More

Government Approves Comcast-NBC Merger

JOELLE TESSLER   01/18/11 07:42 PM ET   AP

Comcast Nbc

WASHINGTON — The government on Tuesday cleared the way for Comcast Corp., the country's largest cable company, to take over NBC Universal in a deal certain to transform the entertainment industry landscape.

Comcast is buying a 51 percent stake in NBC Universal, home of the NBC television network, from General Electric Co. for $13.8 billion in cash and assets.

The Justice Department and five state attorneys general said Tuesday that they have reached a court settlement allowing the companies to proceed with their combination, subject to conditions intended to preserve competition among video providers.

In addition, the five-member Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday voted 4-1 to approve the transaction, subject to similar but broader conditions.

Among other things, the government is requiring Comcast to make NBC programming available to competitors such as satellite and phone companies, as well as new Internet video services that could pose a threat to the company's core cable business. Officials want to guarantee that online video services from companies such as Netflix Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and Apple Inc. can get the movies and TV shows they need to grow – and potentially offer a cheaper alternative to monthly cable subscriptions.

The government's conditions will help ensure that the transaction cannot "chill the nascent competition posed by online competitors," said Christine Varney, head of the Justice Department's antritrust division.

Still, the conditions did not go far enough for Michael Copps, one of the three Democrats on the FCC and a vocal critic of media consolidation. Copps voted against the deal, warning that it "confers too much power in one company's hands."

Several public interest groups and at least a few members of Congress also decried the combination.

"This will ultimately mean higher cable and Internet bills, fewer independent voices in the media, and less freedom of choice for all American consumers," Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., said in a statement.

Comcast Executive Vice President David Cohen, meanwhile, stressed that none of the conditions "will disadvantage the competitive positioning of the Comcast Cable or NBC Universal businesses."

Philadelphia-based Comcast has about 23 million cable TV subscribers and nearly 17 million Internet subscribers. It also owns a handful of cable channels, including E! Entertainment and the Golf Channel, and has a controlling interest in the Philadelphia 76ers and Flyers sports teams. Comcast's SportsNet Philadelphia channel carries Flyers, Phillies and 76ers games.

Taking over NBC will transform the company into a media powerhouse. NBC Universal owns the NBC and Telemundo broadcast networks; 26 local TV stations; popular cable channels including CNBC, Bravo and Oxygen; the Universal Pictures movie studio and theme parks; and a roughly 30 stake in Hulu.com, which distributes NBC and other broadcast programming online.

Most of the government conditions outlined Tuesday will remain in effect for seven years.

One key goal of federal regulators is to ensure that satellite companies, rival cable operators and other existing pay-TV providers can still get access to marquee NBC programming at reasonable prices once the deal closes. The FCC approval establishes an arbitration process to resolve disputes between Comcast and competitors that want to buy programming. It also prohibits Comcast from withholding programming during negotiations – a practice that broadcasters have been using recently to extract higher fees from cable companies.

In addition, both the FCC and the Justice Department are imposing a series of conditions to ensure that Comcast cannot starve new Internet video providers of popular programming. Those include requirements that Comcast offer its programming to legitimate Internet video providers on the same terms and conditions that it offers other pay-TV providers. In addition, if an Internet video provider has reached an agreement to buy programming from another major media company, Comcast must make comparable programming available at equivalent prices.

Both agencies are also imposing conditions to ensure that Comcast cannot force independent programmers seeking spots in its cable lineups to withhold their content, too, from online distribution platforms.

Yet another FCC condition requires Comcast to continue offering an affordable, standalone broadband option for customers who want Internet access but not cable TV service. This condition, too, is intended help drive the growth of online video by allowing consumers to cancel their cable subscriptions without losing their Internet connections.

At least one public-interest watchdog was pleased with the government's online video conditions. Mark Cooper, director of research for the Consumer Federation of America, said they could help pave the way for Internet distributors to break the cable industry's "stanglehold" over the video market.

The FCC and the Justice Department are also requiring Comcast to relinquish its management rights – including board seats and shareholder control – in Hulu to ensure that it cannot interfere with the development of competing online services. Comcast will still be required to make NBC content available to Hulu, however.

Another key condition being imposed by both agencies bars Comcast from discriminating against Internet video traveling over its broadband network. Although the FCC recently adopted industry-wide "network neutrality" rules barring broadband providers from interfering with Internet traffic on their systems, those regulations are likely to be challenged in court. The condition would ensure that Comcast, which has come under fire for discriminating against Internet traffic in the past, would still have to abide by the rules.

Other FCC conditions require Comcast to increase local news coverage, expand children's programming and programming for Spanish-speaking viewers, add 10 new independent channels and provide a subsidized broadband service for low-income households. The FCC is also prohibiting Comcast from giving its own channels preferential placement in its cable system line-ups.

__

AP Technology Writer Ryan Nakashima in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

WASHINGTON — The government on Tuesday cleared the way for Comcast Corp., the country's largest cable company, to take over NBC Universal in a deal certain to transform the entertainment industr...
WASHINGTON — The government on Tuesday cleared the way for Comcast Corp., the country's largest cable company, to take over NBC Universal in a deal certain to transform the entertainment industr...
Filed by Jack Mirkinson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,316
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (68 total)
02:17 PM on 01/22/2011
Well, NBC used to be owned by one of the world's largest weapons manufacturers, GE. Is it really worse that our news be owned instead by a television company?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
derekc06
Good night, you Princes of Maine.
10:23 AM on 01/20/2011
Subsidized internet for low-income people is pretty cool..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediamarv
1-2-3 Is this thing working?
09:51 PM on 01/19/2011
Note to Netflix streaming users on Comcast: How long until you can't get the service anymore? Shall we start a pool?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:02 PM on 01/19/2011
I had such high hopes for this Administration. With the FCC's approval of this merger, with the two Obama appointees voting for it, I have just one more bit of confirmation that this Administration is a corporate shill, just like the last, but this time for somewhat different corporations.

My disappointment is profound.

Get ready for higher cable, internet, smartphone fees, all.
02:23 PM on 01/19/2011
If Comcast touches MSNBC's lineup of Olbermann, Maddow, and other liberal voices they will lose my business forever. Why couldn't Oprah have bought NBC rather than try to launch her own network? She has the dough by now, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith Cozart
Chaos reigns in Crowley's temple
08:05 PM on 01/19/2011
one individual paying 13 plus billion for a broadcast network... If she really has that kind of money to throw away on some thing that would be difficult to leverage a profit without a cable companies longstanding corrupt practices.
I don't even know what to say...
01:22 PM on 01/19/2011
The only beneficiaries of this merger are Comcast and GE. None of this is in the public interest and what is to prevent Comcast from selling the owned and operated stations (as GE/NBC once considered) and eliminating the requirement to provide more local news and access for minority members?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mediamarv
1-2-3 Is this thing working?
09:52 PM on 01/19/2011
The four FCC commissioners who sold out obviously think they are going to benefit sometime in the future.
photo
didyouseethat
UI's should get a clue
12:56 PM on 01/19/2011
Doing a little social engineering??? Sounds like Technology Welfare to me. Hang on Comcast subscribers. Grab your ankles.

"Broadband Adoption and Deployment. Comcast will make available to approximately 2.5 million low income households: (i) high-speed Internet access service for less than $10 per month; (ii) personal computers, netbooks, or other computer equipment at a purchase price below $150; and (iii) an array of digital-literacy education opportunities. Comcast will also expand its existing broadband networks to reach approximately 400,000 additional homes, provide broadband Internet access service in six additional rural communities, and provide free video and high-speed Internet service to 600 new anchor institutions, such as schools and libraries, in underserved, low-income areas."

http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/01/18/comcast-nbc-merger-read-the-fcc-approval-letter/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pundit Commentator
http://punditcommentator.blogspot.com
01:00 PM on 01/19/2011
this is all well and good...but according to huffpost blogger josh silver, your cable bill is going up whether or not you subscribe to comcast.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hendricks
see wikipedia
12:46 PM on 01/19/2011
This is a mess, but the media problem runs deep. The Huffington Post won't even talk about National Hiring Day.
Today is National Hiring Day. Huffington Post and the rest of the media has failed the public on fair coverage and fair reporting on the jobs issue, though they talk about the jobs problem daily. Every news source that was contacted about it, and there were about 100, has refused to talk about National Hiring Day, and it's here 1.19.11. This is a day that corporations were encouraged to hire new employees. The day suggested is Wednesday JANUARY 19, 2011.”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pundit Commentator
http://punditcommentator.blogspot.com
12:53 PM on 01/19/2011
thank you for bringing this up.
02:30 PM on 01/19/2011
If this is a GOP-spawned concept, then it makes sense that it wouldn't be recognized over here. National Hiring Day is probably only celebrated in China, because the GOP continues to support sending our jobs overseas by resisting the Democratic Party's push to end tax breaks for companies that outsource jobs overseas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hendricks
see wikipedia
01:32 PM on 01/20/2011
No its not initiated by any party, or any corporation. It's outside the government, the media, corporations, and political parties. Musea is a long running one person zine that suggests reasonable solutions to tough problems that are fair for all.
BTW no matter where it comes from, if its a fair and reasonable part of the solution of joblessness, let's consider it - and the media should too if they are going to cover the jobs issue daily - like HP.
11:31 AM on 01/19/2011
I'm waiting for an announcement on how many people will be laid off now because of this merger.
12:02 PM on 01/19/2011
Bye, Keith. Don't let the door hit you. Switch to Fox? It worked for Juan.
photo
StillIRise
The past, present and future are one
12:16 PM on 01/19/2011
Switch to Fox?  When wasn't Juan a part of Fox?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pundit Commentator
http://punditcommentator.blogspot.com
12:52 PM on 01/19/2011
You mean, the top rated anchor who transformed MSNBC? Yeah, somehow, I don't think so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pundit Commentator
http://punditcommentator.blogspot.com
12:58 PM on 01/19/2011
I'm sure there will be some staff upheaval as with any merger, but since this is a vertical integration, perhaps not so many firings?

I also don't think any of the famous name anchors are going anywhere. MSNBC started making good money once it took the programming decision "to go left".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibertyInProg
09:05 PM on 01/19/2011
Exactly, Pundit. Any decision to get rid of their liberal lineup, now that Fox News clearly has the attention of all the far-right lunatics, would be absolutely foolish. They tried that before during the beginning of the Iraq War, when they would shut up some of their anchors and tell them not to criticize the war. That's what lead to getting rid of Phil Donahue and adding all these far-right hosts who got no ratings. Now, they have Olbermann, Maddow, O'Donnell all getting about a million viewers a night.
photo
bridge to somewhere
That's impossible, even for a computer!
11:17 AM on 01/19/2011
There is this amazing place called "outside" that most people don't seem to get much exposure to nowadays. Turn off the TV, ditch cable, and get outdoors.
photo
bridge to somewhere
That's impossible, even for a computer!
11:10 AM on 01/19/2011
And my cancellation of Comcast is also a done deal now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anti politricks
better to light 1 candle than curse darkness
12:33 PM on 01/19/2011
did you tell them why?

i plan to call in a half hour, on my lunch break to cancel. i will tell them it's because 3 reasons:
1. tv is the eye of the devil
2. if they control what i see then they control what i watch. no more cable for me period.
3. i wholeheartedly disagree with this merger and what it stands for and symbolizes.
photo
intolleft
ObamaCare...getting you shovel ready
11:00 AM on 01/19/2011
Part of the deal is to let other cable companies and satellite TV to access programming. Here's hoping Comcastsports Net teams are part of that "programming".
12:19 PM on 01/19/2011
Yeah. Sure. I have beachfront property in Tennessee for ya if you believe that programming access won't be stifled.
photo
intolleft
ObamaCare...getting you shovel ready
12:28 PM on 01/19/2011
Content that is owned by someone or some other entity, should not be forced to give it away.
photo
nfatt1
You can fool some of the people all the time, all
09:50 AM on 01/19/2011
Is that a crescent in the logo ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anti politricks
better to light 1 candle than curse darkness
11:11 AM on 01/19/2011
yes. what does that mean?
12:03 PM on 01/19/2011
It's not dangerous unless it's green
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pundit Commentator
http://punditcommentator.blogspot.com
12:50 PM on 01/19/2011
are you kidding with this stuff?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pundit Commentator
http://punditcommentator.blogspot.com
10:52 PM on 01/19/2011
Off topic to everybody else.

palainausa 18 minutes ago (10:24 PM)
44 Fans
Become a fan
Just two things: 1) I wondered too if "color" had anything to do with it on a bus in a certain middle eastern country when a man gave me his seat. Was it because I was white (male), or because I was obviously a visitor, or because I looked (and was) beat? 2) Since you didn't see the Zimmern episode, there was very little skin difference between Zimmern and the locals, although there were grooming difference­­s and dress difference­­s, not to mention language. I genuinely don't know. But I do know that a certain Quebecois beer vendor in the Montreal Forum spit on the floor every time I asked for a Molson in English.

----------­----------­-----

Tourists, especially white ones, are often treated very well by foreign non-white countries with a great tradition of hospitalit­y. In India, there is a famous saying in Sanskrit. "Atithi devo bhava". It means "guest is god". This applies to guests at your house party, visits from your in-laws, friends and relatives as well as the workmen who come to fix your water filter.

Regarding Molson, I believe your experience­s goes to the other universal truth. Tastebuds are different all over the world and at all stages of civilizati­on. Tastebuds are also not static and are dependent on exposure to a variety of global cuisines, natural fruits and ingredient­s.
09:00 AM on 01/19/2011
Well, criticize now, because Comcast will soon be blocking those criticisms out of existence. I really wouldn't expect anything else from them.

They don't really like it when people criticize them, and feel it is within their right to, you know, just block and manipulate media in any way they please. Well, why not, right? They see the media as THEIR property. They see the media as simply a vehicle they can use to rip money out of the hands of Americans and make themselves richer. Anything that might endanger their profits should be eliminated. Unethical? Nothing's unethical when your sole reason for existence is to help yourself and harm everyone else.
08:55 AM on 01/19/2011
Folks, I just don't understand the thinking of the FCC that destroyed local radio in 1988 as Hugh Stegman, wrote, "One ignores the engineering side at their peril. That's how the corporations got control of radio, by giving the licensee control of, and legal responsibility for, the transmitter and therefore the air itself." "The disease is that control of transmitters was taken away from the engineer signed into the log, and given to licensees off in some holding company incorporated in Delaware or whatever. It sounds like just a technical thing, but the effect was to centralize radio, kill off most local programming, and allow octopus like Clear Channel to take over." Now the approval of the FCC Comcast/NBC merger, I don't what say about that other then it just put access to media further in the toilet for the People. Former Producer/Programmer Pacifica/Wpfw Radio.>>Billy Ray (1/19/11)
12:25 PM on 01/19/2011
I know exactly what you are saying. We have Cumulus and Clear Channel stations here. I don't think we have an independent radio station for miles around that isn't one of those companies' holdings.

What's next? Banks are too big to fail. Media takeovers are making these corporations too big to squash!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pundit Commentator
http://punditcommentator.blogspot.com
12:55 PM on 01/19/2011
The FCC is not working in the interest of the people.