iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Key Senator Urges Obama To Push Foreclosure Relief In State Of The Union

Jeff Merkley Letter

First Posted: 01/20/11 09:00 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) is urging President Barack Obama to pledge a new round of foreclosure relief during his State of the Union address next week. In a letter to the president obtained by The Huffington Post, Merkley said the administration's current anti-foreclosure programs have proven woefully inadequate, and pushed for a more thorough program to keep families in their homes.

"A record one million families lost their home to foreclosure last year," Merkley wrote. "Next week, Mr. President, you will have the attention of the nation. I urge you to use this opportunity to renew efforts to tackle the national foreclosure crisis."

Merkley's call for presidential leadership on foreclosures comes as infighting among federal regulators appears to have stalled out key reforms to the bank divisions that work with troubled borrowers and process foreclosures.

The FDIC has been pushing to impose new requirements on the operations of those divisions, which are known as mortgage servicers. The agency has been engaged in heated negotiations with other regulators at the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). According to a source familiar with the negotiations, the Fed had initially opposed the plan, but agreed to support the rules after a few weeks of negotiations. The OCC, however, which is currently responsible for regulating the largest mortgage servicers -- Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup -- has resisted those rules. The OCC has never publicly sanctioned a mortgage servicer, despite widespread court findings of servicer fraud in the foreclosure process.

The Treasury Department, which had supported the new rules, had expected an agreement between agencies by Friday, Jan. 14, according to a spokesman. That anticipated agreement has not yet come to fruition.

But Treasury itself is engaged in a delicate dance on foreclosure policy -- defending the foreclosure prevention program criticized by Merkley, even as it urges sweeping reform of the bank divisions that participate in that program.

"The goal of the [Home Affordable Modification Program] was to prevent three to four million foreclosures," Merkley wrote, "but to date, fewer than 600,000 homowners have been approved."

Merkley is a persistent advocate for financial reform, and co-authored a key provision of last year's Wall Street overhaul legislation known as the Volcker Rule, which bars banks from speculating with taxpayer money.

At a Wednesday meeting of the Mortgage Bankers Association, Cindy Gertz, Treasury's Director of Operations for HAMP, praised the servicers involved in the Treasury plan, noting that they had ramped up staffing in order to deal with the foreclosure flood. Treasury spokeswoman Andrea Risotto told HuffPost that Gertz's praise for servicers was restricted to HAMP, and not to any other servicer activities. But servicer abuses within HAMP have been widely documented, with borrowers frequently making good on loan modification arrangements only to be foreclosed on.

Risotto noted that Treasury has a "compliance agent" that inspects servicers once a month to make sure banks are implementing the program correctly. Nevertheless, servicer employees have admitted to fraudulently robo-signing hundreds of foreclosure documents a day as a matter of ordinary procedure. Treasury has never sanctioned a servicer for violating HAMP rules, and maintains that it has no authority to do so, because the program is voluntary for banks.

But as Treasury defends servicers with one hand, it is also demanding fundamental reform of the servicer industry with the other. On Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner called for an overhaul of the way servicers are paid, arguing that the status quo is a "broken" system.

Regulatory agencies are debating whether to include standards for servicer conduct in new "skin-in-the-game" regulations for the mortgage bond market. The Wall Street overhaul legislation contains a provision requiring banks to retain at least five percent of the default risk whenever they sell mortgages off to investors. But there's a key exception to the rule: for standardized, top-quality loans, banks will not have to retain any of the risk. The FDIC hopes that by including mortgage servicing rules in the definition of a standardized, top-quality mortgage, they can create a new gold standard for mortgage lending that is immune from current abuses.

But these new regulations would only reform the way that servicers operate with regard to new mortgages. They will not help the millions of borrowers already trapped in unaffordable loans, nor will they provide a way to manage the widening gyre of fraud allegations and other improprieties that pose massive potential losses at the nation's too-big-to-fail banks.

In a speech Wednesday, FDIC Chair Sheila Bair warned, "Chaos in mortgage servicing and foreclosure is introducing a dangerous new uncertainty into this fragile market." Bair suggested creating a foreclosure disaster fund akin to the BP oil spill fund that would compensate wronged homeowners and investors, while capping liabilities for big banks.

Merkley wants to find a solution that deals with homeowners already facing foreclosure (and bank fraud). He's pushing for a six-point program to overhaul the current foreclosure system, including new standards for servicer conduct and new legal mechanisms to provide debt relief to deserving families.

Central to the program is a reform of the bankruptcy code, dubbed by Merkley as "lifeline bankruptcy reform." Mortgages are currently excluded from the bankruptcy process, so even if borrowers declare bankruptcy -- a process that is difficult to qualify for and comes with serious financial penalties -- they cannot get debt relief on their mortgage. By making mortgages subject to renegotiation in bankruptcy under the supervision of a judge, Merkley hopes to establish a process that would allow borrowers to remain in their homes without simply granting a get-out-of-debt free card to everyone whose home value has declined since the collapse of the housing bubble.

"This makes much more sense than paying for modifications," economist Dean Baker, co-Director of the Center for Economic Policy and Research, told HuffPost. Under HAMP, the Treasury pays servicers $1,000 to implement each loan modification, plus an additional $1,000 for every year that borrowers keep paying on the modified loan.

A similar program for farm loans was adopted during the mid-1980s and helped thousands of family farms avoid foreclosure, and a recent IMF report suggested bankruptcy reform as an effective solution to the U.S. mortgage mess. The same report found that the high rate of foreclosure may be responsible for between 1 percent and 1.25 percent of the U.S. unemployment rate, currently at 9.4 percent.

Mortgage bankruptcy reform was endorsed by then-Sen. Barack Obama during his presidential campaign, but died in the Senate in Spring 2009 amid weak backing from President Obama. Senate Republicans, who pushed for bankruptcy to be the appropriate way to deal with faltering megabanks, did not believe that consumers should receive the same treatment. Several bank-friendly Democrats also opposed the bankruptcy overhaul, prompting Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) to fume that banks "frankly own the place," referring to Congress.

Merkley also calls for an end to the "dual-track" system, in which mortgage servicers begin the foreclosure process even as they negotiate loan modifications with troubled borrowers. The system allows banks to foreclose as quickly as possible if the modification falls through, but also leads to many unnecessary foreclosures as banks improperly continue with foreclosures on successful modifications. Merkley would also require servicers to establish a single individual to contact borrowers, preventing paperwork mix-ups and other bank confusion which lead to improper foreclosures, and establish an independent party to review whether banks have followed the rules on foreclosures.

OCC policy already bans the dual-track system unless the process is required by mortgage bond agreements, but the OCC is yet to enforce that ban with any sanction against banks that violate it.

The potential impact of other elements in Merkley's plan is less clear. He would implement a "short-refinance" plan, which would allow homeowners who owe more on their loan than their house is worth to refinance into a new loan at the current value of their home. Government agencies would then pay the existing bank to expunge the remaining debt levels. But Baker was skeptical that such a program would be workable. With home prices down dramatically nationwide from their bubble-level peaks, even outright housing speculators will be sure to seek relief, triggering a government payout to the very banks who caused the problem by lending recklessly in the midst of a bubble. "There is not going to be any plausible means test that you can put in place that will prevent almost anyone in this situation from taking advantage of the opportunity," Baker said.

Merkley would also provide a $5,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers in an effort to boost home sales. But Baker said such an arrangement is unlikely to be an efficient mechanism to lift the struggling housing market.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) is urging President Barack Obama to pledge a new round of foreclosure relief during his State of the Union address next week. In a letter to the president obta...
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) is urging President Barack Obama to pledge a new round of foreclosure relief during his State of the Union address next week. In a letter to the president obta...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 256
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aristedes DuVal
Composer, Lyricist, Rock singer, Band Leader, Reco
12:24 AM on 01/28/2011
Confiscate all properties owned by Illegals until immigration is reformed! To both Houses of Congress: When are you going to enforce the Mexican Border and STOP THE ILLEGAL INVASION, make English the official language of the U.S. & begin to expel the nearly 30 MILLION Illegals who are destroying the economy of the USA & bringing down the American Standard lower than its been in decades?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Cause Endures
09:29 PM on 02/07/2011
Do you have any evidence for any of these claims or are you just reacting to things you don't understand again?

Make "English" the official language of the United States? What will that do again? Besides guarantee a loss of territory.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
Vegan, not a Murderer
05:43 PM on 01/25/2011
Obama wants foreclsosures to go on, since JPM Chase is in bed with him.

Before posters get the wrong idea, I voted for him.
11:16 AM on 01/22/2011
Obama will disappoint the America Public, AGAIN, and will not even address the foreclosure issue. Geithner has apparently sold him a bill of goods that more foreclosures will stabilize the market. A pure nonsensical theory. Obama is a trained lawyer. He knows that a foreclosure procured by robosigning is a fraud and a void judgment. But instead of addressing this issue, I believe Axelrod said there are "some problems" in the foreclosure process. Obama administration, hello, rampant perjury is not a "problem". It is a crime!
09:08 AM on 01/22/2011
Foreclosure RELIEF? Foreclosure is a legal remedy for non payment. You set a very dangerous precedent when you empower the government to step in and interceed involving monies owed. If you signed the mortgage papers, you knew what you were getting into. Just because the market collapsed doesn't mean everyone else should be on the hook for your failed investment. Also, if you've lost your job and can't pay your mortgage, that is not a reason to have the government subsidize your house payment either. The faster we bite the bullet and quit delaying the inevitable, the quicker we'll turn these houses around and get them into the hands of people who can actually afford them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aristedes DuVal
Composer, Lyricist, Rock singer, Band Leader, Reco
12:25 AM on 01/28/2011
Yes The Chinese, The Indians, The MessiKans, oh, & WALL STREET.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ACMSinc
04:05 AM on 01/22/2011
Who ever wrote in here blaming the Consumer borrowers and using them as scape goats let me just says this:
You are using the same logic as blaming passengers of a discount airline for their deaths if it turn out that the plane have been rigged and flown by monkeys and then say, Shouldn't they have known they should pay more?
In reality the gushing of the collaterliized debt markets and greed meant the original lenders had no motive to actually vet the recipients-they wouldn't be trying to collect the debt themselves anyway, instead they would do anything to to entreat consumers to borrow far beyond their means reassuring in a booming economy them they would be suckers not to buy buy buy !
photo
ibsteve2u
Someone who cares - to his unending regret
05:05 AM on 01/22/2011
You have it exactly right...I recall getting letter and phone call after letter and phone call at the turn of the millennium begging me to take out a home loan even though I had recently gotten divorced and left a home behind and had lost the will even to work towards my own survival...let alone assume the responsibility for another home.

Although I did not partake of the poisoned wine the bankers offered me, when I consider all of the Americans with families who were similarly inundated...who sat there on the cusp of home affordability and who did not have the understanding of what Republicans policies - particularly inequitable free trade - were about to do to the American people that I did...

Well, I cannot blame Americans when the bankers - people who, today, live on the respect earned by their predecessors - used their seeming authority to say "Yes, you most certainly can afford a home! Just sign here, and your family's dream home - and yard!!!!...and your children's access to better schools...will become a reality!".

For that is precisely what the bankers did...they transformed the American Dream into a weapon. I don't think enough of the American people have experienced never having had a yard or a decent school for their children to understand how compelling that vision - in the hands of a banker; a master liar - can be.
09:14 AM on 01/22/2011
You're making the counterpoint for them. You were inundated with marketing materials and "too good to be true" offers, and yet, you chose not to partake? As did millions of other people. And why not? Cause you knew better, as should they have. Everyone was betting on the continued market escallation and when it went the other way they got caught. When you enter into a mortgage you know you can't pay for once the teaser expires with the idea that you'll refi or flip it before the other shoe drops and it blows up in your face, that's no reason to get bailed out by the rest of us who acted responsibly. At that point, you are a real estate investor not a home owner and with investment comes risk. This is no different than if you took a bath in the stock market or put your paycheck on red in las vegas and lost, then wanted someone else to pay your debt.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
04:33 PM on 01/21/2011
I'd advocate a moratorium on foreclosures.

You go, Jeff!
02:02 PM on 01/21/2011
For all of those who think that more foreclosures are the answer remember this:
This country is already drowning in foreclosure properties that are not selling and millions more
will come on the market this year. And when your neighbor home goes into foreclosure, it will bring the value of your home down 30 percent.
We must pass a bankruptcy ruling to allow cramdowns and let people stay in their homes and maintain them, right now and put it into action right now. This would be the quickest and fairest solution to our dire situation.
01:26 PM on 01/21/2011
The Democrats are the reason I switched to being an Independent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:15 AM on 01/21/2011
Since those being foreclosed upon are human beings with families that are being forced to endure very real hardship and pain when they are tossed out into the street by the bank initiated proceeding, and the bank is merely a corporation for which being made to follow accepted rules, laws and prior standards is just an accounting adjustment and NOTHING MORE, then why not come to the aid of the wronged homeowners?

Fines for the banks are merely accounting adjustments, but foreclosures for homeowners cause very real pain for human beings! (Jail time is much more appropriate for the bankers that engaged in the many frauds evidenced.)
09:17 AM on 01/22/2011
foreclosures are initiated by the non payment of the borrower.
02:31 PM on 01/22/2011
"Tossed out into the street" overdramatizes the situation. In reality, they are tossed from housing that they can't afford and into housing that they can afford.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:58 AM on 01/21/2011
It makes perfect sense to allow for the letter of the law to be followed and that the iniators of the various frauds (the perps) involved here (fraudulent robo-signing, and most egregious breaking the chain of title during the securitization process, faked valuations for loans, selling junk as AAA, etc.) to be held accountable for their illegal activity by CEASING ALL FORECLOSUIRES NOW!

If the banks broke it, they must be held accountable!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sarah Albers
no longer quite so empty
02:23 AM on 01/21/2011
The hard part about reading these comments is that all of them are partially right. I don't believe that we should subsidize the whole country's worth of mortgages in trouble. However, I also don't believe that the banks EVER have been really trying to help people in trouble. They routinely give bad advice and generally give the homeowner so much crap to deal with that I'd have loved to have seen them get a great big kick in their collective nuts.
I think that maybe they should be forced to change all loans currently on the books to the interest rate that they are being charged from the Fed. I do mean across the board. That way, those who have kept up on their mortgage payments get a free loan refinance for a lower interest rate.
I know from my own experience with Wells Fargo that the big banks are not interested in doing anything other than harassing their clients and scr*wing the public at large for any amount of profit they can get and I'm definitely sick of listening to them carp and whine about toxic assets. To me, they are the country's toxic assets.
05:29 PM on 01/20/2011
The true costs of not doing something dramatic and pervasive to stop the foreclosures and right the wrongs done to homeowners is becoming so overwhelming that waiting for the problem to correct itself is not just a callous disregard for those caught by this "inside" big business, big banks, big government sinister trap, but an American Empire killing event.
Think about the broken homes, the broken lives, the public health issues, the children that do not go to school and get a high school diploma and the real costs of taking care of those people for the rest of their lives.
We had better start building trillions of dollars worth of prisons, and other treatment facilities for the casualties of this perversely insane and sadistic treatment of our good hard-working people and families. It costs between $50,000 and $100,000 per year to incarcerate a person.
Millions and millions of families have been foreclosed on.
The gloating and cheering of seeing your neighbors go down the drain is akin to the crowds cheering on the Guillotine in the French Revolution.
At least in France, they ultimately tired of seeing their neighbors both guilty and innocent pay the price for the actions of the aristocracy that controlled 80% of all the wealth.
Sound familiar?
Please stop.
09:19 AM on 01/22/2011
Would you like to write me a check for my mortgage please... otherwise I'll become a criminal. Thats what you're saying right?
04:08 PM on 01/20/2011
I am rather courious about the banks foreclosing on so many homes. What are they intending to do with all of these homes, no one can afford them? Why are they willing to pay all of the realestate taxes, and perhaps insurance? One million homes were foreclosed on last year, it will take ten years to resell all of those homes. Something does not add up here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeckyJustice
Stop the frickin Fracking. NOW!
05:11 PM on 01/20/2011
The answer is simple – banks have insurance. The borrower has typically paid either private mortgage insurance or it is insured through Fannie/Freddie. So they go through the foreclosure process and then collect the insurance on the home. In the case of Fannie/Freddie, the taxpayers are going to pay them the whole mortgage amount owed, plus thousands of dollars for their time and trouble to foreclose.
10:14 PM on 01/20/2011
yes, Becky! well stated.
they *prefer* a FC. the bank gets the house to resell, collects insurance and then, in some states, gets to sue the original family for "deficiency" if they lost money in the resale.
it is a toxic three-fer for banks. the family on the curb, credit trashed and having to find a place to rent that disregards credit score.
an American tragedy. atrocious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sarah Albers
no longer quite so empty
02:06 AM on 01/21/2011
The other benefit to the bank is that they will now have clear title to the property. They haven't had clear titles since MERS got involved and all of the "rules" regarding proper property transfer were ignored.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeckyJustice
Stop the frickin Fracking. NOW!
03:27 PM on 01/20/2011
Well, I live in Oregon and my son's home is in foreclosure, but there is a big mistake in Merkley's proposal. The banks do NOT own these mortgages. They service these mortgages. In fact there is a question if they even know who does own the mortgage. The PSAs on my son's home are non-existant. The present Servicer on his home, OneWest Bank, appointed a successor trustee, BEFORE OneWest was assigned the loan? OneWest was assigned the loan by an employee of OneWest, who also claims to be a Vice President of MERS. Not to mention, IndyMac, and others. She also has a variety of job titles. Attorney in Fact. Authorized Signatory. (Trying to find one that works?)

IndyMac was the original Servicer, and continued until last month, long after they had been taken over by OneWest. One would think they still are the servicer, since they call here up to 8 times per day. Neat thing is, now OneWest also calls several times a day. Their reason for calling? They said it is because they are trying to help us. Their message? They didn't recieve one or more items of paperwork for reorganizing the loan. (Doesn't matter how many times my son sends it, by certified mail, they didn't get one or two pieces, or one of them was outdated.)

Too bad our Government didn't put them through all this before they 'gave' them all our money...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gray Mouser
Former Republican
03:01 PM on 01/20/2011
Look, it is painful to get thrown out of a home. There can be no doubt about that. But, we cannot willy-nilly protect or guarantee all who are in trouble. Some are there simply because they over-extended, were gaming the system, or were trying to ride the bubble for investment purpose. To those folks I say "Nice try".

Others have been burned through no fault of their own, were trying to to the American dream the right way, and deserve a second look and, perhaps, some assistance. I say it doesn't hurt to look at those situations a bit closer.

Still others have been scammed by real estate agents, banks, brokers, et al. To those I say, re-write the loans under fair terms, no questions asked. It may well be they still can't afford the mortgage, but at least they will have a fair chance under which to make that decision.

Just saying....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BeckyJustice
Stop the frickin Fracking. NOW!
03:55 PM on 01/20/2011
You mean like we willy-nilly protected the banks, so their CEOs could get their multi-million dollar bonuses?
04:29 PM on 01/20/2011
the reason they were scammed is because they were greedy little pigs, looking for the quick flip, looking for the easy deal. I hope they have all learned a lesson...it's serious business when you sign your name to a note for many hundreds of thousands of dollars. Think before you sign, if you don't understand what you are signing, hire someone to look out for your interests, no one elses.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:33 PM on 01/20/2011
The other reason they were scammed is because predatory mortgage brokers took advantage of them to feed the ravenous Wall Street subprime mortgage bond market. It takes a mark and a grifter for a scam to happen. Greed is either good or bad. It can't be good for Wall Street and bad for Main Street.