iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Did The Sun Rise 2 Days Early In Greenland? Global Warming May Be Cause

Greenland

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 01/20/11 04:36 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

Vampires aren't the only ones who worry about the sun rising. After living in complete darkness for a chunk of winter, one might think Greenland citizens would be happy to finally see sunlight. But instead, the first sight of sun sent residents of Ilulissat, a town on the western coast, into a panic, with good reason - the sun supposedly rose two days early.

According to LiveScience, Ilulissat is about three degrees north of the Arctic Circle - where the sun doesn't set during summer solstice, and the sun doesn't rise on winter solstice. In other words, people living near this region experience winters without any sunlight. Ilulissat normally sees its first sunrise on January 13th - this year, the sun allegedly rose on January 11th instead.

Scientists are puzzled by this phenomenon, and theories are circulating like wildfire. Some speculations have already been squashed - the 2012 leap year and changes in constellations are both considered unlikely explanations.

Could it all just be an illusion? Maybe so, according to Thomas Posch, with Austria's Institute of Astronomy. He hypothesizes that the sun's rays may have had a stronger bend than usual, resulting in the sun appearing earlier.

But the most troublesome theory may also be the truth. Some scientists suggest that the sun rose early due to global warming, namely, Greenland's melting ice caps. In the past year, temperatures in Greenland have risen three degrees Celcius above average. As icecaps melt, the horizon sinks down as well, which makes the sun appear earlier over the horizon. According to Tim Dixon, a professor of geodesy, "It is well known that global warming is causing most of Greenland's outlet glaciers to melt faster and draw down the inland ice." That said, there is debate over whether the melting ice sheet would affect the sunrise, given the ice's eastern location.

If Greenland's early sunrise is due to global warming, it is just the tip of the iceberg (no pun intended). Beyond the commonly spoken results of global warming, there are many unusual occurrences around the world that may also be due to our changing climate. While it seems counterintuitive, the bizarre blizzards that have recently hit the US may in fact be due to a warming Arctic. Another weird result of global warming may be that satellites speed through air faster due to increased levels of carbon dioxide creating a less dense atmosphere. Global warming has also been blamed for increased allergies, raging wildfires, and the potential reintroduction of smallpox from dead corpses. Very weird.

And now, we just may have to add "early sunrise" to the list.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Vampires aren't the only ones who worry about the sun rising. After living in complete darkness for a chunk of winter, one might think Greenland citizens would be happy to finally see sunlight. But in...
Vampires aren't the only ones who worry about the sun rising. After living in complete darkness for a chunk of winter, one might think Greenland citizens would be happy to finally see sunlight. But in...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 346
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
12:45 AM on 02/06/2011
There have been quite a bit of earthquake and volcano events over the past year or so. The Earth's crust has been changing. If the crust under Ilulissat is bulging from pockets underneath, perhaps this could cause a higher view, and people see the Sun earlier? Seems like the satellites would have caught the change in surface height, though. Might there be some sort of gaseous material between us and the Sun that refracts the light for an earlier visual of the Sun rise? Perhaps our Earth has passed through a large magnetic field(near a miniature black hole, perhaps) which has pulled the planet to a distance 2 days ahead of where it should have been?(A black hole is also a refractor of light). Seems like the astronomers would have noticed the shift in the stars, if they are checking star placements in the sky. Here's an interesting thought: experimenters with the super collider at CERN have imagined worm holes. It is possible that CERN's experiments have caused a time leap of two days. CERN has been creating very powerful magnetic fields, so who knows?
06:57 PM on 02/04/2011
also reported in Northern Finland one day early: http://www.lapinkansa.fi/cs/Satellite/Lappi/1194662390117/artikkeli/kaamos+paattyi+etuajassa+utsjoella.html
07:47 PM on 01/28/2011
All kinds of explanations but there is one overlooked. The earth is not completely round . Between the poles the earth is 41 miles shorter. One reason for this, is the amounth of ice, located near both poles. The presure of this gigantic ice shelfs will decrease when they start to melt. The effect is the gradual lift of earths crust in the polar region. If the earth is gradually becoming more round at the poles, sunlight is able the reach locations, on higher latetude. That would be the only real explanation for this remarkeble change. I have no idea how much the earth needs to lift in order to see the sun one or two days earlyer but because after months of darkness, the first day the sun is visible just a tiny bit. Like when the days start to length, is is only a few seconds. It is possible that earth's shape at the polar region is in a lifting mode. Maybe only a few meters a year or decennia, but that would be enough for the sun to be visible one or two days earlyer. This effect will become more extreem if the glaciers in the northpole region keep melting in the rate they do now. The sun will be also be one or two days longer visible next winterperiod on the roof of the world. Let's wait and see. It would alwso explain why there are no astronomical changes. I hope I am wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valhalladad
Freedom went out of style too soon
12:52 PM on 01/25/2011
"Another weird result of global warming may be that satellites speed through air faster due to increased levels of carbon dioxide creating a less dense atmosphere."

You're kidding right? Does this author understand that satellites necessarily have to be above the atmosphere, as in outer space? Statements like these are what reveal the utter inanity of the global warming bogeyman. The ice sheet would have had to have melted many miles off the top to make the sun visible a full two days earlier than normal. If true there would have to be a calculable rise in the Oceans and so far that evidence isn't to be found.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:09 PM on 01/25/2011
You may benefit from a quick google of 'atmospheric drag' and `satellite'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
valhalladad
Freedom went out of style too soon
09:37 PM on 01/25/2011
You may benefit from a quick google of 'gravity' and 'satellites' and outer space. Nice try but until a satellite reaches the upper atmosphere, increased levels of carbon dioxide will have no effect on a satellite. The people putting up satellites are way smarter than this author and apparently you. They wouldn't put them within the reach of 'atmospheric drag'. Moran.
photo
WRH Mike Rivero
Humble and concise
10:28 AM on 01/25/2011
Ever see how distorted the sun appears on the horizon? The atmosphere refracts sunlight. The colder the atmosphere is, the more dense the air becomes and the greater the shifting upward of the sun's image. So, the appearance of the refracted image of the sun 2 days early tells us the atmosphere is COLDER, not warmer.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:12 PM on 01/25/2011
It's a density gradient that affects the appearance. As in mirage. When you have free air at -45C and sea at ~0C, you get a relatively warm surface layer. When there was thick sea ice, you got -45 to the ice surface too.

Any more denials for refutation?
photo
morris111
fac fortia et patere
05:46 AM on 01/25/2011
Could we please stop blaming "global warming" for everything?? Melting glaciers did not have one damn thing to to with the real or perceive timing of the sun rise.

The Earth precesses, or wobbles as it orbits the Sun in a 23,000 year cycle . The Earth's orbit around the Sun changes shape, or eccentricity in a 100,000 year cycle. The tilt of the Earth's axis varies from 21.5 to 24.5 degress in a 41,000 year cycle. We're talking about seemingly small and insignificant incremental changes in angles tilting us towards and away from the Sun and small orbital changes placing us closer or father from the Sun. These are nearly unfathomable, titanic forces here at work and they occur over great periods of time.

It's called the Milankovitch cycle. Look it up for yourselves. It, and solar activity, are the real and tangible reasons for " Global Warming" and Global Cooling", not the current fairy tale of mean old SUV driving Republicans causing all the problems.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:24 PM on 01/25/2011
An irrelevant minor tweak.

The unfathomable, titanic force is called gravity. Isaac Newton had it all sorted out by about 1690.
photo
morris111
fac fortia et patere
08:24 PM on 01/25/2011
Yes, we know it's gravity. Thank you for your astute observations of the obvious! ;)

The amount of energy and force is so great that it is practically out of the realm of comprehension of those who cling to the ideal that mankind is the sole reason for climate change and that all other factors are irrelevent. That's what I was insinuating.
07:02 PM on 01/24/2011
There certainly seem to be some challengable facts here. As noted earlier, satellites fly in space, not the atmosphere. When icebergs melt, there is no impact on water levels, whereas when ice melts over land and drains into the ocean, the water level rises (raising the horizon) versus dropping. I hear Keith Obermann is available, maybe he could do some fact checking.
11:45 PM on 01/24/2011
I would think that would depend entirely on your vantage point, how far from the water's edge.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:14 PM on 01/25/2011
Satellites in low earth orbit experience drag from the remaining atmosphere - heat the atmosphere, increase the drag.

It's nothing to do with sea level, it's to do with the temperature gradient in the air that contacts the water/sea ice.
10:09 PM on 01/23/2011
According to my my own calculations the earths axis has deviated almost 3 meters sense the last election. Therefor while Greenland enjoys sunlight 2-3 days earlier than historically records, and likewise Antarctica goes darker 2 days earlier, expect major fluctuation in the weather patterns , especially in the sub-arid and subterranean climates north and south of the equator.
12:14 PM on 01/24/2011
now ... strange enough, there were no reports about Antarctica going darker 2 days earlier than usual ... don't you think that's a bit .... awkward?!?!
if you have any information about that, I'd appreciate a feedback

thanks
06:31 PM on 01/24/2011
What do I look like? An encyclopedia? What do you think? I'm pulling this extremely important information out of my sphincter?
07:09 PM on 01/23/2011
I thought about this a bit more. Just after the solstice, the sun creeps northward very slowly. Thus the exact day on which it first peeks above the horizon at a site just north of the Arctic circle will depend _very_ sensitively on atmospheric refraction near the horizon, which varies significantly -- enough to shift the time of sunset by the better part of a minute in ordinary circumstances. So this is a complete non-event.

I've written (correct!) computer programs for observatory time-and-the-sky calculations, so I actually know what I'm talking about, for once.
12:18 PM on 01/24/2011
Hi,
Do you happen to know if something similar has happened before? And what is the situation on the other pole?
According to your theory, the atmospheric structure should have been significantly different, so the next question would be ... why?
07:08 AM on 01/27/2011
No, I don't know if this has happened before. But the point of my post is that this can happen because of small fluctuations in the atmosphere, not "significant" differences -- the kinds of fluctuations that happen all the time anyway (and lead to weird-shaped suns at sunrise and the like, all old news). So this whole story is a complete, utter, non-story.

Incidentally, I'm not some global-warming denialist or anything. It's just that this particular event has no significance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramenra
06:42 PM on 01/23/2011
Everything was fine until the author said the satellites speed thru the air, satellites are only in the oxygenated atmosphere for a few minutes or even moments until they are in space, a vacumn.
10:12 PM on 01/23/2011
I thought the same thing. I'll bethcha that's what "nasa" told them.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:16 PM on 01/25/2011
And what defines the top of the atmosphere? What is the profile of the density of the atmosphere from 10km to 200km in altitude? Have a little think.
07:04 PM on 01/23/2011
No -- those effects are minuscule.
12:20 PM on 01/24/2011
don't think so ... powerful earthquakes do that all the time, the underwater earthquake that produced that huge tsunami also had a similar effect, and still there were no reports about sun rising days earlier in the Arctic
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thismachinekillsfascists
Exposing the GOP Lie-machine
01:13 PM on 01/23/2011
Wait, I thought global warming was a hoax perpetrated by Al Gore and thousands of international climate scientists bent on destroying the American economy?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amber15
02:32 AM on 01/24/2011
actually, global warming has been totally debunked by Fox News, the most "distrusted" news channel on the planet....(pun intended)
photo
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
07:49 AM on 01/23/2011
Great piece.  I was wondering what had happened to the writers and editorial staff of the Weekly World News, since they stopped selling it at the local Piggly Wiggly store.  Now, I know.  Next week, I hope the author writes that the early sunrise is the harbinger of the return of Elvis.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jferg61
02:07 PM on 01/23/2011
Bigfoot goes on vacation!
05:38 AM on 01/23/2011
If I recall there was a claim that the earthquake in Chile was so big that it caused the Earths axis to shift. If in fact it did then that would most likely be the reason for this early sun rise if that is even true. I don't trust any thing the GW camp has to say any more. They are full of it.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
07:17 AM on 01/23/2011
So, you believe some science then? What criteria do you use to decide which bits?
08:49 AM on 01/23/2011
You're jumping to conclusions about the earth's axis shifting. There are people who keep track of this to incredible accuracy (the International Earth Rotation Service), and it hasn't moved significantly (read, more than a few milliarcseconds). Then you go off on "the GW camp". Before you jump to that conclusion too, you might want to learn about radiative transfer and molecular absorption bands. It's pretty scary.
03:08 AM on 01/23/2011
What is meant by "as the ice level sinks, so does the horizon" (I'm paraphrasing)? Is isostatic rebound what is being implied? If so, then the effect seems a little too soon for ice sheet melting in the past couple of decades.
photo
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
07:56 AM on 01/23/2011
Thank goodness for Thomas Dolby.  He understands that

I don't believe it!
 There she goes again! 
She's tidied up, and I can't find anything! 
All my tubes and wires 
And careful notes And antiquated notions 

Maybe the Greenlanders are still using last year's calendar.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
12:39 PM on 01/23/2011
UncleSquinky: "What is meant by "as the ice level sinks, so does the horizon" (I'm paraphrasi­ng)? Is isostatic rebound what is being implied?"

No, isostatic rebound does the opposite - that's what the "rebound" in "isostatic rebound" refers to.