More

Iraqi Cleric Muqtada al-Sadr: "Resist The US By All Means Necessary"

REBECCA SANTANA   01/ 8/11 06:18 PM ET   AP

Alsadr

NAJAF, Iraq — Muqtada al-Sadr lambasted the American "enemy" in Iraq during his first speech in the country since returning from exile, fiery rhetoric from a new powerbroker in the government that will make it difficult to extend the U.S. military deployment beyond the end of this year.

The young Shiite cleric once blamed for some of the country's worst sectarian violence also told his followers that such bloodshed would no longer be tolerated and appealed to them to show unity in the face of the country's many problems.

The 35-minute speech on Saturday in the Shiite holy city of Najaf was a public debut for the young cleric after nearly four years in voluntary exile in neighboring Iran, and it seemed at times like a combination of a rock concert and religious sermon. After walking out to a podium draped in black cloth, al-Sadr had to wait almost a full five minutes for the rapturous crowd of around 20,000 people to quiet down enough for him to speak.

Some of the young men packed into the street outside the cleric's family home in Najaf slept on the ground with only cardboard slabs to protect them from the cold concrete. It gave them a prime seat to see their idol, and much of the crowd was openly weeping when al-Sadr took the stage. The young men pressed up against the concrete barriers and security guards, and after the cleric left, hundreds of supporters lingered by the podium, as though hoping for an encore performance.

Those in Najaf and thousands of Iraqis across the nation watching on TV saw a performance focused on the issue that has been the cornerstone of the cleric's ideology and popularity: resistance to any American presence in Iraq.

"We are still resisters, and we are still resisting the occupier militarily and culturally and by all the means of resistance. Repeat after me: No, no for the occupier. Let's have all the world hear that Iraqi people reject the occupier," he shouted. The crowd thundered along with him, pumping their fists in the air.

Unlike many Iraqi politicians who lived in exile while Saddam Hussein was in power, al-Sadr remained in Iraq – a fact that has earned him much of his popularity. Just a few hundred yards (meters) from where he al-Sadr spoke Saturday stands a small memorial marking the spot where the cleric's father and two brothers were gunned down, allegedly by Saddam's agents.

After the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, al-Sadr quickly became one of the most vocal people rallying against the Americans. His Mahdi Army militia, armed with AK-47s and a deep devotion to its leader, battled U.S. forces through the streets of Najaf in 2004, when other Shiite leaders were cooperating with the Americans.

In 2006 and 2007, when sectarian bloodshed was at its height, his militia members were accused of some of the most vicious attacks against Sunnis, including torture with drills and electrocution.

But aiming now to become a mature political movement, al-Sadr in his speech sought to put the group's brutal reputation behind it.

"My dear, if any conflict happened between the brothers, let's forget this page and turn it over forever and let's live united," he said. "We have had enough fighting."

Al-Sadr left for Iran in 2007, in part to bolster his theological credentials – a necessity for a religious leader in this Shiite-dominated country – but also to escape an arrest warrant for allegedly killing another cleric. While he studied and deepened his ties to Iran, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki sent in the army to crush al-Sadr's militias in Basra and eastern Baghdad.

After the bruising defeat, al-Sadr's influence appeared to have exhausted itself.

But his movement regrouped, and a disciplined performance in the March election earned the Sadrists 40 seats in parliament, political clout and a return to prominence. His decision to throw his support behind al-Maliki all but gave the prime minister a second term after months of negotiations.

In turn for his support, al-Sadr got eight senior posts in government and the warrant for his arrest no longer seems to be an issue.

Despite his movement's now legitimate role inside the U.S.-allied government, al-Sadr remains stedfast in his opposition to the U.S. presence in Iraq, and showed no signs Saturday of being open to the Americans sticking around.

"Maybe during the past few days and months, we forgot the resistance and the expulsion of the occupier as we were busy with politics," he said. "We are the Iraqi people, our primary aim is to expel the occupier with any means available."

The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad dismissed the remarks as "nothing new." But the presence of such a hardline, anti-American faction as one of al-Maliki's closest partners in a new government that is supposedly allied with Washington will likely make for uncomfortable moments down the road as Baghdad tries to balance the demands of its American allies and those of neighboring Iran, the region's Shiite power.

A little less than 50,000 U.S. troops are still stationed in Iraq. Many Iraqi and U.S. officials are believed to want an American presence beyond the end of 2011, as currently planned under a U.S-Iraqi agreement, to do such things as control Iraq's airspace and monitor the borders.

But al-Sadr's remarks made clear it will be difficult for al-Maliki to renegotiate that deal.

The cleric also emphasized the need to improve services in the country where electricity is still intermittent, drinking water is often trucked into neighborhoods and sewage still runs in the streets. He implied that he would yank his support for the government if it didn't improve services for its impoverished citizens. But his own bloc's short history in al-Maliki's previous government had an abysmal record at running government agencies and will be hard-pressed to show an improvement this time.

Al-Sadr's decision to back al-Maliki last fall angered many in his bloc, to the point that some thought the movement was beginning to fracture. No such split has occurred, but al-Sadr is likely aware that much of his popularity stems from his family's lengthy history and not necessarily his own short political resume or thin religious credentials.

And many Iraqis who cannot forget the sectarian bloodshed viewed his call for unity with skepticism.

But among the hardcore followers chanting and beating their chests Saturday morning, there was little questioning of the direction he was taking the movement.

"He knows the interest of the people of the country," said 47-yera-old Sadiya Abed, who drove down from Baghdad for the speech.

Mindful of his new role, al-Sadr has sought since returning to Iraq to project a more sophisticated image of a disciplined, mature leader. The long row of guards who provided security at the morning speech wore identical gray suits – with shirts but no ties in the Iranian style – in a break from the more casual black clothes that used to be worn by his Mahdi Army members.

Al-Sadr said little about his immediate plans after exiting the stage but Sadrist politicians who watched the speech said he was here to stay.

"He's staying in this country and he's staying with these people," said a beaming Bahaa al-Aaraji, a leading Sadrist lawmaker.

___

Associated Press writers Bushra Juhi in Najaf and Lara Jakes, Sinan Salaheddin, and Qassim Abdul-Zahra in Baghdad contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

NAJAF, Iraq — Muqtada al-Sadr lambasted the American "enemy" in Iraq during his first speech in the country since returning from exile, fiery rhetoric from a new powerbroker in the government th...
NAJAF, Iraq — Muqtada al-Sadr lambasted the American "enemy" in Iraq during his first speech in the country since returning from exile, fiery rhetoric from a new powerbroker in the government th...
Filed by Hunter Stuart  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 193
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
03:33 PM on 01/09/2011
His pay check must be overdue!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:29 PM on 01/08/2011
The lede is blatantly FALSE!

Please correct this heading and it's implications.

Thanks.
10:37 PM on 01/08/2011
agree. Makes it sound like he is calling for attacks against US personnel.
10:09 PM on 01/08/2011
How is it possible that the overwhelming majority of policy planners, chickenhawks, neo-cons and diplomatic warmongers weren't able to figure out what most of us who opposed the war back in 2002 already knew?
It was obvious that the removal of Saddam would most likely result in a Shiite cleric dominated government with close ties to the IRI; the insanity of Bremer's decision to disband the Iraqi army all but assured it.
Or was it by design- an attempt to create a Shia axis between Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon and engineer an apocalyptic Sunni-Shia conflict, as part of the greater "Clash of Civilizations" strategy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dnietz
Tired of censorship? Reddit
09:38 PM on 01/08/2011
Uhhmmm.........    who cares

He is talking about resisting us.......   there......... in his country.......  not ours

We should never have gone in
We should have gotten out years ago
We should be out now
and we can leave tomorrow

Who cares what happens there,
we can't control it anyway
all we are doing is making them more angry
forget the embassy
forget everything
just get out fast

Our military is made up of pros
if we really wanted to,
we could evacuate all of Iraq in a couple of weeks.

No more Americans there
nothing else to worry about

We can feel free to track them all day on satellites
and scan their phones and computers
to make sure they don't come here.
photo
funserious
I have not yet BEGUN to procrastinate
06:31 PM on 01/08/2011
......and how many days ago since "the shrub'' declared mission accomplished........???????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tercio
Say NO to War.
11:43 AM on 01/09/2011
I don't know how many people would even remeber that the mission was declared "acomplished". Thanks for that.
photo
funserious
I have not yet BEGUN to procrastinate
01:29 PM on 01/09/2011
You're welcome.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
carlgt1
06:06 PM on 01/08/2011
HAHA, it's so great we spent trillions of $ and thousands of US lives to create yet another cluster-fuqq like Iraq & Afghanistan. So like 9/11 was blowback for the 80's BS of Reagan/Bush; we're going to have blowback probably for the next 10 decades....
photo
BrassOnes
Hasa Diga Eebowai
05:31 PM on 01/08/2011
Lot's of comments about getting out of Iraq but few on what will result. Surely what we have created there is more dangerous than under Saddam. So we leave. Then what happens?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dnietz
Tired of censorship? Reddit
09:42 PM on 01/08/2011
There is nothing we can do
It is guaranteed that we are going to leave eventually
And the shiites will take over their country

They are the majority of that nation
and as much as we believe certain things
they believe their things
we are never going to change their minds
they are going to do what they are going to do

The only question is, how much angrier do they get
at us
while we are still there
How long are we going to drag this out.

It is a guaranteed loss for us.
It is an unwinable war
The only question is what is the price we are going to pay
We aren't done paying
We are in debt and still spending
We are broke
And they hate us

Time to just get out and let them be
We do not have the power to change the course of their nation

But we do have the power to create another generation of angry Iraqis
10:25 PM on 01/08/2011
Iran and Iraq will become allies and will control some 30% of global oil reserves.
photo
babybecks
"because I am involved in Mankind;"
05:14 PM on 01/08/2011
George Bush must be so pleased with how this whole debacle has worked out. He's beaming with pride at every book signing. I'm still trying to figure out if the mission was accomplished. No one seems to really know anymore exactly what that was supposed to be
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fein
And this too shall pass.
06:05 PM on 01/08/2011
Let's see if he's still smiling when Sadr becomes Prime Minister and unites Iraq politically with Iran.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dnietz
Tired of censorship? Reddit
09:43 PM on 01/08/2011
You are assuming Bush cares.

His families wealth totals in the billions.

He only pretends to care about the USA.

If he did, he wouldn't have done what he did for 8 years.
10:23 PM on 01/08/2011
They are already politically, economically and culturally aligned with Iran. All the other Iraqi shia politicians lived, and worked and got funding from Iranians. This guy, was the only guy that that was anti-Iranian, now he is back from 4 years of teachings from Iranian Ayatollahs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David01
texan Badges, I don't got no badges. I don't need
04:55 PM on 01/08/2011
I guess now that we're leaving, he wants to get credit for "running us out."
05:29 PM on 01/08/2011
If you've been concious for the past several years, you'd have realized that we switched out mercenaries for our troops. Leaving? I don't think so. Not with all that money at stake.
11:17 AM on 01/09/2011
US will leave with all its mercenaries. Trillion dollar war and multi-billion dollar embassy, all for nothing.
kenergy599
banned for speaking my mind
04:23 PM on 01/08/2011
Good. Hopefully our troops will be leaving sooner than Obama and his defense contractor fiends
would like.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
04:01 PM on 01/08/2011
FRONTLINE: bush's war: join the discussion | PBS
Mar 24, 2008 ... And Bush's War did not ask why: why was Bush so determined to go .... i.e. the U.S. paid $332 million to bribe al-Sadr into a truce. ... the replay of him speak to the UN and personally staking his ... And when you say the surge is working, if you mean paying iraqi insurgents not to attack us troups ...
www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/.../index2.html -
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
04:01 PM on 01/08/2011
I don't know, what kind of cars would we be driving today if, at the conclusion of the first gulf war, the administration at that time had decided it was time to shift gears to alternative fuels and EV's and so forth, in earnest, like they meant it?

Iraq is a country with oil in it. Venezuela's a country, with oil in it. And, we hear a lot of political fist-shaking from both. Soooo....what happens, when their commodity becomes basically worthless, and all the troops and diplomats and Americans and everyone else just ups and leaves, and there they are, with an empty 6-pack of beer, a tattered old campaign banner, no money, and, unless someone outside helps them, no future? 

I say bring the troops home, and instead of buying smart bombs, or bomber fleets, you really lean into this alternatives stuff and 'get er done'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:12 PM on 01/08/2011
The problem is they people in power make more money producing weapons and selling oil than if they were to invent clean energy sources. Corporate America wont accept a no oil world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fein
And this too shall pass.
06:09 PM on 01/08/2011
They just haven't found a way yet to tax sunlight. When they do, we'll be 100% solar in no time.
03:32 PM on 01/08/2011
Twenty bucks says HuffPo or any other number of Americans will support this Cleric. Derp.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:16 PM on 01/08/2011
HP likes all kinds of weird religious talk they think it is hip and pro peace if we all got religious and followed dear old god. HP might soon produce their own line of religious wear, best bourkhas ever :)
07:57 PM on 01/08/2011
And don't you notice how they always say 'peace is the answer', yet over the years of peace we've had we've grown to levels of intolerable famine that is being patched and patched again with duct-tape solutions that are considerably third-rate to imperialism, total-war and war itself? Back in the days, our economies and states were sound because we followed the true virtues of peace: fight, lick wounds, fight again. But now, we've licked our wounds and gone home to have buffets after buffets of food, and soon we will meet our enemies again but we will be too lethargic to fight. To shed the weight of our mistakes would save the world, at the cost of the pitiful ideal of forever peace. We can't afford it anymore, but there is still some puppet governments in North America, Europe and all around the world that were set up to follow it. And even unto that, many say they 'follow God'. The idea of God was one of the pinnacle things to go to war over, and even though there is evidence to the contrary of his existence and the idea that there is any omnipotence is fool-hearty, I would readily abandon my public position as an Atheist if it meant to save the world from this merchantile, illiterate anarchy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dnietz
Tired of censorship? Reddit
09:48 PM on 01/08/2011
Twenty bucks says you support
us staying there another decade,
another few thousand of our soldiers dying
us building up more blowback anger
spending a few more trillion public dollars

as long as some of your favorite oil company execs take in a few more billion dollars of profit
03:17 PM on 01/08/2011
It's time for the CIA to send a predator drone to silence this lunatic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:19 PM on 01/08/2011
I think they want him safe. They are setting the Shea of Iraq and Iran against the Sunna especially in the gulf. Down with Saddam and bring fundamental Shea Islam instead. Shea have a history of trying to convert Sunnies to their sect. Sunnie countries hate that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fein
And this too shall pass.
06:11 PM on 01/08/2011
That's exactly how he got into power - they murdered his father.

Got any other bright ideas that don't involve murdering someone?
03:10 PM on 01/08/2011
Why doesn't the CIA just remove this fundamentalist muck racker like they do so easily in most H-wood movies (Bourne Identity, etc).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
04:06 PM on 01/08/2011
NonConforming agreed, here is a award winning Frontline-PBS video talking about Al-Sadr in 'Bushs' War
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/?utm_campaign=viewpage&utm_medium=grid&utm_source=grid
indyclem
looking for logic
04:27 PM on 01/08/2011
bush war no dems voted for opps i forgot they did
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dnietz
Tired of censorship? Reddit
09:51 PM on 01/08/2011
You think this guy doesn't have protection?

You are kidding right?

He can call up thousands of people to serve as martyrs for the cause. How many defenders would our Jason Bourne have to go through to get to him?

The only way to get him is nuke the city he is in, and even then I wouldn't be surprised if somehow gets informed and gets out of the city before we glaze it.