More

Reid Opens The Door To Longer Background Checks For Gun Purchasers


First Posted: 01/19/11 02:47 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Tuesday appeared to open the door to pushing legislation that would revamp the waiting period and background checks administered to prospective gun purchasers.

The Nevada Democrat, in a sit-down interview with Las Vegas journalist Jon Ralston, said that the recent shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and 19 others had made clear the need to prevent firearms from landing in the hands of the mentally disturbed.

"There should be a waiting period for the purchase of a handgun to stop someone who has mental problems from buying a gun. We can check instantly, it is so easy to do," Reid said, according to a transcript of the show.

"I think that it is really important that we find out and keep people like this guy from going and buying a gun, he had just bought it a few days before," Reid added, when asked if something needed to be done federally. "I have learned a couple things from this thing dealing with Giffords ... Number one, we have to do something about our mental health all over this country ... We cannot, we cannot let people who are sick not be treated because bad things can happen. And secondly, I do not want to take anyone's gun away from them, but I think there are things that we can do. I think the waiting period is important."

As the Senate Democratic leader and a longtime proponent of Second Amendment rights (Reid nearly earned the endorsement of the National Rifle Association during the most recent reelection campaign), the senator's calls for more restrictions on firearm purchases echo a bit farther than those of his colleagues -- notably, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), a longtime gun control proponent.

That said, in a follow up statement to The Huffington Post, Reid spokesman Jon Summers cautioned that now is not the time to consider legislative responses to the Giffords shooting.

"There is still an investigation taking place and we should allow it to run its course," Summers said. "That said, there will be time to debate the variety of proposals that are out there and whatever action we take should be in the best interests of both protecting the public as well as the principles laid out in the Constitution."

Reid has pushed for similar restrictions before. As a state legislator in 1969, he helped pass legislation establishing a firm waiting period for the purchase of a handgun. Such restrictions don't exist currently exist on the federal level. The Brady Act imposed a five-day waiting period before a handgun could be sold. That policy ended in November 1998 when computerized systems became operational.

Whether the political will exists to restore the old law or to tinker with other elements of gun control legislation isn't entirely clear. On the Hill, Democrats are skeptical. Rep John Yarmuth (D-Ky.), who supports a bill to outlaw high-capacity magazines, told The Huffington Post that he "can't imagine" how such legislation could pass, let alone "get to the floor."

And yet, on Wednesday morning, former Vice President Dick Cheney -- no shrinking violet with respect to Second Amendment rights -- said that "maybe it's appropriate to reestablish" limits to magazine sizes.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Tuesday appeared to open the door to pushing legislation that would revamp the waiting period and background checks administered to prospective gun p...
WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Tuesday appeared to open the door to pushing legislation that would revamp the waiting period and background checks administered to prospective gun p...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 987
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
JStading 11:29 PM on 01/19/2011
I understand the push to close the "gun show loophole" (to be clear - the exception of background check requirements for private sales). I don't get added waiting periods that won't do anything. The initial justification for waiting periods was to ensure that people didn't buy guns in the heat of passion to commit crimes. Did it work? Sure, but it also got some people killed because they couldn't buy  Read More...
05:41 PM on 02/24/2011
People who are seeking a ccw license aren't typically the individuals who are planning to misuse a firearm. As such, extending the time for a background check doesn't necessarily increase the safety of the populace, but gives more cause for frustration from law abiding citizens. http://www.djoutfitters.com
photo
PRR Fan
8 year-olds, dude.....
03:24 PM on 02/16/2011
Senator Reid, how will puting delays on gun purchase make things any better when the person who prompted this wouldn't be in the system? If you really want to prevent nuts like Lockner from getting guns, mandate that law enforcement turn over people they get reported to them for maniacal behavior be turned over for evaluation, even if Mom's a big wheel in the County. Oh, and give some sort of legal immunity to people and institutions who, in good faith, report someone whom they suspect of being mentally disturbed.
photo
GonzoBrawler
Hunter S. Thompson is my hero
06:17 AM on 01/21/2011
I applaud any politician that wants a more thorough, and comprehens­ive backround check for anyone that wants to buy guns.... But the fact is, its most likely going to be a huge waste of time, because the GOP, teabaggers­, NRA, lobbyists, and every gun crazy person will fight any kind of gun law reform with every breath they have in their ignorant bodies. For some reason, they just do not get the point that our gun laws, and backround checks simply are not adequate enough to keep guns out of the hands of disturbed, violent individual­s. Instead, they lobby to make our laws even more lax, and lenient, to let people carry concealed weapons in even more places than they already can... including college campuses, political rallies, and town hall events....­.. If these people havnt learned from the VA Tech, and Tucson tragedies, they never will, and the country needs to move forward without them, or their support.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:44 AM on 01/21/2011
Watch the following videos and you wll understand why we don't need more laws...First is from a 20-20 show the other is a funny but insightful video about crimminals...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR9RN_iSKtg&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER8Ieop6_Jc&playnext=1&list=PLDDE16A8783CFF982&index=38
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
03:19 PM on 01/20/2011
Congress should have an actual debate about some means to alleviate the gun tragedies that are a daily occurrence in this country. Reid's "suggestion" has a long ways to go and even at that, I noticed his aide quickly backing away from any legislation related to the Giffords shooting. Typical concern for the safety of the congressional members, but not one practical action designed to protect the rest of the people. King of New York introduced a bill to ban anyone from carrying a gun in the vicinity of a federal official. Jackson of Illinois wants an additional 10% added to their budgets for security, Burton of Indiana suggested enclosing the House gallery in Plexiglas, and not even a mention of civilized debate on the safety of their constituents. It's time for the bully NRA to stop lobbying against($$$$$$) any sensible gun control, even Dick Cheney and Levy of Heller "fame" and the Cato Institute have realized something needs to be done to staunch the horrific bloodletting by firearms....
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
rikilii
Hush, was the first word you were taught...
04:21 PM on 01/20/2011
The NRA is not lobbying against sensible gun control, because no sensible gun control has been proposed (as you so astutely pointed out).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
12:18 PM on 01/21/2011
Any problem with withholding the confirmation on any ATF director for the past years. How's about the "juvenile" and gun purchasing D'Cruz with his "cool" web contributions? And I'm just getting started....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
txgrandpa6
Progressive Democrat living in Texas!
10:53 AM on 01/21/2011
A very insightful post, F&F. I am a proponent of a background check and a waiting period for gun ownership. However, the gun show loophole must be closed if we are to get serious about a background check and a waiting period. As a Texas resident I have no problem with these sensible recommendations, depending on how the EXACT wording of any proposed legislation comes out of committee.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
12:19 PM on 01/21/2011
Thank you, friend.....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:01 PM on 01/20/2011
John F. Kennedy: "By calling attention to 'a well regulated militia,' 'the security of the nation,' and the right of each citizen 'to keep and bear arms,' our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy... The Second Amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason I believe the Second Amendment will always be important." John F. Kennedy, Junior Senator of MA in a 1959 letter to E.B. Mann
03:36 PM on 01/20/2011
Your agenda would be better served by a quote from someone who wasn't a victim of gun violence, in my opinion.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
rikilii
Hush, was the first word you were taught...
04:22 PM on 01/20/2011
To the contrary, it is all the more relevant because he was a victim, especially considering the fact that he was killed by one of the weapons that gun-control advocates swear on a stack of bibles that they will never touch.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:42 PM on 01/20/2011
I apologize for that, my intent is that Obama and Kennedy are said to be alike in their thinking at times it seemed appropiate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donnie4488
01:29 PM on 01/20/2011
Reid says checks can be done instantly.If so,why the need for a waiting period?Once again the politician's idea of reform is to burden law-abiding citizens with more hoops to go through.What sort of check would be used to check for mental illness?People don't walk around with a sign saying "I'm mentally unstable.Don't sell me a gun."Current privacy laws prevent information concerning medical conditions from being released without a persons consent.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
12:29 PM on 01/20/2011
Why not make state issued concealed carry licenses valid in all 50 states just the way state issued driver's licenses are good anywhere in the USA?
12:52 PM on 01/20/2011
Future Loughners would certainly applaud that notion, provided they could afford the travel expenses.
12:54 PM on 01/20/2011
Future Loughners don't care. They don't get concealed carry permits, they carry illegally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
enlightened45
01:15 PM on 01/20/2011
And I thought you were a dedicated "states' rights" man.....
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
01:24 PM on 01/20/2011
I don't see that letting me drive from Florida to New York with my Florida D/L is a violation of states rights. Why shouldn't I be able to carry concealed the same way? I don't have to take out a copy of the driving rules as I cross each state's boundaries, just drive in a reasonable and prudent manner and obey all posted traffic signs along the way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:34 AM on 01/20/2011
"There should be a waiting period for the purchase of a handgun to stop someone who has mental problems from buying a gun. We can check instantly, it is so easy to do," Reid said, according to a transcript of the show."

This statement from Reid is a non sequtur. It actually makes more sense if he had said:

"There should be no waiting period for the purchase of a handgun to stop someone who has mental problems from buying a gun. We can check instantly, it is so easy to do,"
10:26 AM on 01/20/2011
As a farm kid who lived with guns in the house, I would like to start a discussion about how guns are planned to be used in our current society. My idea is to develop a system by which we mirror some of the requirements and practices of the automobile licensure practices. It is an idea which would require monetary investments in parts beyond the cost of the fire arm. It would require the gun to be operationally sound, registered, and the licensure to have a short renewal time aka the automobile yearly renewal. It would require a physical exam of some sort to ensure the physical and mental health of the person being licensed to use the fire arm. A demonstration of skill in the use of the fire arm should be a part of that package as well - in the same way that we take drivers' exams and have vision assessments prior to being licensed to drive. The practice that every vehicle which is to be driven on any roadway requires license, any gun to be used should also be licensed.
I have problems with the lax enforcement of research at gun shows makes me ask for opinions about them. How can we tighten the sales to protect the innocently targeted in some of these sales? Is there a better way to structure them?
photo
Belle Starr
cattle rustler and horse thief
10:37 AM on 01/20/2011
It looks like we are in the same boat. I just can't see a practical, enforceable answer. Even if we incorporated your suggestions into practice into buying guns, how do we deal with the guns already out there?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dmherb
I don't even know how to read...so...yeah
11:00 AM on 01/20/2011
At gun shows no live rounds would certainly do the trick. Shooting blanks or rubber bullets is far less likely to kill someone.
11:19 AM on 01/20/2011
If we could somehow insure that all the guns sold at gun shows to persons unknown, without background checks or documentation of any kind, could only shoot blanks, we would have gotten somewhere.
09:42 AM on 01/20/2011
No taxes for billionaires! Ammo-clips for nut-cases! Paleo-Christians for President!
09:21 AM on 01/20/2011
You cannot legislate criminal thought or intent...this is a complete charade.
renoir
Comfortably Numb
09:27 AM on 01/20/2011
Yeah? Then why do we take off our shoes at airports?

Nothing wrong with slowing down the process... it is not stated in the constitution that the right to bear arms includes the right to bear arms RIGHT THIS SECOND.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eljefefx
09:36 AM on 01/20/2011
Where does it say you have to wait?
12:58 PM on 01/20/2011
We take our shoes off at the airport as part of what is called "security theater".
09:41 AM on 01/20/2011
Do you know the meaning of the word charade? (Just curious)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paulnps
09:11 AM on 01/20/2011
Never mind getting anything like Reid is talking about through this lobbyist money loving Congress. Never mind that the U.S. is the number one supplier for weapons to the drug thugs in Mexico. Never mind that we are the number one exporter of weapons internationally.

It's just business...no matter who dies. After all people kill people...not guns. Tell that to the thousands who are dying in Mexico from the assault and other weapons that drug lords are buying daily in the U.S.
09:10 AM on 01/20/2011
That's funny, he was practically carrying a 6-shooter during his Nevada re-election.
photo
Belle Starr
cattle rustler and horse thief
08:43 AM on 01/20/2011
I understand why so many people want to get rid of guns, but does anyone really think that legislating ownership will end gun-related violence? I'd just like to know what you think and why you think it.
09:45 AM on 01/20/2011
You've already decided "what we think'. Your invitation to dialogue is unmistakably rhetorical.
photo
Belle Starr
cattle rustler and horse thief
10:12 AM on 01/20/2011
It really isn't Johnny. I'm a life-long, gun-owning Dem who is in the process of trying to develop an opinion on where I stand with restrictions. On one hand I believe that the longer something is in a society, the harder it is to get rid of, but gun restriction doesn't really fall into that category does it?

I'm sorry that I wasn't clearer in my question. I really do want to hear thoughts on the subject.
photo
Opygollopy
The more I talk to people, the more I love my dogs
09:47 AM on 01/20/2011
Canada has 36 million people and 7 million of them own guns. We have strict gun laws. 49 people were killed last year with guns. 49 in a YEAR.

America has 10 x the population and 89 people A DAY are killed. Thats 32,485 people A YEAR.

Even with a multiplier of 100, in Canada, it would only be 4900 people. There is a huge difference.

We have to go into gun training, have background checks, detailed ones. Anyone with mental conditions, ie. bi-polar, depression, anger management problems, etc. are refused. Anyone with domestic abuse on their records, male or female are refused.

Anyone who is divorced or separated have to have their ex-spouses interviewed before being licensed and a signed document from them for the license to be issued.

All gun sales are from gun shops, no travelling gun shows - you want to sell guns, you need to adhere to strict laws. If they don't, they are fined heavily and do jail time. The onus is on the merchant. If he/she sells a gun to anyone without doing proper checks and the gun is involved in a crime, they are given equal jail time as the perpetrator.

It works. It is harsh but as I said before - 49 people were victims last year in a country with 7 million gun owners. Do the math.
09:53 AM on 01/20/2011
Yeah, but you don't have Freedoms endowed to you by the Creator, now, do you? That Socialistical medicine of yours proves it.
renoir
Comfortably Numb
10:07 AM on 01/20/2011
That's it. I'm immigrating.
04:32 AM on 01/20/2011
reid's words should spur another increase in gun sales. you would think he's getting a commision.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
05:44 AM on 01/20/2011
One of their friends and colleagues is fighting to get her life back, changed forever and lucky to be alive, because the gutless cowards in Washington allow gun lobbyists and the NRA to spread the madness and mayhem across this country with ease, FOR GREEDY PROFITS. Everyone in Washington is guilty to some degree (some more than others) for the attack on Giffords and so many others. Their cowardice is killing and brutally injuring Americans on a regular basis that is only going to increase. BAN ALL ASSAULT WEAPONS IN AMERICA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eljefefx
08:29 AM on 01/20/2011
My friend, an assault weapon was not used in the attack. Furthermore, assault weapons (real, bonafide assault weapons) have been heavily regulated and not open to general civilian purchase since the National Firearms Act of 1936. The process to acquire one is not simple and it is not short.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hershobr
09:06 AM on 01/20/2011
Stop using this attack to try and get gun laws changed. Nothing you've said has anything at all to do with what happened in AZ.