institutions of civil society to enact some untested utopian theory.
04:25 PM on 12/30/2010
Im not sure what the song below is trying to say exactly.

Most Anarchists do not support these attacks in Rome. The group responsible is a tiny offshoot from the main federation, and the majority of Anarchists had nothing to do with these attacks.

Its pure sensationalism to claim that there is an international conspiracy and that all of us collectively are all getting "increasingly violent". It just isnt true.
03:37 PM on 12/30/2010
You don't know me from the wind
You never will, you never did
I'm the little jew
Who wrote the bible
I've seen the nations rise and fall
I've heard their stories, heard them all
But love's the only engine of survival
Your servant here, he has been told
To say it clear, to say it cold
It's over, it ain't going
Any further
And now the wheels of heaven stop
You feel the devil's riding crop
Get ready for the future
It is murder.

Things are going to slide

There'll be the breaking of the ancient
Western code
Your private life will suddenly explode
There'll be phantoms
There'll be fires on the road
And the white man dancing
You'll see a woman
Hanging upside down
Her features covered by her fallen gown
And all the lousy little poets
Coming round
Trying to sound like charlie manson
And the white man dancin'

Give me back the berlin wall
Give me stalin and st paul
Give me christ
Or give me hiroshima
Destroy another fetus now
We don't like children anyhow
I've see the future, baby
It is murder.

Things are going to slide

When they said repent repent

(Leonard Cohen, Future)
01:47 PM on 12/30/2010
I am an Anarchist, and I condemn the attacks on the embassy workers. There is no justification for those bombings. The embassy workers were not a threat to anyone. Attacking them was stupid and does not help our cause in any way.

Anarchists are not necessary violent. Some Anarchists are pacifists. I am not a pacifist, but I do not support random violence. Violence should be an option of last resort, to be used in self defense.....never against innocent people. That is why we oppose war, because we dont want innocent people to be hurt.

There is a small offshoot group in Rome who is responsible for these unjustified attacks, but they do not represent the rest of the Anarchist movement internationally.

The Oklahoma city bombing was carried out by a white christian, a 'right-Libertarian'. Were there articles saying 'Libertarian Party members increasingly violent'? No. Are there articles saying 'Republicans increasingly engaging in hate crimes' when a handful of Republicans engage in a hate crime?

Articles like this are pure sensationalism. Garbage. There is no international Anarchist conspiracy. There is no "Anarchist organization".....there are federations, but the main federation in Rome condemned these attacks. This was a small breakoff group who took responsibility, and they have nothing to do with the rest of us. Most of the Anarchists I know condemned the attacks because they didnt make sense.
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
02:00 PM on 12/30/2010
Hypothetical question:

Let's say we want to help the poor folks in Haiti by providing food and medical resources... but there are gangs running around kiIIing people and bIowing things up. Would you advocate the use of vioIence against those gangs so innocent civilians can live in peace?

Ok, now let's say this same scenario is happening in Afghanistan... would you still advocate the use of vioIence against theocratic nu.tjob gangs?

If you oppose war... you're essentially allowing bIoody despots and gangs to have free rein to hurt and kiII innocent people. It's quite a conundrum you're faced with.
04:21 PM on 12/30/2010
WTF?!!....That isnt "war".

I am against institutionalized invasions of other countries, imperialism.

I am not against the use of force in all instances. I am not against self defense or defense of the innocent from predators. I am not against people organizing to turn the tables on the oppressors. I am not against the use of violence against organized gangs who victimized the poor.

I am also not against insurgency. I fully support insurgencies who use violence against invading armies, but I am against war as an institutionalized practice of invading other countries. I am against imperialism.
05:21 PM on 12/30/2010
Before it became unfashionable in the U.S. around 2002, Islamists got a lot of praise from the left. They saw elements of Islam that looked like socialism and marxism. Ward Churchill, Yvonne Ridley,  Lynne Stewart and Muriel Degaque  are just some of the more spectacular examples of the people who let their sympathies get the better of them.

As for the writers who've tried to reconcile Islam with the left, there are many.
05:26 PM on 12/30/2010
Actually there were many, many articles and books written about what you call "right libertarians" and liberals often scramble for the OKC bombing case when confronted with attacks on Islam. They hold that up to say that Islam is no more violent than any other faith or ideology. That's incorrect IMO.

In the age of twitter, cellphones, irc  and other means of rapid communication, why is it so far fetched that Anarchists from different cities and countries in Europe could be communicating and coordinating.

Muslim terrorists, leftists and soccer hooligans have done it time and time again in Europe, why not Anarchists?


The next question is WHY are you an anarchist?
12:51 PM on 12/30/2010
How many fatalities have these various cited incidents caused? I count one mentioned in recent history (an eco-saboteur's explosive accidentally going off) while observing that the author had to go back to 1989 to bring up the death of a police officer at the hands of an anarchist. So... who is really violent and coordinated?

Like dominant media sources of the past, I suppose Huffpost is just doing its job in whipping up fear of the anarchists while repeating the words of authoritarians in power. If you look at the histories of Bolshevik Russia, Nazi Germany, WWI America, and on and on, you'll see that it is often the anarchists who are actually targeted first in those repressive regimes. Continuing that tradition today will not make for a saner or more just world.

And why doesn't this article mention any of the good done by anarchists (from Tolstoy & Emma Goldman straight through to Abbie Hoffman, Food Not Bombs members of today, and anarchist organizations struggling for an end to war and the prison-industrial complex)? Simply reading this article would give the false impression that anarchists are only ever concerned with being violent and attacking the state. I won't condemn the anarchistic militancy that is arising in the face of growing oppression across Europe (and around the world), but it would be nice if some of the less-violent anarchist coordination was also mentioned.
11:57 AM on 12/30/2010
Erm... I think you'll find that it is European governments who have grown more and more violent. Since 2001 for example, European governments - UK, Spain, Poland, Italy and Germany especially - have been involved in two majors invasions on sovereign states in which hundreds of thousands of civilans were killed by their ordinance. I am surprised you hadn't heard of these wars - they were even in the news. Meanwhile dozens of smaller wars fought by these states and their proxies (eg by Israel agains thte civilain populations of Palestine and Lebanon) have killed tens of thousands more. The Anarchist actions in Europe do not even measure a blip when they are compared by the wholesale slaughter enacted by European and north Amrican governments.
11:51 AM on 12/30/2010
Anarchismis in many ways is an actual democracy where people get what they want and only get how much they need. there have been many successful anarchist societies among indigenous populations.
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
11:59 AM on 12/30/2010
If anarchist indigenous societies had been successful... they wouldn't be called indigenous by an occupying empire.
04:49 PM on 12/30/2010
All empires fall, no exceptions!
02:51 PM on 12/30/2010
In anarchy, the only people who get what they want are those who wield power over others. There will always be power, with or without a government. And you'd better believe that they get want they want, not just what they need, because they have the power. The only reason that anarchys are successful is because they literally destroy any competition. The winner writes the history. The losers are left to rot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slider79
03:27 PM on 12/30/2010
both of you really have no idea about anarchist theory or history, and it clearly shows. It is like talking to Glenn Beck about socialism.
11:44 AM on 12/30/2010
This little rant is not just about this article or these comments, but refers to all I see on these types of articles. I wonder if the day will ever come when media reports on anarchism in a balanced way. It's about disrupting a current system they oppose AND creating new things in its place. The latter is the stuff you never hear about. The really really free markets, food not bombs, community organizing, accountability, support, etc. When will the media report on that?

Is reporting on black clad folks breaking things (which also has its place) the only thing sexy enough? WHY they are breaking things is the real sexy part. It's no wonder most people don't understand that anarchy very much involves organizing with each other, mutual aid, cooperation, respect, dismantling oppression, and so on.

Will the media focus on the state's starvation and exploitation of people to serve a few at the top? Will this media focus on capitalism's poisonous affects on the entire world? Will the media focus on the horrors inflicted by oppressive hierarchies like sexism, racism, heteronormativity, and so on? One cop getting hurt reaches national headlines but civilians, including anarchists, getting assaulted, raped, and murdered by the police every day worldwide doesn't create a hiccup?

When the media focuses on a minute fraction of the tactics alone, the message is always lost. I suppose that is what many of them want though...
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
12:47 PM on 12/30/2010
But the anarchist message is confused and inconsistent. Maybe that's the problem.
04:58 PM on 12/30/2010
That which you are incapable of comprehending will always seem confused and inconsistent to you. Maybe when you witness the total collapse of the empire in which you reside, you will finally get the message.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Candide33
I heart Bernie Sanders
05:24 PM on 12/30/2010
If you are an anarchist why do you care about the media?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slider79
07:44 PM on 12/30/2010
once again, your conception of anarchism is similar to Glenn Beck's conception of socialism.
11:42 AM on 12/30/2010
This is our future if socialism continues to seep in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
forty8r
Gerrman Freethinker
01:59 PM on 12/30/2010
BS brighteyes. Capitalists are the biggest terrorists on the planet.
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
02:06 PM on 12/30/2010
*chortle*

Yeah, McDonalds and Starbucks... those awful terrrorists.

They must be stopped at all costs.... never mind the theocratic nu.tjobs trying to get nooks... we must bring down the capitalist terrrrorists!

Way to keep your eyes on the ball, 48er.
02:52 PM on 12/30/2010
Why, just the other day I saw a beheading at the local McDonalds...
11:22 AM on 12/30/2010
Wouldn't coordinated anarchists be an oxymoron?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorkosan
PhD Chem E, HBS
11:30 AM on 12/30/2010
Semi-anarchists?
11:46 AM on 12/30/2010
No. Anarchism involves a lot of organization. Probably as much as or more than most other ideologies. It is not chaos but if your only information comes from the movie screen I can see how you'd think it was.
11:02 AM on 12/30/2010
Libertarian-Socialism IS the fix
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
11:47 AM on 12/30/2010
Libertarian socialism is an 0xym0r0n. Socialism at it's foundation is coercive.
12:48 PM on 12/30/2010
"Socialism at it's foundation is coercive." Just like Capitalism and those capitalist bombs dropped on innocent children and civilians. Yeah, capitalism is great!
12:57 PM on 12/30/2010
Ur confused about the way "Socialism" is being used in this term. For good reason, because this was the original libertarianism...until, (in America) capital-libertarianism became the societal definition of "Libertarianism"
10:23 AM on 12/30/2010
A one of HuffPost's regular anarchist readers, I need to point out several problems with this article by the AP. For starters, it's typical corporate journalism about anarchists. If corporate journalists cover anarchists, it's always in the context of us doing something violent. Journalists never cover all of the things that anarchists are actually doing every day, in our communities, for example. They don't cover our work on organizing campaigns in the U.S. for Starbucks and Jimmy Johns workers. They don't cover any of our co-ops and infoshops. They've pretty much neglected the support work we've done for WikiLeaks. Last week Congress passed an act authorizing government support for more community radio stations. It was anarchist activism and direct action (pirate radio stations) back in the 1990s that paved the way for this legislation.

Several anarchist groups have already condemned the mail bomb attacks in Rome. Most anarchists are opposed to that kind of tactic. Others are not. At the same time, we get cast as "violent" when there are millions of Republicans and Democrats out there who support the U.S. government and its armies, which are more violent every day than anarchists could ever be violent in a thousand years.

Most anarchists probably oppose the mail bombs attacks, but many anarchists support violent tactics. We just oppose using violence against innocent people. If violence is used, it should be employed against violent thugs, such as police and capitalists.
photo
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
11:16 AM on 12/30/2010
Anarchists are ideologically confused folks... who tend to lash out at their perceived enemies, while missing the ginormous big picture right in front of their angry faces.

For instance:

Anarchists like Rev. Chuck are against capitalism... which is the most distributed, egalitarian, evolved, non-centralized successful economic model in the history of mankind that has raised hundreds of millions out of abject grinding socialist misery. 

Here's the rub... What do anarchists, who oppose vioIence, force and coercion, suggest to do with 'eviI capitalism'? And what system would they put in it's place? How do we know it would work?

Of all the real vioIent th.ugs and repressive regimes out there... little anarchists go after capitalism.

Uncivilized misguided ideologues, the lot of them.
11:22 AM on 12/30/2010
I sometimes feel anger at the whole shabang and turn up a little heavy metal. It's easy to condemn the imperfect system in place without offering a coherent alternative.
Faved
12:55 PM on 12/30/2010
"capitalism­... which is the most distribute­d, egalitaria­n, evolved, non-centra­lized successful economic model in the history of mankind that has raised hundreds of millions out of abject grinding socialist misery. "

You're a funny person. Tell that to the victims of US Capitalist-Imperialism.