More

Walking Could Lower Your Risk Of This Disease

01/13/11 06:30 PM ET   AP

Diabetes

LONDON — Walk more, and not only burn off calories, but also lessen the chance of becoming diabetic, a new study says.

As part of a national study in Australia to measure diabetes levels, experts gave nearly 600 adults a pedometer to measure how many steps they took over two consecutive days in 2000 and again in 2005.

Participants also completed a diet and lifestyle questionnaire and had their measurements – including height, weight and insulin sensitivity – taken.

It was found that people who walked the most after five years not only had a lower body mass index, but were also more sensitive to insulin and less likely to develop diabetes.

The study was paid for by the Australian government and pharmaceuticals groups who make diabetes drugs, including Abbott Australasia, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb. It was published Thursday in the journal BMJ.

Many governments and health officials recommend people walk 10,000 steps a day, the equivalent of about five miles (eight kilometres). The study authors, from the Murdoch Children's Research Institute in Melbourne, estimated that if a sedentary person increased their daily steps to reach the 10,000 step threshold, he or she would lower their body mass index by almost one point and improve their sensitivity to insulin by three times.

Health officials have long suggested people stay slim and exercise to avoid diabetes.

"Think about what you do each day and how you can work in more steps," advises the American Diabetes Association on its website, which recommends taking the stairs instead of the elevator. "You'll be amazed at how these extra minutes and steps add up."

___

Online:

http://www.bmj.com

http://www.diabetes.org

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

LONDON — Walk more, and not only burn off calories, but also lessen the chance of becoming diabetic, a new study says. As part of a national study in Australia to measure diabetes levels, exper...
LONDON — Walk more, and not only burn off calories, but also lessen the chance of becoming diabetic, a new study says. As part of a national study in Australia to measure diabetes levels, exper...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:23 PM on 01/18/2011
*of course, as your fitness improves, walking won't increase your fitness and you will burn far fewer calories as your body becomes more efficient at walking. Good idea to have a progressive fitness goal as well (always!) as a healthy nutrition lifestyle in place.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:19 PM on 01/18/2011
Holy shite. You're kidding, right? Exercise HAS been shown for at least the last 25 years to be the number one effective intervention in preventing or mitigating adult onset diabetes. A ten week program of 30 minute walks daily at
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeyJaii
Socialism.
10:23 PM on 01/17/2011
Wow, it look scientist to figure this out? Common sense here.
06:37 PM on 01/17/2011
And running may reduce your risk even further.
05:18 AM on 01/15/2011
It seems like common sense but reading about this study may prompt some people to get off the couch.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrP
10:07 PM on 01/14/2011
I exercise much more than walking 10,000 steps a day. I have never felt that walking was "real exercise." You need to break a sweat and get your heart rate up. Biking or running are my work-outs of choice. I rode over 3,000 miles last summer. However, I am still seriously insulin-resistant. It is a progressive, genetic condition, not a "disease." It can't be cured. It does not need to lead to health problems if those with the condition will severely restrict carbohydrates. Exercise is a good thing, but walking those steps won't prevent chronic high blood sugar in those who are insulin-resistant if they continue to eat the grain/sugar/starch heavy Standard American Diet, or even the disastrous low-fat diets promoted by the ADA.
12:32 AM on 01/16/2011
On the contrary, walking (distances of 2 km or more) is great exercise
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chuck Bluestein
Always searching for latest health breakthrough
09:04 PM on 01/14/2011
In China the average person would walk an average of 10 miles a day. Now they are buying cars at a faster rate than ever in America. So it will not be long until they are more like Americans with fat people all over the place and lots of pollution. You are talking about type 2 diabetes. Overweight Americans would benefit to eat less calories and unhealthy food and exercise more. The same applies to people with type 2 diabetes.
04:57 PM on 01/14/2011
I'd love to see the US become a nation of walkers. I've drastically improved my health since starting a daily walking regime last June. I'm too cheap to join a gym...and I abhor working out like a rat indoors, anyway. I found an awesome nature trail and have stuck to a 2-4 mile walk every day.

I live in the suburbs and rarely have a chance to walk to the stores. I pretty much need to drive wherever I go. So I'm happy that I found such a simple and cheap way to get in exercise.
photo
french queen13
my beloved is mine and I am his
10:22 PM on 01/15/2011
Good on you, carrieanna! Having somewhere like a nature trail to walk makes it so much more enjoyable, too. I agree about gyms - tried one and it was awful.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BBQribsNOnapkin
tl; dr
02:26 PM on 01/14/2011
Hey, I got a headline for the follow up article: "A Healthy Lifestyle of Exercise and Proper Nutrition Could Lower Your Risk of This Disease: All of Them."
01:39 PM on 01/14/2011
As reported, and as is typical in most science news stories, correlation is confused with causation. People who walked more had generally better outcomes than those who walked less is the only conclusion I see here. Duh! Why? Age difference? Initial health condition difference? There is no data or discussion of individuals improving their health outcomes by walking more. This article does not present any information on that count. The actual article is clearer:

Objectives To investigate the association between change in daily step count and both adiposity and insulin sensitivity and the extent to which the association between change in daily step count and insulin sensitivity may be mediated by adiposity.

Conclusions Among community dwelling, middle aged adults, a higher daily step count at five year follow-up than at baseline was associated with better insulin sensitivity. This effect seems to be largely mediated through lower adiposity.

But still no discussion of initial age or health effects...

Someone needs a lesson in how to write about science...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Repubnomore
03:15 PM on 01/14/2011
You are correct - someone needs a lesson in how to write about science.

Every one of these articles that doesn't reference a true scientific research study (controlled variables, peer review etc) should start out with "a study was released that correlates..."

I guess that way, everyone that understands the difference between causation and correlation will know not to expect earth-shattering, irrefutable results. But then again, wouldn't they be smart enough to notice this without the disclaimer? Wouldn't the people that don't understand the difference stop reading at the word "correlates"?

Maybe it just should have stated "remember when you learned that some exercise was better than no exercise?" Here's another observation of that...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrP
10:08 PM on 01/14/2011
Absolutely. Read Gary Taubes. His work is all about the danger of confusing correlation with causation and the abysmally poor state of what passes for nutrition "science."
01:26 PM on 01/14/2011
Exercise helps stave of diabetes

Earthshattering
07:58 PM on 01/14/2011
Lols
05:51 AM on 01/17/2011
Not always, it "can" help..
01:21 PM on 01/14/2011
The scourge of the suburbs.  We need to go back to living in cities.  The burbs have brought us dependence on foreign oil, pollution and obesity.  They have also contributed to the creation of an underclass who can't afford to purchase the cars need to get to minimum wage jobs so they are relegated to public assistance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
07:52 AM on 01/16/2011
I have to agree totally...........thanks for putting those thoughts put there......
05:53 AM on 01/17/2011
I think obesity is more prevalent in poor neighborhoods than in suburbs..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:04 PM on 01/14/2011
DUH...AND THEY PAId for this!
sorry for the caps
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharkcellar
support your local library.
12:54 PM on 01/14/2011
Can this author.
12:33 AM on 01/16/2011
The editor writes the title, not the author.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharkcellar
support your local library.
12:41 AM on 01/16/2011
Can this editor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:53 PM on 01/14/2011
This article's tittle should read: "We are really terrible journalists" or "we need proofreaders ASAP."