iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

SOTU Preview: Obama To Focus Speech On Jobs, Innovation, Cooperation

JULIE PACE   01/22/11 11:55 PM ET   AP

Obama Sotu

WASHINGTON — Under pressure to energize the economy, President Barack Obama said Saturday he will use his State of the Union address to outline an agenda to create jobs now and boost American competitiveness over the long term.

Heading quickly into re-election mode, Obama is expected to use Tuesday's prime-time speech to promote spending on innovation while also promising to reduce the national debt and cooperate with emboldened Republicans.

"I'm focused on making sure the economy is working for everybody, for the entire American family," Obama said Saturday in an uncommon preview of his speech, offered up in an online video to his supporters late Saturday afternoon. The president announced that the economy would be the main topic of his speech, a nod to how important that issue is to the country's standing and his own as well.

At the halfway point of his term, Obama said the economy is on firmer footing than it was two years ago: it is growing again, albeit slowly, while the stock market is rising, and corporate profits are climbing. But with the unemployment rate stubbornly stuck above 9 percent, Obama will signal a shift Tuesday from short-term stabilization policies toward ones focused on job creation and longer-term growth.

Obama offered no details on specific proposals he will call for in his address, though he has offered hints in recent weeks.

Perhaps the clearest came in an overlooked speech in North Carolina last month, one that will likely serve as a template of what the nation is about to hear. Obama said then that making the U.S. more competitive means investing in a more educated work force, committing more to research and technology, and improving everything from highways and airports to high-speed Internet.

In his weekly radio and Internet address Saturday, Obama also highlighted free trade as a way to increase U.S. exports and put Americans to work.

"That's how we'll create jobs today," Obama said. "That's how we'll make America more competitive tomorrow. And that's how we'll win the future."

Obama's challenge will be to find the money and political will to spend it, at a time when he's pledged to reduce spending and tackle the mountainous debt. In his preview to supporters Saturday, Obama said he would emphasize fiscal restraint Tuesday, but didn't go into detail, saying only that any spending cuts should be done in a "responsible way."

The president is under growing pressure to tackle the debt from the public and lawmakers, particularly some newly elected Republicans who ran on pledges to cut spending. Obama, too, has made spending cuts a priority, setting up a bipartisan fiscal commission which recommended tax hikes and cuts to entitlement programs – both efforts that would likely be a hard sell with the American people.

Obama will speak Tuesday to a Congress changed both by Republican wins in the November election and the attempted assassination of one of its own. Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot in the head two weeks ago during an event in her district in Tucson, Ariz.

Since then, the president has appealed for more civility in politics, and in a nod to that ideal, some Democrats and Republicans will break with tradition and sit alongside each other in the House chamber Tuesday night. Obama hinted Saturday that he would build on that theme during the State of the Union, tying the country's economic success to bipartisan cooperation.

"We're up to it, as long as we come together as a people_Republicans, Democrats, Independents_as long as we focus on what binds us together as a people, as long as we're willing to find common ground even as we're having some very vigorous debates," Obama said.

The White House sees competitiveness as a framework Republicans could support. GOP lawmakers traditionally have backed the types of trade deals and research-and-development efforts that Obama is promoting. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., appeared to give the president an opening when he said last week in a speech that "my advice to my colleagues is if the president is willing to do what we would do anyway, then we should say yes."

Yet for all the talk of bipartisanship, Obama will deliver Tuesday's address at a time when his White House is shifting into re-election mode. Obama plans to file papers to formally run for re-election around March, and several aides are moving to Chicago to run the 2012 campaign. Saturday's video preview to supporters signaled a return to the campaign-style outreach Obama's team mastered in 2008, and underscored his need to rally his base around his agenda.

The White House is keenly aware that Obama's re-election prospects likely hinge on the state of the economy. More than half of those questioned in a new Associated Press-GfK poll disapproved of how he's handled the economy, and just 35 percent said it's improved on his watch. Three-quarters of those surveyed did say it's unrealistic to expect noticeable improvements after two years. They said it will take longer.

Obama's preview Saturday focused exclusively on his domestic agenda, with no mention of foreign policy. Obama is, however, expected to frame his call for competitiveness in global terms, calling for a new Sputnik moment – a reference to the Soviet Union's 1957 launch of the first satellite, ahead of the U.S. He intends to say the U.S. is again facing challenges from abroad, this time from fast-growing economies in China, India and throughout Southeast Asia.

In his travels to Asia and during Chinese President Hu Jintao's recent trip to Washington, Obama has said he's been struck by the rapid rise of that region and the laser-like focus on competing in the global economy.

"They are thinking each and every day about how to educate their work force, rebuild their infrastructure, enter into new markets," Obama said in November, after wrapping up a 10-day Asia trip. "We should feel confident about our ability to compete, but we are going to have to step up our game."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Under pressure to energize the economy, President Barack Obama said Saturday he will use his State of the Union address to outline an agenda to create jobs now and boost American co...
WASHINGTON — Under pressure to energize the economy, President Barack Obama said Saturday he will use his State of the Union address to outline an agenda to create jobs now and boost American co...
Filed by Carly Schwartz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10,941
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (164 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
02:12 AM on 01/26/2011
President's assessment is correct to high light the subject he mentioned to boost up the economy and create job in his union address. If both political Parties work as one then American will soon enough jump back to its original position and status. It must also stop giving grants of American Taxed money to countries those that eats on the grant money year after years.

These countries are the worst burden on US OVER AND ABOVE TH.ESE COUNTRIED GOVERNMENT WILLFULLY KILLS AMERICAN AS BIRDS WITH NO REMORSE AND ALSO TAKES BRIBE FROM THE AMERICAN CONCERNS ON HIGH SEA BEFORE LETTING THEM ENTER THE COUNTRY'S PORT WITH COMMERCIAL CONSINMENTS.

The President is very right to have boldly said that whatever he would do will do for all Americans because he is the President of the entire country.

May GOD Almighty bless him and help him to accomplish his mission that he undertook to do for the betterment of the Americans and America in all spheres...Amen
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
09:20 PM on 01/24/2011
Let's hope he says:
Cut the Federal Grants to Religious and Political Organizations FIRST !!!!!!!
Money borrowed from China and given to Religious and Political Organizations.

American Family Association --- $ 19,233,560 Million Dollars --- $82,777, 894 Million Dollar in the last 5 years !! PLUS INTEREST THERE AMERICANS !!!!
Heritage Foundation ---$ 63, 910, 593 Million Dollar --- $ 190, 085,156 Million Dollars in the last 5 Years !!!! PLUS INTEREST AMERICANS !!!!!!!
Pat Robinson’s – American Center for Law and Justice --- $13,291,865 Million Dollars -$ 57, 586, 400 Million Dollars the last 5 years !!!! PLUS INTEREST AMERICANS !!!!
Pat Robinson and the 700 Club -- $ 183,000,00¬0 Million Dollars – $ 843, 340, 545 Million Dollars in the last 5 years !!!!! PLUS INTEREST AMERICANS !!!!

Pat Robinson’s – Operation Blessing International Relief and Development Corporation -- $406, 254, 443 Million Dollars --- $ 1,368.331,808 Billion Dollars in the last 5 years !!! PLUS INTEREST AMERICANS !!!!!!!
Rev. Graham and his Samaritans Trust -- 193,000,000 Million Dollars – Rev. pays himself over $ 570,000 a year.
American Enterprise Institute -- $ 58, 998,984 Million Dollars
Cato Institute --- $19,129, 916 Million Dollars

This is only a few I am still researching at Guidestar.org . Open a Free Account and see where U.S. Tax Dollars are going.

Church World Services ---- $68, 971,520 Million Dollars – these people claim a Baby Blanket cost $450.00 when they write it off.
05:09 PM on 01/24/2011
A new remix of Obama's state of the union:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVmq5A4m1fU
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bronxdude
Integrity has no need of rules
02:34 PM on 01/24/2011
An objective analysis of the Bush-Cheney era of deregulation, no-regulation, malfeasance, and corruption dramatically underscores how Rushlicans ushered in an insidious and pervasive period of government rot—a rot so prevalent, the Constitution was abandoned and vital governmental functions usurped or suspended with deadly results. Starting with Bush ignoring while on an unprecedented six week vacation (no President—past or present—has ever “vacationed” more than Bush) the now infamous Rice intelligence memo entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.,” examples of criminal negligence and misconduct abound: 1) outing CIA field agent who refused to corroborate White House lie linking Saddam to WMDs and 9/11 al-Qaida terrorists, 2) gutting clean water regulations via Energy Policy Act of 2005 authored by oil and mining executives secretly selected by Cheney for White House policy setting energy committee, 3) BP oil disaster made possible by corrupt and inept Cheney appointees placed in regulatory positions at the Minerals Management Service and then tasked with eviscerating various safety procedures in favor of profit, 4) Bush appointees illegally misuse funds at Walter Reed intended for wounded soldiers, 5) White House sanctioned illegal wiretaps and torture of detainees at Abu Ghraib and 6) billions illegally awarded in secret, no-bid buddy contracts to Halliburton in exchange for shoddy construction that electrocuted soldiers, yet Boehner has directed Darrell Issa, Chairman, Oversight and Government Reform Committee, to use his subpoena authority to harass Obama by going after ACORN, while ignoring documented high crimes directly attributable to the Bush-Cheney Administration.
02:00 PM on 01/24/2011
Speechwriter: "...I must take lessons from recent election. Why so important question as health care fail?

It fail, despite Democrats have good intention. Good intention will never work if we haven't good condition for them.
What will be good condition? Answer is - only one hundred percent of employment. Democrats and I must learn from our mistakes. Agenda must be changed from health care-jobs to Jobs-health care. Only job could provide insurance.
Insurance without job is a Joke...."
01:27 PM on 01/24/2011
Moderator and readers, sorry about multiple posts - kept getting message to wait. Please delete if possible.
01:24 PM on 01/24/2011
Before we start talking about "Sputnik moments" we need to consider the interest level of Americans when it comes to science and technology issues, starting with the NON-EXISTENT interest that seems to be displayed, by even Huff-P readers, as evidenced by many past blog postings calling for better science education and the promotion of science (note the lack of almost any comments in these recent posts):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paula-golden/keep-science-fairs-alive_b_810421.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tara-chklovski/girls-as-inventors_b_808236.html


If people aren't in the least bit interested in these matters (but have the time to comment - by the thousands - when it comes to celebrities and the latest stupid things they are doing), then how does the President hope to bring up a "Sputnik moment" - people just don't care if it might involve doing something hard.
01:19 PM on 01/24/2011
Before we start talking about "Sputnik moments" we should consider the interest level of Americans when it comes to science and technology issues, starting with the NON-EXISTENT interest level displayed by even Huff-P readers, as evidenced by many past blog postings calling for better science education and the promotion of science (note the lack of almost any comments in these recent posts):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paula-golden/keep-science-fairs-alive_b_810421.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tara-chklovski/girls-as-inventors_b_808236.html


If people aren't in the least bit interested in these matters (but have the time to comment - by the thousands - when it comes to celebrities and the latest stupid things they are doing), then how does the President hope to bring up a "Sputnik moment" - people just don't care if it might involve doing something hard.
01:19 PM on 01/24/2011
Before we start talking about "Sputnik moments", we should consider the interest level of Americans when it comes to science and technology issues, starting with the NON-EXISTENT interest level displayed by even Huff-P readers, as evidenced by many past blog postings calling for better science education and the promotion of science (note the lack of almost any comments in these recent posts):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paula-golden/keep-science-fairs-alive_b_810421.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tara-chklovski/girls-as-inventors_b_808236.html


If people aren't in the least bit interested in these matters (but have the time to comment - by the thousands - when it comes to celebrities and the latest stupid things they are doing), then how does the President hope to bring up a "Sputnik moment" - people just don't care if it might involve doing something hard.
01:19 PM on 01/24/2011
Did I hear "A Sputnik moment" being thrown around lately? Before we start talking about "Sputnik moments" we should consider the interest level of Americans when it comes to science and technology issues, starting with the NON-EXISTENT interest level displayed by even Huff-P readers, as evidenced by many past blog postings calling for better science education and the promotion of science (note the lack of almost any comments in these recent posts):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paula-golden/keep-science-fairs-alive_b_810421.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tara-chklovski/girls-as-inventors_b_808236.html

If people aren't in the least bit interested in these matters (but have the time to comment - by the thousands - when it comes to celebrities and the latest stupid things they are doing), then how does the President hope to bring up a "Sputnik moment" - people just don't care if it might involve doing something hard.
01:16 PM on 01/24/2011
Before we start talking about a "Sputnik moment" we should consider the interest level of the American people with regards to science and technology issues, starting with the, essentially, NON-EXISTENT interest level displayed by even Huff-P readers, when it comes to numerous past blog postings regarding the need for better science education and promotion (note the lack of almost any comments in these recent posts):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paula-golden/keep-science-fairs-alive_b_810421.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tara-chklovski/girls-as-inventors_b_808236.html

If people aren't in the least bit interested in these matters (but have the time to comment - by the thousands - when it comes to celebrities and the latest stupid things they are doing), then how does the President hope to bring up a "Sputnik moment" - people just don't care if it might involve doing something hard.
01:16 PM on 01/24/2011
Did I hear "A Sputnik moment" being thrown around lately? Before we start talking about a "Sputnik moment" we should consider the interest level of the American people with regards to science and technology issues, starting with the, essentially, NON-EXISTENT interest level displayed by even Huff-P readers, when it comes to numerous past blog postings regarding the need for better science education and promotion (note the lack of almost any comments in these recent posts):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paula-golden/keep-science-fairs-alive_b_810421.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tara-chklovski/girls-as-inventors_b_808236.html

If people aren't in the least bit interested in these matters (but have the time to comment - by the thousands - when it comes to celebrities and the latest stupid things they are doing), then how does the President hope to bring up a "Sputnik moment" - people just don't care if it might involve doing something hard.
12:54 PM on 01/24/2011
He'll give the old "laser like focus on jobs" speech. Guaranteed to be as effective as last year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
allengoldchain
Freedom is never voluntarily given bythe oppressor
12:42 PM on 01/24/2011
How is Obama SOTU going to be any different than the one he gave last year. Last year he promised to focus on jobs but now all the media spokesperson for this administration (aka CNN, MSNBC, NBC) are all making talking points of "investments". They are saying that Obama is now ready to focus of job creation as his number one priority but why was it not his priority all along? How is different is this speech from last year's speech when it all appears to be the exact same thing?

Just questions...
photo
rickroland
Two Parties, Same Crap
12:35 PM on 01/24/2011
I would like to see the President be uncharacteristically open and candid. He should admit that he has absolutely no practical experience in running a business or corporation. And, that when it comes to the economy, he has absolutely no clue what makes an economy grow, or what creates jobs, etc.

And, as a result, he has been attempting to surround himself with experts in such, and that he is getting rid of the current set of experts (czars and the like) and replacing them with people that have direct experience running a business and helping the economy grow and the like.

Why, I would stand up and applaud such openess, candor and the effort to get people with practical experience advising President Obama.