iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

First U.S. Ambassador In 5 Years Arrives In Syria

ELIZABETH A. KENNEDY   01/16/11 11:03 AM ET   AP

BEIRUT — The first American ambassador to Syria since 2005 arrived in Damascus on Sunday at a time of regional turmoil and with Syrian-U.S. relations still mired in mutual distrust.

Few expect immediate changes, but having career diplomat Robert Ford in Damascus offers Washington a better glimpse into Syria at a time of rising tensions – particularly in neighboring Lebanon, where the Western-backed government collapsed last week.

"Intelligence sharing is the most promising overlap in U.S.-Syrian relations," said Joshua Landis, an American professor and Syria expert. He noted that like Washington, Syria's secular regime is against al-Qaida and "takfiri" Islamists, referring to an ideology that urges Sunni Muslims to kill anyone they consider an infidel.

President Barack Obama's administration has argued that returning an ambassador to Damascus would help persuade Syria to change its policies regarding Lebanon, Israel and Iraq and end its support for extremist groups.

Syria is designated a "state sponsor of terrorism" by the State Department.

Ford takes up his post just days after the government in Lebanon collapsed when Hezbollah, which gets key support from Syria and Iran, walked out of the Cabinet on Wednesday.

The government fell after months of tensions stemming from a U.N.-backed investigation into the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. Many have blamed the killing on Syria and Hezbollah. President George W. Bush's administration withdrew a full-time ambassador from Syria in 2005 in part to protest Hariri's assassination.

Both Syria and Hezbollah deny any links to the assassination, which galvanized opposition to Damascus in 2005 and sparked huge street demonstrations that helped end Syria's 29-year military presence in Lebanon and paved the way for pro-Western parties – led by Saad Hariri, the slain man's son – to head the government in subsequent elections.

The tribunal is expected to issue indictments soon, and many expect the Shiite militant group Hezbollah to be named. The indictments could rekindle violence in Lebanon, which has been plagued for decades by war and civil strife.

With Syria's backing, Hezbollah has demanded Saad Hariri break off Lebanon's ties with the tribunal, but he has refused. The collapse of his Western-backed government on Wednesday was a clear sign of the strength of Hezbollah – along with its Syrian and Iranian patrons – and a setback for U.S. policy in the region.

Ford's arrival is a clear sign of Obama's push for engagement.

Obama nominated Ford, a former ambassador to Algeria, to the post in February.

The nomination stalled after Ford's confirmation hearings, but Obama bypassed the Senate in December and directly appointed Ford and three other new U.S. ambassadors whose nominations had been stalled or blocked by lawmakers for months.

A number of senators objected because they believed sending an ambassador to Syria would reward it for bad behavior.

Syria has bounced back from years of international isolation and is wielding its influence in crises around the Middle East, shrugging off U.S. attempts to pull it away from its alliances with Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah.

Washington has increasingly expressed its frustration with Syria, which it says is stirring up tension through its support of Hezbollah. In October, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Syria's behavior "has not met our hopes and expectations."

Syria could benefit from improved ties with Washington, which would boost its economy and end sanctions first imposed by Bush.

Bilal al-Ghazzawi, 23-year-old working at an electronics shop, said he was doubtful relations between the two countries would change.

"Americans cannot be trusted," he said. "Today they send an ambassador, tomorrow they might pull him out again."

___

Associated Press writers Zeina Karam and Albert Aji contributed to this story from Damascus, Syria.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BEIRUT — The first American ambassador to Syria since 2005 arrived in Damascus on Sunday at a time of regional turmoil and with Syrian-U.S. relations still mired in mutual distrust. Few expect ...
BEIRUT — The first American ambassador to Syria since 2005 arrived in Damascus on Sunday at a time of regional turmoil and with Syrian-U.S. relations still mired in mutual distrust. Few expect ...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 136
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackstonia
08:20 AM on 01/18/2011
Gosh, that embassy looks like a bunker.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgarbuz
10:09 PM on 01/17/2011
What does the US gain by close relationships with dictatorships? During the Cold War, we had to have relations with some otherwise undesirable regimes, because we were fiercely competing with the USSR for control of resources which the other side was trying to deny us. But what the US gains in close relationships with dictatorships today eludes me.
07:30 PM on 01/17/2011
The US should follow Turkey's lead in having good relations with Syria, as a bridge toward better US relations with other countries in the region.
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
03:09 PM on 01/17/2011
Oh, good.

Better jaw-jaw than war-war.
02:09 PM on 01/17/2011
Finally! How absurd that five years went by without an American ambassador in Damascus! Lunacy.
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
03:11 PM on 01/17/2011
I'm surprised that the United States even have diplomatic relations with Syria. I always thought it's the same thing with Iran.

Looking bet, guess there's no reason for the US to cut ties with Syria completely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:20 PM on 01/17/2011
Well establishing an embassy gets more boots and ears to the ground.

Diplomacy is something else.
12:06 PM on 01/17/2011
The Ambassador should challenge the boy Assad to legitimise his rule by running for office in an open, free and fair election.
 
Time is running out for the Arab gangsters, they can either leave of their own accord or in a hurry with the mob at the palace gate.
02:10 PM on 01/17/2011
Cannonball - - Bashar al-Assad is actually a very nice man who wants to do what is best for his country and for the region.
02:14 PM on 01/17/2011
So why won’t he stand for election?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atif Ahmed Choudhury
J.D. Candidate, William and Mary College of Law
05:44 PM on 01/17/2011
Bashar may not be a butcher like his father, but he is still a feared autocrat whose rule thrives on corruption, tribal and sectarian patronage, and establishing a police state which denies basic liberties and freedoms to his citizens...the apple did not fall too far from the tree.
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
03:08 PM on 01/17/2011
"The Ambassador should challenge the boy Assad..."

Yes, that is exactly what an ambassador should do.

Oh wait, I seem to mix up "Ambassador" with "war messenger".
07:05 PM on 01/17/2011
That is ok.
 
You get an awful lot of things 'mixed-up' old boy.
11:46 AM on 01/17/2011
We should always maintain communication with our adversaries.
02:11 PM on 01/17/2011
Yes. And the US should have ambassadors in Tehran and Havana.
02:19 PM on 01/17/2011
Absolutely. It is easy to communicate with allies. But far more challenging to communicate with one's adversaries. Know thy enemy.
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
03:13 PM on 01/17/2011
"And the US should have ambassador­s in Tehran and Havana"

About time too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
11:45 AM on 01/17/2011
This move can only be good news, for the US and for other nation states in the Middle East. It can be a balance for our unlimited support for Israel and indicates that we are not continuing to follow the previous administration's suspicion of any enemy of Israel. We...the US...don't seem to be very popular with the people of Syria, and this may help to improve reputation and trust there.
photo
wom122
Primum non nocere
04:02 PM on 01/17/2011
The Us government is not at all popular anywhere in the Middle East outside of Israel. The US achievements in medicine , science, and law on the other hand are widely admired
photo
Amryxx
politeness rules, but with sharpened edges
04:07 PM on 01/17/2011
"The Us government is not at all popular anywhere in the Middle East outside of Israel"

True.

"The US achievemen­ts in medicine , science, and law on the other hand are widely admired"

True. Although I need to point out that "US scientific achievement" is not equivalent to "US government", the same way "Cuban cigars" is not the same thing as "Cuban government"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerryjerry5959
LIFE--Good and bad days. Just have more good ones
06:38 AM on 01/17/2011
"A number of senators objected because they believed sending an ambassador to Syria would reward it for bad behavior."

If that were the case, we better withdraw everyone from Washington.
09:40 PM on 01/17/2011
And Israel.
05:33 AM on 01/17/2011
Syria is a secular regime where women enjoy remarkable success and freedom

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asma_al-Assad
Syria's first lady
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Najah_al-Attar
Syria's (female) Vice President
http://www.sarashamma.com/
Female Syrian artist/painter

Syria is a secular regime where millions of Christians live comfortably and freely. Many famous American and Canadianshave Syrian ancestry. Syria's recent humanitarian role in welcoming millions of Iraqi refugees (despite US sanctions) helped reduce the catastrophic human impact of the Iraq war.

The reality of Syria (not to mention its amazing history) is so much better than its "Axis of evil" manufactured image by the ISraeli lobby and Israeli supporters in Congress.

Syria holds the key to US success in the region. Building good relations with Syria would serve both the US and the region's best interests. It's about time that US policy does what's good for the US not Israel!
05:20 AM on 01/17/2011
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/General+News/80903/President-Bush-Sends-Special-Letter-To-Outgoing-Mossad-Chief.html
The above link shows how dependent Bush was on Israel for mideast policy. The difference between Israel and the US is that Israel's leaders and secret service knew clearly what is good for Israel and managed to convince Bush that what is good for Israel is good for the US. The fact that the US congress is under the thumb of the Israeli lobby made it all the easier. Obama is different. He is smart and knowledgeable and sees a difference between American priorities and Israeli priorities, especially under a Bibi/lieberman coalition.Bashar el Assad regime has helped the US with intelligence on Iraq and most importantly by absorbing millions of Iraqi refugees which significantly helped to diminish the human catastrophy of the Iraq war. Syria has been extending a hand to teh US and Israel for severla years now, it is about time that the US takes advantage. A good relationship with Syria would isolate and separate the Iran problem from the Arab mideast. This is a no brainer for the US best interests if it can overcome Israel's lobby and Israel agents in Congress.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jerryjerry5959
LIFE--Good and bad days. Just have more good ones
06:43 AM on 01/17/2011
"Israel agents in Congress." You mean if someone is Pro something, they are an agent meaning spy?

Who let the trolls out, who who who who who
11:38 AM on 01/17/2011
Agents act on behalf of others, to promote their interests, or in the case of a guy who lives near me, to sell their bicycles. It is you who said ''spy'' - what a strange thing to say. Why would you say that? You think they are spies?
07:38 PM on 01/17/2011
jerry - - Maybe a better word would be stooges.
11:36 AM on 01/17/2011
Interesting post. The story on the link was kind of creepy, Bush and Mossad, such dirty business.
05:01 AM on 01/17/2011
What? You mean we're going to TALK with them? Oh my word. What next? (sarcasm intended)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NateBk
02:38 AM on 01/17/2011
Why do we need to suck up to this ASSad??
02:15 PM on 01/17/2011
Nate -- Bashar al-Assad is polite, well-informed, diligent and sensible. This combination of characteristics is missing from most of the US Congressmen and Senators who try to determine the course of US foreign policy in the ME.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atif Ahmed Choudhury
J.D. Candidate, William and Mary College of Law
05:49 PM on 01/17/2011
He may be a more effective or even benign autocrat than most of the others in the region, but at the end of the day he is still an undemocratic autocrat. If he is truly such a great leader, then he needs to give the Syrian people what they have been yearning for for decades: liberty and the right to self-determination.
12:32 AM on 01/17/2011
Why is it such a big deal. The Ambassador didn't have to fight his way back into Damascus, it was the choice of the Neocons that we left 5 years ago.
12:10 AM on 01/17/2011
We ALL know USA had to ask Israel for permission.