iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mystery Green Blob In Space Captured By Hubble (PICTURE)

First Posted: 01/11/2011 9:55 am EST   Updated: 01/18/2013 4:36 pm EST

(SETH BORENSTEIN, AP) WASHINGTON -- The Hubble Space Telescope got its first peek at a mysterious giant green blob in outer space and found that it's strangely alive. The bizarre glowing blob is giving birth to new stars, some only a couple million years old, in remote areas of the universe where stars don't normally form.

The blob of gas was first discovered by a Dutch school teacher in 2007 and is named Hanny's Voorwerp (HAN'-nee's-FOR'-vehrp). Voorwerp is Dutch for object.

NASA released the new Hubble photo Monday at the American Astronomical Society meeting in Seattle.

Parts of the green blob are collapsing and the resulting pressure from that is creating the stars. The stellar nurseries are outside of a normal galaxy, which is usually where stars live.

That makes these "very lonely newborn stars" that are "in the middle of nowhere," said Bill Keel, the University of Alabama astronomer who examined the blob.

The blob is the size of our own Milky Way galaxy and it is 650 million light years away. Each light year is about 6 trillion miles.

The blob is mostly hydrogen gas swirling from a close encounter of two galaxies and it glows because it is illuminated by a quasar in one of the galaxies. A quasar is a bright object full of energy powered by a black hole.

The blob was discovered by elementary school teacher Hanny van Arkel, who was 24 at the time, as part of a worldwide Galaxy Zoo project where everyday people can look at archived star photographs to catalog new objects.

Van Arkel said when she first saw the odd object in 2007 it appeared blue and smaller. The Hubble photo provides a clear picture and better explanation for what is happening around the blob.

"It actually looked like a blue smudge," van Arkel told The Associated Press. "Now it looks like dancing frog in the sky because it's green." She says she can even see what passes for arms and eyes.

Since van Arkel's discovery, astronomers have looked for similar gas blobs and found 18 of them. But all of them are about half the size of Hanny's Voorwerp, Keel said.

LOOK:

Image credit: NASA, ESA, William Keel (University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa), and the Galaxy Zoo team
___

Online:

Hubble Space Telescope: http://www.spacetelescope.org/

Galaxy Zoo project: http://www.galaxyzoo.org

___

Online:

http://www.spacetelescope.org/

http://www.galaxyzoo.org

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Bloon - Zero2Infinity's Balloon

    The bloon, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/24/bloon-space-balloon-pictures-video_n_935415.html" target="_hplink">a helium-filled balloon</a>, will take a capsule with as many as six people to 118,000 feet -- not quite outer space, but near space. The company expects to make its first commercial flight in 2013. The cost? €110,000, or about $147,000.

  • NASA

    NASA announced in September that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/14/nasa-space-launch-system-sls_n_962051.html" target="_hplink">it's developing the Space Launch System (SLS)</a>, a heavy-lift rocket that will one day take humans farther than ever before. The 34-story rocket will carry six astronauts aboard the <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/mpcv/" target="_hplink">Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle</a>. <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2392960,00.asp" target="_hplink">According to PC Mag</a>, NASA will spend $18 billion over the next five years developing the SLS. With <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/14/space-shuttle-program-qa-_n_861994.html" target="_hplink">the retirement of the space shuttle program</a>, NASA currently pays Russia around $60 million per person to get American astronauts into space. Remember, there's still time <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/15/nasa-to-hire-new-astronauts_n_1095686.html" target="_hplink">to apply to be an astronaut</a>.

  • Virgin Galactic

    Over 450 "astronauts" have already booked a $200,000 spot on Sir Richard Branson's SpaceShipTwo, a craft that will take passengers to an altitude of 110 km (68.3 miles). Branson hopes to begin commercial flights in 2013, but that date could get pushed back. "We want to be sure we've really tested the craft through and through before turning it over to the astronauts who bought tickets to go up," he said in October, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/18/richard-branson-dedicates_n_1017226.html" target="_hplink">according to the Associated Press</a>. "If it takes a bit longer, we'll take a little bit longer." Passengers will experience about five minutes of weighlessness during the 2 1/2 hour sub-orbital spaceflight.

  • SpaceX

    In December 2010, SpaceX <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/16/spacex-international-space-station_n_927916.html" target="_hplink">became the first private company</a> to have a spacecraft re-enter orbit, <a href="http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=20101208" target="_hplink">when its Dragon spacecraft</a> orbited earth twice and then landed in the Pacific Ocean. Next stop? The International Space Station. A representative from SpaceX told HuffPost that a Dragon capsule carrying supplies to the ISS will launch in early 2012. It will be the first commercial company to berth a spacecraft with the space station. But you're going to have to be a NASA astronaut to hitch a ride to space with SpaceX, as the company doesn't have any plans in the near future for space tourism.

  • Blue Origin

    Blue Origin, the notoriously-secretive company underwritten by Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos, is developing both orbital and sub-orbital launch vehicles to take people into space. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/03/blue-origin-spaceship-fai_n_947731.html" target="_hplink">The company recently released video</a> of a test of its New Shepard rocket, a three-person capsule and launch vehicle that the company is planning to use to take space tourists "to the edge of space." The cost and timeline of the completion of the New Shepard is unclear. <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nasa-awards-next-set-of-commercial-crew-development-agreements-120113774.html" target="_hplink">In April, Blue Origin was awarded</a> $22 million from NASA "to advance commercial crew space transportation system concepts and mature the design and development of elements of their systems, such as launch vehicles and spacecraft."

  • Space Adventures/Armadillo Aerospace

    Space Adventures, a company that has sent seven private citizens to the International Space Station, <a href="http://www.spaceadventures.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=news.viewnews&newsid=791" target="_hplink">announced in 2010</a> that it would partner with Armadillo Aerospace to provide suborbital spaceflights. The <a href="http://www.spaceadventures.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=suborbital.Vehicle_Design" target="_hplink">two-passenger rocket</a> will land and take-off vertically and allow for a 360-degree view of the earth below. According to Jaunted, the rocket will travel 62 miles above the earth. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/space-adventures-undercuts-virgin-galactic-announces-100-000/" target="_hplink">Engadget reports</a> that a flight to space will set you back $102,000.

  • Orbital Technologies' Space Hotel

    Of course, you'll need somewhere to put your bags once you're in space. Orbital Technologies, a Russian company, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/21/space-hotel-pictures-video_n_931951.html" target="_hplink">is building a space hotel</a> where 7 guests will be able to dine on veal cheeks and wild mushrooms at 217 miles above the earth. The company is planning to open the hotel in 2016. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/19/russia-space-tourism-idUSLDE77F0PF20110819" target="_hplink">According to Reuters</a>, a five-day stay will set you back a cool $1 million.

  • Video: "Nasa Searches For Life Clues on Mars" info

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 443
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
01:52 AM on 01/27/2011
The Romulan invasion fleet is arriving.
06:44 PM on 01/21/2011
maybe there is a god.. maybe she/he has really bad gas?
04:17 PM on 01/19/2011
Stunning.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
04:54 PM on 01/12/2011
Lyman alpha blobs are pretty well documented, these days. Still the claim of being 650 million light years from earth is dubious. Everbody knows the earth is only 6000 years old.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
metriks
Hillary 2008, 2012, 2016
11:12 AM on 01/14/2011
lol
01:52 PM on 01/12/2011
Looks kinda Kligon
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shaw
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
05:37 PM on 01/12/2011
Was thinking the same thing. Cloaking device....We know what the deal is.
12:58 PM on 01/12/2011
Citing the article:

""It actually looked like a blue smudge," van Arkel told The Associated Press. "Now it looks like dancing frog in the sky because it's green." She says she can even see what passes for arms and eyes."

The slant given on this story seems more like astrology that astronomy. As usual science gets the short stick.
01:36 PM on 01/12/2011
Not so sure that the sense of whimsy that prompted Ms von Arkel's "froggie" comment wasn't part & parcel with the hard-to-quantify pattern recognition abilities which prompted the initiation of the Galactic Zoo project in the first place. This ability, of seeing more in an image than is quite really there, has been honed by eons of Darwinian winnowing, selecting those of our ancestors that could distinguish between shadows under a tree and a pride of leopards under a tree, and those of our ancestors who weren't our ancestors, but rather, a leopard's lunch!

Machine vision systems have yet to learn these very stern lessons...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:25 PM on 01/26/2011
Thats because most large predators dont eat metal objects....yet...muahahahaha
12:39 PM on 01/12/2011
Interesting that, after all the high tech automated image capture, data relaying, automatic data retrieval that support the HST, still, the best "filter" for images of the unexpected comes down to the old standby "Mark I Human Eyeball!" Hanny von Arkel, the Vorwerp's, er, Object's discoverer, was participating in the Galaxy Zoo, a project that recruited volunteer image reviewers to spot just this sort of anomalous objects, cause they could do it and machine vision systems could not.

Perhaps machines just lack a sense of wonder...
05:11 PM on 01/13/2011
Part of it is that Hubble's time is so limited and in such high demand. They had to wait three years after they discovered this nebula to have Hubble capture a much better image. It's just not possible to have Hubble browse the universe for interesting objects, because there's only one Hubble and it can only capture so much imagery in a given amount of time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NomadicView
07:15 AM on 01/12/2011
The Milky Way sneezed!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edwoodjr
06:50 AM on 01/12/2011
Very similar to the space cloud on episode 26 of "Lost in Space" - "The Davlar Enterance".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Larry Jebsen
06:09 AM on 01/12/2011
I think it's an alien with outstretched arms yelling "throw me the damn ball"
06:09 AM on 01/12/2011
Well, that's a Voorwerp if I ever saw one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donns
06:08 AM on 01/12/2011
Run, Hide, get under your school desks (do they still have those A-Bomb proof desks in schools?).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
planetmango
If life hands you lemons, ask for tequila and salt
12:41 PM on 01/16/2011
desks have been lost to budget cuts
02:02 AM on 01/12/2011
Kind of like the giant space baby in 2001.
01:20 AM on 01/12/2011
doesnt the hubble take black and white photos only? I thought the colors in hubble images were recreated by artist at nasa?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karots
I make dreams happen, for rabbits.
02:16 AM on 01/12/2011
Taking color pictures with the Hubble Space Telescope is much more complex than taking color pictures with a traditional camera. For one thing, Hubble doesn't use color film — in fact, it doesn't use film at all. Rather, its cameras record light from the universe with special electronic detectors. These detectors produce images of the cosmos not in color, but in shades of black and white.

Finished color images are actually combinations of two or more black-and-white exposures to which color has been added during image processing.

The colors in Hubble images, which are assigned for various reasons, aren't always what we'd see if we were able to visit the imaged objects in a spacecraft. We often use color as a tool, whether it is to enhance an object's detail or to visualize what ordinarily could never be seen by the human eye.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jericha
Independent, not co-dependent
03:06 AM on 01/12/2011
Wait, we paid how much to put an overgrown black-and-white camera up there?

Was there a problem jamming a color camrea on that thing?
04:38 AM on 01/12/2011
Thanks for the explanation!
So, XM202 is correct.

"Mystery Green Blob In Space Captured By Hubble"

could just as easily be

"Mystery Purple Blob In Space Captured By Hubble"

Correct?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karots
I make dreams happen, for rabbits.
02:18 AM on 01/12/2011
http://hubblesite.org/gallery/behind_the_pictures/meaning_of_color/

This is a very interesting link on the Hubble site that explains it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
knightoftheroundtable
Old Knight without porfolio or armor
12:55 AM on 01/12/2011
Nature is just so amazing. Too bad we will never fully understand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruEngineHearing
Happiness needs new pursuers...
01:57 PM on 01/13/2011
...at least not on this side of the river.