iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Administration Reverses Decision On End-Of-Life Counseling

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   01/ 5/11 02:10 PM ET   AP

Obama End Of Life Counseling

WASHINGTON — Reversing a potentially controversial decision, the Obama administration will drop references to end-of-life counseling from the ground rules for Medicare's new annual checkup, the White House said Wednesday.

The latest shift on the sensitive subject comes ahead of a vote next week in the new GOP-led House to repeal President Barack Obama's landmark health care overhaul.

The decision is not likely to have much impact on patients and doctors already discussing options for care in the last stages of life. For example, voluntary end-of-life planning is already covered as part of the "Welcome to Medicare" doctor visit, available to seniors within the first year of joining the program.

The original House version of the overhaul legislation sought to expand coverage, allowing for discussions every few years. But the plan was dropped after Sarah Palin and other Republicans raised the specter of "death panels" deciding the fate of vulnerable seniors. Those charges were later debunked by several non-partisan fact-checking groups.

End-of-life counseling unexpectedly surfaced again late last year in a Medicare regulation that spelled out what would be covered in a new annual checkup, or wellness visit, authorized by the health care law. Issued without fanfare, the regulation said such voluntary doctor-patient discussions could be part of the annual visit.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the administration still supports end-of-life planning, but is pulling the language from the regulation because there wasn't enough chance for all sides to comment on the change. "We did not think that the process (gave) the public an adequate space in a public comment period to debate these kinds of things," Gibbs told reporters.

Discussions about how to face the end of life are already an accepted part of care for people with a terminal illness, and the administration's reversal is unlikely to have much impact on that. Longstanding federal rules require hospital patients to be informed of their right to spell out in a living will or similar document their wishes about being kept alive by machinery if there's no hope for a cure.

However, many doctors and public health advocates believe the government should take a more direct role in encouraging people to plan ahead. They say it would save families the ordeal of having to make agonizing decisions when a loved one is incapacitated.

Opponents counter that such decisions are highly personal, and government should stay out. They worry that explicitly including end-of-life counseling in Medicare rules could send an indirect message that people facing serious illness should be nudged toward hospice care, giving up on seeking a cure.

The new regulation was first reported by The New York Times.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Reversing a potentially controversial decision, the Obama administration will drop references to end-of-life counseling from the ground rules for Medicare's new annual checkup, the ...
WASHINGTON — Reversing a potentially controversial decision, the Obama administration will drop references to end-of-life counseling from the ground rules for Medicare's new annual checkup, the ...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,563
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (33 total)
09:41 AM on 01/07/2011
There are so many "hidden" or unknown aspects written into the 2400 pages of Obamacare that this so-called "death panel" discussion (which would have been required each year) is a minor issue. The fact that they tried to "sneak" it in under the radar is scary. What else is in there that is being forced on the American people that we won't like? We need to repeal this montrosity and replace it with a much simpler plan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pkafin
03:15 PM on 01/19/2011
Here's an idea: Why don't you sit down and read the bill. I'm sure you could do it.

My 10 year old has read every Harry Potter Book in the last 2 years. That's over 4,000 pages. After reading this public document that can be accessed for free, you can either dismiss or support your fears.

Those of us who are not afraid of our own shadow have wither read the bill and found it to be just about what we expected and would happily vote for it. Those who haven't, for the most part assume that it is no better or worse written than any other bill. It was not hastily done. It was an 18 month process that brought together ideas that have been hashed over for decades.

Stop acting like it's just too complicated for our brains. It may be for you, but for the average American, it's not. The fact that, months after it passed, you still haven't read it yet is not a reason to assume that there's anything wrong with or sneaky about the bill.

Pick it up, read it, and then get back to us.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
07:43 AM on 01/07/2011
The federal government paying a fee to a Doctor to discuss options and help elderly patients weigh their decisions?Death panels!
Insurance companies denying life extending coverage ? Free market!

bizarro world is here
photo
armywifee
From the Soviet Republic of Canuckistan
07:56 PM on 01/06/2011
I'm not a big fan of plastic surgery but Jan Brewer just looks plain mean.
Scare the grandkids kinda mean.
03:23 PM on 01/06/2011
I'm sorry to say, Mr. President, that backing down on "death panels" (...eye roll...) without a fight gives the proudly uninformed/ignorant among us the impression that their foolish position was correct and that their mindless foot stomping is somehow protecting the nation from your "socialist 5th column attacks on the Constitution".
This was an opportunity to show them their petulant, unwarranted opposition to a specific common-sense health care reform concept first proposed by a Republican legislator wasn't going to impede your agenda of improving the quality and access of Americans to quality health care. your surrender on this issue gives the Alaskan Twitterer and others an opportunity to - incredulously - trumpet another "victory" against you. Not good, Sir, not good....
02:02 PM on 01/06/2011
I was hospitalized busted appendix and staff infection.every time doctor visited my room it sounded like he was giving me end of life counseling.They notified my family with that end of life stuff.That morphine pump was what I needed counseling on,I hated because every time I pumped I wanted to hear RUSH LAMBAUGH
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
FreedToChoose
...lest my wife says I'm not.
01:05 PM on 01/06/2011
The whole issue is bogus. Health counseling is SOP with any health professional. To create a special label, end-of-life counseling, suggests special condition and feeds alarmists, especially those who think everlasting life is the goal.
12:12 PM on 01/06/2011
"White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the administration still supports end-of-life planning, but is pulling the language from the regulation because there wasn't enough chance for all sides to comment on the change. "We did not think that the process (gave) the public an adequate space in a public comment period to debate these kinds of things," Gibbs told reporters."

So--they are not willing to stand up for what they believe in because it may take too long?
considerthis
I try my best
12:28 PM on 01/06/2011
at this time, yes. the bill needs to be voted on next wee and you know the repubs will be looking for every lame excuse to say no..
photo
pdsimdars
Steel spine and golden aura.
06:26 AM on 01/06/2011
I had often wondered why there's all this fuss about whether or not medicare pays for end-of-life counseling. Don't you? If people want to discuss what they want done with their doctor, who should care so much as to make such a big fuss about it?
Well, I recently found the answer. Did you know that 27-30% of health care costs are for those expensive end-of-life procedures? In other words, it's estimated that 27-30% of the money the health care industry rakes in is during the end-of-life period. So they have a HUGE incentive to keep everyone uninformed.
Now, doesn't that help explain all this 'death panel' frenzy?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:20 AM on 01/06/2011
Hi people earlier today on this issue, logicallylogical, felt it necessary to call me and tell me the following,

"lazy, stu pid, mentally handicapped, lo ser, you should learn how to use Google while you are at it, No wonder people think Americans are stu pid, it's because of people like you.

all because I asked him for his link...

G*d there are some real head cases out there.
======================================

His original posting, "lol, they couldn't keep it secret long enough." and it escalated from there.

People please read the whole article below if you want to know who "they" are or just because, and not just cherry picked sentences to mislead.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/26/us/politics/26death.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
glomtt
Terribly Political
02:17 AM on 01/06/2011
The Caver Caves Again, Stay Tuned For More Caving!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:31 AM on 01/06/2011
Oh' brother!
considerthis
I try my best
12:32 PM on 01/06/2011
you have the most intelligent thoughts and posts.............not really
scipio2009
Alan Wolfe's "The Future of Liberalism"
01:49 AM on 01/06/2011
If Republicans honestly want to continue with this notion, that doctors, performing work that is deeply beneficial to the patients that they work with, will continue to do so, on a voluntary basis, that's their argument to make, one would guess.

Just end all of this nonsense about "fighting for healthcare" and doctors.
01:40 AM on 01/06/2011
"Opponents...worry that explicitly including end-of-life counseling in Medicare rules could send an indirect message that people facing serious illness should be nudged toward hospice care, giving up on seeking a cure."

Indirect message? Yet another conservative bogeyman created entirely from whole cloth.

There is nothing insidious or implied in providing opportunities for patients, families, and their chosen doctors to openly engage in end-of-life education and planning (and paying the doctors for this service). It is incredibly necessary and extremely helpful to all parties...and to society at large.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:02 AM on 01/06/2011
The paying part is what I have an issue with.
03:13 AM on 01/06/2011
Why shouldn't physicians be compensated for their time?
03:53 PM on 01/06/2011
Why should the government force people to admit that they're going to die someday? According to the official Tee Hee Hee Party health care manifesto "denial of mortality is one of the most effective and lowest cost ways to forestall death." What you do not acknowledge can not harm you!

(It would be funny if it weren't true.......)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
twinite
01:18 AM on 01/06/2011
Okay....this is nonsense. Speaking for myself, I WANT to have a voice concerning my end of life medical care.
considerthis
I try my best
12:34 PM on 01/06/2011
well, you're just being too logical. don't you realize the repubs know what all the people want and need, that's why they were elected? if not, listen to boehner and bachman a bit more (if you can stand it) and you'll probably come around. re-education is the key
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lendmeanear
12:49 AM on 01/06/2011
President Obama should talk about his own end of life planning. Why doesn't he say this in a speech. "I have an Advanced Directive putting my wishes on paper. I remember when Michelle and I sat with our family doctor and talked about our wishes. It wasn't a comfortable discussion and like many people we would of rather avoided it but having a family we felt it was the responsible thing to do. And I'm glad we did. And our doctor being part of that was invaluable. So I would encourage every American to do the same for the last thing you want is a judge having to try and determine what you would of wanted. "

I think if he used the death panel crap as an oppurtunity to lead on the issue of end of life planning and why its so very important he could actually help the country and pull out a political win.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:28 AM on 01/06/2011
He did at an AARP meeting, I guess the media didn't think it to be that important. That is the problem here, he gets drowned out be Palin, Fox, Beck, Republicans, Tea Party, etc rhetoric.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]