iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Northern Yellowstone Elk Herd Suffers Major Decline

Elk

MATTHEW BROWN   01/12/11 08:25 PM ET   AP

BILLINGS, Mont. — An acclaimed elk herd in Yellowstone National Park took a major hit last year, with biologists saying almost one in four of the animals were lost, mainly to predators and hunters.

As recently as 1994, the northern Yellowstone elk herd was the largest in North America with almost 20,000 animals that migrated between the park and parts of southern Montana.

But those numbers have plummeted sharply since wolves were reintroduced 15 years ago, adding to threats that already included mountain lions and grizzly bears.

Figures released Wednesday showed the Yellowstone herd down to a minimum of 4,635 elk. That's a 24 percent drop from last winter, and wildlife officials said the decline was unexpected because the herd in recent years showed signs of stabilizing.

"Either we counted them poorly this year, predator effects were stronger, the big snow event made us miss more elk, or more elk were harvested," said Park Service biologist Doug Smith. "Usually the best answer in ecology is all of the above."

He said there was no reason to suspect a continued decline, and that a smaller herd is healthier in some ways because it gives the animals room to thrive.

Bill Hoppe, an outfitter near Gardiner, said harsh weather in the park in late November pushed many of the animals to lower elevations in Montana. He estimated several hundred bull elk from the herd were killed by hunters in the last part of the season – one of the most successful harvests in years.

Yet in the 1990s, several thousand elk were killed in some years. Hoppe believes the herd's best days are gone, and a local hunting industry that already was ailing will collapse.

"There's coyotes and there's wolves and there's bears and there's mountain lions. (The elk) may come back, but it's going to be slow," said Hoppe, who is also president of a group called the Friends of the Northern Yellowstone Elk Herd.

The Park Service has no set population target for the herd, but the latest count falls below those of Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks.

The state's elk management plan calls for 3,000 to 5,000 elk in parts of Montana just north of the park, said Fish, Wildlife and Parks spokesman Ron Aasheim. This year's count included 2,236 outside the park.

Aasheim said state officials would review whether hunting restrictions need to be tightened in future years to help bolster the herd. Yet it's uncertain how much could be done. Harvest limits for reproducing female elk were down to just a few dozen north of the park this year, versus almost 3,000 a season at their peak.

Park biologist Smith said the long-term decline was indisputable, with 70 percent of the herd gone since wolves were reintroduced to the park from Canada in 1995.

Conservationists credit wolves with helping restore balance to the ecosystem, in part by reducing the size of a herd some had said was far too large at its peak.

Smith declined to weigh in, saying that was before his time at Yellowstone. But he pointed out controversy has long followed the northern Yellowstone herd.

"Yellowstone is one of the most predator rich environments in North America and that has an effect on elk," he said. "But the biggest criticism when I got here in 1994 was there were too many elk. Now we're getting criticism there's too few elk. The Park Service does not specifically target a population size."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BILLINGS, Mont. — An acclaimed elk herd in Yellowstone National Park took a major hit last year, with biologists saying almost one in four of the animals were lost, mainly to predators and hunte...
BILLINGS, Mont. — An acclaimed elk herd in Yellowstone National Park took a major hit last year, with biologists saying almost one in four of the animals were lost, mainly to predators and hunte...
Filed by Zoe Triska  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 123
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dn sf
07:59 PM on 02/14/2011
Once the super volcano under the park blows, it won't really matter how many elk used to live there because they will all be burnt to a crisp.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
03:04 PM on 01/19/2011
I have to laugh.. Greenies scream to bring in the wolves, and they do and then fret when they wolves eat the deer???
photo
FranklinCat
18 claws & 3½ fangs
03:21 PM on 01/18/2011
I find this article simplistic, even dishonest. By narrowly choosing elk populations at two isolated points in time, one before and one 15 years after the re-introduction of wolves to the ecosystem one ensures controversy if little or no attempt is made to look at the wider picture. The intelligent question to ask is how has the ecosystem changed in those 15 years? Does the whole system seem healthier? Has diversity increased?

Before wolves, stream-side ecology was in a poor state and aspen shoots where nearly non-existent. Now willows and aspens are returning along with beavers; and along with beavers and their dams comes an increase in aquatic life and a rise in the water table. Wolves have also caused changes to the coyote population which has benefited the foxes.

There's a whole lot more to be seen than: 20,000 elk > 5,000 elk.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:00 PM on 01/18/2011
Exactly. What you describe is the result of an approach to management and measurement of efficacy based on biodiversity rather than numbers of harvest animals.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jim bob
Be the change you wish to see.
02:58 PM on 01/18/2011
The Yellowstone herd has been controversial since Yellowstone became a park. People outside the park thrive on the tourism it brings. the more elk, the better, as far as they're concerned, and whenever a wolf kills an elk, they see it as money out of their pockets. I wouldn't trust a yellowstone "outfitter" out of my sight with anything to do with an elk.

In the 60's the NPS chased elk into corrals so they could be shipped elsewhere. The herd was smaller then.

About ten years ago, the herd was so big there were single elk walking across the Yellowstone River bridge in Gardner, on Highway 89, in the middle of the summer. Small herds gathered in the shade of the headquarters buildings in Mammoth. Coming from this, I imagine the herd will recover just fine, even if an outfitter or two has to get his money some other way. Maybe they'll be willing to accept the idea that "food stamps" isn't such a socialistic thing. That would be an adaptation I'd like to see to this environment.
12:25 PM on 01/18/2011
UM LETS RELEASE MORE WOLVES?
photo
cambo
On the grand MN's side.
06:57 AM on 01/18/2011
Ah, now the poor wedneck hunter won`t have anything to kill - boo hoo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ken Detweiler
05:53 PM on 01/17/2011
"a smaller herd is healthier in some ways because it gives the animals room to thrive" same might be true for so-called higher species.
photo
cambo
On the grand MN's side.
07:14 AM on 01/18/2011
Humans were once unique, now we are a dime in a dozen herd.
photo
cambo
On the grand MN's side.
07:15 AM on 01/18/2011
And our biggest predator is our own species - bizarre.
photo
paxatman
Do no harm, Help others.
06:08 PM on 01/16/2011
Require all hunters to wear elk suits instead of camouflage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
03:06 PM on 01/19/2011
If elk aren't important.. just food for wolves, why is this even an issue?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scifibird
05:16 PM on 01/16/2011
Mother Nature is a better manager of all things natural than man. Hunting by humans should be banned so that the natural predators and prey can survive in harmony.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:57 PM on 01/16/2011
So where do you get your meat ?
photo
Earthling1125
Respect Nature - we are lost without her
08:09 AM on 01/18/2011
Don't eat meat. Don't have to. Hunting should be banned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scifibird
12:27 PM on 01/18/2011
I am a vegetarian.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:53 PM on 01/17/2011
Humans are natural predators, no less so than a wolf or a cougar.
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
03:35 PM on 01/17/2011
Humans used to be hunters/gatherers, not strictly hunters. Some - few in numbers and proportion of the overall population - are still today. That does not include you and me. While we are natural indeed, we are no longer playing the primary role of occasional hunter/predator - and haven't in many thousands of years. In the meantime, our existence has spelled doom for many many species and continues to this day. Were we 'natural' hunters, we would probably have a relative small human population and live much closer to the carrying capacity of earth for other species.

Oh, and by the way: we are much less than a wolf of a cougar. We neither have the senses these animals do nor do we have the equipment for killing and being predators on animals with whom they evolved. We are amputated from our natural heritage and we continue to build walls that further divide us from the natural world. That's why we can kill the Gulf of Mexico and not care. There are many other ways to measure our worth - or lack of it - to the natural world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crowmeris
Rad-fem from way back when
08:00 PM on 01/17/2011
Yes, we are predators; however, in our modern state we are both less and more than the wolf or cougar.
"More" in the sense that we have high-powered rifles, high-quality scopes, and support equipment to turn our ancestors green with envy.
"Less" in the sense that we have no ..well, sense. The average hunter spends virtually no time studying the herd(s) from which he/she wants to take a deer or two; he/she parks, walks back to a well-used and well-stocked stand, plops in to wait, and generally shoots what happens to wander by, with no concern of what the herd(s) in that area are like or what they can give. The average hunter has no desire to cull the weak or the wounded; no - he/she wants the fattest doe, the strongest buck. This is not the way of the wolf or of the cougar.
I am NOT anti-hunting for sustenance; well-behaved non-trophy hunters are welcome on my land if they have the courtesy to come and ask. But do not try to convince me that we are "natural predators".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:26 PM on 01/16/2011
Perhaps its time to understand the difference between managing the natural world as a game farm and doing so in the interests of biodiversity.
10:44 PM on 01/18/2011
Clearly you've never read anything about YNP and what its purpose was when the land was set-aside.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:55 PM on 01/18/2011
To the contrary, the rules for biodiversity do not conform to arbitrary boundaries, or to the limits of human capacity to establish "purpose".
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
01:52 PM on 01/16/2011
So what's wrong with this picture? The note that the real unmeasured and added pressure on elk isn't their natural predators, but their human ones. Hunters are the piece of the puzzle that do not fit into the scope of ecology. Ban hunting and the picture will reflect much more closely Yellowstone's historical biomass. We need to quit acting like shooting animals that evolved in a ecological setting without our guns needs us to survive. What a cruel joke. And what ignorance!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:58 PM on 01/16/2011
What does overpopulation do the species ?
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
03:19 AM on 01/17/2011
When the herbivores have their natural predators, there doesn't seem to be much overpopulation, does there? In the case of deer that are overpopulating their habitats (see Aldo Leopold's A Sand County Almanac), the hills, streams, and mountains suffer. That is what has been seen in Yellowstone, now that the wolves are back. The stream banks are returning to their former riparian characteristics now that there are fewer elks eating the young trees. Hunting never takes the place of natural attrition due to predators, disease, and famine. It's just an excuse to have an entré to kill animals that have have no way to protect themselves from bullets. It hunting was actually culling overpopulated herds, it wouldn't be done on an annual basis.

As for your question, I would say human overpopulation is a real problem for other earthlings, wouldn't you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:55 PM on 01/17/2011
Your distinction between "natural" predators and humans is a false dichotomy.

Humans have been hunting animals like elk for thousands of years.
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
03:26 PM on 01/17/2011
Not a false dichotomy; a reflection of life on earth as it is today. Humans are only marginally hunters these days, and those who are hunters are so because in most cases they are desperate persons living on the edge of society. For these humans, hunting is for subsistence; what it should be only. Sport hunting by 'sportsmen' is not natural predation but rather one more aspect of human technological evolution that produces equipment and machinery for a single purpose - killing another animal that stands no chance of coping with the technology brought to bear upon them. While it was true in our evolutionary history that we were just another 'natural' predator, such is no longer the case for humans or the natural world. Holding to the romantic old concept that the role humans beings used to play in the world as one of predator is obsolete.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
10:43 AM on 01/16/2011
I remember a while back hearing of Yellowstone Elk drinking from the geyser pools which were highly fluoridated. This caused severe skeletal abnormalities which caused the animals to collapse from breaking legs under their own weight due to the effects of the fluoride on their bones. Wonder how much that has to do with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
07:57 AM on 01/16/2011
Don't allow guns in national forests.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
My little dog — a heartbeat at my feet ^..^
09:19 AM on 01/16/2011
Amen ☮
10:53 PM on 01/18/2011
YNP is a national park. Hunting is not allowed in any national park.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
06:34 AM on 01/16/2011
What's Palin been up to in her spare time?