iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Peter King, Leading Republican, To Introduce Strict Gun-Control Legislation

Peter King

First Posted: 01/11/11 10:47 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

Scroll down for updates.

Rep. Peter King, a Republican from New York, is planning to introduce legislation that would make it illegal to bring a gun within 1,000 feet of a government official, according to a person familiar with the congressman's intentions.

King is chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. The proposed law follows the Saturday shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and a federal judge that left six dead, including the judge, and 14 wounded.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, one of the nation's most outspoken gun-control advocates, is backing King's measure and is expected to put the weight of his pro-gun-control organization behind it.

"Yesterday everyone here joined in observing a moment of silence on behalf of the victims of the shooting, and today we come together to speak up for ways to prevent tragedies like this from occurring in the future, by adopting commonsense fixes to some of our broken gun laws," Bloomberg said Tuesday. "Civil debate is important, and I've long spoken out in favor of more cooperation and less antagonism, but I think it's true that the more we learn, the more it becomes clear that this case is fundamentally about a mentally ill drug abuser who had access to guns and shouldn't have."

A spokesman for King wasn't immediately available for comment.

In 2009, Bloomberg's pro-gun-control organization specified 40 ways President Obama could rein in illegal gun use without passing any new legislation. At a press event in Manhattan on Tuesday, Bloomberg added three steps to the list, including revamping the system of federal background checks on gun buyers, sharing information between gun background check databases, and appointing a head of the federal law enforcement agency responsible for controlling gun crime, which has operated without a director for almost five years.

"We simply can't afford to have ATF at less than full strength when so many gun murders are occurring," said Bloomberg. Every day 35 people are murdered at gunpoint in the U.S., according to the Brady Campaign website.

It is already illegal in the U.S. to carry a gun within 1,000 feet of a school. King's legislation to make it illegal to knowingly carry a gun within 1,000 feet of the president, vice president, members of Congress or judges of the Federal Judiciary, would offer government officials the same protection.

Over on Capitol Hill, gun control advocates are planning a major push in response to Saturday's shootings. Freshmen Congress members, particularly Giffords's state colleagues, Arizona freshman Republicans David Schweikert and Paul Gosar, will be among the main targets of the lobby effort.

Gun controls advocates will push not only for the legislation announced by King, but also for a bill proposed by Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), which would limit the sale of high-capacity clips like the one used by alleged shooter Jared Lee Loughner.

"The horrendously tragic circumstances involved in this event and that it involves a member of congress changes the dynamic a bit," Kristen Rand, legislative director for Violence Policy Center, told HuffPost. "There's a sense there's more momentum."

And yet, while it would seem like an ideal time to push for gun restrictions, given public outcry over the violence that took place in Tucson, Ariz. the National Rifle Association has, notably, abstained from lobbying against potential bills -- or even talking about how the shooting relates to gun policy at all.

The NRA has declined to comment for this and for other articles. "At this time anything other than prayers for the victims and their families would be inappropriate," an NRA spokesman said in a statement.

Gun control advocates, for their part, have used the NRA's silence to criticize them for ducking the political ramifications of Saturday's events.

"It's interesting that the NRA's only response whenever something like this happens is that it's an inappropriate time to discuss this," Chad Ramsey, federal legislative director for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, told HuffPost. "While prayers are important, it's really cold comfort to people who have been affected by gun violence, largely because of the NRA's policies that have led to our lax gun laws in this country."

Whether they formally lobby on Arizona response bills or not, the NRA's inherent clout on the Hill makes any effort to tighten gun laws an uphill battle. During the last session, a bill to close a gun sale loophole received 114 cosponsors -- a record for gun control legislation in the past decade -- but did not pass.

McCarthy told HuffPost on Monday a larger-scale reduction on guns would likely die before reaching committee. "I know what I can get passed and I know what I can't get passed," she said. "And if I wanted to get something symbolic -- and we are going to reintroducing the assault-weapons ban and that's wonderful -- it won't go anywhere."

Still, gun control advocates are hopeful that the McCarthy bill, a smaller-scale effort at tightening gun restrictions, will win support from lawmakers. "What I hope is that this shooting will make people look at this issue with a new set of eyes," Ramsey said. "Anytime someone you know is affected by gun violence, it changes your perspective. Everybody knows Gabby Giffords, so I'm hoping they'll be able to see through the political rhetoric."

In the longer term, gun control advocates plan to lobby Congress to reinstate a ban on assault weapons that was first implemented in 1994 under President Bill Clinton and expired in 2004, Rand told HuffPost. The District of Columbia and six states, including California, already have the ban on their books, which Rand said might convince Republicans to vote for the legislation.

Gun restriction advocates also said they will lobby this session to close a gun sale loophole that allows private sales to occur without the screenings required for federally-licensed gun vendors. "Even if you have all the protections in the world on federally-licensed sellers, you're not going to be able to stop the next Loughner from buying a gun through a private seller at a gun show or on the internet or on the street," Everitt said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Scroll down for updates. Rep. Peter King, a Republican from New York, is planning to introduce legislation that would make it illegal to bring a gun within 1,000 feet of a government official, accord...
Scroll down for updates. Rep. Peter King, a Republican from New York, is planning to introduce legislation that would make it illegal to bring a gun within 1,000 feet of a government official, accord...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9,414
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (236 total)
12:54 PM on 01/16/2011
How to prevent violence at political gatherings­­­­­­? - A Common sense solution.

MSNBC Commentato­­­­­­r Chris Matthews proposed the following practical common sense solution to prevent future violence at political gatherings­­­­­­. Administra­­­­­tion, press and media should seriously look at this proposal and take necessary action. Mr. Matthews is not always sharp in his analysis and frequently gets lost in polemics. However, this suggestion is well worth considerin­­­g.

Do not allow people to bring guns within 1000 Meters of political gatherings­­­­­­.

What roles guns have to play at peaceful political gatherings­­­­­­? Just because one has the right to bear arms, one does not demand the right to take guns to a school or a public building? Gun lobby tries to make it as a gun rights issue, if we demand that the guns shall be kept aside during political gatherings and discourses­­­­­­. The gun rights argument from the gun lobby in the context of public peaceful meetings seems to be fictitious and without merit.

Presence of guns at public gatherings is a public safety issue and not a gun rights issue.

Since public safety is a bipartisan concern for both Democrats and Republican­­­­­­s, they should discuss and agree upon common sense fool proof solutions to prevent violence at future political gatherings in America and allow vibrant democratic discourses and interactio­­­­­­ns to continue unimpeded without fear in America.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:41 PM on 01/28/2011
Actually one of the people that ran toward the gunfire in Az. was a young man who was lawfully carrying a pistol. He got there too late but had the gunman still been trying to kill people, the lawful gun toter 'Could' have possibly shot him and stoped further violence. I believe that's exactly what he intended to do.
I know in the past a Teacher at a public school ran to his vehicle parked (legaly)off campus , retrieved his lawful pistol ran back to the school and using the gun as a threat took down a teenage gunman who had shot other students.

I'm retired law enforcement and I don't see a lot of danger in lawfully armed good citizens.

I would like to see Congress work on more and better education and less prisons with full employement like I remember back in the 60s 70s and people were just not as angry and crazy as they seem to be today. Why do people feel the need to carry a firearm today ? Because they are afraid being a crime victim.

Wonder where all the Republican and TeaBagg anger was when the young man openly wore a pistol to President Obama's speech ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:53 PM on 01/14/2011
Ok you are right, it's the guns fault. And Oprah, its not your fault that you are fat, it's the spoons fault.
02:04 PM on 01/13/2011
Brilliant. I'm sure this law would have made all the difference.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:43 PM on 01/28/2011
He wouldn't have dared break a gun ban within 10000 yds. Ya Think?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
London Diplomat
Diplomacy is worth a fight
11:01 AM on 01/13/2011
I am fascinated to see how this will square with Rep. Louie Gohmert's proposal:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/13/louie-gohmert-congress-guns_n_808436.html

If it wasn't such a serious topic, it would be hilariously funny just how little these people talk to each other!!

Besides, census takers are Government Officials: would they not be able to go near houses? Or Posties? The list goes on....
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
06:53 AM on 01/13/2011
With regard to background checks, it is illegal to lie on an application to purchase a gun.  However, the shooter in this case did lie and that lie wasn't even part of the background check.  Ergo, the whole application process is a joke.  Another unenforceable law.  Let's make laws that are enforcable even if it takes months for the background check.  
11:50 PM on 01/12/2011
Seriously? It is also illegal to shoot public officials but that didn't stop that lunatic! How about making guns harder to get, and getting them off the streets!
10:53 PM on 01/12/2011
Please define government official.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
10:01 AM on 01/13/2011
Excellent question!
12:46 PM on 01/13/2011
According to the article above:
"King's legislation to make it illegal to knowingly carry a gun within 1,000 feet of the president, vice president, members of Congress or judges of the Federal Judiciary, would offer government officials the same protection."
08:54 PM on 01/13/2011
All gun free zones are asymmetrically more dangerous. http://www.orcosportsmans.com/Pages/ConcealedCarry.html
10:48 PM on 01/12/2011
This bill is backwards. It should keep politicians at least 1000 feet from our guns...
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
10:54 PM on 01/12/2011
Why don't we just declare all gun owners, kings?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
London Diplomat
Diplomacy is worth a fight
05:03 AM on 01/14/2011
Indeed - let's not ignore Wayne LaPierre:

"the guys with the guns make the rules"
08:25 PM on 01/12/2011
If only this piece of legislation had been signed into law before the shooting!

"Man, I want to kill that Gifford *****! Oh, wait... I can't legally be within 1000 ft of a government official. Rats! Spoiled again!" - Loughner
04:46 PM on 01/12/2011
So if you are a homeowner and own guns, the US Postal Carrier who, as a government official, can't deliver mail to your door either?

Cool!
No more junk mail!
05:10 PM on 01/12/2011
Actually, no.
The law will make you take your guns and move 1000.1' feet from your house before the mailman arrives. And make sure you don't move less than 1000' feet in the direction of a neighbor who also works for the governent.
06:54 PM on 01/12/2011
and how is that rational in light of the 2nd amendment
04:11 PM on 01/12/2011
I called Rep. King's office this morning, and asked that my name be added to the list of people who people with guns, need to stay 1,000 feet from. After all, what's one more person, right?

My conversation with the person in his office is here: http://bit.ly/i22dJs
02:56 PM on 01/12/2011
Why just government officials? Are their lives more valued? Such hypocrisy. If Peter King believes in this law, it ought to cover everybody, not just those who bring a gun in close proximity to government officials. King's proposal ought to restrict having a gun near any citizen, including government officials.

Many law-makers say they want to protect our right to bear arms (weapons) but have you noticed that even though we can carry a weapon in Arizona we are not allowed to bring our weapons into the Capital Building in Wash. D.C.? I am not saying we should be allowed. I am saying that these law-makers would break into a cold sweat and pass out from fright at the thought of visitors to the Capital carrying weapons. But it is okay for those same citizens to carry guns back home, far away from the halls of Congress.

When Congress votes to allow citizens to bring semiautomatic and assault weapons when they visit the Capital building, then I will really believe they are serious about the right to bear arms. Until that happens, they are pandering.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dimensio
I just don't know what went wrong!
05:37 PM on 01/12/2011
 King's proposal ought to restrict having a gun near any citizen, including government officials.
Why is such a proposal more rational than merely proposing that Representative King not submit such unreasonable legislation for consideration?
05:41 PM on 01/12/2011
Well, in the Kentucky state capital, the Governor just made the public announcement that he's ok with the current rules that allow gun owners to carry in the capital building. http://www.fox41.com/story/13826366/beshear-content-with-lax-gun-rules-in-capitol

and the New Hampshire legislature just passed new rules that provide for the right to carry on the legislature floor, repealing a ban that had been in place since 1971. http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2011/01/05/nh_legislature_convenes_gop_in_charge/

So, some legislators and elected officials have put their philosophy into action.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sidplicity
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banan
02:22 PM on 01/12/2011
I thought more guns makes us safer was the arguement. The grotesque, obscene and petty(gop) regularly hug, adore, and possibly sleep with their firearms. Why doesn't Peter King as a member of the party of personal responsibility take responsibility for his own personal safety like they tell us? Hey walk the talk. What about us regular people that goto the store, a sporting event, attend class where's our special gun bill?
07:16 PM on 01/13/2011
Peter King is as anti-gun as any Democrat in congress, maybe we could arrange a trade when Congresswoman Giffords returns to the House. Giffords for King, even trade.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sidplicity
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banan
08:04 PM on 01/13/2011
King gets a C rating from NRA and that makes him anti gun? What is it with the gun crowd. Just curious, when you see someone has drowned do you think someone should have gotten them a glass of water? Highest per capita gun by any country, highest death rate per capita than any country and more and more guns is all we ever hear.
02:11 PM on 01/12/2011
I think a much better law would be to prohibit politicians from knowingly coming within 1000 feet of a gun. It makes much more sense. There are almost 270,000,000 firearms in this country, and only 535 legislators.

It would have the added bonus of hopefully preventing them from enacting self-promoting unconstitutional laws, and it might even make the liberals happy!

Some people just cannot handle freedom.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftintheoven
02:01 PM on 01/12/2011
Okay, here is where I have a problem with how some react to the horrible shootings in Tucson. The reality is that people are shot around this country everyday. Now that one of their own has been impacted, here come the legislative proposals and shutting down Congress for a few days. My response sounds uncaring at first glance but keep reading.

Why is it that now Congressional member wants to do something about weapons? It wasn't enough that some child was shot in cross fire of a gang shoot out. It didn't move them enough when parents were shot by their child or one of their lovers. But now that a member of Congress is shot, Washington DC comes to a halt and everyone wants to react like this is the country's first murder.

It is this very hipocracy that causes me anger. Our elected officials would rather filibuster or play games with rules of their body than do something constructive to help the citizens of this country. Now here comes Peter King wanting to protect his own hyde while others drop like flies any other time.

This whole Washington DC crowd is a worthless bunch of criminals.
02:21 PM on 01/12/2011
There is website I discovered a couple of months ago that everyone needs to at least check out once. It discusses the government, and how it is treating the average American citizen. Believe me, brothers and sisters, it's very, very interesting ! www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com