More

LA Judge Rules Teacher Layoffs Should Not Be Based On Seniority

Teacher Layoffs

CHRISTINA HOAG   01/21/11 08:32 PM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES — A judge on Friday approved a sweeping overhaul of how teachers are laid off in what education reformers hail as a landmark decision to keep more effective instructors in the classroom, but unions denounce as a step toward dismantling tenure policies.

The decision was the outcome of a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California in February, charging that inner-city students' right to a quality education was being violated by a last-hired, first-fired layoff policy.

"This is a historic decision for the state of California," said John Deasy, deputy superintendent of Los Angeles Unified School District. "The court stood and lifted up the voice of youth. That voice was loud and clear."

The ruling by Superior Court Judge William Highberger approved a settlement between the ACLU, the state and LAUSD in which the district agreed to shield 45 of its lowest performing schools from layoffs and to ensure that the redistribution of those layoffs will not be sent to a school that will experience greater than the district average of layoffs for that year.

It also calls for an incentive plan to attract and retain teachers and principals at the struggling schools.

"This settlement is about giving our most disadvantaged children a fighting chance at their schools," said Mark Rosenbaum, ACLU-SC chief counsel.

Teachers union United Teachers Los Angeles will appeal the ruling because it is unfair to pass on layoffs to teachers who have earned their jobs and skills, said Vice President Julie Washington.

"What it is really saying is that experience in teaching has no value," she said. "We feel that this remedy, if allowed to go through, will actually exacerbate the problem."

The union was supported by state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, who filed a brief opposing the settlement on Friday noting it "could have far reaching, unintended consequences throughout the state."

The agreement could harm the instruction quality at the 45 schools because it maintains inexperienced teachers there instead of seeking ways to bring more experienced "arguably more effective teachers," said Torlakson, who was elected last year with the endorsement of the statewide union California Teachers Association.

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, a long-standing proponent of school reform, said he was confident that Highberger's decision would stand and called on the union to collaborate on reform initiatives.

"No one is saying seniority shouldn't be a factor," he said at a news conference. "But in what successful system, when isn't performance taken into account at all? This isn't a radical notion."

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of students at three troubled middle schools in south and central Los Angeles, which have traditionally had high turnover of teachers and administrators.

Because of that turnover, a large portion of their staffs are recent graduates who expressed a desire to work in urban schools. However, layoffs over the past two years meant that the untenured teachers were the first to receive pink slips.

More than half of the teaching staffs at Edwin Markham, John H. Liechty and Samuel Gompers middle schools lost their jobs. At Liechty, 72 percent of the teachers received layoff notices; at Markham, the layoffs included almost the entire English department along with every 8th grade history teacher.

Students were taught by a revolving-door succession of substitutes who served as little more than babysitters, the lawsuit said. One substitute gave each student a C because she simply didn't know what grade to give them, the suit said.

In contrast, schools in more affluent areas of the district, where staffing is traditionally much more stable, lost far fewer teachers.

"Students fighting for their education, that's what it was all about," said Nick Melvoin, a teacher laid off from Markham Middle School last year. "This sends a message far outside the city that these kids matter."

The case came down to socioeconomic equality, said Michelle Fine, a social psychologist at City University of New York, during a three-day hearing on the settlement that took place this week.

"We have policies that have distributed pain and burden in a way that low-income schools have for generations paid a price," she said.

But Washington said the settlement does not attack the root causes of high turnover at these schools, including creating safe, clean working conditions so teachers don't leave. "My members have been screaming and hollering about this full issue for many years," she said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

LOS ANGELES — A judge on Friday approved a sweeping overhaul of how teachers are laid off in what education reformers hail as a landmark decision to keep more effective instructors in the classr...
LOS ANGELES — A judge on Friday approved a sweeping overhaul of how teachers are laid off in what education reformers hail as a landmark decision to keep more effective instructors in the classr...
Filed by Erica Liepmann  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 545
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
09:28 PM on 03/14/2011
The older one becomes, the more alienated one becomes from youth culture. I feel a huge gap already; I'm 34, teaching grades 9 and 11. How much more distant from my students will I be in 20 years?

We will share few cultural experiences or icons. My superstars will be retired, dead, or dying. The same goes for my political figures. My favorite writers will truly exist in name only. My old-fashioned sense of dress will be completely scandalized by the clothing trends of their day. I'll be a mid-fifties school marm, and to my kids, embarrassingly ancient.

Moreover, my way of teaching will be informed by what's hot now. I'm big stuff today with my e-submission options, my Promethean board, and my Elmo document reader, but this "cutting edge" technology will be laughable to my kids in 20 years.

This is not to say that younger teachers have all the answers. We need the graybeards around to impart wisdom to the greenears and to provide the anchor of stability to campus communities.

I think all we want is for newer teachers not to be the first to go always. We can all point to eye-buggingly bad teachers who are tenured. And trust me: principals know who they are. They just don't have the time to do what it takes to get rid of them. Every now and then, these teaching horrors should get booted first, and not the successful newbies.
08:00 AM on 02/24/2011
There have been so many great comments here with so many POV & I appreciate everyone taking the time to post.

I grew up in a family of teachers, in a neighborhood of educators at all education levels, & am myself a union member (USW). I hate that so many people say tenured teachers are just putting in their time & new teachers are the answer to all of our educational woes- like any generalization,
08:53 AM on 02/24/2011
it is not accurate. I had new teachers who taught because it was their 'fallback' degree for when they couldn't get a job in their chosen career & new teachers who were excited, creative, & innovative. I also had tenured teachers who were excited, creative, & innovative along with the ones who were more excited about Xmas, weekends, & summer vacations than t.he students. This is so much more complex of an issue than tenured vs. new. There are so many more contributing factors. Realistically, this is a ploy to pay less for education not bring a better education to poor schools.
Collective bargain rights determine the working environment for the teacher which means CB determines the learning environment for the student.
Thank you teachers for all you do!
04:55 PM on 01/25/2011
He's right. IME as a student, the worst teachers were the ones who had been there the longest. College included. The young energetic teachers and adjunct professors always were the most engaging and always had more enjoyable classes where learning wasn't a chore. The old seasoned teachers seemed to hate school just as much as the students and it was reflected in the classes performance. For example, i had a professor who was the head of the computer science dept for Programming I, a very basic very easy low level class, that everyone who was admitted to college can pass. The class began with about 60 students. I was one of 6 who took the final and one of 2 who passed it and passed the class. This guy still has a job.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:43 PM on 01/26/2011
Also, many of the senior teachers don't want to use new technology in the classroom.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:36 PM on 01/25/2011
Definition of an Ineffectiv­e Teacher:
An inner city teacher hired to teach 30+ students for 5 periods a day. The students are 3-4 years below grade level, yet the teacher is required to teach students on grade level (8th grade curriculum taught to 4th grade ability). The teacher must also deal with highly unmotivate­d children (behvior problems) because they know that they will be promoted no matter if they do any homework, pass any test, or demonstrat­e adequate skill level on standardiz­ed tests from year to year. When students are offered afterschoo­l and Saturday tutoring they do not show up. The teacher cannot contact the parent because the cell phone is shut off. The teacher then makes a home visit and understand­s why with everything they have tried, they are ineffectiv­e.

The effect is ineffectiv­e teachers, the cause is ineffectiv­e home environments: parents who have not realized or have no chance realizing the American Dream. The economic, educationa­lly oppressed and/or depressed have difficulty supporting their children, all they can do is send them to school and hope for the best. The District tells them we will take care of your children by cutting funding and pitting the parents and teachers against each other.....­..........­lovely system.

LOGICAL REASONING:
Ineffective environment (home & school) = Ineffective teachers

NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND, WHICH SOME WOULD HAVE YOU TO BELIEVE

Effective environment (home & school) = Ineffective teachers
photo
Righteous Fury
The history of all hitherto existing society is ..
06:19 PM on 01/24/2011
Globalization = No more well paying jobs with only a high school degree

No more well paying jobs with only a high school degree = Every kid has to go to college

Every kid has to go to college = Lots more pressure on teachers to produce

Lots more pressure on teachers to produce = Break the unions
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:00 AM on 01/25/2011
Break the unions = Import Teachers from India/China/Japan for less (H1-B Visa)

Globalization full circle!
photo
Righteous Fury
The history of all hitherto existing society is ..
06:07 AM on 01/25/2011
Well done.
05:12 PM on 01/24/2011
As I recall, there was an LA TImes article a few months ago about a middle school where the principal wanted to try some teaching methods (such as team teaching) that veteran teachers didn't want to try. And veteran teachers weren't willing to teach in that neighborhood. So the principal gathered a group of young eager teachers, who were starting to show some real progeress, then they all got laid off for lack of seniority. So now the kids get substitutes and a seriously substandard level of teaching. I'm not willing to sacrifice hindreds of kids for the sake of a union rule in this instance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Bonzai
Naked is the best disguise.
08:27 PM on 01/24/2011
You are absolutely right. I am a teachers in the same district and the truth is, many senior teachers feel they have earned the right to work in better schools. I agree with what you imply: Experienced teachers should go to these schools and form teams with rookie teachers, but can you see their concerns with "Value-added" evaluations and the "teacher cleansing" practices that are a cost-effective measure employed by ruthless educrats to keep their own non essential, six figure positions at all costs. . .?
You know what would really be great? If educators didn't let educrats (UTLA/LAUSD)pit us against one another and sought unity in our crusade to end ignorance and illiteracy.
Visit us at:
Perdaily.com
04:31 PM on 01/26/2011
Just because a principal wanted to try some new teaching methods that veteran teachers didn't want to try doesn't NECESSARILY mean the principal's new methods were automatically of a higher standard than what the veteran teachers "wanted to do," and thus "the kids get.....a seriously substandard level of teaching." A "new program" has a lot to prove before it can be assumed to be better for the students than that of the experience of a committed teacher.

District Administrators are "presented" with "new programs," invented by Educational Theorists, aka "Consultants," multiple times a year. These "new programs" are then BOUGHT from these theorists and shoved down the throats of teachers without any input open from the actual teachers in the classroom. Moreover, these "new programs" get replaced by a "new and improved program" in a couple/three years. Why? Because administrators like to show that they are DOING something by the simple act of BUYING/CHANGING something. They equate the amount of $$ spent on programs with improvement of education. The problem is that a (K-6) student can be exposed to 3-4 different/conflicting "ways" to teach language or math.

All that money spent on "new and improved" programs could've been spent on lower class sizes (which means YOUR student gets better attention), as well as more/any aides (which means YOUR student gets better attention). All the "new programs" in the world won't help YOUR student if the teacher/student ratio is NUTS!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Bonzai
Naked is the best disguise.
06:06 PM on 01/27/2011
They spend a lot of money paying other people to do their job. CONsultants always have some NEW program but what you say about overcrowding. . .THAT's the bottom line.

We'd love to hear more from you @ Perdaily.com
05:11 PM on 01/24/2011
Google the term "housed teacher" and you'll see why this make perfect sense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:10 PM on 01/24/2011
Teachers need protecting (all employees do for that matter)..............school boards have decided to promote students based on age and NOT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE, parents pressue teachers for A's, administrators favor teachers that do whatever they are told (change grades, allow disruptive students to run the school, dress up the campus and leave classrooms dirty, constant interuptions for paperwork which interfere with teaching time, etc, etc. Teachers have 35-40 kids to deal with each class period.............already unfair working conditions.............teachers have taken 12 furlough days in LA................while just last week the new Superintendent just received an $80,000.00 annual increase in pay over the previous Superintendent (from $250K to $330K).

Consequences should be fair...........if the test scores ment something to students, teachers would have more leverage to get results. The students will pass on to the next grade in June, even if they have not done any homework, projects, or passed any test. As soon as these standardized tests have consequences for students you will see dramatic improvement. Teachers in the inner city are expected to produce miracles with no support from the student or home..............teachers are not magicians!!!!!!!!!
Lordpappanqui
Left-Wing Pariah!
05:07 PM on 01/24/2011
Very well said!

My wife has been a teacher for 16+ years now at a low socioeconomic school, and she can attest to all that you have posted.

HOWEVER: academic performance should not be the yardstick in promoting kids. The change MUST be made at the family level...
1) parents need to become involved
2) parents and teachers must work together
3) parents need to be hold accountable for their kids (put the kids to sleep at 8pm, no electronic games/distractions on school nights
4) care must be taken to ensure homework is completed when the child gets home, not at 9pm when the kid comes home after running around in the neighborhood for 4 hours
5) a 'sense' or 'need' to instill in kids the understanding that they are attending school FOR A REASON! [not simply to "meet their friends"]
6) etc.

The U.S. will not have any meaningful change in public education until all of these sets of conditions are met.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LPH
It's more fun when you put your arms up like this.
10:30 PM on 01/24/2011
I respectfully disagree. Public schools and public school officials need to stay out of people's homes.

The teachers' jobs are to get content into the minds of kids. It's also a teacher's specific job to determine if the kid knows the content. Teachers need to stop advancing kids who do not know material - period. Yes, administrators try to pressure teachers but it's time to make the kids accountable for the knowledge. Once the kids are accountable then the system has changed - for the good.

Thus - as the OP suggested - placing student state scores on exams should be done immediately at all local public schools. Hold the kids accountable - and stand back as the fingers start to point. Regardless, the teachers need to hold strong on this topic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Bonzai
Naked is the best disguise.
08:28 PM on 01/24/2011
We NEED YOUR voice. Join us at Perdaily.com
photo
DanoX
I'll be your snack-pack baby!
11:46 AM on 01/24/2011
Another ham-fisted attempt to fix a messed up system. If we as a country put the proper amout of money into the education system we wouldn't have to worry about layoffs in the first place. Less bullets, more books!
10:14 AM on 01/24/2011
How ironic that Google ads are displaying ads for becoming a teacher. Who would want to? I've been in the business almost 20 years. I'm just hoping I don't end up getting laid off before I can retire. If I had it to do all over again, I certainly wouldn't take this job. The kids are great. Everything else is horrible.
Lordpappanqui
Left-Wing Pariah!
05:08 PM on 01/24/2011
How sad, but so true!

Well, I for one thank you for your service.
06:44 PM on 01/24/2011
I appreciate the thanks. Best thing you can do for all education is encourage people to look at the whole system, top to bottom. You can't improve education by replacing different parts every election cycle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Bonzai
Naked is the best disguise.
08:29 PM on 01/24/2011
It's NOT a "business"!
08:52 AM on 01/25/2011
Figure of speech, badly used. I keep telling people that they can't compare business models to education. And there I go hurting my argument. This whole anti-teacher movement has my head spinning. I don't even know why I'm trying to defend teachers on a blog comment section. It's not exactly a forum known for changing peoples' minds.
09:37 AM on 01/24/2011
This is not merit based job protection, it is more geographical. Basically, teachers with 5-7 years of experience will be more likely to be laid off if they work at a school with an older staff and teachers with 2-3 years of experience will be more likely to keep their job if they work at a school with a younger staff. Since no school can have a higher percentage of layoffs than the district average, these 5-7 year teachers are at risk. However, this has nothing to do with merit, only where you work. A second year teachers who is the worst teacher in the district will keep his or her job while a fantastic sixth year teacher will be let go. Can anybody on this forum really say that makes sense?
09:32 AM on 01/24/2011
The entire time I was in grade school our district was going through layoffs. Pure seniority layoffs gave me teachers who slept through class, if I brought in donuts I could skip most of class, some just hated their jobs, and then next year a couple more of the good one's would be gone. There has to be some balance between districts trying to cut costs by getting rid of experienced teachers who cost more, losing teachers with lower seniority who are doing a great job, and job security. There has to be some security to the job or the good one's will eventually leave for a job that pays a hell of a lot more than teaching.
09:23 AM on 01/24/2011
I find it ironic that a profession designed to teach our children of today how to prepare for the real world, is full of professionals who refuse to live in the real world themselves.

In most any professional pursuit, you will not keep your job if you do not perform well. Why should teaching be any other way? Retaining teachers just because of seniority doesn't reward performance, it undermines the quality of education our children receive. The results of our education system are proof enough of that already.

I'm all for paying teachers what they deserve. They have earned our respect and deserve great working conditions. However, the entitltement mentality should not apply to any profession. Would you feel the same way about a nurse? Should a nurse be taking care of your child if she just happened to be hired years before someone who actually is better at that job?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:28 AM on 01/24/2011
Teachers are evaluated all the time. They are required to complete continuing education. Sometimes they are placed on a "plan of assistance" if they are not performing well. And sometimes they are fired. Just like other professions.

My take on this whole thing, sorry to be so cynical, is that districts want cheaper teachers. Teachers with fewer years experience are less expensive to pay. Districts will find all kinds of reasons to let experienced teachers go, regardless of effectiveness, so that they can save $ in salaries. I'm sure this is part of the "real world" too. Is it good for kids? Guess we'll have to wait and see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Bonzai
Naked is the best disguise.
08:31 PM on 01/24/2011
Exactly, Deputy Fife!
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
09:13 AM on 01/24/2011
I think we should look at Sweden's School Voucher system....seems to have worked well for almost 20 yrs now.
 
Wha this plan sounds like is, a school district that needs to lay off teachers will just take say 1-2 from each school, sort of like a quota system....
 
I wish more kids had access to a good education, my little grandkids, 7 yrs old learning portugese, little Sacha learning Chinese, public schools just don't offer those kinds of opportunities, sad so many kids get a second, third rate education.......I read in some big city districts, they graduate kids who can't even read their own diploma.....very sad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
obama20082012
Happy Memorial Day!
09:13 AM on 01/24/2011
How about laying off bad parents? Nothing is even mentioned about poor parenting.
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
09:18 AM on 01/24/2011
Can you imagine, parents be held responsible for performance reviews....;)
 
Maybe withhold child tax credits to parents who have children failing in school or with poor attendence records....and not allow EIC for low income parents who are not preforming well???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OnTheOtherBeach
09:35 AM on 01/24/2011
Florida lawmakers are considering a bill that would require giving grades for the "quality" of parental (and/or grandparent or guardian) involvement with grade-school kids. On the kids' report cards. I like the idea.