More

Polling Lessons For Obama From Oklahoma City

First Posted: 01/14/11 04:31 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

Obama Congresswoman Shot

Will President Barack Obama's Tucson speech affect his job approval ratings? If public reaction to Bill Clinton's handling of the Oklahoma City bombing in April 1995 is a guide, Obama is likely experience a bump in his ratings, but if so, it won't be because of some new ability to "connect" or show "empathy." It will be because as with Clinton nearly 16 years ago, Obama reminded voters of things they already liked about him.

"Clinton was at his empathetic best" in his Oklahoma City address, my colleague Howard Fineman recounted. "It reminded the public of what they liked about Bubba, and that -- more than any ideological 'triangulation' -- is what set him on the road to reelection the next year."

The public response to Clinton then was very positive. A CBS News poll conducted two days after the speech found that 79 percent of respondents approved of his handling of the bombing. The aftermath of the bombing also coincided with a modest increase in Clinton's overall job-approval rating, rising from the mid-40s to near 50 percent in most opinion polls. However, as illustrated in the chart below, the bump in the polls was just that: A small, temporary increase that faded by summer's end.

2011-01-14-Blumenthal-20110114Clinton95.png

If we look at Gallup's more complete picture of Clinton's approval rating over the entire course of his presidency, we see that it rose slightly during 1995 and continued to increase steadily for the next three years. The Oklahoma City address likely did remind voters of what they liked most about Clinton -- thus creating the temporary bump in the late spring of 1995 -- but the real engine of his rebound was the ongoing revival of the U.S. economy. That year, the economy created an average of 179,000 new jobs per month, and the rest of Clinton's presidency saw an average of more than 200,000 created per month.

2011-01-14-Blumenthal-20110114ClintonFullTerm1.png

Predictably enough, reporters and pundits are already advancing the narrative that Obama used his Tucson speech to better "connect" with voters, a perceived shortcoming that some use to explain his low job-approval ratings. During Thursday's press briefing, for example, one reporter asked White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs about the degree of "empathy" in the speech, "because in the past it's been noted that perhaps he wasn't as forthcoming with empathy as some of his predecessors."

Obama's speech "seem to resonate this time," another reporter said in a question, due to "the personal aspect of this tragedy," also noting "criticism of him in the past in terms of not really being able to empathize with folks and the comparisons between himself and Clinton. Those really went by the wayside last night."

Perhaps. But if this speech helps boost Obama, it will be because, like Clinton's Oklahoma address in 1995, it reminds voters of what they already like about Obama. Consider these results from December's NBC/Wall Street Journal poll:

[W]hen it comes to the president's personality, voters still like what they see…he gets his highest marks for having a strong family and family values (74 percent give him a high rating here), being easygoing and likeable (68 percent), being inspirational and exciting (51 percent) and having strong leadership qualities (49 percent).

Better yet, consider these results from the just-released Pew Research survey. The results from early January are virtually identical to those from June in showing that the overwhelming majority of Americans have long been convinced that Obama is "warm and friendly" (70 percent in January) and a "good communicator" (75 percent) who "cares about people" (60 percent) and is "trustworthy" (58 percent). These are not the numbers of someone who has previously had a problem personally "connecting" with the Americans people.

2011-01-14-Blumenthal-20110114ObamaPRCRatings.png

Collectively, these data show that Obama was already "the dad next door" -- the moniker Fineman applied in another column worth reading in full -- well before his Tucson address:

Even as President Obama's job approval numbers sank last year, Americans said they liked him personally, in part because he was so devoted to his family.

It was that unassuming role -- father and husband -- which enabled Obama to turn his Tucson speech into a memorable moment of healing and hope.

So if Americans like Obama personally, why is his job approval so much lower? Look at the top half of the Pew Research table above. Most Americans like their dad next door, but they have not yet seen enough tangible progress on the issues they care about, especially on the economy. If and when the economy comes roaring back, Obama's approval ratings will, too.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Will President Barack Obama's Tucson speech affect his job approval ratings? If public reaction to Bill Clinton's handling of the Oklahoma City bombing in April 1995 is a guide, Obama is likely experi...
Will President Barack Obama's Tucson speech affect his job approval ratings? If public reaction to Bill Clinton's handling of the Oklahoma City bombing in April 1995 is a guide, Obama is likely experi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,612
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (22 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Marcospinelli 02:12 AM on 01/15/2011
It's not like Obama and Democrats are talking about the real cause of and solution for the events on Saturday (expansion of mentaI heaIth services and gvn control legisIation) -- Obama and Democrats are still making it all about "inciviIity".

Obama should be using the power of the bully pulpit, and the opportunity of the *shock&awe* of last Saturday, and his poll numbers to call for the  Read More...

If the Bush years taught us anything, it's that anyone can sell anything to Americans, if you're stolid and relentless in your sales pitch and tactics. If you keep at it, escalate your attacks,  don't take 'no' for an answer, never back away, you will wear the opposition down.  By the way, Bush-Cheney-R0ve weren't geniuses, they didn't invent this strategy, nor was it something that political operatives didn't know or that political science students don't learn in poli sci 101.  Bush & R0ve were just more ruthless in doing what politicians and the political parties had gone to great lengths to hide from Americans, be more subtle about.  

What Bush-Cheney-Rove showed Democrats, though, was that there was no need to be subtle. It doesn't matter how you get the rhetoric, the spin, on the table, just get it on the table.  You don't have to go to great lengths to set up a logical or legitimate premise for it.  The shock&awe tactics of having surrogates fan out all over the air waves, with other diversionary news stories competing for air time, will prevent opponents challenging you with logical analyses getting any air time, much less any traction.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Aerows
05:55 PM on 01/17/2011
All I have to say is this - I had a discussion where even my conservative-leaning, Republican mother and I talked about the level that the rhetoric had reached was awful.

That was months before this.  The only people claiming they didn't see something like this coming are the people that now feel guilty that maybe they DID have something to do with it.

Some are protesting far too much, and those of us who have been searching for common ground long before this are NOT fooled.  You know who you are.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:46 PM on 01/17/2011
Do elaborate who they are. Fact is he was an isolated individual. He hated bush like most of you liberals do. He didnt listen to talk radio or watch Fox. So who are you talking about and back it up with facts please.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Aerows
12:23 PM on 01/18/2011
When conservatives and moderates alike agree that the level of discourse got out of hand, you would be wise to listen.  Feel free to label me as you will - just understand that you are doing so in an attempt to deflect from what is a sensible take on the situation.

Don't like it?  Fantastic.  Do something about it by tempering your own discourse with people instead of trying to stuff people in little categories of "liberal", "conservative", "right" and "left".

The sooner some of you realize we are all Americans and that most of us are tired of the constant bickering between extreme partisans, the sooner things can change for the better.

What are you ultimately, an American, or a partisan?  I'm an American first.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wattnot
I'm a Lumberjack and He's OK.
05:35 PM on 01/17/2011
There seems to be a view in America that polling has some special validity, and that asking 1500 ignoramuses for their opinion on something about which they know nothing at all (by definition) somehow produces a meaningful assessment of the issue.
John McCain says Obama is a patriot, so if you conduct a poll of all the total ignoramuses who place some value on what McCain says you will now find that Obama is a patriot, whereas only a few hours before McCain spoke, that same set of ignoramuses would have described Obama as a Traitor, or a Kenyan, or a Racist, or whatever else they had been told he was. But I guess polling is one of the few remaining areas of economic activity aside from weapons production, so we should all be thankful.
photo
Vince Weiguang Li
Alferd Packer-Epicurean Go Go Greyhound!
12:06 PM on 01/17/2011
Yep "never let a good crisis go to waste"

Rahm Emanuel former Chief of Staff of the current administration.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yeA_kHHLow

This an all time low, using polling figures to determine the maximum political advantage to be taken from a tragedy. It was as if those attempting to push a call for civility, have no shame.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wattnot
I'm a Lumberjack and He's OK.
05:36 PM on 01/17/2011
That is right, and from an external perspective it seems pretty clear that nobody in America knows what shame is.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Aerows
05:56 PM on 01/17/2011
Please don't judge us all for some of our fellow countrymen.  Many of us were appalled long before this by the level of our national discourse.
09:24 AM on 01/17/2011
Obama has brought the cynical mind set. Off teleprompter he has shown us the "real" Obama. Remember Crowley/Gates for an overall view. On teleprompter remember his speech where he thanks himself and his pronounciation of CORPS. Where is his sincerity? Clinton had it. Bush had it. You can call him "cool" or you can call him "cold". I choose cold and arrogant.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
human2008
You only live once, so live for a human purpose.
02:54 PM on 01/17/2011
In a wizzardly way you follow Sarah Palin, what else would you choose? Even Glen Beck had some good words about the President.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:50 PM on 01/17/2011
Ahh Ahh Ahhh! Can someone check the telepromptor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ehjay
Reform, social, political, economic
12:08 PM on 01/16/2011
How crass of Mark Blementhal to place such a discussion of Obama within the context of the Tucson tragedy. Blumenthal brings into question his own character.
03:10 AM on 01/17/2011
I am surprised to see so many articles about "polling bumps" around such a horrific event. Polling companies and their owner spokesman should sit down and be quiet for awhile after tragedies like this one.
But corporate egos and cash compensation are the pollster's main goal in the non-sense pursuit of trivial data at such a sad time.
Mr Blumenthal's position as the HuffPost poll taker now presumes to advise BO that his 'numbers' will get better if he can improve the economic situation. Wow that is an amazing suggestion. I hope the WH is reading MB's column.
PS Mr B., I have yet to participate in a single poll here at HP that ran quickly and seamlessly in the past 10 months
11:38 AM on 01/16/2011
Another speech with what to follow? Obama is good at speeches.

James Brady was shot during a presidential assassination attempt and what came of that? A lot of rage and rhetoric like now.

Daily blow by blow on Giffords recovery, the entertainment machine called news will keep things going till something new emerges and the government (state and federal) will do nothing more than they have done, talk.

The congress will make sure their butts are protected, but as for the rest of America nothing will change.

There is a lot of money in the firearms business both commercial and private. The banks aren't the only ones who bought and paid for politicians.
10:10 AM on 01/16/2011
Rarely do I have the opportunity to say something good about Obi.
He is such a bungler.
BUT
He is doing something now that should have been done thirty years ago.
He is easing restrictions on Cuba.

That hollow shell could have fallen when the old Soviet Union fell apart,
fut for the crazy Cuban, or perception of the Cuban lobby in Miami.

Had the American people had contact and travel to Cuba then, without the
Union of Soviet Republics oil, and with the American dollar rolling in, Castro et al.
would have been out of a job.

With The President's new easing, and more to come, it shouldn't take long.

Kudos Mr. President.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chucknchar
10:48 AM on 01/16/2011
Well the more attention you pay, the smarter Obama gets
10:53 AM on 01/16/2011
The more attention I pay the more I see the wrath of Aff*rmat*ve Act*on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wattnot
I'm a Lumberjack and He's OK.
05:42 PM on 01/17/2011
Why is it you guys always want to roll some other country's leaders?
I went to an IBM sales convention once and there was a guest speaker from the US. He told everyone that the best thing for all of us was to apply to become honorary states of the US. As far as I know, only Australia has taken up the challenge to date. It takes a while to get used to all the brown noses when you walk around the streets of Sydney.
10:04 AM on 01/16/2011
The only purpose of these news polls is for MSM outlets to gauge how effective the propaganda efforts are.
10:02 AM on 01/16/2011
Funny that you mention this, Mark.

MSNBC clip related. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjO6NFLLE04
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andman0121
09:47 AM on 01/16/2011
Havent been able to leave a comment for the last TWO DAYS. Really??
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lqw
Justmyopinion
09:39 AM on 01/16/2011
"I thought this was a memorial to honor the dead and the wounded. So how do we get from that to t-shirts, distributed at the event, that say “Together We Thrive?” And what does that slogan have to do with the Tucson tragedy?"

http://tucsoncitizen.com/in-the-aggregate/2011/01/15/tucson-memorial-t-shirts-%E2%80%93-tackiness-on-parade/
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lqw
Justmyopinion
09:35 AM on 01/16/2011
This story belongs with the story on HP that says:
"Democrats, Republicans and independent groups across the ideological spectrum are seeking political profit from the shooting rampage in Arizona, often moderating their rhetoric in pursuit of their goals."
09:33 AM on 01/16/2011
There are no lessons for Obama...... He is our moral and spiritual leader.
Wildlife2064
Left is Right and Right is Wrong
09:48 AM on 01/16/2011
He is our commander in Chief. While his morals are important, his spirituality is irrelevant. The separation of church and state means that his religion does not interfere with his decisions. However, even though he, as a constitutional scholar knows this precept, I believe he's forgotten it. The right decision for the country would have been to refuse to extend the tax cuts for the wealthy, but his spirituality, his Christian faith, wanted him to, in effect, help the poor (now joined by the middle class in level of need) by securing unemployment insurance and some other relatively minor concessions that should not have been linked to the tax cut in the first place. It is his spirituality that pushes him to compromise with the right and try to make everyone happy, instead of doing what is right for the country which will no doubt anger a large portion of the population. Peacekeeping is a good idea in theory, but it cannot come at the cost of progress.
12:02 PM on 01/16/2011
He is by far the wisest Leader of all time.
I hope we can repeal the 22nd Amendment allowing him to stay in office as long as he lives.
09:28 AM on 01/16/2011
In a separate poll this past week, over 70% want the health care law to be stronger, not repealed. He can learn that throwing the public option over the side, and agreeing not to negotiate down the cost of drugs was a mistake. He can learn that Americans are sick, very sick of being gouged and profiteered upon by the private health insurance companies and drug companies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ugonna
10:04 AM on 01/16/2011
Rev Sharpton said something that makes sense on MTP this morning. He said the difference btw MLK Jr. and Obama is that one was an activist and the other has to govern. I think that is what progressives misunderstand. Obama does not have the freedom to push for everything he wants in an uncompromising manner. He is no activist, and has to run an actual country. As a leader of a country, you are bound to piss ppl off. It is the risk you take on. Which is why even someone as popular as Clinton has many haters, and yet he is one of our most successful and best Democratic representatives ever. Someone like MLK Jr., if he ever took office, would have had his image somewhat tarnished, cause he would have let you down in many ways too. It is human that a leader has to make the best decisions he can, whether it pleases his base or not. He can make mistakes as well. There is no time for purity when in office. It is is easy to throw stones, but you would disappoint your base if you were in office too. Remember even Bush had many Republican detractors toward the end of his 2nd term.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nicholasb
10:10 AM on 01/16/2011
Totally meaningless speculations and what-ifs. People who try to please everybody...wind up pleasing nobody.
09:19 AM on 01/16/2011
Mean while the cons are making stuff up about the memorial service.

Among attempts by some conservati ves to cast last night’s “Together We Thrive” memorial for victims of the massacre in Tucson in a negative light were suggestion s that the White House was involved in designing and distributi ng t-shirts at the event. While that notion has already been partially debunked, we looked into the rumors, and besides a frank denial from the White House, we’ve uncovered some relevant details about the shirts, which were, infact, distribute d by the University of Arizona.

This type of smear is nothing new, and despite the apparent absurdity of the claim, I checked with the White House, anyway. A senior administra tion official confirmed the widely-rep orted fact that the administra tion had nothing to do with the shirts.

University of Arizona spokespers on Jennifer Fitzenberg er told me that the shirts were, indeed, provided by the University . “The University wanted to give people something to remember that symbolized community spirit and continued the event’s positive energy into the future,” she said.

According to Fitzenberg er, the shirts were designed by a University of Arizona student, and they cost about $60,000. “The University will pay for them,” she noted. “No tuition, state allocation s, tax dollars or student fees will be used.”

http://www .mediaite. com/online /the-truth -about-the -together- we-thrive- t-shirts-a t-the-tucs on-memoria l/