iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

EPA Vetoes Permit For Largest Mountaintop Removal Mine In West Virginia, Arch Coal's Spruce No. 1

Wva Mine

VICKI SMITH   01/13/11 01:19 PM ET   AP

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — The Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday it's revoking a crucial water permit for West Virginia's largest mountaintop removal mine because it would irreparably damage the environment and threaten the health of nearby communities.

Assistant Administrator for Water Peter S. Silva said the agency was employing a rarely used veto power because Arch Coal's Spruce No. 1 mine in Logan County would use "destructive and unsustainable" mining practices.

The move formalizes an action the agency first threatened nine months ago.

Arch issued a statement saying it was "shocked and dismayed" by EPA's assault on a permit that was legitimately issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and vowed to continue fighting for the mine.

"We believe this decision will have a chilling effect on future U.S. investment," said company spokeswoman Kim Link.

The nearly 2,300-acre Spruce mine would bury 7 miles of streams, and EPA has previously ruled it would likely harm downstream water quality. The St. Louis-based coal company has planned to invest $250 million in the project, creating 250 jobs, but the mine has been delayed by lawsuits since it was permitted in 2007.

Mining already under way in a small portion of the Spruce site won't be affected by the EPA ruling, but it prohibits new, large-scale operations in other areas.

The ruling brought predictable responses from observers – praise from environmentalists and harsh words from the industry and its supporters, including many of the state's top elected officials.

"This news is devastating," said acting Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin, a Democrat. "The Spruce No. 1 permit was issued years ago and it's hard to understand how the EPA at this late stage could take such a drastic action."

Democratic U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, a former governor whose administration sued EPA last year over its new scrutiny of mountaintop removal coal mining, called the ruling "fundamentally wrong" and "a shocking display of overreach" that will cost jobs.

But Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, called it "a strong commitment to the law, the science and the principles of environmental justice."

And Janet Keating, executive director of the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, said EPA is validating what her organization has long argued: "These types of mining operations are destroying our streams and forests, and nearby residents' health."

EPA said it was acting within its legal authority in revoking the permit and "using the best science" to protect water quality, wildlife and people.

"Coal and coal mining are part of our nation's energy future, and EPA has worked with companies to design mining operations that adequately protect our nation's waters," Silva said. "We have a responsibility under the law to protect water quality and safeguard the people who rely on clean water."

The EPA said this is only the 13th time since 1972 that it has used its Clean Water Act veto authority, and the first time it's acted on a previously permitted mine. EPA says it reserves that power "for only unacceptable cases" and used it in 1978 to veto a previously permitted landfill in Miami.

National Mining Association President Hal Quinn said EPA's action threatens the certainty of all similar permits that have been issued. Spruce No. 1 went through a "robust 10-year review" process, he said, and the project has complied with every permit requirement.

Mountaintop removal is a highly efficient but particularly destructive form of strip mining that blasts mountains apart at the top to expose multiple seams of coal. Excess rock and rubble are dumped into nearby valleys, often burying streams.

EPA said it had urged Arch for more than a year to come up with a plan to mitigate environmental harm from the Spruce mine, but the company proposed no new configurations. Thursday's ruling prohibits Arch from dumping waste into streams "unless the company identifies an alternative mining design."

Last year, EPA and another company collaborated on a plan to halve the impact on water resources while simultaneously increasing coal production, Silva said.

Environmentalists had challenged the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' authority to issue Clean Water Act permits for large mountaintop removal mines, and last March, EPA announced it would veto one issued for Spruce.

Arch countered that the EPA has no authority to revoke such a permit once it's been issued.

Public hearings on the EPA's plan set off a fierce battle last year.

In October, months after the state Department of Environmental Protection warned that litigation was imminent, West Virginia sued the EPA over its mountaintop mining policies. Since President Barack Obama took office, the flow of water quality permits for Appalachian mines has slowed to a trickle.

Sen. Jay Rockefeller, another Democrat, fired off an angry letter to Obama on Thursday, declaring EPA's action wrong and unfair.

Manchin called EPA's retroactive action "an unprecedented power grab, period."

"This is not just an assault on the coal industry. It's an assault on every job market in the U.S. economy," Manchin said. "It might be West Virginia and the coal industry today. It will be your industry tomorrow."

___

Online:

EPA ruling: http://bit.ly/gNtpxW

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — The Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday it's revoking a crucial water permit for West Virginia's largest mountaintop removal mine because it would irreparably damag...
MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — The Environmental Protection Agency said Thursday it's revoking a crucial water permit for West Virginia's largest mountaintop removal mine because it would irreparably damag...
Filed by Zoe Triska  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
AGooglyMinotaur
Ahh, Theseus. It appears you are out of thread.
09:40 AM on 01/18/2011
Good on the EPA. I've never understood the argument "EPA is making a power-grab"... A power-grab to do what, exactly? It's not like they get money out of this. It's not like they get to mine the mountain instead. They're doing exactly what they were designed to do--- making sure heavy metals don't get into drinking water supplies. 250 jobs isn't worth 250 cases of cancer, however the greedy industry hacks try to spin it.
11:21 AM on 01/17/2011
This is probably one of the best things to happen to West Virginia.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beemerron
08:35 PM on 01/14/2011
when is enough, enough?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
angusmciver
Feels Empty
11:11 PM on 01/14/2011
Now it is enough. It is time for change. This is a tiny step in the right direction to preserve natural resource. For too long resource development has taken the lead, in the name of progress all for profit margins over preservation. Although not quite the money makers, preservation of natural resources and biodiversity is slowly gaining support as highly valuable. A similar mine is in the works in Alaska. The Pebble Mine at the headwaters of the largest run of sockeye salmon in the world will put the entire watershed in jeopardy. The mining company says that the project is safe and the environment is not at risk. Salmon have been there for thousands of years. Will they soon be in trouble. Permits are in the works.
05:20 PM on 01/14/2011
www.friendsofblairmountain.org/join.html
Friends of Blair Mountain Battle ground, It was on the preliminary list for historic places..but the coal cos got it taken off(short version for a very twisty story)
This is where the miners that wanted to uniionize against the coal companies went to war against the miners killing some twenty (been a long since 8gr hystory) were killed and many injured, the faced sheriffs and national guard.
If this were Gettysburg can you see a coal co blowing that up?
I dont recall if that is the right URL (have to get back to work).
There is a petition to put it back on the historic list of places. Is our WV heritage (or mine anyway)
Massey Energy has a hand in this..I really haven't been able to take time to sort it all out, but I think they are only one company pushing to blow this historic site up.
12:42 AM on 01/14/2011
It'a about time the EPA did something constructive to protect our waterways and mountains.
Oil and mine companies know just one method of operation...that is full steam ahead without regard to any environmental consequences. It's all about profits at any cost. Can you say BP
or Freeport-McMoRan? I thought so.
10:07 PM on 01/13/2011
The permit was "valid" only because Bush basically ordered the EPA to break the law and issue it in the first place. It's not too late to impeach the bum. I can dream...
02:45 PM on 01/13/2011
"We believe this decision will have a chilling effect on future U.S. investment," said company spokeswoman Kim Link." We can only hope so. This ISN'T the kind of investment that this country needs. I just hope that Americans finally make the connection between electing people who will appoint real guardians of our environment instead of those who would simply facilitate its destruction. Leave the mountaintops in place. Surely we can use them to better advantage by collecting wind and solar energy from their peaks...until, that is, we can figure out how to harness existing sources of energy in even less intrusive ways. BRAVO EPA. This is defending America from its enemies-"foreign or domestic" in a way that I support wholeheartedly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nomadrdw
Zen Druid
01:28 PM on 01/13/2011
these greedy SOB's that own these mines don't want anything to be able to slow them down because they are fully aware that the viability of coal as an energy source is at an end. these are the same people that see to it that new research is starved for money as well. we are now in the 21st century. why on earth are we still using the same energy source as stone age man? are we really going to let them completely destroy the entire environment every where coal in now in this country as well as oil and natural gas?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:08 PM on 01/13/2011
Uh-oh, the Koch brothers are going to be pissed.
02:45 PM on 01/13/2011
Well, now, wouldn't that just be too too bad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:45 PM on 01/13/2011
What a bunch of socialists looking out for members of society and not just business owners.

/sarcasm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:45 PM on 01/13/2011
Fabulous news...is it true??? The EPA is doing its job protecting the environment? Hallelu!