iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

William Daley's JP Morgan Stock: Obama's Next Chief Of Staff Has Millions Invested

William Daley

First Posted: 01/11/11 01:00 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

President Barack Obama's next chief of staff holds more than $7.6 million worth of stock in JPMorgan Chase, according to a regulatory filing.

William M. Daley, vice chairman at JPMorgan Chase, holds 175,678 shares in the $2.1 trillion behemoth, the nation's second-largest bank by assets. Daley headed the firm's Corporate Responsibility division, which included oversight of the firm's lobbyists and relations with government officials.

Daley exercised his holdings on Thursday, the same day Obama announced he was bringing in the former banker to run the White House. Daley acquired 201,913 shares to bring his total to 316,327, but sold 140,649 of those shares to cover tax liabilities, according to the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. JPMorgan shares closed at $43.40 on Monday.

A White House official said Daley will sell his stake in his former employer.

The administration has come under fire since Obama's announcement that he would name a former banker to the pivotal role, which many experts describe as one of the most powerful positions in government. While business groups and various elected officials have hailed the choice as a move to repair the White House's apparently fractured relationship with corporate America, those wary of Wall Street's growing influence in Washington have denounced it as yet another sop to the nation's largest banks.

Daley's holdings could present a conflict of interest, experts warn.

"JPMorgan Chase is the nation's second-largest bank. Anything and everything can involve them," said Simon Johnson, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund who now teaches at the M.I.T. Sloan School of Management. Johnson, who's been critical of the selection -- warning that "Bill Daley now controls how information is presented to and decisions are made by the president" -- said it was "essential" for Daley to sell his stake.

But Daley doesn't have to. Though his holdings would likely forbid him from participating in matters directly involving JPMorgan Chase, if he were to maintain his shares he'd simply need to recuse himself from those specific issues involving his former employer, or he could obtain a waiver, according to federal rules. Daley could also place his holdings in a blind trust over which he'd have no control.

As White House chief of staff, Daley wouldn't be directly involved in writing the new rules that will govern Wall Street. Dodd-Frank, the 2010 law overhauling financial regulation, calls for more than 200 of them.

But that shouldn't even matter, said Mark Blyth, a member of the Warwick Commission on International Financial Reform and a professor of international political economy at Brown University.

"Do you expect people not to have shares? That anybody working in government should immediately divest themselves of all interests?" asked Blyth.

Arguing that those with knowledge of finance would make for better regulators, Blyth said it's natural for them to have stock holdings. "If you start forcing people to divest themselves of their investments to take on government work, you are seriously restricting your talent pool."

Blyth added that for Daley, so long as he either sells his stake or relinquishes control of it, his ownership of bank shares shouldn't preclude him from the White House position.

"It's not like he's going to be directly writing financial regulations," said Blyth. "So, are we really going to make the case that the chief of staff, because he wants the share price of JPMorgan to stay high, is going to write the rules of government such that they're benefitting?" he asked.

Blyth said he was "shocked" that Daley had so few shares, given his top position at JPMorgan and the exorbitant compensation showered on bankers over the years.

"Also, there's a long chain of causation you have to walk through to make that story stick," Blyth added. Independent federal agencies, with Senate-confirmed chiefs, write and interpret federal regulations.

Daley is expected to formally begin in his new position this week.

*************************

Shahien Nasiripour is a business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 646-274-2455.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
President Barack Obama's next chief of staff holds more than $7.6 million worth of stock in JPMorgan Chase, according to a regulatory filing. William M. Daley, vice chairman at JPMorgan Chase, holds ...
President Barack Obama's next chief of staff holds more than $7.6 million worth of stock in JPMorgan Chase, according to a regulatory filing. William M. Daley, vice chairman at JPMorgan Chase, holds ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,578
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (40 total)
07:09 AM on 01/19/2011
I see no conflict of interest here do you? I mean afterall, he's already gift wrapped and delivered...let the corruption continue until it breaks our backs and you wonder why the congress is worried about magazine capacities!
02:21 AM on 01/19/2011
Looks like the fox is in the henhouse again, and this time the farmer put the fox inside the henhouse! What is wrong with this President, he keeps appointing people who are either past Lobbyists or CEO's of Corporations. These are the same guys responsible for the big financial disaster we are in now, Lobbyists and CEO's and former CEO's are in it for themselves. They will not look out for the consumer or the American citizen, they only want more money poured into their own causes and self-interests! I am an Obama supporter, but Gee!, why don't you appoint people who aren't in it for themselves, former Lobbyists, CEO's or former CEO's who are in it for themselves and the interests they represent!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hieagle
12:48 AM on 01/19/2011
yipee...! the 'tea-party' is over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hieagle
12:45 AM on 01/19/2011
So when will the citizens realize that they no longer have any say in the running of this country... and simply hope and pray that banks, and other corporate giants now controlling government, will be 'civilized' enough to maintain some compassion...? It's TOO LATE folks...!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
08:42 PM on 01/14/2011
Or Monsanto's former VP for public policy, Michael Taylor, who Obama tapped as deputy commissioner for foods at the Food and Drug Administration.

William J. Lynn became Obama's deputy defense secretary within 10 months of being a lobbyist for Raytheon, a giant of the military-industrial complex.

Joe Biden's chief of staff, Ron Klain, was a K Street lobbyist who represented Fannie Mae during the housing boom, opposing regulation of the now-bailed-out mortgage giant. And Biden's deputy chief of staff is Alan Hoffman, a K Street veteran who helped oil giant Unocal avoid U.S. sanctions against its natural-gas partnership with the military dictatorship of Burma.

William Lynn at DOD? He got a waiver from the president, and so he's exempt from the new rules.

But then there's Mark Patterson, a Goldman Sachs lobbyist until April 2008 (apparently, back then, Wall Street lobbyists weren't all evil in Obama's eyes) who now serves as chief of staff at the Treasury Department. He's one of those lobbyists whom Obama neither "excluded" nor granted a waiver.

But whether or not Obama is living up to his executive order, he's not living up to his rhetoric.

That candidate Obama would pledge lobbyists "will not work in my White House," but President Obama would hire many of them, reflects what we already knew during campaign:
That President Obama would say, "we've excluded lobbyists," when he really meant, "we've included them, too,"

http://washingtonexaminer.com/politics/obama-makes-mockery-his-own-lobbyist-ban
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
07:21 PM on 01/13/2011
No lobbyists in Obama's administration. He just hires them outright. Let civility reign!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuanCarlosysofia
01:28 AM on 01/14/2011
next, he'll put Murdoch in charge...barack keeps slipping and sliding.somebody is telling him who to appoint.he can't be that dense not to see what he's doing to his base.
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
07:15 PM on 01/13/2011
For more information read:

The Progressive Case Against Obama's New Oval Office Team
Obama's picks of Bill Daley and Gene Sperling will likely result in tens of millions of people across the country experience serious economic hardship.

http://www.alternet.org/news/149509/the_progressive_case_against_obama%27s_new_oval_office_team/?page=2
06:56 PM on 01/13/2011
"Give me control of a nation's currency, and I care not who makes its laws"
Mayer Amschel Rothschild; "Inventor" of World Banks.

Well the privately held and secret Federal Reserve controls our money supply. We are rapidly becoming endentured servants to them all.....

Maybe Bill Hick's has it right:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MRykTpw1RQ
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
knosiswar
Major General Smedley Butler - get to know him
09:41 PM on 01/12/2011
Maybe this guy is the next president, that's generally what you do in a corporate takeover, you replace the management with your own.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:16 AM on 01/12/2011
   In our emerging oligarchy, there is no conflict of interest possible. Wealth, monopoly  and government are welded together at the thigh.  Personal, special, elite interests and govermental interests are identical.  The "common interests" is an alien, outdated theory.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Just another hostage of the poopy heads
04:59 AM on 01/12/2011
JPMorgan CEO says dividend may rise in 2011

(Reuters) - JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N) is ready to pay an annual dividend of 75 cents to a dollar once the Federal Reserve completes stress-testing of the largest U.S. banks and gives its approval, Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said on Tuesday.

Dimon also told an audience of investors at a bank-sponsored healthcare conference here that the greatest risk to the U.S. economy right now was the bulging fiscal deficit.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70A6K920110111
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Just another hostage of the poopy heads
05:06 AM on 01/12/2011
Oh, yeah, everything's coming up roses for Jamie & Co.

China just gave JPM and Morgan Stanley the green light for new securities ventures there.

Coincidence?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Indigo River
06:55 PM on 01/12/2011
Thanks for the info. Now, they control everything. The Supreme Court, Congress and the President.
02:16 AM on 01/12/2011
So what? Who said chiefs of staff have to be poor. As long as there are checks and balances to ensure that there is no conflict of interest, insider trading, unfair competitive advantage etc or any wrong doing accruing from his position, I see nothing wrong with him holding the stock.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:03 PM on 01/13/2011
Because there is no checks and balances here.

Divesting oneself by putting one's shares in a "blind trust" is simply a nicety. Where does he expect to go as soon as his public service is over and after he has made lots of solid friends holding public offices?

The only real check is a candidate who has a good history of regulation of an indust. In this case Mr. Daley not only has a familial background of ties to Chicago politicians, he has also been an employee and wholehearted advocate for the banking industry.

It is interesting that White House spin has been "look how much they hate us -- we must be doing something right".
What are Mr. Obama's fond advocates going to say now that Wall Street is applauding the choice?
photo
Kassandra
Your micro-bio is empty
07:17 PM on 01/13/2011
Well, it used to be against the law to have such obvious conflicts of interest. Bush changed all that
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmosKnows
Educating The American Idol Masses
12:29 AM on 01/12/2011
The government = banks + corporations. So the fact that he owns the bank is no big shock. What should open people's eyes is the appointment itself - it should give you some insight in to who Obama is really working for.
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage against stupidity
10:51 AM on 01/12/2011
We already figured that out! When he signed the Republican Tax bill, it sealed the deal - so to speak..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scoobanchi
Would you like a slice of pie?
11:54 PM on 01/11/2011
!!!!EXPLATIVE!!! I hate it all. Who am I kidding? I thought this sort of insider workings was a thing of the past but... I hate/love money.
11:07 PM on 01/11/2011
All investments need to be a blind trust if you work in the highest levels of government.