iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Fed To Back New Rules To Rein In Home Foreclosure Abuses

Foreclosure Protest

First Posted: 01/05/11 07:02 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- The Federal Reserve has reversed its opposition to new rules reining in foreclosure abuses, and will support stronger regulations on the nation's largest banks, according to a source familiar with the matter.

The Wall Street reform legislation signed into law by President Obama in July 2010 required federal regulators to write new rules governing the broken market for mortgage bonds. Problems in the packaging and sale of mortgage bonds helped inflate the housing bubble and facilitated the sale of predatory loans nationwide. Since banks could push mortgages on borrowers and then sell them to investors, critics say that banks lacked serious incentives to ensure those loans could be repaid.

The FDIC has been pushing hard to ensure that new regulations on the mortgage bond market include clear instructions for how banks handle mortgages-- and under what circumstances they can evict delinquent borrowers. The bank divisions that collect payments from borrowers and implement the foreclosure process-- known as "mortgage servicers"-- have been plagued by rampant problems with fraudulent documentation. This fraud has resulted in everything from illegal fees charged to borrowers to improper evictions.

The Fed had opposed using the mortgage bond rules to crack down on foreclosure abuses, despite pressure from the FDIC. But FDIC General Counsel Michael Krimminger recently told the Fed his agency would not support any new mortgage bond regulations that do not include strong rules forbidding foreclosure abuses. Krimminger told HuffPost that other regulatory agencies are "moving in our direction on the issue."

Krimminger would not specify which agencies were coming around. But a separate source close to the discussions told HuffPost that the Fed has come on board, with systemic risk watchdogs at the central bank sympathetic to Krimminger's position.

Late last month, more than 50 economists, banking experts and financial reform advocates sent regulators a letter urging them to use the mortgage bond rules to create a gold standard for handling mortgages in a responsible fashion. Many of the rules proposed in the letter were very simple standards, like promptly crediting borrower accounts when they make payments on their loans. But mortgage servicers have had significant problems performing these tasks for years, and regulators have not checked them. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which regulates the largest mortgage servicers, has never issued any public regulatory sanction against a servicer. Current OCC chief John Walsh also said in a recent Congressional hearing that his agency was unaware of foreclosure fraud problems until the media began reporting them.

A cadre of House Democrats lead by Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.) has also urged regulators to use the new mortgage bond rules to crack down on foreclosure abuses and encourage loan work-outs.

Under the new rules required by Wall Street reform legislation, banks that plan to sell mortgages off to bond investors will be required to keep some of the loans on their own books. The idea is to prevent banks from knowingly selling off bad mortgages to other firms, avoiding losses while creating risks to the broader economy. But a certain class of top-grade mortgages will be exempt from this "skin-in-the-game" requirement. If a mortgage is of superior quality, the thinking goes, it doesn't need such safeguards.

Financial experts believe the criteria that regulators use to define these top-quality loans will become the new standard for the mortgage business. The FDIC and reform advocates hope to ensure that strong standards of mortgage servicer conduct will be included in these definitions.

Financial blogger Yves Smith has also organized more than 3,000 individuals to pressure regulators into taking action on foreclosure fraud. Smith established the website StopServicerScams.com, where supporters can sign a short petition urging regulators to stop foreclosure abuses. The CREDO Mobile telecom company has been rounding up petitioners for the site.

The OCC is yet to support the new rules, according to the source familiar with negotiations. Krimminger told HuffPost that no specific language has yet been dissected in interagency talks. Neither the Fed nor the OCC were immediately available for comment.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Federal Reserve has reversed its opposition to new rules reining in foreclosure abuses, and will support stronger regulations on the nation's largest banks, according to a source fam...
WASHINGTON -- The Federal Reserve has reversed its opposition to new rules reining in foreclosure abuses, and will support stronger regulations on the nation's largest banks, according to a source fam...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,452
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
03:38 PM on 01/12/2011
"Current OCC chief John Walsh also said in a recent Congressional hearing that his agency was unaware of foreclosure fraud problems until the media began reporting them."


This is a lie. I wrote to the OCC on numerous occasions since 12/2008 regarding Wells Fargo's fraudulent foreclosure practices, false affidavit of assignment after foreclosure filing, and refusal to produce a true copy of the currently existing note - I have six "true copies" so far, and the OCC as of 8/2010 denied my appeal, stating that WF complied with my requests, completely ignoring the fact that there were sent to me several copies with conflicting information.

Also, a bit off-topic - I also wrote to FHFA because Fannie website lists my mortgage as Fannie-owned, but WF says it owns the loan, plus MERS avers to be mortgagee still - and FHFA says it can't force Fannie to disclose. ??...Fannie has never responded to any of my letters regarding ownership of my loan. Also contacted the FRB regarding TILA/Reg z, specifically asking whether or not lenders have a time limit (20 days) to take action upon a rescission notice by either rescinding or applying to court for a mod of Reg Z procedure, or can they delay and destroy a consumer's finances until a homeowner files suit - and thier written answer to me was "sorry we cannot respond to your inquiry because you are not a bank". ???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
04:54 PM on 01/10/2011
There are many rules already in place, seller\servicing agreements. PSA - Pooling and servicer agreements.

Banks just gave the law, and regulators the finger, laws are useless without the regulators actually insuring that banks follow the rules and punish those who don't.

Govt and politicians cower in fear.

Criminal actions should be rampant right now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
04:47 PM on 01/10/2011
Yes the new rules require 5% of all originations be portfolio loans, up from 2.5%

What a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deadfed
10:29 AM on 01/10/2011
My blog has a link to MERS...typ­e in your address to see who's claiming to be the servicer and investor on your note...

http://deadfed.com/
08:20 AM on 01/07/2011
It's important to follow the rules to avoid problems in the future over this foreclosure situation.

Regards
Tony
http://www.foreclosurelistings.com/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Deihl
01:16 AM on 01/07/2011
I never received a finished appraisel from first bank (Lend America) before they sold it 2 bank (Wells Fargo ). When I asked Wells Fargo for the appraisel they told that didn't have one.And that I had to ask first bank (lend America) for it.So I called my Loan officer of Lend America a left a message to please send me a copy of appraisel.Well after 2 months no return phone calls or appraisel.So I called the man that was suppose to have done my appraisel.And he told me it was NEVER finished cause of NO entrance to attic to look at underlying of roof and structural sound. Well here my Real Estate Agent made sure that my loan was pushed through without it.Why ? Cause she was also working for seller of home (dual Agent).Together they covered up the fact that the house was manufactured in 1981,not built on sight in 1988.And they sealed off the roof to hide the structal damage from water running down joistes and black n white mildew build up on underlying of roof and joistes.And the fact of 1/3s and 1/ 2s were holding up the roof.If my Real Estate Agent wasn't working with my loan officer from the Bank . I would have never bought a house that was way over market value and falsifying documents.The seller of this house paid $60,000 for it 5 months before I bought it for $153,000.
-swift
Can you put your country before your party?
08:18 AM on 01/07/2011
Those are good points for anyone buying a house. Never work with a real estate investor who's also working with the seller. Always hire your own home inspector.
11:32 PM on 01/06/2011
Nice blog....a small group of rich, greedy bankers crashed the economy and got bailed out by tax payers ... Now the banks are making unprecedented profits.
11:03 PM on 01/06/2011
Straight lies! I reported to the OCC of deceptive lending practices (FRAUD) as of July of 2009. They replied stating they don't over see lenders. Only banks.

The Huffington Post has been excellent at stating the truth. Keep it up and they will put Washington Post and New York Times to shame.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
04:50 PM on 01/10/2011
Federal Agencies that regulate banks

The Comptroller of the Currency charters "national banks"

The Federal Reserve Board

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

State Regulators

Keep in mind most of the lenders left ARE banks
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:00 PM on 01/06/2011
I will take this as a small victory for those of us fighting the foreclosure crisis. Servicers sit at the Hub of the problem. Since servicers (in this sense) arent your neighborhood bank, but are the monsters who no longer hold the notes in question and make tons in fees by pushing foreclosures, they have no economic interest in helping people with workouts. yeah, this does not solve the problem, but it is potentially a significant baby step (depending on the final regulatory language) to establish at least a modicum of responsibility. Shows that some activism and media coverage can help on occassion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
12:39 PM on 01/06/2011
Well this is a surprise. But I'm still waiting for the other shoe to drop. The shoe always drops but we don't always see it until it's too late to save ourselves.
12:29 PM on 01/06/2011
Does this mean that the falsification of documents by banks will no longer be allowed to prosecute foreclosures. How big of the FED to stop this kind of abuse.
03:40 PM on 01/06/2011
NO it means the LENDERS defrauded the consumers, fed & state gov, SEC, Banking Regulators, FDIC, mortgage ins companies, title insurance companies, appraisers, etc - AND THEY WILL NOT BE PROSECUTED. AND because those consumers were mispresented and lied to by these lenders they will be TOSSED TO THE STREET - have their credit destoyed - be forced to pay absurd PENALTIES and outrageous interest rates in the future because the lenders destoyed their credit...

The LENDERS go FREE - take the consumers houses - resell it and defraud the next victim. THEN it will be LEGAL...

That is what our gov is doing for us...
photo
AwakeNow
just flew into town
12:07 PM on 01/06/2011
B_nks should not be allowed to foreclose on homes that are not even in foreclosure. I just watched
a piece on a woman that was about to be foreclosed on who in the final analysis was able to
save her home only to find out that the bnks were in such a hurry for the land grab that they
entered her home and removed all her possesions. She has her home,yet it was emptied of
everything including her husbands urn of ashes and her de_ceased fathers war medals. Those
rob_ber bnkers sure are a class act.
10:12 AM on 01/06/2011
a broken corrupt system.
I'm surprised there aren't more shootings over this crap.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:26 AM on 01/06/2011
Housing is a basic human need and a basic human right. No one should be forced out of their home just because they miss a payment or two. People should be allowed to stay in their homes if they are unemployed or facing other hardships. These heartless banks have no right to throw people out of their homes when they are already down and out due to no action of their own.
10:14 AM on 01/06/2011
How on Earth can you justify such a position?

Why should people be able to get something for free, a home no less? If they can't afford it then they can't afford it. Should I be able to keep an Aston Martin that I can't afford, or should I downsize and maybe consider getting that Toyota Corrola that I should have bought in the first place?

These people signed a contract, and they did not hold up their end of the agreement. There are no morals or feelings here, it is a piece of paper that says you pay me back for the money I loaned you, or I get to keep the house. Do you honestly think that banks should just say "oh well, forget about that $200,000 I gave you, you can just keep the house"?

And housing is not a basic human right my friend. I don't know where you guys learn this stuff, but it is unbelievable.
12:11 PM on 01/06/2011
Though I agree with you about the free nonsense... and basically agree regarding the contract... However, the contracts for most of these loans were illegal. In fact, one of the reasons for the robo-signing and alleged "document" errors & problems is to HIDE the frauds committed by these lenders. It was deliberate & calculated.

The irony is the lenders broke the laws that SECURED the loan. Legally - they cannot foreclose because the loan is secured by the property.

If the FED would simply FORCE the courts to enforce Real Property & UCC laws already on the books, these foreclosures would disappear in a month or two. The LENDERS that WROTE the FRAUDULENT MORTGAGE would be forced to re-write that loan OR risk LOSING the loan completely.

These lenders should be in prison. They deliberately "knowingly" put borrowers into loans they could not afford. In most cases these borrowers did NOT know it and had no reason to think otherwise. Case after case it is being exposed that many of these families were sold a complete LIE by the lender. The lenders ignored the underwriting standards and set these families up to FAIL. Obviously that is NOT every case but it IS IN FACT the case for MILLIONS & MILLIONS of families. The lenders destroyed most of these documents therefore the courts have no-way of knowing. These borrowers have no idea it was even done to them. 80-90% of foreclosures are uncontested.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:12 PM on 01/06/2011
Would you feel better if they all lived in a cardboard box?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDMac
It's called sarcasm, Genius.
01:04 PM on 01/06/2011
Easy for you to say. What if someone were buying a house on land contract from you and they couldn't afford to pay you for months and months?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:11 PM on 01/06/2011
I'm sure you would have no problem kicking the working poor into the streets, Right?
03:58 PM on 01/12/2011
You know, I've owned for 21 years and have asked myself that same question but in the case of a renter - funny how someone who hasn't paid rent for 2 months gets more time from a judge - and I can PROVE I own the house (and have a mortgage to pay). On the other hand, a lot of these "lenders" were already repaid in full - and third-parties are foreclosing WITHOUT PROOF THAT THEY ARE OWED ONE CENT...what say you - will you pay rent to your landlord's neighbor, when your lease specifically states you must pay your landlord?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
08:56 AM on 01/06/2011
The article's headline should read "Fed to Back New Mortgage Underwriting and Retention Rules." It devotes little space to new foreclosure rules, perhaps because there aren't any. "The "rules changes" related to foreclosure proposed by the group of 50 economists referenced in the article are so nebulous that no one would oppose them. Mortgage servicers would be required to provide loan modifications to borrowers when reasonable and would be held accountable for losing paperwork and failing to stop the foreclosure process when a borrower is receiving assistance. They would also be required to disclose to investors if they own any other loans, such as second mortgages, when collecting payments on a primary mortgage. The prroposals that affect homeowners seem to apply only to those who apply for HAMP loan modifications. Mortgage servicers contend they already provide loan modifications when reasonable. What is the definition of reasonable? Is it eligiblity for HAMP modifications? We know HAMP helps only a tiny percent of distressed homeowners. The only concrete proposal is full disclosure to investors. It's meant to protect investors, not homeowners.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jen Celli
Done sitting and watching quietly.
12:27 PM on 01/06/2011
Modifications can be had if there's a pretty good certainty that the lender isn't going to get all of the money owed on the loan. If they will receive full payment for all costs and expenses through foreclosure or make money on the loan, then they're likely to foreclose and get it all right away. If, for instance, the borrower bought the home many years ago and had a reasonable down payment and has now lost employment and the house is worth less than what's owed, the lender will have to take what they can get as there is likely to be no PMI or other subsidy to ensure full payment. Those borrowers would be more likely to get modified to keep them in the home and paying a mortgage that is underwater. Hope that makes sense; it's the best way I can think of to explain it. Just consider this: if there is financial incentive to foreclose, they'll do that; if there isn't, they'll work on a modification.
04:09 PM on 01/12/2011
What the FED should do is make the new rules (in favor of the consumer) retroactive. All the new rules made now are not going to help the millions who lost thier homes and credit because of all this. Some of these people lost for no fault of thier own, many were defrauded outright and thier credit and finances destroyed and may never own a home again because of the frauds committed by the banker (specifically through Mortgage Bankers' Association and it's pet, MERS).

Ten to one these fraudsters get a slap on the wrist and the go-ahead to continue the fraud, having a fresh supply of foreclosed homes to mortgage in order to restart the money wheel (it would take another 5-10 years for frauds by new lenders to show up, plenty of time to make a huge profit). Of course, if fraud is found a month after closing, lender wins anyway in recission (because who can pay back the total loan amount a month after the loan closed? Um, if you had rthat kind of money you wouldn't need a loan LMAO). We don't really need Banks - banks need us, the Fed needs banks or no profit can be made by the Fed.