More

WikiLeaks: Ahmadinejad BLOCKED From Making Nuclear Deal By Hard-Liners

BRIAN MURPHY   01/ 4/11 08:05 AM ET   AP

Wikileaks Ahmadinejad

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sought some kind of nuclear fuel swap deal more than a year ago, but faced internal pressures from hard-liners who viewed it as a "virtual defeat," according to U.S. diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks.

The report, available on the WikiLeaks website Tuesday, also suggested Iran trusted its arch-foe the United States more than ally Russia to follow through with the U.N.-backed proposal: providing reactor-ready fuel in exchange for Iran giving up control of its low-enriched uranium stockpile.

The assessment was given to a top U.S. envoy by Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, whose nation has a growing friendship with Tehran and is scheduled to host the next round of nuclear talks later this month between Iran and six world powers, including the United States.

The fuel swap proposal is a centerpiece of efforts for greater international controls on Iran's nuclear program, which the West and others fear could lead to development of atomic weapons. Iran insists it only seeks reactors for power and research.

The U.N. plan in 2009 called for Iran to ship its low-enriched uranium out of the country and receive nuclear fuel ready for use. Iran balked at the proposal and outlined alternative fuel swaps involving allies Brazil and Turkey. But the six nations – the five permanent U.N. Security Council members plus Germany – said the offers fell short of their demands.

In late 2009, Davutoglu told visiting Assistant Secretary of State Philip Gordon that Iran's government was willing to work out some kind of fuel swap arrangement, but Ahmadinejad was facing "huge pressures" at home, according to the secret memo.

Davutoglu was quoted as saying that the proposal deal was "interpreted by some circles in Iran as a virtual defeat" by Western pressures.

The cable said Turkish officials had asked Ahmadinejad "if the core of the issue is psychological rather than substance."

"Ahmadinejad had said `yes,' that the Iranians agree to the proposal but need to manage the public perception," the message said, adding that Turkish officials consider Ahmadinejad as "more flexible than others who are inside the Iranian government."

It also noted that it appears the Iranians have "more trust" in the U.S. envoys than British negotiators and "the Iranians would also prefer to get fuel from the U.S. rather than the Russians."

The talks between Iran and the world powers resumed in Geneva last month after an impasse lasting more than a year.

Iran pressed hard to have the second round in Turkey, which has developed close economic and political ties with Iran.

The leaked cable said the U.S. diplomat Gordon noted that Washington believes Turkey can be "helpful as a mediator" with Iran, but he also pushed for a stronger Turkish stance on Iran's nuclear efforts.

It quoted the Turkish foreign minister as replying: "Only Turkey can speak bluntly and critically to the Iranians ... but only because Ankara is showing public messages of friendship."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sought some kind of nuclear fuel swap deal more than a year ago, but faced internal pressures from hard-liners who viewed it a...
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sought some kind of nuclear fuel swap deal more than a year ago, but faced internal pressures from hard-liners who viewed it a...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 331
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Sarnoski
01:14 PM on 01/05/2011
No surprise ....the revolutionary guard and revolutionary council control Iran.
05:39 PM on 01/05/2011
What is the revolution­ary council?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
08:41 AM on 01/05/2011
This is another case of Wikileaks telling us what we know already. Personality conflicts are often more important then substance. Our foreign policy seems to be based on everything except thoughtful analysis of issues.
09:17 AM on 01/05/2011
Couldn't have said it better myself
09:43 AM on 01/05/2011
This is NOT the case that WikiLeaks is proving Ahmadinejad was blocked by internal pressures from making a nuclear deal. This is telling us that someone's perception of the situation is that Ahmadinejad was blocked from internal pressures, etc.

The cable was not written by Ahmadinejad himself. It is based on interpretations and hearsay. You cannot base your understanding or Iran's government on what it says here. You can only deduce the US perception of Iran...
08:38 AM on 01/05/2011
He sure was blocked by hardliners, the hardliners in the U.S. Dept. of State, such as Hillary Clinton. The U.S. blocked Turkey and Brazil from intervening to resolve the impasse too. This just looks like our relationship with Saddam Hussein and Iraq all over again.We are sanctioning them and causing their people hardship and we are bullying their leadership and making resolution of the nuclear issues impossible.
photo
CaptRuby
Corporations are people my friend!
09:21 AM on 01/05/2011
Yes, looks like history is repeating itself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cgeorgan
Proud American-Canadian Libertarian
08:30 AM on 01/05/2011
More evidence that we are dealing indirectly with a theocracy that cannot be reasoned with.

Diplomacy will fail in this case - the only thing that theocrats understand, aside from their own language, is the language of violence.  Let's use the tools at our disposal -
Vyslichajici
private american citizen
08:38 AM on 01/05/2011
Your unjustifiably violent approach is based on teleological absurdism.
The USA has no strategic interest in war with Iran; only miltant Zionist
paranoia could be expected to prompt such an irrational hostility. Are
you a Zionist?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cgeorgan
Proud American-Canadian Libertarian
08:54 AM on 01/05/2011
I figured one out of three responses would come from an anti-semite.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
08:42 AM on 01/05/2011
And acting like bullies and school children has worked out well so far, hasn't it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cgeorgan
Proud American-Canadian Libertarian
08:53 AM on 01/05/2011
Yes.
07:42 AM on 01/05/2011
And another indication that Admadinejad is not really the man in charge... When will the western media finally give a somewhat-accurate representation of the political realities in Iran?!?
07:21 AM on 01/05/2011
In the good old days someone would have slipped this Iranian Jiminy Cricket an exploding cigar...

This guy looks like Martini (Danny DeVito's character in "One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest")...
07:47 AM on 01/05/2011
And after you read this article... and probably trust the US diplomatic assesment... how would that change anything to the better?!?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:35 AM on 01/05/2011
US foreign policy genius first delivered Iraq to Iran and then all Iran trade to Turkey. Meanwhile Turkey is Europe's only alternative to Russian energy dependence while China and India just sitting back and smiling at US inability to forge a ME policy that benefits the US.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JasonWS
Lovely day for a good plan
06:54 AM on 01/05/2011
China's actually struggling with the same command economy woes the former Soviet Union struggled with in the late 60's, building capital capacity that goes unused and the corruption associated with that sort of project.

India in the meantime, has forged tight military development ties with the Russian federation, is modernizing their military "faster" than China and is bilking Western customers in service contracts and telecom development, while sidelining other powers.

The US unfortunately has an effective MidEast policy--effective in bankrupting Social programs and efforts, which since Reagan, have been slowly evaporated out through spending attachments. Were the US to throw Israel under the bus, embrace Iran as a friend who'd ultimately have to stab them in the back, and leave all of their military bases, they'd still wrestle with the Middle East as an enemy of ease for decades because they're so easy to blame for everything. I think what you actually suggest is that the US needs a Positive ME policy that promotes detente in oil trade wars, nuclear ambition and the moderation of treasure leak.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:20 AM on 01/05/2011
Slipping into conspiracy theory neighborhood but the perspective associated with the first sentence is entertaining, to say the least.
photo
asmir
Cancer Awareness, We Must Find a Cure!
03:56 AM on 01/05/2011
Ahmadineja­d needs to take a bath he's nothing but a shlepper
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:02 AM on 01/05/2011
See! Ahmadinejad really is a great guy! All those threats to annihilate Israel were just for fun! He's all about world peace! I knew this guy was on the level! We should have the Ahmadinejads over for dinner, honey. I really like his wife.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
06:55 AM on 01/05/2011
You know, here in the grown-up world there is a fairly large range of possibilities between "nice guy" and "Hitler".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hershobr
07:09 AM on 01/05/2011
Not with Ahmedinejad.
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
01:13 PM on 01/05/2011
He never threatened to annihilate Israel.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:30 AM on 01/05/2011
It just shows who has the real power in Tehran.
photo
SamEllison
I feel so clean!
02:08 AM on 01/05/2011
Agreed or someone is trying really hard
to soften I'madinnerjacket's image.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:19 AM on 01/05/2011
Agree! Turks are trying to soften Iranian regimes image...
They are calculating that helping US to cut a deal with Iran would be a nice tickett into the europian union. Billions of oil dollars worth of trade on the turkish-Iranian border is waiting. That border would be the EU - Iran border...
So some lies from turks is natural.. they are good at it...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Hirnlego
07:08 AM on 01/05/2011
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/07/AR2007120701614.html

Here McCain is asked about it a few years back:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr6Va7PEBg8

McCain is caught in a lie basically... they know he doesn't have much power, but the picture presented to the public is not the same.
04:55 PM on 01/06/2011
Ahmadinejad always seemed to me to be just a face man.
12:52 AM on 01/05/2011
You would think nothing else that happened during the entire period of the Leaks other than the "Iran threat" was the discussion of any diplomat anywhere. All this about something that didn't happen (Iran going nuclear).

What about things that did occur? Georgia conflict? The destruction of Gaza? Darfur? Myanamar? Anything, anywhere? Why is that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:34 AM on 01/05/2011
Leaks? What leaks? The only reporting in the most accessed media, like tv and newspapers and radio generally consists in stories about Assange....not much information about the actual leaks....
photo
SamEllison
I feel so clean!
02:11 AM on 01/05/2011
MSM has a self-sealing feature.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:03 AM on 01/05/2011
Iran's not going nuclear? The leaks talk about issues all over the world. Have you read them? Or do you read the cliffs notes online? Why do you think Iran is the only subject discussed?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Hirnlego
07:10 AM on 01/05/2011
“Everyone wants to go to Baghdad. Real men want to go to Tehran.” [Newsweek, 8/11/2002; Newsweek, 8/11/2002]

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?geopolitics_and_9/11=centralAsia&timeline=complete_911_timeline

We're sold a war.
05:15 PM on 01/05/2011
I've read plenty of them - most are routine nothings of no consequence OR if the word "Iran" appears, then out it comes with all the varied spinning.

Where, for instance, are all the cables concerning Israel's attacks on Hezbollah, or Hamas in Gaza? Or the Georgian conflict? Or ANYTHING to do with the global meltdown what was already underway in 2007?

My own view is that the Leaks were in some fashion compromised and information deliberately planted, managed etc. Just too much about purely speculative matters, and nothing at all about concrete events as they occur.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ehjay
Reform, social, political, economic
11:49 PM on 01/04/2011
Ahmadineja­d's first language is presuneably Farsi. Western interpreters present the words in English and other languages. Linguistic relativity causes the English speaker to receive the words and derive a particular meaning from the words, while the Farsi speaker may intend.to convey some other nuance. A French speaker may receive the French interpretration and derive a meaning that varies from both Farsi and English. Anyone well travelled understands that great care must be exercised when deriving a meaning from translated words.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:04 AM on 01/05/2011
So what are you suggesting?
Vyslichajici
private american citizen
08:51 AM on 01/05/2011
ehjay is recounting the rationale used to wrest permission for the continuing (untrue) claim that Ahmadineja­­d supposedly (but not in fact whatsoever) called for the destruction of Israel, when in fact he simply claimed that a day will come when Israel is no longer recognized as a sovereign nation when cartographers create maps of the world. Assuming humans continue to exts as they have for many tens of thousands of years, and assuming empires and nations rise and fall as they have throughout the millenia, it is a prefectly safe bet that no nation that exists today will continue forever as one whose boundaries are notated by human cartographers - unless one clings to the irrational belief in the eternity of one's nation-state of course.

china itself only became what we recognize as china around 3kbc under the emperor Xin. Its dynasties and boundaries have risen and fallen, ebbed and flowed. Egypt under the Pharoahs, great as it was, fell to invaders. European centers have been overrun. America was conquered and inhabited - and Israel as a place has been run by every outfit with an army since millions of years have seen dawns and evenings pass.

Every nation will someday be erased from the maps of the world - and no nation iss an exception to that rule. ehjay was simply explaining that to us, or reminding us of it obliquely if you like.
10:56 PM on 01/04/2011
No surprise that Iran wants US fuel. That Russian stuff is probably crap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
08:48 AM on 01/05/2011
The entire world is incapable of anything but waiting for Americans to tell them what to do. Arrogant much?
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
09:35 PM on 01/04/2011
Eventually the US and Europe will convince Iran to disarm.

After they do that the Western coalition will attack and seize their oil.
09:41 PM on 01/04/2011
What do you mean by disarm?
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
09:28 AM on 01/05/2011
If past actions are a guide eventually the western coalition will up their demands to include demands that Iran get rid of any technology it has that might deter aggression­.

Certainly there will be claims about chemical and biological weapons. Such claims can be used as a rationalization for demanding inspections which can produce good pre-invasion intelligence.

There will be claims about missiles as well.

Any compliance will be taken advantage of when the invasion is eventually launched.

The US knows how to do siege warfare very well.
10:00 PM on 01/04/2011
disarm what? lol Please explain...if you can.
photo
OliverTwist
Contrarian advocate for truth and justice
09:24 AM on 01/05/2011
If past actions are a guide eventually the western coalition will up their demands to include demands that Iran get rid of any technology it has that might deter aggression.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:41 PM on 01/04/2011
Is the fact that Ahmadinejad is the soft guy, and it's really a lot of OTHER Iranian hardliners we need to worry about, supposed to be any consolation...? Unless somebody corrupted every word he ever said, I seem to remember several speeches by Ahmadinejad about Jews, Israel, the Holocaust, 9/11 etc, where the substance was nothing but twisted lies and unmitigating hatred.
Oh - and btw: Howw about prosecuting him for his involvement in holding US diplomats hostage in Tehran back in 1980...? How come he is never prosecuted for this, despite staggering evidence...?
08:55 PM on 01/04/2011
Well, hate to break it to you, but somebody always corrupted every word he ever said ;) mind you, he is not a good speaker and usually offers a lot of matterial.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:06 PM on 01/04/2011
I have to admit, my Persian is a bit rusty - but are you really suggesting, that both the official translators at the Un, as well as the collective media outlets, constantly and deliberately have distorted/twisted his words into something completely different...to somehow fool everyone, without someonee with a better understanding of Persian officially objecting...?
I'm not saying it's impossible, or even beyond what governments would do - but it seems very, very unlikely, don't you agree...?